 Are you in the same groups like last time? I think you were somewhere in the front row, right? But that's a group. So, because what we are going to do is, I have found on Moodle that you all have submitted your mind maps, come concept maps, come mix of mind and concept maps, which is good and we have a review of those mind maps later in the class today. So, it's important that you be in the same group so that you can review someone else's mind map. Any cross group activity will just hold that point. What we saw was the process of creating a presentation and which starts with planning and then goes to execution and finally was the impressed part. I'm trying to see if we can finish it off today itself or we may just cross over for another session maybe next time. But what we are today going to talk about is the execute part, which we have come up to this point now of creating outline and a bulleted detailed content of that. Today's session is concentrated mostly on use of graphics. This is one question I have been faced with a lot of times, being a visual communication person myself. So, what are the graphics to be used and when they have to be used are the typical questions. So, I'm going to devote a larger amount of time on use of graphics in presentations. Of course, we'll have the impressed part later, where we'll talk about how to actually show it off to people. We are concentrating on this. So, you remember this, right? How many people associate this sentence with a visual? What was that visual? Do you associate this sentence with the visual in my last presentation? What was that? Yeah, poster of the one, right? That's the power of visual. You will never forget this association now probably. I say everyone love stories, you remember the one, right? So, there were submissions of this mind maps and concept maps. By the way, this is a interesting mind map. If you Google for this online, you'll find out this is a mind map about a mind map. There is also a parallel text given to this, which is around three to four paragraphs about mind map. They keep asking this question that, do you make sense out of those four paragraphs or this mind map? Try to recreate those four paragraphs using this mind map. It's a very interesting exercise. Sometime you can give it a try. It's very easy to construct those four paragraphs using just one graphic, which is given here. So, there were some submitted mind maps when I offered this course earlier in 2013, 14, 15, but you can't see this. Barely readable, right? Anyway, I'll try to read it out for you. So, the topic that time was given was titled as Accidental Discoveries. So, within this science domain, so how people discovered something very accidentally and what could be the presentation for that. Same thing like what I had given you the topics, only about IIT Bombay, some contextual thing for IIT Bombay campus. That time it was slightly wide open. So, what were the accidental discoveries? So, it starts with the center of accidental discoveries and motivation behind the talk was why scientific discoveries, how this talk is going to be useful to us and the connection to what MTech PhD we are doing. Then there was a introduction explaining the topic, giving an example of discovery of America and describe some scientific discoveries. So, she selected five discoveries and what is the name, what is the functionality, who did discover it, what was the preparation, what was the careless action which led to the discovery and what is the analysis of the result and what was the final discovery. And then she has also given the names of those five discoveries as penicillin, x-rays, radioactivity, pacemeter and pacemaker and microwave. And then there was a conclusion. What interesting I found in this submission was the sense of timing. So, she had actually calculated how much time should be distributed for each of the sections. So, like you see here, motivation would be, we didn't have actually a presentation that time. In 2013, we didn't give a chance to students to exactly present these things because they're a group of presentation. I believe in this course also you are supposed to present for five minutes at the end of the course about a topic of your choice. So, this was interesting to see. For example, the weightage given for describing five discoveries is seven and a half minutes where she obviously knows that there will be a lot of time required to explain these five points and then that's why the timing is more and so on and so forth. So, the planned stage is done very well so that you know you are not going to overshoot something or under shoot anything. So, this is important to know how much time are we going to spend on that. There was one more about software piracy. It's a very simple mind map, just cause, the cause effects and remedies. So, just three bubbles, what are the causes and there are some causes? What are the effects of those things and then what are the remedies for that? I saw similar bubbles I think in some of your submissions also for certain very straightforward. So, now what we should do is we should peer review of your submissions and I have the printouts of those. I have deliberately printed them on A3 papers so that you can read them. Most of the softwares actually lack that property of fit to page or something like that. So, I found lot of people struggled with getting the font size correct when they had created a bigger mind map and I will talk about it later how to get that thing sorted out. But for right now if you tell me the name of the mind map you have made I will ensure that you don't get the same thing back. Okay, so what was your topic? Don't take yours, pass it on. You have a privilege to pick up whatever you want to choose. Don't take yours, that's a key. You took yours? Or take yours and then swap, that's also fine. Just pick up one, if it is yours, pick up the next. So what have you got now? Food quality and wastage, that was not your topic. So good. By the way who submitted food quality and wastage? He also raised his hand so I was wondering. Okay, you submitted food quality and wastage. Four of