 Please we are not investigating new CZ. There is no complaint against you CZ as it has been alleged that the CCC is investigating the change. I personally spoke to the bishop in charge of new CZ to find out whether any officer from ACAC visited. And he said that in his father's consent there is no complaint against them on which we are investigating the change. And as a follow up to that propaganda investigations have been instituted against those who are secreting malicious information. Definitely once they are arrested, the law will take its course. Then the other issue leads to Mr. Hari Kalawa and Mr. Immanuel, Ambassador Immanuel Manawa. Yes, restrictions have been placed on their properties. And I am confirming that they are not the only persons in that area where those properties are where restrictions have been replaced. There are also other people who own properties in that area where we have placed restrictions. But for purposes of investigations, I will not disclose the names of other people unless they themselves come forward to you. Then the other issue is the one to do with the honey bee Dr. Chittavichofi. I think I was asked whether we discontinued the matter because one of our officers resigned. The answer is no. It was not discontinued because our officer left. There is an issue going on in relation to the same matter. And once what we are doing is over, a position will be taken as to which direction we go. As to what we are doing, that I cannot disclose for investigation purposes. I think that's where we end. Thank you very much, Tiji. So maybe just for orderliness, unless you want clarity on those three issues. Let me ask that we start from this end and then we go round this way. Any request for clarity? Yes, please. My name is Pamela. I come back from this end of when we get to conclusion. I would like to find out when you talked about Ambassador Immanuel Manawa. You said people in that area have been investigated. What is so special about that particular area? And are those people politically connected? Or is just anybody living there who has been investigated? And how many people are there? I think that's to the number I would not say. But I mean, when ACC is investigating issues to do with property. We are interested in how you acquire it. Yes. So it's everybody in that particular area or there are specific individuals? There are specific individuals. Are they politically connected? Some are. Thank you. And please, this notion of saying no state house or what, it's not there. These complaint came from outside individuals. That's like citizens like it. They gave us that information that these people have these properties in this area. And we started following those issues. It has nothing to do with President Akainda. Some people are insinuating nothing. Individuals, Zambian citizens, elated ACC to say look, why less you are investigating these people that they have properties here. Actually, they also have properties this side. And that's how we moved in. We are not saying they are guilty. Please mark that very carefully. We are not saying that they are guilty or they have stolen. A restriction notice is just placed to facilitate investigations so that a person doesn't sell the property or does anything that will jeopardize the investigations. Once we find that there is nothing against them, who uplift the restriction notices? Thank you. What are you investigating in that property? When you have the property, what is presumed that ACC will investigate? The suspicion is how did you acquire the property? Simple as that. That's what you want to find out. I know some people are already giving answers themselves how they acquired the word, what, what, how many. But to me as I have said, they are innocent. It's just a formality that we do our own investigations and if there is nothing against them, who uplift the restriction notices? We have ACC has done restriction notices on several properties and where we have found that there is nothing against that individual company, the restriction notices have been removed. Thank you. Information has it that you have arrested the accountant in general? On that one I'm not going to speak. Sorry. It's an arrest. So I think it's in public domain. You remember when we were there what I said? You remember what I said? I said I'll have a date for you. Let's just do everything for more. I'll call you just the way you have come to say now this is the position. So for now, I will not say much on that. I know you have news. You guys can dig deeper than me. Yes, I will take you to the issue to do with the case was discontinued. And you are saying that there is something similar that you are respecting. Does it mean that the case was not discontinued with the sense that they cannot be arrested or what? If you look at the provision under which it was withdrawn, if we want to reduce it, we can go back and be arrested. But I'm not saying we are re-arresting them. Please. And that's where I want to go. Please mark me. Yes, you tell me whether we are re-arresting them. No, the case was withdrawn under a provision that if in case we have anything against them, that's where I want to go. Yes, but we are not saying we are re-arresting them for now. No. If we find something, which means you don't have anything I'm not saying we don't have anything for what. My question is, is it that there is lack of sufficient evidence for you to have the case discontinued? Because if you have sufficient evidence against Dr. Chidupia, obviously you will proceed with the case. In the case where you discontinued with a pretext that if anything else comes up, you may re-arrest, it means the sufficiency of evidence is not there. You heard that the arresting officer has moved away from ACC. So if you think of that now, think about it yourself. Because earlier you said it's not because the officer has moved away from ACC. No, no, no. There was an issue to say, did we discontinue it because of that? Now there is a reason which is attached to that, which I cannot disclose. I rest like this. But why is it so difficult sometimes to disclose? I'll be sharing the investigation data. Then I'll be relating those people. Because if I tell you that I'm going to ACC, we will arrest you. Do you know the effect it has? Yes. Already there are two people in Lusaka whom you guys are even expecting to question. And those are the fears that we have. The president of this. My name is Mutumbali Ambela from Crown TV. Basically I just want to find out if you are ready for the task that cases should be done within 90 days. If you are aware, the president was in parliament just a few days ago where he said all cases under the financial crimes court that has to do with corruption have to be done within that mandate. Are you up for the task? Are you ready? Those would be new rules for those courts. So meaning whether you are ready or not you have to live within those rules. You can't go beyond it. It's just like a petition if you come to court within such a period, you finish it. You have to be within that. And we are ready as a commission. If we are ready yesterday, Magistrate Irene Wishimanga actually told, I'm