 Um, sorry, sorry. Sight. Here's the site. It should not. Who has any questions. I'll follow these proceedings. The applicant is available in the audience. If you have any questions and staff is available for questions. I think we're good. I think this may cover it most of what we needed. Um, alterations are going to be minor. They're going to be to the interior of the building. We may have to change out windows to get egress, but we would, they would be in the same locations as the windows that are there now. So other than that, it's mostly, it's all interior. Some landscaping out back. 22 bed. And now we will open it for the public comment. If there's anybody attending in person who would like to make a public comment on this item, please raise your hand. Seeing no hands. There's no public comment. I don't have any comments also. It's a great to see the reuse of that they can build. He's in a great area. And I know the use will not add any additional traffic. Because those people are staying there. Don't be able to drive. I will approve it also with the e-signature. So you will have the resolution on mark where email to you when it is ready. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Congratulations. Thank you. And just to let everyone know again, this decision is available and the deadline is February 26. 29. 29. Okay. Thank you. And. Thank you. Sorry. That is the 26. Shoot. That is the 26. Okay. That is the 26. Dang it. And we will go on the second item. This is for a public meeting for coffee park storage. Another conditional use permit for a proper vehicle at 3240 coffee lane. One for public meeting. Thank you. And this is a conditional use permit. CUP 21 dash 101. And senior planner, we'll go over it. Thank you, Miss. This is another. Another project called coffee park, self-storage offsite parking. Very straightforward project. It's a minor use permit to allow. 25 existing parking spaces at 3300 coffee lane to be used for the proposed. 242 coffee lane. This is an aerial showing the project area, which includes the proposed parking area, which is, it's a little strip to the north of that green area, and then the coffee park storage facility that was approved already. So here's the project site with the coffee park self-storage that slightly dashed rectangle above the green is where the proposed parking will be, which is offsite of where the coffee park self-storage will be. Here's a closer aerial showing where the 25 offsite parking spaces will be located just north of that vacant lot, which will eventually be coffee park self-storage. Here's a street view of coffee lane. And just to give you a brief overview, December 19, 2019 concept review application was submitted. It was withdrawn in favor of a designer view application. A formal application was submitted September 2020. The applicant submitted a conditional use permit for offsite parking in December 22, 2021. Staff deemed that both applications complete on July 27, 2023. On December 21st, 2023, the zoning administrator adopted a zoning interpretation. 23-001 clarifying the required entitlement for offsite parking is a minor use permit, not a major. Here's a general plan and zoning diagram showing that the whole surrounding areas are light industrial, but for the little bit of residential to the northwest. And it shows the offsite parking location. And here's the zoning IL light industrial. Again, this is a site plan showing the parking spaces to the north, which I really already paved and striped. And then there are some findings that the, has to be designed to meet city standards. And there should be, it's required to have a recorded covenant running with the land, recorded by the owner of the parking facility, guaranteeing that the required parking will be maintained exclusively for the use or activity served during the duration of use or activity that agreement has already been recorded. And then this project qualifies for class 32 exemption per CEQA section 15332 as an infill exemption for development projects. There are no unresolved issues. Staff did not receive any comments, questions or concerns from the public when the notice went out. And with that, the staff is recommending that the zoning and mystery improvement use permit to allow 25 offsite parking spaces at 330 coffee lane for coffee park self storage. Again, here's my contact information. If anybody has any questions following this meeting and staff is available for any questions. Anyone from the applicant here, do you have that? You don't have anything to add? Nothing yet, thank you. I will ask you actually a question. I was there yesterday. Are you going to do restriping there? Cause I noticed some of them are fading away. Yes. Okay, do you think we should add the condition that says make sure they are restriped and meet with the current zoning code requirements? Like that? Okay, just to be clear, we will add that condition. And now I will open into the public recording section. If there is a member of the public in person who'd like to make a comment, please raise your hand. Zoning and minister, there are no comments. Okay, it will close it. And I remember this project, it started I was involved with it too at some point. So I'm pretty familiar. I'm glad to see it's coming to an end. So I hope it will start constructing it. And I have no questions or issues with it also. I will approve it. So you will also receive your resolution soon after the get signed. I appreciate your patience. Thank you. Thank you very much. Okay, can we take a break in between projects so we can get the audio straightened out? Yeah, I can take a break right now. Let me kind of take a