us. Yeah. You don't have to really spend time on choosing one, just pick up one. So what now you have to do is the following. Identify the hierarchy issues in the mind map. What I mean by hierarchy issues is that if the bubble which is emerging from the center, is it the first level bubble or the second level bubble? Or is there some bubble in the second or third level which should be the first level bubble? But gone somewhere deep down, right? So identify such bubbles which you feel should be at the first level and not at the second level or third level or vice versa. I think very trivial which has come as a first bubble should be pushed down under some bubble. So that decision making you have to do right now. First of all. And secondly rearrange them if you. And thirdly which is not written here, if you want to add a bubble to it, which is not present there, that is the three point thing you have to do. And then we'll discuss it. I should see some extra drawings on those papers and some rearrangement. And I would like now to request the groups to come here and show the suggestions what they have in mind to all of us. And the group which has prepared the original one should defend it or accept it. Okay, so let's start. So this group had a food wastage topic. Who had given that? Submitted? Okay, great. Come, come. You can keep it under this so that everybody can see it. By the way, just show the original one first of all. Okay, so one quick comment about what this group had done. One of the most important things they were able to achieve and they should tell when they come on stage is the visual quality of the mind map was great. It's perfectly readable because now you see some of the present the mind maps you have in your hands. The readability is an issue but they had managed to do a better job of this thing. So they had done this part and now let us hear from the group which actually dissected the whole thing. Sir, in this the mass and canteen should be the level one but we are focusing on the quality and the wastage. So it should be the level one and the mass and canteen should be goes down. And in the feedback system, the remedy action should not be there. So we have also discussed about the remedy actions and in quality, we have added a point that proper cleaning of utensils is not there. So we have added one more point. Yes, sir. Under quality. Under quality. So the hygiene of means kitchen as well as there should be a hygiene of labor also. So we have included that also, but not written but in a hygiene should be specify all the things. Means labor as well as kitchen. Means labor should be also hygiene. So it is affected the quality of the food. So in the food, we have done the quality and wastage the level one. And in quality, we have some points. We can be written this section and these are the points under wastage. So all the points should be categorized under three canteen, mass and cafeteria. So if some points should under canteen, so we have written one, two, three, four. So we have choose from the points from, these are the some points. What are the points should be under canteen should be written in this section and under mass as well as cafeteria. So all the points should be taken to the feedback system and action. And again to the level one wastage as well as quality department. Our idea of bringing the mess and canteen on the first hierarchy after the food quality is these are the main sources of the food at the campus. So we wanted to specify that these are the main sources that we have to take care about and from then we segregated here what is the main issues with the quality and wastage from these two sources. And then we tried to correlate all these things together. And from the quality and wastage point of view, we had some points and we made a feedback loop from both the points. I mean, one, if we are looking at the quality, what are the particular points and whatever is lagging within those points, we can take a feedback from there and then it can be reiterated to improve the quality further. Similarly, in this, what they've suggested is to take the quality and wastage right at the first and you segregate canteen mess and cafeteria differently. My question was before getting to the point, wouldn't it be okay to first discuss what are the sources that we are dealing with if we are going like a story. So you don't just get to the climax at first. You have to put in some introduction. I mean, our problem is food quality and wastage. So shouldn't be the first thing is what are the sources of food and what we have at our campus. That's just my one point. So the topic is food wastage, food quality and wastage. So the opening sentence is food quality and wastage on the campus depends on these sources, mess and canteens on the campus. That is one opening line. Second line is to determine the food quality and wastage, let us see what are the sources of these things and what are the quality issues and the wastage issues and then figure out from where are they coming in. So which story will you buy? So in my opinion, which story will you buy and why? Which we have done, this is better. What is the third party opinion? These guys will stick to their own guns. Any opinion? So I want to add one point that amount of wastage will be inversely proportional to the quality of the food. If you have the good quality food, wastage will be less. If you can consider this quality and wastage, you can rate the different messes or canteens under the quality. Highest quality mess is hostile number something or highest quality canteen is some near hostile eight or you can consider staff canteen or any canteen. You can rate according to quality about the mess and you can rate according to the wastage. You can easily observe the inverse proportion. I think he has brought in one positive point to the discussion, what you were talking about is the problems with quality, problems with wastage and then going in the direction of where are the sources of the problems? Where are the sources of this thing? What he's saying that, what is the ideal quality? Define that and if there