 I am grateful, Presiding Officer, to seek your clarification as to whether the vote that is about to take place is in relation to suspending standing orders to allow an urgent question to be put in after the time or whether the vote is to suspend standing orders to accept an urgent question to hear or at the next appropriate time for it to be responded to. The vote before us will set aside rule 13.8 of standing orders while its particular requirement is that any urgent question be lodged before 10am, so it will enable that timetable to be shifted. I hope that that is clear. It sets aside the requirement that an urgent question be lodged before 10am. The question is that rule 13.8 of standing orders be varied to enable an urgent question to be lodged later than 10am today. Are we all agreed? I am just going to ask that again because I was not entirely clear. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and members should cast their votes now. The vote is closed. Order Angus Robertson The result of the vote on the motion to vary standing orders in the name of Stuart McMillan is yes, 49, no 55, there were no abstentions, the amendment is therefore not agreed. Maggie Chapman I seek your guidance in relation to section 7.5 of the code of conduct, the requirement to treat each other with courtesy and respect. Given the repeated heckling from mainly men of mainly women who are on their feet answering questions, I refer specifically to an incident at topical questions earlier this afternoon, where Stephen Cares repeated interruptions of Minister Jenny Minto, what was designed, I can only imagine to try and knock her off her feet. When, as a Parliament, we should be valuing and welcoming the contribution of women ministers, I would welcome your guidance on this. Thank you, Ms Chapman, for your point of order. I believe that I dealt with the matter concerned at the time, and I am sure that there is no surprise to any member in here that I am very determined that we will all treat one another with courtesy and respect at all times. Mary McCallan Very briefly from me in respect to the previous vote with no motion, it was just to put on the record that the decision to terminate the contract of the former CEO has been a decision entirely for the board of Ferguson Marine, including the timings thereof. As in respect of all matters with Ferguson Marine, I will be very pleased to take questions from members at the appropriate time. I am sure that the cabinet secretary is aware that, while her comments are on the record, that is not the point of order. We will now move on to the next item of business. I will allow a moment or two for front benches to organise themselves.