 I promise to statement, I have a statement. Today's meetings have been extremely productive. There's a strong sense of unity in the alliance as reflecting the statement on conventionally imbalanced in Europe. This document is a major step forward for the alliance. The most direct threat to our security and to stability in Europe lies in the Soviet Union's massive military presence at a level far exceeding its defense needs. First, effective defenses are vital. We are determined to ensure that the alliance's defenses remain strong. We'll continue to cooperate on better and more efficient ways to maintain our defenses. Second, we also seek to strengthen stability through effective and verifiable conventional arms reduction. Large asymmetrical reductions in the Warsaw Pact tanks of artillery, which pose the greatest threat to peace are essential to meeting this goal. But arms reduction is not enough. Arms are only the symptom, not the cause, of the political division of Europe between free and unfree societies. In addition to arms reductions, we also look for greater respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms on which lasting security and stability in Europe ultimately depend. During my meetings in Brussels, I have kept close watch on the situation in the Middle East. Secretary Schultz briefed me fully on his negotiating efforts, and it's clear all countries in the region believe it is useful for the United States to remain engaged in this process. We'll spare no effort in our search for a comprehensive peace settlement. I have directed Secretary Schultz to return to the Middle East tomorrow to continue his discussions. Mr. President, if I asked you earlier, some critics are saying that it's just some of your papering over some of the real differences within NATO about burden sharing and what to do about modernizing the short-range nuclear routers. Well, I have to say, Chris, that is, that's the only question I'm going to get. That's where it's warm now, but that's the only question that actually there's no foundation for the questions. There are no great fundamental differences there. I have never seen such fundamental issues togetherness as we have. And all of the statements that were made today and every head of state had an opportunity to speak, you know, all of the supporting of what's going on and what we're doing. Well, Mr. President, did you agree about anything, all those hours? Here's the conventional arms, uh... Mr. Secretary, I need a job to handle this. Mr. President, did you agree about anything, though, sir? No. No. Mr. President, what do you think that the Secretary can accomplish by going back to the Middle East when, in fact, he returned here last night with no concrete sign of progress there? Participate in what was going on here today, and now he's going back. Mr. Secretary, will you meet with a group of Palestinians while you're in the Middle East this time? Mr. President? I hope you're in the middle.