is ideal quality, there will be zero wastage. If you find good food in the mess, no one will take it. So that is what he's coming up with and later on you can go to problems section that this is the thing. So this is very interesting thing to observe that the same sentence can be perceived by so many people in so many different ways and to tell you there is no right or wrong answer to the approach. It is decided when you present and you get a lot of hooting on the presentation then you know that it is not working for that audience probably. It may be a good presentation for some other audience but not for that audience. So if you say that hostile 15 is the worst food ever and then there are a lot of 15 patterns there then they will not digest this fact probably. So it depends on the context but there is absolutely the way you present becomes the decider when you say that which is the best approach. Sir, I think I want to suggest one more thing that IIT is taking more efforts for regarding the care of the students. I want to suggest one thing. So IIT is hiring much more employees for different aspects like sports, like for gym or anything. It can be suggested that IIT can hire one or two cooks, experts and that can rate on the daily basis for the different masses or contents, how the quality is there. And accordingly the certification should be given to the masses or contents. So this is a way to monitor. So they had put up some comments about how to monitor quality and how to monitor wastage. So this can be a way. So you can see that when you open it up because you wrote they added a feature to it. Both of you wrote then he added a feature to it. So it just keeps on growing. The challenge of the presenter is to imagine all corners of the room and accommodate one point for each of the person to nod his or her head is the challenge. And that is why you need brainstorming at a very high level. When you do brainstorming, if you pull up all the points you have in your mind, there is a high probability that you'll cover each and every person's approach included in the presentation. That's how it can go on. So because four of you did brainstorming, you came up with something. If 30 people will do brainstorming, I think you can make a better presentation immediately. So that's how you have to go. Thank you very much. Can you take your presentation? Yeah, you take this. Actually, you will have to carry this now. You will get yours back after the comments. Now you take your. Okay, okay, no problem. You are getting turns to speak. That's a good strategy that there are defenders and there are attackers, okay? So these are defenders which are going back now and now the presenters will come in. Which is the topic you have? Waste management. Who submitted this mind map on waste management? Okay, so you please keep making notes about what they are saying because you have to defend it later on. Good morning all. The first thing that we noticed that the presentation is not clear. That we are roaming here and there. Where is the start? Where is the end? Second thing is that the more focus is on biodegradable things. What about the non-biodegradable? Apart from that, some of the things that like buses are mentioned over there. So I think very few buses are there inside the campus that is running on the biofields. So you hardly find some issues with the buses. And dumping the things, opening. So till date I haven't find anything that is dumped openly inside the campus. So these are the things that we find out and apart from that we have mentioned very specific that some cow is there, some person is there all together. So it is a bit confusing what you need to point out here. So coming back to that, we came with some very different things. In that we have done, the heading with the waste management is somewhat hierarchy level and you can see from here that it is keep on decreasing with the amount of wastage, amount of creating the problem. First we have divided the waste management from the source and sink. Where is the source? Where is the sink? If we don't have the sink, we can't manage the waste. So the source is human waste. Around more than 5,000 people are inside the campus all the time. So we find it the first. Second is the misfoods. Most often all 5,000 people are not taking food every day. That is the labs. We have the N number of labs and they are having, we don't know how much waste is there for each lab. Lab carries both, biodegradable, non-biodegradable. So lab it is in both. Non-biodegradable also it carries the lab. And last one is the paper. So most often we are using the electronic mediate a lot of things. But sometimes we need to go for the paper and all. So this is the paper wastage. And non-biodegradable part plastic bags. On every day I don't think that around 5,000 people, more than 1,000 people are ordering something on the Flipkart, Amazon and all. So these all things are delivered in the plastic packed bags. There is nothing recycling inside the campus what we find it. And lab, electronics item, all we are having minimum two mobiles at a time right now I can find out. Electronic item construction. Every day there is some construction work is going on inside the campus. So I'm going long or so. So time is okay, shall I reduce? And last one is metal cycles. So most often we leave the campus, we leave the cycle back to the campus. So we have tried to keep the one to one relationship. So first one is the human waste. So we went for the sewage management. Second one food wastage, we go for the biogas plant for the labs, chemical solutions and all. For the paper, paper recycling. We can go for the news. So we can see we are having this left side problem. We are having the solution to the right side. So we can manage with that. And it is somewhat incomplete. We can go again back to the recycling it. Thank you. Yeah, actually our main focus was actually the food management. We are not classifying in the different classification first of all. Actually we wanted to concentrate on one particular segment actually. So in that segment we concentrate on food management. It means