break. You can have a break. Yeah. We just want to make sure that it's not issue with the audio. Yeah. Can we be muted? Yeah. I know. Hello, can you hear me? Hello, can you hear me? Hey, I can hear you guys, but I think there's an echo. We can hear you too. Okay. I can get my presentation. I just hear an echo on your end when you guys speak. Mike, can you hear me now? Yeah, that sounds great, Monet. There's no echo. Mike, can you hear me now? Yes, I can hear you. Do you hear any echo? No echo. Perfect. So I will go from here. Turn them all the way up. Okay. Okay. All just about the technology, but we will move forward with the next item. And the next item on the list is 6.3 public meeting, pool and remada located at 3565 Kirk Ridge Street. This is a hillside development permit. File number is HDP 22-015 and the presenter is Mark Janisig, our contract planner. Mike, can you go ahead and give your presentation? Yes, zoning administrator. And thank you for the introduction. I'll present the hillside development permit for 35. Mike, can you just give us a second? Mike, let's see if we can share the screen so you can have your presentation. Just give us a minute. Okay. We can hear you from laptop, but let's see if we can share your presentation on the screen. You should be able to share your screen. Okay, Mike. Can you go ahead and share your screen? Sure. Thank you. Can you see it? Yes. Thank you. Oh, okay. Great. So I'll present the hillside development permit. So I'll present the hillside development permit for 3565 Ridge. This is hillside development permit number 22-015. Their proposal is to construct a cool Ramada, Pergola and associated site improvements. And this is subject to zoning administrator review as an addition to a single family development on a site with 10% or greater slope. And the addition is 10% or more of floor area. And that includes outdoor porches and decks. Here's an aerial of the project location. The site is located within the Alturia Heights planned development, which was adopted in 1994. These are approximately quarter acre lots. Unfortunately, these homes are fire rebuilds as a result of the 2017. Tubbs fire. It's a second house in there's Kirk bridge and there's Alturia. There's also open space to the rear of the site. Here's an oblique aerial. Most of the, the vast majority of the improvements are in the rear yard. The rear yard was previously graded. For from the original house and there was a pool. This new pool would be a different design. Most of the backyard. Is. On a slope that's consistent similar to the building pad. So it's less than 10% slope. And then the site gets steeper within 30 feet or so of the back of the site. The rear property line. There's also 3 existing trees on site. There's no trees proposed for removal. With this project. You can also see neighboring properties to this is the north, which is an uphill. Pad and then the pad step down and this is the property, the corner lot to the south, which is the downhill. Property. It's it has low density residential general plan. Land use designation. And again, it's in the. It's in PD 72 001 J. Here's the site plan. Here's the location of the new pool and the new remada structure. There'd also be a new pergola. New decking. Resurface side. Side yard walks. Mike. Mike can. Okay. There you go. We were waiting for the sideline. He showed up right now. Go ahead. Okay, must be a lag. Yeah. So there's. Then most of the site improvements are in the rear yard, the pool, the remada. There's a new decking. New pergola, the sidewalks. The side yard walkways, I should say are would be resurfaced, but our existing be a new pool equipment storage on the side. The house. These retaining walls are existing. There would be 2 new retaining walls proposed. And new timber steps. And again, all the trees would be protected. The. The project would meet this 15 foot side yard hillside setback. The house does not because it's built to the original is built to the PD. Setback standards. And was a fire rebuilt. So. The new improvements would be. Subject to the more restrictive hillside setback. The grading is generally. Limited to immediately. The immediate footprint of the improvements. And it, everything is on the flattest portion of the site, except for the 3 foot 3 and a half foot wide timber steps with decompose granite landings. Which go down to the steepest part of the. A lot. And there would also be new trench, strange, trend, trench drains installed in the below the deck, which would tie into the existing. Stormwater inlets. And the new proposed lot coverage would be 25% or 40 is allowed. Here's an elevation of the. Ramada it's open on 2 sides. It would be unconditioned and uninhabitable space. The. Stone veneer and the siding would match the existing house. The low side is 8 feet. The high side is 11 feet. It the shed roof is oriented such that the low side is closer to the uphill neighbor. And so it works with the, the stepped. Pet elevations and the existing. Terrain out there and would effectively reduce the visibility. Of the structure from, from the neighboring. Property 1 public comment was received. As during the public notice period. And the comment shared concerns from the downhill property to the south. Regarding drainage and the proposed relocation of the existing fence along that property line. The, I already explained that the drainage plan, which would. Which would manage any runoff from new impervious. Surfaces and then would also be subject to building permit review. The existing fence, which if you go back to the site plan. Is located. It varies, but roughly 2 to 3 feet off of the property line. It's noted