 Okay, good evening all. You're very welcome. Monday night, live stream, time. I hope you're all doing well. I'm doing very well. I'm in a really chipper mood this evening. I don't know why, because I can already see boxes, boxes of leaflets to go out in the Harley Pearl. Here we go again. It never ends, ever. Round we go. Well, that's the name of the game. Evening all, God, what are we going to do this evening? I'm going to have a look back at Batman's Span by way of a couple of very detailed questions. It was quite hard hitting. I'm not going to avoid the tough questions on this. I picked out a couple of emails from members, which I'm going to answer in detail. And I want to thank the people who sent me these questions because answering these on this live stream is the best way I think to respond generally because the questions cover a lot of things. So I'll do that in the second part of this evening. I'm not no longer, no longer avoid is not the right because I'm not trying to avoid it. But I get so many emails, so many videos, so many communications basically on vaccines, COVID vaccines that have had a little rummage around today. And I want to cover that in a bit of detail this evening. COVID is in the news this evening, as you might know. And I'll have a quick look at the BBC on this. So where are we? Face masks. Well, this is from the BBC about 45 minutes ago. Face masks will no longer be legally required and distance and rules will be scrapped at the final stage of England's COVID lockdown roadmap, Boris Johnson has confirmed. The rule of six inside private homes will be removed and work from home guidance abolished a 16 months of on off restrictions on daily life ends. The PM said he expected the final step would go ahead as planned on the 19th of July. So where will a couple of couple of weeks away from that? This will be confirmed on the 12th of July, it says after review of the latest data. Before I came on, I wasn't actually watching it, watching it. But in the background, I could hear a discussion on acceptable risk, if you like. And this is relevant to the vaccination issue as well. The government is weighing up what is an acceptable risk for them to take to come out of restrictions and to go back to normal life and what's the acceptable risk. And I could hear this reporter talking in a very morally condemnatory, if that's a word, way. But that is actually the name of the game. That is what politicians have to do is weigh up risk and take decisions that cause the least harm. We don't live in a perfect world and we have to take decisions that cause the least harm to the fewest number of people. And that is, I suspect what their justification will be for going ahead with vaccinations despite what appear to be risks. And what appear to be numbers of, from what I'm told, growing numbers of people getting sick and even dying from this. To carry on just with this article, Mr Johnson said the ability to end a vast majority of legal restrictions in England was thanks to the success of the vaccine rollout in breaking the link between cases and deaths. But he warned cases were predicted to rise to 50,000 a day later this month. And that we must quote, and this is what the reporter I was just mentioning was talking about just before we started. We must reconcile ourselves, sadly, to more deaths from COVID. And they'd apparently asked him about how many deaths is acceptable. But look, no amount of deaths is acceptable is the wrong word. A great deal, a great deal of damage has been caused also by the lockdown. And so they have to make these decisions and weigh up these risks. Not, I don't doubt, an easy thing to do. I've explained the Prime Minister, if we don't go ahead now, when we've clearly done so much with the vaccination program to break the link, when would we go ahead? We run the risk of either opening up at a very difficult time when the virus has an edge, has an advantage in the cold months, or again putting everything off to next year. Self-isolation orders for those who test positive would continue, Mr Johnson said. But he suggested there would soon be new rules for fully vaccinated contacts. Health Secretary Sajid Javid told MPs he would probably make an announcement regarding a new regime for close contacts on Tuesday. I'm going to just put this phone back on silent. It's usually on silent, but I had to collect the dogs from the groomers today. They're looking very, very pretty, very, very pretty. And they came out with this gorgeous little bow ties on. I'm still laughing at it. We were able to collect them and saw them in little bow ties. Sorry to drift off though. So let's have a look at vaccinations. And do send me any questions, please. Questions are coming in. Let's have a look at vaccinations. I thought I'd start with an article that was sent to me. So I've watched quite a few things on this today. Some of them outright. I'm not saying that there's no possibility. This stuff could be true. But how do I describe this? On the far end, I would say of not strange. Okay, let me tell you what, I can't find the word. I can't find the word because I did watch a video today. And actually while I'm here, I want to quickly Google this. Human 2.0. Some of you might know what human 2.0 is. This is the idea that we will be changed from a sort of organic biological human being into a hybrid of technology and human being. And it's been called human 2.0. And to my surprise actually it's come up from an article with Forbes magazine and the headline is human 2.0 is coming faster than you think. Will you evolve with the times? And what I've watched