like whatever the waste is available as part of like we can reuse that waste. Okay, as part of that one only we focus. And based on that only we prepare the like whatever mind mapping is available in that. Sir, the comment I have at this point is that make it clear, loud and clear. Then what is the focus of it? Yes. It's not about waste management but I can. Yes, it's only. Correct. Section of it. It's very clear section about like the consumable waste whatever available in the like in the canteen whatever the waste is available somewhere if they are dumping it to the some yards actually. So they are not utilizing that whatever the it may be not inside the ATB. It's outside the ATB. Might be somewhere else they are throwing out actually. So at this point that we have spoke the topic. Yes. To the feed point. Yes. Yes. You said five minutes. Yes, exactly one topic five. You don't know about many other things. Yes. Just moving to what I. Only one thing and then concentrate on that topic. What to do that one actually. Now, yeah. Now reflect on. Yes. The part they had a claim that you don't know where to start at. Yeah, actually they are. Means that's what actually they are starting where to start exactly. So the starting point for space basically the waste biomass actually. Yes, we have a. Correct right. So that is actually the waste biomass in that. Put this question in that tell us where to start. Okay. Yeah, exactly right actually. First of all the waste it is there biomass. What we are doing we are dumping to the yard. So the comment here is that if you feel that is the starting point of the mine and for the project. It is not enough that you feel that it is the starting point. The rest of the world also should feel that that is the starting point. Yeah. It is very important in creating any such graphics. Okay. Graphics are and you have arrow this way. Yes. It would have so it's not a very ambiguous picture. We have arrow. We have sighted. We have used very nice graphics to add on top of it. It's not just a textual concept that we have. Actually we wanted to add some physical like the practical scenarios what we are just doing it. We have messed up on the fact of the hierarchy of the. Correct. Yes. How much has to be paid by others. Only you can explain it right now. I know you are. It's not what we are taking up along. Correct. Yes, actually we. Yeah. Reflect on their. Their. Just show the other one. They have divided into the like the they have like wide source of thing. They are not narrowed on actually. They are actually they spread it into all over the things. How you will focus on the in the within short time. How you manage all the things in the single segment. Just concentrate on the single point of source and try to resolve that point and then try to give some application oriented things. That will be the good idea. You are concentrating all the problems at a time and you are not resolving a single problem you'll end up with some upper way. So that is not the way to come up with as of my understanding. And as I agree with that the source and sink is right actually the whatever you are divided into like human waste and mess food. That's what actually our point also same only the whatever the human waste and mess food and whatever the papers, laugh facility, whatever that can be usable for the some some application. We can just reuse it that that's what we are also I didn't but we are not put on the like as your identity as a bullet points actually. So we are not directed towards all the identified points. Any comments? Yes, that we are agree with that we need to add some of the points and then we need to have delete some of the points in that. Yes, yes, that's what we agreed that actually that need to be modified. That's what our we agreed for that actually. Yeah, yeah, in this mind but as the structure shows that directly there is just one level after the main level. So there is just a one level shown we are like pros and cons and suggestions. And even if you see in the pros, there are some basic facilities like libraries and that kind of thing which is not a need or pros for the academic institutions. Like if you see any academic institute library is a need. It is not pros of it. So you should not as well as we thought that they should be much beyond at the lower level. They should be of third or fourth level because that is the very obvious thing that library will always be in the college campus. And the second thing is that we added one of the level which is the you can say the R&D department for managing the infrastructure waste. For example, there are some recycle recyclable waste is occurring through the infrastructures. So which can be utilized again for recycling purposes. And one more thing which we thought which should be here is that the infrastructure infrastructure should be the disabled friendly as our IT campus is already it is. So that you can highlight as a pro point at a somewhat higher level which we have mentioned with this up and marking. So though this structure is not completed due to time limitation, but we have tried our best to complete it on the left side. You can see that from the building infrastructure, there goes one disabled friendly infrastructure. Then one point goes to the basic academic facilities, which then goes to the library or book bank and then that library goes to online and offline facilities. So according to us, there should be some structure. There should be more sub points coming after not directly the pros and cons of the library. First level, second level. Instead of that, there should be more levels downwards. So respond to this. So we are agree upon that that there should be multiple levels of the infrastructure and building. But I don't think online library facility comes under infrastructure. I am saying first of all, talk about whether you require multiple levels in this mind. What is there first? So we can extend the topic at any level. You can make any parts according to priorities. In the building and infrastructure, we can go for the hostel. We can go for the sub part of the academic section, non-academic