 social conflict. In this session we are going to understand the concept of social conflict under the perspective of news a kosher. Conflict theory is a functional social system according to kosher's standpoint because conflict in a society according to him don't just have a bad purpose. Conflict on the other hand might have a constructive impact on the current social order. Kosher's philosophy is very interesting because it is not necessary to call him that there is a bad purpose in the conflict in this society. Now generally there are some terms, some terminologies or some concepts such as we always consider them to be a negative context with a negative perspective. But in the philosophy of kosher, this perspective is specifically about conflict that the existing social order of this system, the way it is going along with the system, the way it is going along with the system, it is possible that due to the rise of conflict in the society, in the social order, there should be some kind of a positive change that should be considered positive. We see in many of the societies where there is injustice, where the class system is very strong, or some class elements, some class groups are considered to be more powerful, and according to their own will, the system is running. Now if in such a situation, a specific group comes from the perspective of the person, that is, that existing social order is challenged, then as a result of this situation, this can also be the outcome, this can also be the outcome, that in that social order, there should be some kind of a change, that instead of a group, instead of a few people, in the society, most people, most of them, start getting a share in the system, in the system. So, surely this conflict, this outcome will be considered positive. Conflict, according to Kozer, is a type of interaction that does not need to be avoided. Again, a very interesting perspective. Conflict does not have to be damaging or dysfunctional for the system in question, according to Kozer, because confrontation can have both positive and negative outcomes. Again, we have to keep one point in mind here, that the result of conflict can also be positive, yes, it can also be negative, it does not deny it, but we have to see how influential the outcome of conflict is, because he points out, for the explanation of his philosophy, that conflict is defined as this agreement about values or demands relating to power, prestige and money sources with insufficient supply. Disagreement about values or demands relating to power. Prestige and income, these are the layers on which conflict rises in the society. So, if this disagreement is made, then to settle it down, if there is some tension between the two, and then these things are fixed, then surely this situation can also be positive, because usually between individuals, collective groups, people, in all of these, there is tension, and this is what the theory of conflict is called. And Kozer's call for tension is sometimes internal solidarity, or internal, which integrates the groups, the groups between the two are better for each other, and sometimes the tolerance level is also changed, people are more against each other in the beginning, but then the situation goes to the better side, and sometimes such a situation arises, that alternative situations rise, and as a result of those alternatives, that conflict that we feel is going to the wrong side, but then the same conflict that has a lot of positive changes in the society, as a result of this, then it becomes a way to take all the conditions to the better side.