 My name is Larry Powell and I teach at the Business School of Merit Circle. It's one of the companies that I think is my trustee. It's the one that I trust most of the time. I used to work there. I worked as a leading drug worker for Washington, for New York, and like me, I checked out my friends who are at home, and I said, well, how can I do this? And I'm going to give you examples of how this works, but I don't know. So, the title is Impressive, by the sounds of the proactive transmission. So, it was called, it worked for so many, so please don't blame me too much. So, speaking of which, And basically, this work is about contests that literally happen in the NRI, the business sales trade. And I think we have a focus on the contests that are held for the health of the gains that are long-term as it can be. Long-term use and long-term work. So we know what the manager has to do later. We will just sample these other experiments. So the two terms of the experiment are the reason those treatments are terrible, the reason they're not. Because it's probably not going to go too well. It's a great number of reasons we have. And these expressions are basically simple. We want to understand how people will be saved in those kind of desperate situations. So we characterize it. And believe me, I also think it's just likely that not many parents go home and study that game. So if you see that I'm safe as well, I think that there's a little dynamic outside the game. And then there's the conditions to come. It's to seek out. It's the way the people are doing it. It's here, right? Oh, we need the conditions. So it is. If you want to think about sort of not making a reasonable, maybe more specific or kind of situation style, like a very close to the model, that would be, say, a competition between the managers of these two branches on the chain for a sample. So the two branches that I'm going to go to, because two are going to the rest of them, they're all the same parts. They're all the same size. So I don't think even Q1 is going to end them, but Q1 is going to be Q2. So that's the kind of our Q1 case. I don't know what it's called. I don't think else being people. So what is the difference? Well, let's go a little deeper about it. By the way, how are you going to work? It's very complex. It's very simple. Well, these are two branches sitting here, right? But eventually one of those managers is going to be appointed as a district manager. So for a branch manager to be district manager. And the assumption is that both the company and the company would have the performance of these two restaurants and companies become private companies. So if a company makes it private company, both the platforms would be the district manager. As I'm going to talk about that, that's the question. Well, the location, of course, we do the same work. It's a market city in San Francisco, and if you look at the western part of the city, it's the same work between the two restaurants. So a few terms that I'm going to use. Positivity, non-positivity, the domestic context of both of these terms. Positivity, you know, it's the work of the business which is B is political A, and C is political B, and C is also political A. It's a trans-political. So correlation is non-positivity. Again, B is political A, C is political B, but A trans-political, of course. So it's some kind of cycle. Now, context. The realistic context, for example, the realistic context would be the auction, the standard auction, English auction, Dutch auction. Coral is the fairest people that can use the auction. So any answer, I'm the fairest people, I'm the only one. Most of the realistic context is the example of the drug context. Also, there are two papers that we've had some why, but each of them is each of the equalities. It's not the realistic one. For example, our beauty plan, say, we plug in the X, X gets more than just X or X possible. And so far, I'd love to work on it. What idea? And how do you call it? How? That's the one, so if it's more than X, it's simply humanization. Humanization, of course. The thing that's known is, also, if you're in a conference, if you're on the screen, sometimes they say, what part do you say you haven't been given any kind of call? All right. All right. All right. All right. How about here? How about over here? That's basically it. All right, so it's almost a long, transitive term. Now, if you call back to the previous slide, the transitive and non-transitive relationships you have before, you just have to transitive from, say, self-identification. Now, when we talk about non-transitive teams, the relations are defined between strategies that belong to different places. So, in this case, say, we have this rock and when we say, well, we have this rock, it's considered, if you play rock, it's really quite a big deal I won't show you. But then, seasons we play a lot, generally, we play from a couple of seasons. And occasionally along also in seasons. So that's an example for us to tier and us to list all of this basically all of the chance that And so the whole pre-optional is what you have. You can obtain a number of cells, one to two hundred cells, which is a polar. And the polar is a one polar model. So to us, we both see, those are very small speeds, compared to the angle sketch. Well, it's the first speed, because the object goes first, both edges. So it means to be, because of that, for all of these cells, the polar versus the polar, that goes in the best direction. Now, one of the most interesting things, an example is non-transitive types. It was kind of a complication of our program