section. In that, you can go for the departments, then labs. Multiple levels are required. That is right. That is right. Multiple levels are already required. So we are not saying pros and discos, so many pros in one level. There are sub levels within pros. We can go for pros in the department, in the labs, and in the hostel. In fact, that is also again just documentation of what is there. What I was saying is that, are they according to the topic? You say, what are the community places? What are public places? Are there infrastructure in that time? Academic and non-academic. Academic, non-academic, residential, academic. So that should be this well-equipped classroom and library will all come under academic infrastructure. Versus residential infrastructure, you can have houses and other hostels and all that. So there should be some classification within pros also, because like all of them we can classify pros into, we can classify pros in academic, academic, non-academic, residential. So one thing is, they were taken that you require multiple levels of classifications in that mind. Yes. Because it would be two stage mind that, when you are substituting. So that is taken up. Next point, how about their thing, you can comment on that. How about what is their solution? So add some future things like recyclable material for creating new infrastructure. There are shortage of accommodation for married people in IIT. Yeah. It is there. It is there. There is a shortage. They are added there. So now, let me intervene. Okay. So what happens is now, it is going to the nitty gritty of the presentation. So it is just boiling down to a single point versus not having that point. But if you take a larger picture, the problems what they have found out, one was about lack of multiple levels, which you have already taken up. But also, these guys went ahead encroaching in other domains also like waste management or output millega. So that can be recycled to make new infrastructure. So they combined waste management with infrastructure topic also to bring out something else. So this is a never ending topic. Otherwise, if you just keep on going. So I like the approach by these people when they took up. They said we'll scope it only to biodegradable and only present on that. However, their decision was not communicated to us at all, whether they have scoped it like that. Similarly, if you decide on such things, please announce it loud and clear that you want to scope it to these levels. And we are going to, so this bubble is about taking feed from other people. And then we'll put all these things in under that bubble. So that it is easy for people to understand why, what is the scope of this presentation I'm going to see or hear now. That is all. Okay. Thank you. You can take your seats. What is the topic you received for reviewing? Okay. No, but we will be getting late already. You can talk about the energy audit. Okay. So they had received energy audit. Who made that? Okay. So up for some comments. In their presentation, they have mentioned the energy resources. And in that, they have solar energy, thermal power plant, wind energy, biomass and biofuel and the physiological sources. But thermal power plant is situated in the tromba and we are concentrating on the Hyde Bombay. So they have taken this in the large manner, I think. And they have mentioned wind energy along with the solar energy. But we have only the solar energy related things, like the solar heaters in the hostels. So we have split that part, the solar energy and thermal power plant that are presently existing. And the wind energy and biomass, that things are future scope. So we have made that another domain for that. Also they have not prioritized that. They have not given numbers. They have not specified the priority of the presentation. So we have given that priority. What is their present source? Present source is the first. Then future scope is second. Then analysis of consumption is third. Then analysis of energy wastage is fourth. And methods to reduce the waste energy is fifth. As far as this thermal power plant thing goes, we have just suggested that it is situated in trombay and we are getting the power supply from trombay part. So this is only a means. The existing power source basically. And like for wind energy and biomass and piezoelectric, we have just made a slight bulb in front of these kind of things. So basically these are the ideas which can be pointed out. But we never understood that theme because time was rare for future anyway. Yeah, because we have not actually specified what are bulbs. The classification is exact same. What you had found out as present and future, both of you match on that category. The only problem is they have these bulbs on these things. They are not done yet. But that future clue was not understood by us. Yeah, because it was an eagligency from our side. You know now what is going wrong. Yes, and numbering should be done. Do you agree with this numbering? I have not seen the numbering. Actually we had done the numbering. It is not visible. But do you agree with this number? Start with present, go to future, then analysis of consumption, then analysis of wastage and maybe this future can be the last point and all the others are good. How many people agree? I will again read out the five things. Present, then future, source of energy. Third is amount of usage. Fourth is amount of wastage. And fifth is about methods to reduce wastage. Now I have a comment. How many people agree that analysis of consumption will automatically give us analysis of wastage? What are the usage? It is that it is extra. You can analyze the wastage. So if you keep the bulbs on 24 hours, it is a usage. As well as you know that rest of the hours is wastage. If it is required for two hours in a day and 24 hours, it is all. 22 is obviously the wastage part. Yeah, those two points can be clubbed. Yeah, three points can be. Three points can be. Amount of usage. Methods to reduce wastage. So that has to be separate, right? Everybody agree on that. But, okay. Sir, there is a doubt in the numbering. First