today was a doctor saying that human 2.0 was going to come via the COVID vaccination. So that's a claim that a lot of people would frown at. But the idea of this transhuman or human 2.0 is not, the idea itself is not apparently completely outlandish. A lot of people are talking about it. It's not even, there's no, really from what I've seen today doesn't seem to be rubbish so much as explored with curiosity. The idea that we should be sort of melted into with technology. And the doctor I watched today, she said that the issues that can be solved if this human 2.0 thing comes about. For example that they can inject technology into us and this technology could find a cancerous, potentially cancerous tumor for example and go and get rid of it. She also said that if you were to sort of tear a ligament or tendon this technology would go and fix it for you. And that this is all very attractive. But with everything she said comes a price. And if you are sold on, the idea that technology will make you better when you're sick or heal injuries. With that will come an ability to control and to see and read people's thoughts and autonomy. And your bodily beginning and end if you like. We are this body. It begins and ends with this biological body. That would no longer be the case. Really interesting thing she said. The idea would be, a part of it could be even that we would, if you want to learn to speak a new language you just download the language. I mean it sounds science fiction. But it is actually being discussed with interest and with curiosity. Anyway so that's on sort of one end of the discussion on this. What I'm more interested in covering this evening is death. Death and injury and damage caused to people by these vaccinations. What is the extent of it? So I've got an article. I thought we'd start with an article that says, and the headline is COVID vaccine killing huge numbers. Wands leading doctor. One of the world's top experts on COVID-19, Dr. Peter McCullough is sounding the alarm about the vaccines and the suppression of proven treatment. So immediately there is truth to that, because we know that suppression of, I don't know about proven, but suppression of treatment suggestions is definitely true. We know there have been doctors who come up with ideas and what they think will treat COVID. And they've been shut down and they've had their careers destroyed. They've had even their social media taken down. So we know that that part is true. The COVID shot has already produced thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of hospitalizations. This is in the United States, according to the federal government's own data. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. This is a stark warning offered by Dr. Peter McCullough, the doctor with most citations in the National Library of Medicine on these topics, in an explosive interview with Alex Newman in the New American Magazine. Under normal circumstances, it says 50 deaths reported to CDC's VAE or surveillance system. I'm not going to tell you what that means, but you can work it out yourself. It's a surveillance system. Would result in a drug being taken off the market immediately. So what that basically means is that if there were a drug being used and there were 50 deaths reported to this monitoring system, it would be taken off the market. In the case of COVID shots, however, thousands of deaths have already been reported. And yet the mass vaccination programs continue to be pushed. Dr. McCullough, a professor of medicine who developed a globally acclaimed and highly successful COVID treatment protocol, also emphasized that there have been many unnecessary deaths as a result of policy decisions made at various levels of government. Okay, so that is... It links to... Let me see, I'll just stick the URL from what I'm looking at. So you can have a quick look at it. It's the Liberty Sentinel... I'll leave that up there for a couple of minutes so you can have a look. And on that has a link to this interview with this doctor who says that thousands of deaths have already been reported to this surveillance system. And yet normally, if 50 deaths were reported to this from a drug, that drug would be taken off the market. So coming in to the UK, I thought we would have a look at what denies... Often, at least to me, I often like to read articles or coverage that denies what I'm trying to find out. But often, to my mind, you'll find a lot more truth in the denials than in the actual allegations. I'll explain what I mean. So this is from something called fullfact.org. And what this tries... This is a fact finder, if you like. And what this tries to do is take commonly... You might even... I'm sure they would probably call them rumors or conspiracy theories. Fact-check these things and tell you what the reality is. And I often find that you'll find a lot more in their denials... which more interesting actually than the allegation itself. So here's the claim. COVID-19 vaccines have caused 3,362 deaths in America. That's the claim. Actually, more detail. COVID-19 vaccines have killed 3,362 people in less than four months in the United States. That's the claim. So here's the fact-checker coming back with a response. And they say, this is the number of deaths that were reported in individuals in the U.S. who recently had a COVID-19 vaccine. But there's no proof they were caused by the vaccine. Now, that's as maybe but can we have some consistency in these rules here? You know what I'm going to say now, don't you? Throughout the first six, eight, ten months of this crisis, people who died within 28 days of