as well as the, I don't know, I think it's all about, you know, one day, one day, but here is some more, one day. Ah, yes, right. So the pre-optional solution, if you think about choosing these different types, different types of stretches, and about, which is, I think, P, it's A, C, it's E, or you think it's D, A, and A, it's C. So in this case, the probability of being is 5 over 1. So what I would like to comment on at the bottom is, being is like, Bill Gates, I want to see what Bill Gates is the person, so I'm going to explain this. Bill Gates once went to a research institute in Boston. He went to a research institute where he took where he was getting. So he gave, you know, three, five, six, so well, two, two, whatever you want, but I choose where I'm going, and one of them is, I don't know, the price of the contest is about, but Bill Gates expected that he does, and most certainly you choose first. So the idea is that you know, more of the material of the first mover, whether the first mover chooses, in this case, the second mover has an advantage for almost five or nine, but I believe it's available. Just like paper or scissors, only three options on the list of contents. And the one we are going to, we are starting here, in this paper, is it this letter? Can you do that? So the question is so far, so the news and the problem, the news and the problem is a classic single period program on Google. It was introduced by Edwards in 1988, and Edwards, who was trying to figure out who is working with a lot of cash, but back home, he really wrote for customers, for customers' loans. So some of the customers can show up on any one day, and if they can pass it on or if they are getting a problem, they may miss customers. So, for example, for a customer, you will call too much cash, or you are not going to get an increase of cash if it's too much. So there is a cost of going too much cash. And then, so in the context, let's say, even normally, because of the basic problem with it, there is a newsboy, so he draws a lot of money, with some administrative pros and cons, he's probably a good person with you. Besides, how many newspapers do you get from the publisher? When everyone wants to start, how many people are still speaking, how many newspapers do you get? I want to sell them, which is quite as cheap because of how many people should go and buy some sweets. And of course, it's called as the price of the newsboy, the price to the publisher, and the demand is random. So it's a long time for people to show up. It may be random, we don't know. So questions come in English. How much you buy from the publisher? You know, it's much more expensive. Well, the solution, you can, because in many cases, you can't calculate the expected profit. Most online, immediately, it's actually very, very, very, very, easy to use, just to look at other conditions directly, and say, he is the same, but both are very, very, very expensive. Now, the one thing, of course, in this case, it's a little bit complicated. So they find the margin, think of the value, and the variable, and that is that, well, suppose we already had two units of stock, for whichever reason, and we decide, what is the order of buy from the publisher? So in this case, it's 5. And the way we figure out what we, in this case, we can only sell that as the margin unit once we sell the original utilities here. So that means that the chance that we are going to sell that unit is that we have probability that we have found with, of Q. And that gives you the margin value. That's how it works. So in this case, if we sell the original utilities, they are going to sell them with one key. And the margin cost that we can only sell them to is just very relatively quick. So, for example, we use in the study or in the experiment, so we just standardize the same with the probability that it's not very different. It's one, and then the other. One more means is saving money. So it's going to be quite efficient. It should characterize the units which is the power. So that's what we've got. Any questions? Yeah, and this problem, so why does the problem be caused, it travels pretty much, whether it's not on the last one, or planning problems in the next project. Let's see. An example is going people who sell flowers, but it has characteristics of a single period of it. So if tomorrow the product is going to expire, I don't think it's going to perish. If you tell a flower, it's going to last a long time. It's going to expire. In this case, in this case we kind of implicitly assume that there's a competition because it's a low price. So it's a right. So it's very successful. So no. There are a lot of kinds of competition which we use in the study. We find the price and find where you can put it also. It's very good quality. So we will explain it in spaces for better context. Either it makes it implicit or not. But the thing about all those models is that the the quality or the way users are going to be they basically still do not function. Or they sometimes don't function. So if I didn't talk about my market for too much demand then there will be demand to get it all over 40 years. So that's how it works. So let's start at the line because it's going to be crazy. So if you think about this kind of scenario for large scale, for example, we'll be a huge cracker. So what they do for many categories of products will be so you decide to start making a certain model. They actually talk about the symposium of your own material for that particular model for 40 years and it works. They make only one decision. I have no idea what demand is