as being proposed to be shifted to the shared property line. And after the public comment, it's come to staff's attention that there's a retaining wall located there. And so that fence relocation to the property line would not be approvable. As it would, the measurement will be taken from the low side of the wall. And then that would mean the fences exceeding the maximum height requirements. So staff is recommending a condition of approval. That would require the applicant to revise the project drawings at the time of building permits a middle. To remove the proposed fence relocation. And that's what the understanding that any, any future alterations to that fence would need to be in compliance with. The zoning code fence standards. And also any, any fence over 7 feet would need to build in permit. I'll just also add that. I think it the applicant can speak to their design intent. And I think. The zoning administrator should consider that this that the applicant continue to work with staff. And the neighbor to find the best possible solution for both properties in regard to any future fence alterations at that location. Staff is able so with the condition to remove the proposed fence relocation. Staff is able to make all the applicable findings to the remainder of the scope of work. And I won't, I tried to incorporate those aspects into the project description. In my previous slides, but in summary, the project meets all the PD development standards, including coverage. The remada meets all the accessory structure specific standards, including height. The proposed project is on the flash portion of the law through forms are oriented towards the interior of the law, which reduces the visibility to the uphill property. And the structure provide. Earth tone materials and natural stone materials. The project is exempt and eligible for a categorical exemption pursuant to sequel. It's it would be a class 1 and a class 3. Categorical exemptions class 1 is for existing facilities. And class 3 is for conversion. New construction or conversion of small structures. The project consists of an additional of less than 10,000 square feet. And the new construction. And small structures and accessory structures are proposed, including the pool, the remada retaining wall and the pergola. And with that, staff recommends that the zoning administrator. Approve the hillside development permit to allow the pool, the remada and associate site improvements for the property located at 3, 5, 6, 5. Perkridge and subject to the condition of approval to. Revise the plan to remove the proposal to shift the southern fence to the existing property line. Happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Thank you, Mike. Appreciate it. And any member of that we can see who wants to add any additional comments. My name is Mike did well, my name is certainly applicant and I have the property over here to Jason Johnson. So my did well, regarding the fence, we are will propose not moving the fence and keeping that as existing. So that should, or any of those concerned for the neighbor regarding that issue. Okay. And now I will open for the public comments. And the person who'd like to make a comment. Go ahead and raise your hand. I see no public comments. Thank you, Mark. And I was there yesterday I was really excited with it. That creek there is screening all the houses in that area. It's a great location. It's close. Oh, I will close a public comment right now. Thank you. I was there. I noticed that lots of trees are coming back glad to see that I hope you will add more landscaping also lots of trees were burned there. And yeah, I don't have any comments or additional conditions, and you address the fence comments I appreciate that way that I will approve it and you should get your signed resolution hopefully this week after Mark has it. Thank you. And I will go to the next item. Do you want to take a break is there anything you want to fix Mark or is all good. Okay. So, I will go to the next item. The camera is turned off here. Okay. Item 6.4. Another public meeting. This is for a fence located at 2932 West quickly. Minor conditional use permit file number CUP 23 dash 039 and project plan there is not such no go over the project. Good morning, everyone. The project before you is the wrong residential fence. It is a minor. It is a minor conditional use permit application to to legalize the existing residential fence that was constructed in the rear and exterior side setback without the benefit of permits. The fence is made up of 6 feet and 10 inches of solid wood 9.5 inches of lattice and there are 2 inch tall solar caps that sit flush on top of the fence. Here is an aerial view of the site and you can see that the location of the fence is circled. The fences in the same location as the previous fence that was originally constructed as a part of the subdivision development. And here is a neighborhood context map. The general plan land use designation for this property is low density residential and the zoning is PD 9504. Here you can see the fence design. It is in total 7 feet and 9.5 inches. The staff is able to make all of the required findings for a minor conditional use permit. I would like to note that there have been edits made to my resolution that were added to the agenda this morning, I believe. There are edits that were made to my resolution, so I will go over those on finding number 3. The resolution originally stated that the fence is entirely clear of the required driveway vision triangle and does not affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic. This has been removed the fence is actually in the driveway