a positive COVID test were classed as COVID-death. And only now and it was dismissed as ridiculous at the time that all the conspiracy theorists were saying, no, no, no, it's not people dying from COVID. It's people dying within 28 days of a test. Now, even the press calls it within 28 days of a test. So if that's, if we're reporting everyone who dies within 28 days of a test as a COVID-death of a positive test, as a COVID-death why are we so quick to dismiss these as not caused by vaccine? I mean, people are dying after having the vaccine but that doesn't mean the vaccine killed them. Well, okay, but the rules didn't apply in that direction when you were calling out COVID-death. What this tells me is that there is a was a desire to make the number of deaths from COVID-19 higher and there's now an equal desire for the number of deaths perhaps possibly attributable to the vaccine lower. So the same propaganda if you like, the same manipulation manipulation, okay, that'll do is being used this time only in the other direction. So it goes on this full fact thing goes on to say a Instagram post has claimed that COVID-19 vaccines have killed 3,362 people. This is roughly the number of deaths reported to in the US following COVID-19 vaccinations. The post doesn't provide a source for the figure but it is likely to have originated from remarks made by Fox News host Tucker Carlson on the 5th of May 2021. He quoted the same number claiming that it was taken from the federal vaccine adverse event reporting system. So that's the VAES that I mentioned a minute ago. The video is no longer available but American fact checking organization PolitiFact reported that the political commentator said between late December 2020 and last month a total of 3,362 people died after getting the COVID vaccine. PolitiFact reported that Mr. Carlson then went on to say that he was citing numbers from VAES, the figure is roughly, so it's basically repeating itself down. It doesn't really offer anything other than to say okay, just a few paragraphs down to the deaths were investigated by the CDC Center for Disease Control who said that quote, a review of available clinical information including death certificates, autopsy and medical reports has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. However, recent reports indicate a plausible casual relationship between the Johnson & Johnson slash Janssen COVID-19 vaccine and a rare and serious adverse event, blood clots with low platelets which has caused deaths. Okay. Let me read that again. In the one hand they're saying there's not been established a link, on the other there has been a link with one of these blood clots and low platelets which has caused deaths. So in the same paragraph they say there's no link and there is a link. Now there's probably to be fair they may be talking about one type, there's no link with one type and there is with another. This vaccine, the one we've just mentioned where there is a link between blood clots which has caused death. This vaccine is not currently available in the UK. Although cases of blood clots and low platelets have been found in association with the AstraZeneca vaccine which is used in the UK. Okay. So let me have a look at some UK figures I found. I'll take this down now. Let me have a look at some UK figures on this. So we've got 936 fatalities associated with AstraZeneca 439 associated with Pfizer. That is a lot of people. It's a lot of life lost and those are the figures from the government. Just a couple of things I've seen before we came on including this I've been watching a bit of you go talks today. So those are the figures and finally I went to the NHS themselves who are telling us that the COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in the UK have met strict standards of safety, quality and effectiveness. They can cause some side effects but not everyone gets them. Any side effects usually mild and should not last longer than a week such as a sore arm from the injection feeling tired, a headache feeling an achy feeling or being sick more serious side effects such as allergic reactions or blood clotting are very rare. Maybe there's almost 1400 deaths from the two biggest the number of deaths in the UK compared to the population. But I wonder whether this level of fatalities and let's just quickly have a look again whether this number of fatalities would be tolerated generally if we weren't talking about COVID-19 as well. A million or so adverse reactions would these be tolerated in the general sense with a new drug? Would that new drug however be dealing with a pandemic of this size? My assumption is that the government has weighed this up and that would certainly be their argument that far more lives are being saved than lost and that we would not normally be launching a new drug for a disease that this many people have and therefore the tolerance if you like of fatalities is exceptional because exceptional. That would be their argument no doubt. On the BBC on this so I couldn't leave this issue without going to the BBC's debunking and I like to read the debunking 5 COVID-19 vaccine false theories debunked by the BBC let's have a look at them COVID-19 vaccines will alter our DNA is the claim BBC reality check says false. One of the videos within accurate claims was made by osteopath Carrie she's the doctor I told you about earlier who made this speech about human 2.0 In it says the BBC she falsely suggests that vaccines are designed to change people's DNA to make us genetically modified organisms and to hook us all up to an artificial intelligence interface. Scary