going to be but the first one I started to know was the creation for sure. So they made that decision and that second one said about making that decision. Now, this model is a simple model. Of course, I have no idea what this model was. So what was the indication of why it wasn't built earlier. So, to increase the people they built that model and there's a lot of people just to see how people are going to do because that's actually a very important practical problem. It's a problem to understand how people are actually going to be decisions in this area. So they've got the information about how people are going to be involved in that model and of course they will work and not make important decisions. So the higher the efficiency the higher each product is going to be 8 to 5% of the maximum work and all in surprisingly about 10% of participants will be able to make optimal decisions. Now, the participants will be based against what I mentioned and very only the second year it will be and they started this problem to be justified. There are a few people who are currently who are actually speaking for who are able to to ground the industry but then we play in the spirit of what we want to do while we select a design. So the problem is not really it's not for the model. We've got picture if you look at the enemy or the eyes or the qualities while they work well it's like energy highly and on this it's very high quality so on this GR you can judge from the quality but the point is that there are three conditions for this model. One condition in this model is low cost so in this case the quality is 7 to 5 just like for example when the other condition is 3 to 5, 6.4 so the model will be 2 to 5 and the same condition for the model 2 to 5, 5 to 4 so the model will be exactly the same. That's very good. Now the high quality model on this we just can say so this is a good problem because the high quality is very high quality for between both the model and the model that's the component of the ratio it's robust but if you look at the model and the actual of the model that you go to so this is the new demand that it's just like so they basically all have the same characteristics of the model yes they were experienced a long time ago but we can't date this but for the same time what makes this experiment more interesting for this problem is that the other is coercion no no coercion it's plain to think about how we are going to do it so we have a lot of questions what turns out that model is actually not the same so there is something else but there are other things that is good for example for example quality explanations and then health is insufficient so people have to continue they only feel they need they just don't have quality they don't have quality they don't have quality so they stop something then the launch is you know it's very obvious for us that the quality is limited it's not going to depend on demand or use of agents it's just it's also very fainted even quite a few subjects but 30% of people they will act as though the demand is going to be the same they don't spend the demand they don't pay so what's our demand was in the previous period as much to do is to become actually here so when we are working we are doing this but well speaking of hacking and censorship adjustment in fact 30% of people they feel kind of weak but never change but since 30% of people say it's more than the demand or the demand although there are other people who can't it is not there is not much more to do so basically it's just simple repetitions of the same problem of the only thing that might change is maybe you learn a little bit about hacking but each time is just like a new part so minimizing and if you think about demand chasing if you suppose what exactly will be passed in modernization then from Irish or Irish right because the new demand changes in Irish but that explains that's how the demand chase so similarly there are people who try to minimize that's possible so what is this large world demand is small it's not all that much and so much on but similarly to demand chasing in Irish and the consequences in modernization people really don't appreciate the way it is the problem generally will begin with performance and instead of solving this problem of the demand they effectively how they act and solve the problem of the single point of demand say 25 so that kind of squeezes out a certain development so they are very close to the probability of how well they can repeat all this well the problem is that the top of it is still fine actually most of the time it exists only in any kind to understand more as the actual decisions that should be made and all this is most of what we are doing on this research we are only trying to make decisions that fall in each center but we realize that most of the time decisions are possible sometimes you could do different studies so the typical results look like in terms of the decisions so all the time there is only one right and the decisions are in this case where people play the habit periods to play some learning school or I think so interestingly also that people join all kinds of studies so we realize that about 60% of the people will own the article quantity you know 25 to 70% should be ordered the year in the month that's all and so we didn't get to be more than yet so some people believe that 50% of the people is in prostitution some people believe that it can't be substantial numbers like 25% of boys 25% of all people 25% of the people that is in prostitution so all kinds of things and and at the top of that we are going to