vision triangle, but it's in the same location as the original fence and in a similar location as fences on other properties in the vicinity. Again, in finding number 2 for the additional fence height. I originally stated that the fence is located outside of the required vision triangle and in no way affects pedestrians or vehicles. And this has been removed and changed to say that the fence is designed to minimize site obstruction for vehicle cyclists and pedestrians. Overall staff is able to make the required findings for a minor conditional use permit as the fence is located. The property line on the sides and rear and is. In the same location as the original and of a common design. Similar to those in the surrounding area. And staff is also able to support the required findings for additional fence height. The purpose of the additional fence height is to provide more privacy and safety for this corner lot property. And not allowing the fence to encroach into the side corner setback would deny the property owner privileges. But deny the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and within the same zoning district. This project is categorically exempt from the California environmental quality act. It is eligible for a class 3 exemption as it is the construction of an accessory structure. There are no unresolved issues as a result of staff review at the time of making this presentation. No public comment had been received. However, earlier this week, I received a phone call from a neighbor in support of the project. And commenting on why it is required to have. Required to go through the minor conditional use permit process when the fences of a similar height and design to others in the neighborhood. It is recommended by the planning and economic development department that the zoning administrator approve a minor conditional use permit to allow additional fence height at 2, 9, 3, 2, West Creek Lane. And for any questions or comments, this is my contact in. Thank you. Thank you. And does that have any comments? Okay, and I will open it for the public comments. And courting secretary, if there's anybody attending in person like. There are no public comments and I will close the public comments. And I was there also yesterday. I noticed there are lots of fences, higher than six or seven foot as some maybe 10 within that area. Not sure if all of them got the right permit building permit, but any fence higher than seven foot would require building permit. I don't have any concern or issues. I know you're into privacy. I will also sign this one up and approve it. Thank you. And I will go to the next and last item on the list. This is public meeting for the project located on Fifth Street. How to schedule. The address is 531 Fifth Street. This is a minor conditional use permit file number is CUP 23 dash 071. And the project planner Christina to me. We'll go over the presentation. All right, back again. Thank you, Ms. Sheik Ali. Let me share my screen. So I'm filling in for city planner Suzanne Hartman who cannot be here today. And this is Fifth Street tattoo CUP 23 dash 071. It is a proposed tattoo studio at 531 Fifth Street. They are proposing for employees and hours of operation will be Tuesday through Saturday from noon until eight. They accept walk-ins and the proposed maximum amount of clients per day would probably be about 10. It's located in the downtown between Mendocino and B Street. Just south of Ross. An existing building. Existing tenant space. There's a close up of that. It fronts on the Fifth Street. There is shared parking in the rear. A general plan and land use is core mixed use or CMU. Zoning district is CMU DSA core mixed use. DSA stands for downtown. Station area plan. And here you can see the red circle shows the tenant space. They would take over a part of that building. The tattoo studio and a close up of the storefront. Here's a floor plan showing what it would look like. It sits up and running. So showing the four tattoo stations and the lobby. And rear employee area. The proposed use is allowed within this zoning district, the CMU zoning district and complies with all other applications of this code and city code. It's consistent with the general plan and the downtown station area plan. The design location size and operating characteristics are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The site is physically suitable for the type of use that's proposed. And the granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance. Given that there's adequate parking, it's in the downtown, the hours are within acceptable range. The project is categorically exempt from CEQA first section, 5301. There are no unresolved issues as a result of staff review, no public comments were received. With that staff is recommending that the zoning administrator by resolution approve minor use permit for a tattoo studio. Looking at 531 5th street. Here's Suzanne's contact information. If you have any questions after today. After today's action. Staff is available for questions. Any comments? No comments or questions. Okay. Anyone from the public would provide comments. We have nobody here except for the applicant team. So we have no public comments. And I will close the public comments. I have no concerns or comments about this project. We have similar users in downtown. And I will approve also this use. And you will receive your resolution to after I sign it. And with that, all the items today, they have a deadline appeal, which is February 26. And this meeting of the zoning administrator is now adjourned. Thank you everyone. Thank you for your patience. Thanks for your patience.