stuff if it were true but there's no evidence at all that this is the plan of the vaccine trials currently underway involving humans none are designed to alter human DNA nor do they contain the technology to effectively plug us all into the matrix well you can see the tone they're taking there as well arrogant BBC of the vaccine trials if these claims aren't true why does Carrie Maddedge's video was originally uploaded to YouTube in June and had more than 300,000 views it was also very popular on Facebook and Instagram Doctors are worried that misleading information might put people off getting a vaccine if or when one becomes available. So the next claim Covid-19 vaccines will implant microchips into people BBC reality check says false Also in July, Formula One Lewis Hamilton shared a video on Instagram that featured a TV interview with Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates who funds vaccine research in it Mr. Gates dismisses unfounded claims that a potential vaccine would involve injecting people with microchips so that they can be tracked but a video posted by the account King Buck took this footage and added a laughing emoji with the words I remember when I told my first line this is what Hamilton shared with 18 million followers he later said he hadn't seen the comment wasn't anti-vaccine and deleted the post the microchip conspiracy theory keeps coming up and the Gates Foundation has called it false it is funding research into technology that could store information about whether someone has a particular vaccine or not but this would not involve implanting microchips or tracking people I'm pretty sure I've seen Bill Gates talk about keeping this record on inside okay so next claim I volunteer in the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine trial died BBC reality checks says false updates by the team behind the University of Oxford vaccine trial have been met with comments and post claiming that it has been rushed and is unsafe it is true that the trial is progressing let me see when was this doesn't give a date so anyway this apparently is false as well the Oxford completed its first two stages of testing in record speed despite the pace of the trial Professor Andrew Pollard told the BBC at the end of July there were rigorous safety checks in place so next claim Bill Gates believe huge numbers of people will die from taking the COVID-19 vaccine guess what that's false as well another one of Bill Gates he seems to be a popular target well he is a popular target for a reason for a reason he's funding a lot of he's funded a lot of vaccines over the years he's doubled his personal fortune with vaccinations over the years he's a massive donor to the World Health Organization he's under the spotlight on this for a good reason so one tweet which is more than 45,000 retweets and likes falsely suggested Mr Gates admits the vaccine will no doubt kill 700,000 people this is not something he has ever said and finally the Spanish flu vaccine was responsible for 50 million deaths this is also false similar false stories about the Spanish flu pandemic have been shared in memes one which reality check looked into claims that vaccines were responsible for 50 million deaths this is not true the US Centers for Disease Control claims there was no vaccine for Spanish flu at the time while scientists from Britain and the US experimented with a basic bacterial vaccine they were not according to historian Mark Honningsbaum anything like the vaccines we know today okay I do love to go through the BBC's little fact checking the arrogance just drips off every single page right I want to move on to the two the two emails of questions from members before I do a couple of things I want to show you start with this record numbers of anti-Semitic attacks let me show you how the BBC reports on this so a monthly record number of reports of anti-Semitic incidents were recorded following the 11 day conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in May a rabbi of 13 years, he was used to giving speech he talks about one rabbi this one to mark the start of the Jewish festival of Shavot on 16th May could not on the face of it have been any different he learned his good friend and fellow rabbi was attacked outside a synagogue in Chigwell struck over the head with a brick two men have denied causing grievous bodily harm robbery and religiously aggravated criminal damage in a separate incident that afternoon a mum was filmed apparently using a megaphone with medical abuse from a convoy we go down and find a deeply disturbing it describes here community secretary Robert January told the House of Commons there had been a deeply disturbing upsurge in anti-Semitism in recent years doesn't however tell you who's responsible for these and it just it reminded me of when the similar thing a similar report was coming out of France and the implication is there's no mention of the extreme left no mention of Muslims there is however mention of Islamophobic attacks and tell mama UK this is back in the BBC report tell mama UK this discredited organization was lost its funding under the Lib Dem coalition for making stuff up is again reported so we're getting into it's absolutely it's it's 1984 it really really really is smoke and mirrors the BBC is quite unbelievable it gives a couple of paragraphs doesn't mention who it is behind these record numbers of anti-Semitic events then immediately immediately gets on to Islamophobia and tell mama is quoted incredible stuff last thing before I get on to the questions I'm going to show you this so facebook wants to know