to see the analysis, how much is the usage and the present scenario and the method to reduce it? I want you to respond to that. Because we are just suggesting that what are the things in front of us? Those are the present things. I think future should not be touched right now. Then we have to go to the amount of usage. What are the things being used right now? Then we are suggesting the methods of wastage of energy from where the wastage is occurring. Then we can go to the future scopes. In future, this can be done. So this point is well taken by this group also. Yeah. I think it was already present. But, poor printing as a result of communication. Yes. But, I think you should take some input from these people who had made a very big and bold mind map which was perfectly readable on A3. Yes. Even this one which we would be presenting for the other group the internet connectivity, network and connectivity. This one is good. This is only skill part. How you get it to the point that it is readable for each and every person and all your ideas get communicated. Depends on the usage of font size of images and placement of... Actually, in prior, I didn't get it that we should be giving it here on the paper. Basically, we had to submit it to you. You didn't know what is the purpose of A1. It is going to be used. You didn't know the usage pattern. People can zoom out and then read. These all are colored basically. In black and white, these have become very obsolete. The topic is internet, network and connectivity. It is basically very well segregated in which connections, services, problems and suggestions for improvement are very well stated. Basically, segregation is very good. Then the sub points are good. Only things are we can just number those points. I think if they are not numbered, then also it is good. There is no need to number basically. That is why we numbered but basically there is no need to number because we can directly look at the connections, then services, then problems, what are problems and suggestions for improvement. Those are very much common things. Now, in problems, we have added a few points like some defective LAN ports can be there. Then as Sir suggested, the IATB guest login for that user should be available. Then power shutdown issues are there. So, in power backup should be there. Prompt power backup should be there such that we can use the LAN ports as of required. Then in the suggestion for improvement part, we can provide a tutorial page for IATB guest login user. Whenever the guest comes in, whenever he registers for some hostel or something like that, he can be given a manual or something like that to use the internet. Then proper number of routers can be used on the campus because everywhere the campus is not fully Wi-Fi. So, basically LAN can be eliminated because LAN can go defective for some time. So, basically whole campus can be Wi-Fi. Otherwise, the thing is very positive. The mind map is very positive and it's good. My friend would tell a story for this. This current topic that is Internet Network and Connectivity and the mind map of that can be on campus definitely. It can be correlated to something which might have happened to each and every one of us while we were at IATB previously like last year for in a like written test or interview whatever we were here. So, basically we were here as guests for the interview and we were allotted the guest rooms and when we got to our rooms the night before the written test or the interview we would want to check the website or the other requirements essentials which we need the next day or some props of faculty members which could be our prospective guides. So, we try to get to the Internet but we have learned that IATB has only two connectivity methods Wi-Fi and LAN. So, unfortunately Wi-Fi is not available in the hostel rooms. So, we get to know that and the other thing is the LAN. So, we try to connect the LAN and we find that we need LAN cables for that. So, no one carries LAN cables with them while they are traveling and the hostel rooms. That is the problem and somehow in the middle of the night we go to the adjacent room to someone who we have in bare limit and we ask them for the LAN cables. We get that and we connect our laptops to the ports and when we get in it is basically IATB guest like my friend said and that is a fresh hell. So, we do not know how to connect that. There is no procedures or tutorials or something like that. So, it is a difficult thing for a new user who comes to the hostel. So, like my friend suggested, there could be a method like when we get, when we go to get the keys from the hall manager they can provide a small kit which might include some manuals or tutorials on how to connect the Internet for the guest users and also like something of the, here we have suggested the dongles of Internet service providers which might be like what I have found Airtel, something like that. So, try to incorporate training in your mind map plus try to incorporate the best practices of creating mind map by looking at other books and make a readable, predictable and communicable mind map by next when you see. That is the task. Go ahead. Starting from the sketch, the sketch is not proper. You can go for more segregation. And these are all the suggestions. They did not go through the introduction. What are the positive points? What are the drawbacks and then feature? They did not go through the introduction first one and then positive points, drawbacks and then suggestions. They had gone only through the suggestions. So, I suggest different one with heading, movement and navigation. First of all we will go through the introduction in that for navigation and then for movement. Just go with the first thing then go to the second. Then for navigation we have the site maps. Then next is features. What are the features of navigation system and movements in our hostels or in IITB? Then the drawbacks. What are the drawbacks of navigation system and movement? Then suggestions, which are all suggestions are in the previous one. Just we added some features, introduction and the drawbacks.