Loading...

POLL: SHOULD TRUMP DRAIN THE IRS SWAMP? (thumbs up for 'yes')

607 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Mar 12, 2017

NEXT ► AFGHAN LEADER COMPARES TRUMP TO OBAMA
https://goo.gl/OvVMNL

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/dailykenn
FACEBOOK ►https://www.facebook.com/dailykenncom/
TWITTER ►https://twitter.com/DailyKenncom
KENN SINGS ► https://goo.gl/hDm6cd
KENN'S LAWS ►https://goo.gl/48EoBp
KENN ON CLASHDAILY ► https://goo.gl/IzotGS

ATTRIBUTION [FAIR USE] ▼

http://clashdaily.com/2017/03/questio...

Is THIS a good reason for urgency in ‘Draining The Swamp’?

There’s an old saw that tells us ‘Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason.’

Should that be extended to bureaucrats? The answer might be ‘yes’.

The Internal Revenue Service admitted to a federal court Wednesday that it has identified nearly 7,000 documents that contain information concerning how the agency targeted tax-exempt applications of conservative political organizations.
IRS commissioner John Koskinen has insisted since the scandal broke in 2013 that the agency had cooperated completely in the investigation of its targeting of conservative groups. Now, in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the IRS revealed it has 6,924 documents related to its targeting of tea-party conservatives during the Obama administration.
…Despite court orders forcing officials to admit the existence of the records, the IRS refuses to say when it will release the documents to the public.
“At this time, the Service is unable to provide an estimate regarding when it will complete its review of the potentially responsive documents,” the IRS Status Report states. “The Service will begin producing any non-exempt, responsive documents by March 10, 2017, and, if necessary, continue to produce non-responsive records on a bi-weekly basis.” —WND

Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."
https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92c...

Loading...

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...