if you have been subjected to extremism and where this is leading I strongly suspect is that facebook probably isn't able or is struggling to close down just about everyone who has opinions that aren't sanctioned by the mainstream antifa esk left wing and speaking of antifa I have to mention this you might have seen there's a spar in Los Angeles which a man was walking around with his genitals exposed in women's dressing rooms children were there etc some women complained brilliant woman's great video complained about this and she was told basically to sort of that this guy was identifying as a woman and therefore it was okay for him to walk around the women's dressing room with anyway women went to this place to protest and antifa flags showed up this stuff has to be seen to be believed they are viciously bullying including violence against these protesters in defence of someone who wants to walk around a women's dressing room with his male genitals for all to see this is what antifa are now defending this is what that's the side they're coming to anyway so if you facebook is looking to shut everyone down and I'm basically kicked off it now but I'm not kicked off it yet they won't allow me to do a great deal of things um I don't need to be expected I'll be kicked off it entirely soon but if think what's happening is they're not getting people fast enough they're not getting the wrong thinkers fast enough so they're going to start this roll out of snitch on your friend if they're an extremist how do you know if your friend is an extremist and you can speak to someone at facebook in confidence how do you know if your friend is an extremist well facebook has helpfully given you a little guide as to how you'll know they discriminatory things obsessed over conspiracy theories those are the two that jump out at me doesn't say why can't we discuss conspiracy theories what is so wrong with that what is it why why it's surely surely it's free speech that is by definition free speech surely and then discriminatory things like what doesn't say doesn't say any any on comment I strongly suspect is what they're looking for and they're looking for you to grass up your friends because they're not kicking people off fast enough I think is the reason behind it okay Stu how about the American judge who would reduce a five year probation sentence to one year if the criminal agreed to a vaccine I haven't heard about that one but why am I not surprised not surprised by it at all as a relatively new driver do you consider that there is a war on the motorist with low speed limits a lack of parking spaces etc yes do you know because I started to drive so late these things were never a feature to me finding parking was never a feature to me now it is and yeah it's not easy and particularly in cities absolutely dread driving into cities because you know you're going to struggle with this if you do find somewhere it's going to be expensive you could say it's a couple of quid a couple of quid and yeah I do think the speed limits are too low I probably shouldn't say that but I do think the speed limits are too low I can't to trouble for that one but I do what do you think about the NHS being awarded to George Cross surely people in institutions should not get gongs were simply doing their job I completely agree I didn't know that has happened either I haven't seen anything about it on the BBC or any of the mainstream media that doesn't say it's not there but I haven't seen it no I completely agree the NHS exists for a reason and that reason is to provide healthcare and while I don't object to or have any bitterness about people thanking the NHS for what's gone on in the last I don't mind that that's what people want to do that's up to them but yeah I agree I don't think they should be getting George Cross that's that's insane actually I'm going to look that up in a couple of minutes my understanding is that the voter turnout in Batley was 47% why do you think it was so low and is it time for compulsory voting really really good question that one should do 47% was the turnout I think it's so low because people genuinely have I think a lot of people have given up they just don't trust the political system I mean look at it look at the way the press behave look at the way the two biggest parties behave when you watch the Labour Party and actually the Tories in various different parts of the country speaking only to one minority community and people get this all the time it's not just an election time that people see the Labour Party bowing down to the Muslim community while everyone else they have that all year round all the time and they just don't see I think millions vast numbers of people just don't see themselves reflected in politics and particularly the politics that the press allows a platform the press didn't give any of the small parties a platform and like I said in my Sunday column yesterday if the press behaved in a way that was worthy of a democracy we would all 16 candidates in that election would have been given our time especially by the BBC it's publicly funded they have a duty to my mind to do that but that's not what happens the mainstream press treats it as a two horse race with a little bit of push in by George Galloway in this instance so it's presented to people and so many millions of people do not see themselves their lives they don't relate to those two mainstream parties they don't relate to this theatre political theatre that goes on in the House of Commons this pandering and this lying and this deception and this two faceness and this sculled doggery and they