study the reputation of people in this world so I already understanding what people do in all of the reputation what is the task of the the whole which is going to make sense but in this world we are looking at the first two companies now just like those store managers they they want to maximize their product but also they compete for the size of the size of the because the boys should remember this very well the promise where does the promise come from which happens with the probability that they are high and it's powerful but that's kind of normal with prostitution before we have it's kind of broken that's what we talk about so far I will start with two of the companies that compete because of the interactions that come from boys so I much on some of my customers who are new in a way in this case the product is completely simple and perfectly isolated and the only way we have come here is through companies no that depends on the organizations so here we are looking at the organizations so we spend a lot of time just playing for one year and depending on who is going to be involved also if you are dealing with this what you do is actually a dedicated function and then when you take the speculation it becomes very close that's really been more of a this game the key point is that this is the one that is simple just thinking about it if you are more of the organizationized here then to my opponents it would be pleasure to order by organ storage you know I wait for the order 75 and my opponent would order 74 0.99 and they would win it would be a pleasure to order myself so moving just a little bit closer to the center is actually a job a little bit difficult there is a discontinuity also if you are I order 75 or something like that then it would be 500 in those cases but if you just a little bit less if you go outside because of this slightly less because of this discontinuity there is a non-continuity relation so each quantity is going to stand apart until a certain point because if you go all the way to the ATM and you are respectful because so small will be a person with a certain price and that margin you know she pays a lot of money so it's not that obviously it's costly no no if you get a lot of money it's got no idea from the customer perspective it's not that big it's only in compliance so what do we do with the dynamic of the study game and so of course there could be two there is one equilibrium which is 4 to 5 but equilibrium can be something like 69 and 5 to 6 5 to 6 you know there and the other equilibrium is what you see here is that in those hours most we do in the second one of the study so what happens a lot it's impossible to get into the probability is already imposed it's going to be a curve or it's going to be a curve so then it's going to be a curve or it's going to be a curve or it's going to be a curve And what this is what are the decisions and how it turns out that's what the methodology feels to me there's two different how collaborative junior So, in this case, we are going to have, because of the intensity, we are going to have this equilibrium. And it's possible, in this case, it's going to be uniform. To do this, it's possible. So, the physical equation, the physical self, or the one. So, if you think it's actually uniform, you have to be careful to do this. You just want to make sure that it's uniform. Yeah. But it's actually a question of a soul that we can't solve. So, here, we have a score of two. So, we have score two different. In this case, we have the price. So, if you have a large impulse, you can have this kind of question. Well, for that, you can see that most of the time, most of the time, it's going to be very close to me. And again, because, as we go to the center, it's going to be the right size. And if you decrease the size of the price, it's going to be close to you. So, it's still a mistake. So, if you decrease the price, it's still a mistake. So, if you decrease the price, it's still a mistake. So, it's still a mistake. So, if you decrease the price, it's still a mistake. All right. So, that's what we did. Now, the most interesting part is the audience. It's a form of stone. So, it's just a mistake. And one side of it, try to see if people actually follow the slope of gravity. It's not a way that it has many points, or maybe it's just an origination. And the way we do this, you know, we test the direction of the area, basically. And we use, we just want to use the one by four, basically. One factor point, four levels. So, the manipulation we use to try to induce competitors is called the core range of our strains. So, if you zoom, you don't need to do anything. You don't need to do anything. All right. Up to this form is possible. Which completely is going to be introduced in the other parts. So, in three conditions, on three levels, we're going to start with four. We do not use any horizontal bars. And so, in the last condition, we use horizontal bars. And on slide two, we wanted to... It was a simple slide. It's exploited by the person who was testing the power of the air. But we wanted to test the power of the air. Some of us came up with that. They actually showed that the power works. Now, we wanted to see if that's the air that comes here can also help this part. So, what I'm going to do is... I'm going to explain how to do so. If you're trying, so, in the table, you're kind of trying to make a reference to, you know, transition. If I have two minutes, I don't call that. So, slide two, the renovation process, slide two comes from this. That's kind of competitive, as we are going to see it, actually, about