 Hello everyone, topic of my paper is Zola multi-director computer tomography in evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma, Myself Dr. Akshid Bhangaj under the guidance of Dr. Nihabagri from Department of Video Diagnosis, Balkan Mahavni Medical College, Subjain Hospital, New Delhi. Now blunt abdominal trauma is a very leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries and is the most common cause of death under 45 years of age. These series technique of choice for initial examination after blunt trauma as it is highly sensitive, especially in accurate for use in predicting the injury and extent in minimum time and increased resolution. The speed and accuracy of multi-director CT-infecting multi-organage leads to prompt diagnosis and triage operation, thus reducing scanning time, motion artifacts and increasing image resolution. Now even objectives, to illustrate a spectrum of imaging financing patients presenting blunt abdominal trauma, to detect the role of CCD abdomen in the evaluation of patients of blunt trauma. The methods patient made at the embassy department, and or presentation of blunt abdominal trauma, which were hemodynamic stable and driven CCD abdomen with seamless 256-size scanner. Patient who were hemodynamically unstable with issue of contrast, allergy and deranged KFT with fluid from study. Now scanning extent was from domes of diaphragm till pubic synthesis, non-contrast scan was ordered by post-contrast RTL and venous phase. Contrast was given 100 to 120 ml of non-ionic intravenous and 1.5 to 5 ml per second using pressure engine. Case one, a 45-year-old main presenter with history of trauma and was passed off. So even the exit scans of CCD abdomen in the port of venous phase shows an indefined, non-enhancing, confluent and linear region seen in segment 6 of liver, reaching up to the sub-pabstrel area and it seemed to be communicative with the fluid density in the hepatoid venous phase, just for liver contusion and laceration. No vascular injury was seen. This came out to be asked liver's injury grade 3. Now as you can see, there's a non-enhancing lesion in the well-defined lesion in the left retina, which was well-defined and was hyper dense or non-contrast as well. This came out to be and showed no post-contrast enhancement. This was just a bilateral adrenal hematoma in the same patient. A 40-year-old main presenter with history of trauma and was passed positive. Again, you can see the ill-defined, non-enhancing, confluent and linear region seen in the liver in bilateral lobes reaching up to sub-pabstrel area, resistive liver contusion and laceration. The pan payment depth was more than 3 cm and it was 3 kunyat segment. No vascular injury was seen. This was asked grade 4. Now on a 26-year-old male with history of trauma fall from height, exiled CCT shows, RTL-Portoviner shows, ill-defined, non-enhancing, confluent, linear regions more than 3 cm, seen involving mid and lower pull and one of the segmental vessels with more than 25% involvement of splinic pan diver. This came out to be asked splinic injury grade 4. Now in this, you can see the CCT abdomen phase in the RTL and the Portoviner's ratios and non-enhancing, linear region, 1.1 cm in depth, seen in interpolar region reaching up to the teleglacial system, not involving it. On a delayed scan, there is no extraciton of contrast involved with the pelvis. Large fluid collection was seen around the right kidney. No actual extraciton of contrast was seen. This was asked in an injury grade 2. Now results was more 80% of the patients who were presented in the trauma setting were male, 6% of female. The most common mode of injury was low traffic ascent, which includes 7% of all the patients. Now in distribution of patients, maximum patients belong to 20 to 40 years, which was in the working class of the patients who were in the working class, which came out to be 21. Now, when we quantified hemopytonium, maximum number of patients presented with moderate hemopytonium, when we distributed according to the intrapameral injuries, 25 of them presented with sore organ injuries, 6 presented with bowel movements, and 2 presented with bladder injuries. Now, if we distribution of severity of sore organ injuries, we can see that the most common organ involved was spleen. After that, there was liver. In liver, the most common injury was R-grade 4, which was included, which was 50% of all the patients in R-grade 3. In spleen, the most common was R-grade 3, then 4, and we know R-grade 3. Now, in the discussion, most of the patients presented with trauma were males, and between 20 to 40 years of age. Most patients presented with moderate hemopytonia, spleen was the most common sore organ injury followed by liver. Now, the limitation of the study was that this was a descriptive and cross-section study with no operative follow-up of patients, studying at a relatively small sample size and a small time period, only 30 patients were taken up for this study. Now, finally, discussion and conclusion. Theory is a very good imaging modality to identify hematoma, confusion, and lassochia, as in getting off the hypophagy and deciding the management of patients. High quality of image data that can be further processed into empty, multi-generally formatted for maximum intensity projection and e-dimensional volumetric images often aided in diagnosis of complex injuries in the trauma patient. Now, MDCT is very highly available, provides a better resolution, better sensitivity and specific order of injuries in patient of run-down on trauma, with limited scanning time and can be used to emergency purposes. Thus, it is an important tool in the decision between operative versus conservative management and helps in prognostication of hematoma. Now, these are my references. Thank you very much.