relate to it and they sort of see themselves to me as separate from politics that's why we so badly need to bring politics back to normal people a bit of truth a bit of honest debate a bit of discussion but not censoring and silencing and not false promise after false promise I'm never with an explanation that you couldn't do to my mind if a politician says this is what I would do if elected if they find that they can't necessarily do what they wanted to do which is feasible you need to go back and tell the electorate why you didn't do it and why you can't do it and what you're going to do instead and how you're going to get to as close as possible to the promises you make the voters are adults politicians speak to them like they're children and people don't relate and they don't like it they don't like this closed elitist political system and they don't see themselves represented in it and there's a massive distance a massive gap between politics and millions and millions of people those millions of people I think strongly can be reached they can be reached we just need to speak plain English and build up a level of trust and make sure people understand that this is not, we are not politics as usual there's a couple of quite long comments here I'm going to just scroll through okay, Leslie and Sammy there's deaths from the normal job, MMR, tetanus etc over 42 years amount to 385 that is an interesting statistic, this is an interesting question as well who do you view as far right extremist I'm not going to, I don't name people I'm not going to name people in this but I think people who genuinely loathe black people, Jews gays and to have this burning desire to have this sort of super almost like a superhuman ideology almost like a I hesitate to say this almost like a Nazi like ideology and I understand that I'm not saying the Nazis were clear cut far right actually in many ways in the level of control they exerted over the economy for example and the fact that socialists was in their name I'm not going to get into that but I know but it's sort of a a super race I think is what I'm trying to get at people who believe in a super race and getting rid of everyone they don't like it's not as uncommon as you might think and it lacks a great deal of compassion and a great deal of humanity and it is real it is real but it's not us and it will never be me so Graham has just posted Islam is far right and I'm so glad he did because that's actually spot on it is this is a well Islam is a is a brilliant example and pretty much everything that I've ever said a superior group everyone else is beneath them to the point where they're sort of expected to clear the pathway and live under draconian best rules by this supreme group so yeah Islam is a perfect example of far right let me go on to these emails quickly so the first one is I realise it's probably too soon to consider where to go from here but I thought I'd take this opportunity to express my thoughts firstly it seems to me elections are about aspirations identity projecting faults onto others and ignoring Islam and immigration and it is difficult for our party to find a voice in this world yet I believe there is scope for us it will involve changing unless you want to be known as an anti-islam party environment I think we should advocate for hydrogen power cars and machinery rewild and greening of our city centres, towns and villages it has been reported there's a shortage of hgv drivers because I'm to give some detail about that a shortage of nurses maybe we should introduce a scheme for us or bring back on the job training finally I would advise again springing up Islam, let people attack you us and then ask them to tell us the truth about Islam then challenge them when they obviously fail to reply okay I want to first of all say thank you for that people put thought into these and I'm really very grateful and actually there's a great policies there my with regard to the anti-islam party these are great policies but the truth is that we already have a manifesto of great policies we are not called a far right party for example because we are one we're not called an anti-islam party because that is the extent of our policy we're called it to dismiss us and to minimize what we have to offer we're treated this way not because it's what we are but it's because what the press wants the world to think we are I would advise again springing up Islam well I genuinely do see where you're coming from and I do see the point you're making and I do sympathize with it the problem is that many people in this country do see this as an enormous issue our trust with those people will be damaged immensely if we stopped talking about it all together secondly I think we would be morally it would be a moral let down deficiency we would it would be a moral to my mind to ignore this issue or simply stop talking about it first of all like I say because the people who care about this and I believe strongly they're in much bigger numbers than we think I remember this is going back quite a few years a group I think it was called Islam Watch and they spent I may have mentioned this before but I really want to mention it again they spent a year going through newspaper articles related in some way to Islam and reading the below the line comments and they went through all the major papers and the statistics they provided at the end of it have stuck in my head all this time this is quite a few years we're going back and I think it's gotten people's concern has only grown since then the Guardian and the Daily Mail were both above 90% in terms of