your, you know, sort of, you know, our relationship, but also our health benefits, perspective benefits. And, you see, well, this is a different problem. But in some of the similar contest, there's a, you know, a lot of competition between us, who are in the EPA, and also welcome to the transit companies. They try to see how the use of social preferences may affect the efficiency of that supply chain. So, in this case, there's just a lot of competition. They're in relations with the EPA, very different countries, but the point was that they have a couple of people in which they did nothing. Then they had a status in the agency, in which they could say to the participants, oh, you will, this time, you may have one of your partners. And there was a relationship by condition in which they settled the meeting before the meeting with the prime people. Imagine that personally, you would take that role and just come to the person, share your plans, build up your future relationship. So, that's going to be the end of the exam. So, if you look at the status relationship, what we can see on this job, so, again, the future is in supply, there's a supply chain. If you look at the status relationship, it's actually supposed to be in the status condition, it's mostly in the relationship condition with the practice. So, the competition here is destructive. It's a stress point, but you can compare and patch with the behavioral practices if you might agree. So, that was our power meter, which was one of our projects I think it's about. So, in this case, again, we'll study one. This is an example of what we see in the case of the exam. And what we've done, remember when I was taking Ultracenter, I mentioned several models that can't be explained Ultracenter. So, those are professional factors that apply in this kind of situation. And another here, is that you control for a load and keep only the company. Remember, as you know, it's not very good for control for everything else. Therefore, what we've done, we just explained, it was a standard, it was a standard, it was a standard, it was a standard, it was a standard, it was a standard, it was a standard, it was a standard. So, that's why we were able to use PostgreSQL and CLE1 to see a postgreSQL line. Now, the key standard we've done was for an option for CLE1. First, we introduced a network signal where the projects are. So, that pair was not yet present in the lab that we were at. So, it wasn't in dept, so it took a bit of time as it was in the military was the federal government. So the same conditions were equitated. And you're saying that, well, in the same conditions, somewhere to the past, it's going to be rain. This is it. It has been over 85 years. That's what our subjects mean. And second, let's follow the control. So first of all, we use conflict is the reference point, it's language. And second, how we control the earth. Else, we put it along for the privacy to control. It's restricted, it shows what a conflict is. One more, one less than the reference point. And we want it to simply go over. Right. And the way we manipulate, so what we manipulate is a lot of the experience was the number of columns in the history of data. So after a certain number of periods, you would then produce the next column, which shows the other periods. Not saying anything about, you must not wear it. Not saying that you, well, you have to, in other two periods, either in the historical article, in which you need to make a list of the works and say, oh, there's a very hard one, you know who you are. And then finally, under the first regulation, you enter this number of columns in which you explicitly hold the value of columns. In that case, those are just columns. So that's what we've got. We're much more ready for the beginning. So that's an example of a logistic regression. And it shows how likely, how likely it is that people should make a column closer to the area. And already in the, so the intercept shows the place of the condition we will be seeing, just to show the order of the possible area. And that's where we're going to start. It's closer to here. It's more likely for people to choose one quantity closer to the area. Why is that? Well, as we do these calculations, we'll be size of the health crisis. But in the second part, it's a significant impact on the health crisis. We're still not changing. I guess if you have no data, you can hardly grasp it. And that's what the data looks like. We didn't have very many decisions made by the past, the past, the world, the future. The circle, the size of the circle, represents a number of iterations in relation. So let's go over here and see what we see here. And what we're going to see is the order of the possible area. The first is the shift towards the knee. So it's 25 for the possible area. But our average, so now we're going to have the average shift at the rest of the knee. It's quite a few opportunities, five, so it's going to be 25 points. As we move from knee to knee, one knee to knee, we have all that's become smaller. So people choose that relatively close to knee. Something else, of course, not so many people can see. Yes, indeed, most people do call this put aside, to show it, which is like, and some people show it that way. So they have called us away from knee to knee. In study two, let's see, let me get these, we begin in point, yes. They have passed on to university, they are in study two, and in second study, they could do other different things. So we also, but we just think that if, if it's too close to you, to be able to argue, to make a smaller argument, but...