sure it's aces who are handling the case of Hibene Mwinga. She expressed disappointment, displeasure that you only present two witnesses per session while we are trying to beat or to meet the 90 days. And here you are saying you are ready. Those are not yet in court. Those would be new rules. They are not yet in court. Thank you. Did you alluded to the facts that two people have voted? Is it to do with the issues surrounding the Honey Bee case or is it just another case? Something else. We go to a council and find out who those two are. Who those two individuals are. Who have voted. I'm giving you a clue. Any more questions? I'm sure you know them. We don't know. You have a clue. Your colleague has a clue. People have been complaining that we are just targeting the opposition. Now what is going to give you tell you that I'm not selecting anybody. Whether you are from the ruling party, the former party or whichever way you are coming from. Corruption is corruption. You are better placed. No, I will give you. No, I will give you. Yes, I will give you. On behalf of Daria and we have this question. On behalf of Daria it's my own. So I am just trying to say on our behalf I will ask a question. We are asking any other business? No, I will ask you. The issue of Faith Musunda where is it? How far are we? Are we getting our money back? Are you arresting? Have you made a deal? Why are you gagging this issue? What's taking you so long to take? I'm sure you know that after Faith Musunda was arrested there was that issue that she be given in unit and she loses those property. You are not aware of other developments which came out. That's why I'm asking because I'm not aware. She did not do a food discourse. Meaning that if you don't do a food discourse that in unit you will lose it. So where are we now? We will tell you once we finalize. Definitely there is something. I thought you were aware that there was information that she didn't do a food discourse. No, that's why we wanted to find that that's something on our behalf. P.G., there was an arrest that was charged to the current property and it was a threat to the property. And that's the arrest that was charged to the current property. What has caused it? She's not supposed to be charged and yet she has not been charged before. I want to get an update also on the presidential jails. Do you give us an update on what happened? On the presidential jails either there is one officer who was serving in the previous government who is out of the country we are just waiting for him to arrive. That one I can confirm because I have been pushing that officer comes back. He was saving. He was appointed in one of the country who was in the embassy. So actually they are facilitated by this mountain he should be in the country so that should be appearing in court. We are just waiting for the person to come. He was appointed by the previous government then he went to serve in foreign service and you can't just bring him back. Sorry? I was just saying why everything is being done you will see her appearing in court definitely she is appearing in court. You see when that property in Kasama was taken away from her together with the cash she did not disclose that there were other properties she owned meaning that you did not open up in full. So if you don't open up in full the immunity does not warrant to be given. I hope it's clear. It's like this if you yourself you tell us that you have five properties then we confiscate those five properties then later on during investigation we actually discover that you didn't tell us that you also have three other properties which should have been part of the other five properties to make it eight. So meaning that you were not honest so the new need to be taken away from you. No no no no what I'm saying is this after the new Kasama property and the money there was a deal that should be protected. So after that it was discovered that she has other properties aha that is where now it is yes this one So I was asking what they what would be the happen I used to see you investigating how other matters because standing would be after arresting and charging a person obviously what should I wait until they call out the other ones. No one to see also whether the other properties. So you showed the SEC is to investigate. Yes. Let me tell you I have got property. I'm not saying ha but people that we are investigating have got properties. Digi I've always have a question why I question myself on why SEC has not disclosed what offence faith was admitted to because I understand this particular actor 19 specifies or stipulates that the person should admit to an offence before they enter into this you know agreement to be protected but up to now we've not been told what offence faith was admitted to we've just told we were told that the money property in form of the house was forfeited why haven't we been told what offence the property and the money what were the assurances what offence did she admit to somebody has also said that actually procedure procedure I don't like this you know somebody has also said that actually now I have to be educated that the act itself says that they must prove that that property which is forfeited to the state is in connection to some criminal activity or offence which that person must have engaged in but up to now did you what is it what offence there were procedures of crime she was found with procedure of crime so she just said these are procedures of crime you can get them maybe let me assist I'm not going to do those details where and when is that she was found with procedure of crime the information that is required by law as you are saying is that they should give one voluntary disclosure of the property and give details of how they were doing that right that information cannot be given to people because that is part of investigation so we cannot tell you the story you people here you journalists you even know me I'm not even a resident I'm only here I've just been here for two months we know what was happening to a person you are asking so if we start disclosing to say where you know my system the next question the next question you ask me is okay since it was coming from this person what are you doing yes that is where you are leading actually she are giving a side no no no this side I'm reading her mind because the next time I answer that question she will tell me now because she easily knows the issue surrounding the same person you are asking because the next question will be now what are you being about yes okay, I've got the last one there was a video that went viral of ACC officers visiting or trying to have a chat with former president Ed Galoon my question is as we have never we have never visited the former president not even to greet him for me I've never even met him okay we'll pass it maybe we should come visit you thank you any other we conclude thank you very much for your coming and for your patience we value your support Friday will give you an update on what you asked but I know that you have information I know you are too late no no it may be too late that's why when we met at camp I was telling you okay