the comments left below the line were negative about Islam and it was above 90% in Guardian comments and in Daily Mail comments so this is across the board saying dislike of the Islamic faith and mistrust in it and the reason why I mentioned morals is because we're not talking about minor issues here we're talking about gang rape we're talking about terror attacks we're talking about the brutal often violent suppression of non-Muslims of ex-Muslims we are talking about forced, imposed, halal and grotesque, unnecessary cruelty to animals we're talking about the erosion of freedom of speech we are talking about massive, major, major issues about crime, organised crime serious organised crime heroin dealing serious crime carried out by Muslim gangs untouchable because they've screech racism and Islamophobia if anything and authorities know they're going to do this the reason why it's such a moral imperative for us to not shy away from this issue is because A it's so big I think it is existential and B because what it does what happens in its name is so deeply and profoundly immoral that for us to shy away from it to avoid it would be immoral and we can't run away from it now but I think that the primary point is that we're seen as an anti-Islam party and the rest of our policies are not discussed that is true and it's frustrating and infuriating but it's the press it's what the press are doing and they're doing it to all the small parties and I must say all the small parties are doing really, really badly and all the small parties did really badly in Spain the social democrats for example didn't toe the line and they've got some pretty high profile figures Partica Flynn for example they're on social media for example didn't do as well as us small parties as they rule are really, really struggling and this is largely down to the press however of those we're actually not doing so badly of the small parties especially when you consider what we are talking about and I do believe actually that the wrong mail did deliver a leaflet in Bartlett and Spain and I also, I was speaking to the chap fantastic young chap who stood for UK but I was speaking to him at the count and quite a quite a dull, I said I'd make a video afterwards actually and I must apologise for the fact that I didn't because I was so knackered at the end of it I took me about two and a bit I got home at about nine o'clock half nine in the morning didn't get to sleep until about mid day but quite uneventful I'm not a fan of counts anyway they're quite uneventful until George Galloway showed up at which point it's interesting it's quite an interesting thing to see George Galloway lose it a bit and get angry but he said he was going to contest it and he thought there had been all sorts of shenanigans going on but I don't I don't think this is not a level playing field this is not a level playing field and while I absolutely understand your point we do and those policies I'm going to be doing the new manifesto I think it's a bit shorter than it has been but those policies sound great to me and they're likely to be in there it isn't because we don't have other policies we do it's just that they don't get any coverage because the press wants to dismiss us but I don't think we can turn away from Islam now and I don't think that we should either it is a massive, massive threat and there are other massive threats but this is the one that the rest of them won't talk about and one of the reasons for standing in Badlianzbern was to show that was to show how the press would behave in ignoring us and they did including the press apparently on our side of the divide and to show that the other new parties, the woke parties which aren't getting any coverage either by the way and not doing very well either won't and I wanted to show what I've said all along, I wanted to illustrate demonstrate that we are unique in this regard okay the second one, I wanted to, the second question from a member is I think, I'm sorry to hear about the Badlianzbern result at first I was disappointed at such a low vote card but I have done a U-turn I think you should not have been a candidate in the election in the first place the percentage of Muslims is, in Badlianzbern is too high, there is no way for Britain could have done well it makes for Britain look bad you should write places off like Badlianzbern with high Muslim populations as regards trying to get votes I don't mean write them off totally just where to fill candidates in my opinion, for Britain should put more effort into filling candidates in conservative constituencies where there are more centre right constituents I think for Britain would perform better in those places it's a very good point it's very strong I, part of me, I'm a little bit conflicted about this we take it, if you look at Badlianzbern, the Muslim population is 19-20% so still the vast majority the white British population of Badlianzbern is 76% so it's the vast vast vast majority and as we know and I strongly suspect that the 53% who didn't bother at all to go out and vote were pretty much all minus some individuals of course but will pretty much all be included in that 76% I or rather all of that 53% of that 76 is likely to be who didn't go out and vote the reasons that we stood in Badlianzbern I have explained and I completely respect your view that we shouldn't have done it it's a legitimate view it's one that you have to weigh up it's one that we myself agonized over shouldn't we what will it do to the morale of the members what will it do to them we know that our Wikipedia page is going to be updated five minutes later so what will it do there's always always always weighing up and nothing in this game comes without some sort of a risk of it all going wrong these are decisions we have to make and I felt first of all I felt that the party needed to something to get excited about, something to unite behind we made it clear that we weren't going into this thing to win it or to as a sense of competing to we went in to make some certain points and I do think that those points were made one of the main points I wanted to show was that on this issue and the reason of course for doing it was because it was badly in spend and the issue of Islam was going to come up no matter what it was going to come up that's the reason that that seat was so appealing because we knew that Labour, Tories, all the other candidates were at some point trying to have to address these issues I wanted it made public I wanted people to see what the responses would be of all of those parties on these issues and how different that is from us I particularly want people to see on our side of politics who know that this issue is enormous I want them to know who it is which party it is and actually like I said we didn't do nearly as badly as some of the other small parties which party it is that is at the far front on this issue I wanted that made clear and I knew that badly in spend would make that clear it has given the we've had members have been buoyed by it, excited by it and what we said out to do primarily what we said out to do was done and that brings me to the excess funds that were raised and once again thank you to everyone who donated to us so anything that wasn't spent will now be spent doing the following I've told you about this but I'm going to tell you a little bit more detail and next Monday my live stream Ed is going to join me to tell you more details about what we are going to do with that money we have hired a fantastic chap Paul he is expert at promotion and marketing and branding and image and technology and what we are so he is going through every aspect of this party and going to improve every single bit of it even the room behind me myself everything about this party is being looked at and improvements suggested the website is likely to change there will be difficult things there will be difficult decisions to make the website is likely to change there may even be a change of logo whatever we have dispassionate have a look we want the entire party looked at to be improved we have a further meeting this Thursday myself, Paul and Ed to get a bit more meet on the bones of this and Ed will join me on the live stream to go through it in a bit more detail so that is what we are doing with any excess funds and we want to to me a lot of it is about improving our online presence and reaching more people reaching that 53% because that to me is the key so that is what we are doing with the excess funds that we have raised with that election that would not have happened otherwise I am pleased to better so last one from Paul how would you deal with obvious shortcomings in the media and various new services it is a policy it is party policy that the press should not be able to behave the way they have in this election all candidates should be given some airtime particularly on the BBC and if a newspaper or a broadcast mentions a political candidate they must give that candidate a right of reply they must that it does not happen is shocking and I think they need to be legally held to account for it I think only the law can actually legislating on this can actually rein them in and make them be a press worthy of a democratic society they are not, this is banana republic stuff that we have now from the press they need to be forced to do it because they are it is one of the most immoral sections or factions of society genuinely immoral ok, I have got one about media seems not to report much at all on the Russians harassing a UK frigate as well as Chinese flexing well they certainly don't report anything negative about China I mean they have their own agendas it's part it's part and parcel, the media picks out whatever stories it can use to demonise the West to demonise people who are not on the left to demonise democracy, capitalism and patriotism nationalism, whatever that's all it does and anything that doesn't fit that agenda is ignored and Russia maybe one, China is another there's a long list, an array of topics and issues that the media doesn't cover because it doesn't fit their anti-western agenda short answer but I think an astute one alright that's it everyone thank you very much for joining me I'm going on with Hartley Pool things on Wednesday tomorrow tomorrow I'm going down to Nottingham to speak to members there really looking forward to that I've got a couple of things coming up this month down in Somerset next weekend and down in West Sussex on the 24th so if you're in either of those areas give Sharon a shout on inquiries at forbritain.uk and you can see how you can come along to Nottingham, Nottinghamshire tomorrow night not been there for a long time and this is where I went to university of course in Nottingham so it might not be Nottingham itself but still looking forward to it and thanks to Alan for organizing alright see you back here next week if I don't see you between now and then there is, I have a feeling I'm forgetting to tell you something important but if it's not coming to me then it probably won't come to me okay it's not coming to me anyway thanks very much everyone look after yourselves and I'll see you back here for the next Monday take care you