 Happy Thanksgiving week everyone. And with Thanksgiving coming up on Thursday, the decision time is truncated this week for fantasy football. So we got to decide who we picking up, who we starting, who we getting set for week number 12 with the playoff crunch now underway. We are here to answer your questions about those waivers and get you set for week number 12 and beyond. This is the waiver wire Q and A right here on the FanDuel YouTube, Facebook and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com. I'm joined here as always by JJ Zacharyson. He is the editor-in-chief of numberfire and FanDuel JJ. First of all, happy Thanksgiving. How are you doing here on this beautiful, beautiful Tuesday? You too, Jim. Happy early Thanksgiving. I'm excited even though some of those games are a little bit iffy. At least your boy Jared Goff looks like he might be starting this week. That helps a bit. It helps a bit. Yeah, it helps a little bit. Have you looked at Tim Boyle's college numbers? Like 12 touchdowns, 36 picks, No, like one touchdown. Oh, I thought it was 12, 36. Okay. Well, it's the same ratio. It's like one in 13. So it's a very similar, actually it's on the same ratio. But like, he's thrown one passing touchdown since high school. Tim Boyle has. And he started an NFL game. I had a friend tell me that Tim Boyle is the doctor death of the NFL. Where he just keeps, he's sticking around even though no one knows how or why. He's been around the league. So, good for Tim Boyle, but I'm glad that we're gonna hopefully see Jared Goff instead of him on Thanksgiving. Yeah, get those checks, Tim Boyle. Good for you. I think he had like one good pre-season game with the Packers like a decade ago. And by a decade, I mean like three years ago, but that's what it seems like in the NFL. And I think that's why he's like hanging around. I could have a totally different dude, by the way, because you know, it's Tim Boyle. Name doesn't really stick out in my mind. But yeah, one touchdown, 13 picks in college, negative 122 rushing yards. At least he was athletic, moving around there. You know, I can finally say, JJ, that my boy Jared Goff is an upgrade at quarterback and that makes me feel very good inside. So someone's mentioning that he transferred to a different school. So I was only looking at his Yukon stats. I didn't look beyond Yukon, just to be clear. But at Yukon, okay, he had 275 pass attempts and he had one passing touchdown and 13 interceptions at Yukon. It was just insane to me. It's crazy. Did Daniel Lovsky go to Yukon? Yeah, I think so. Is Daniel Lovsky like, is his jersey retired at Yukon? Cause it probably should be at this point. Like, if it's Daniel Lovsky versus Tim Boyle, I'll take Daniel Lovsky every time. Anyway, we're not picking up Tim Boyle on waivers this week, because it sounds like Jared Goff may have a shot to go. That's a positive for me on the DFS side, cause it makes that game a little bit less stupid. So that'll be a lot of fun. But from a waiver wire perspective, we do have some stuff to talk about for today, not the most plentiful waiver wire either way. But get your questions in via Facebook, YouTube, Twitter will take them no matter where you're watching. Also hit subscribe, hit the like button over on YouTube as well. We do have a stream coming up tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. on the Fando YouTube page, breaking down the week 12 DFS main slate. We also have our Thanksgiving DFS podcast already up on the Fando YouTube page and on the Number Fire Daily Fantasy podcast feed as well. JJ has you covered on the season long side with the late round podcast which you can find wherever you get your podcasts. All right, let's start things off here. With Shake and Bake 145, my opponent does not have a tight end. So do I prioritize blocking him from getting Dan Arnold or Dallas Goddard or claiming the Bears defense? I already have Miami defense options like Philadelphia, Dallas, Houston, the charge is available. And JJ, actually my first question is should Shake and Bake just pick up Dallas Goddard to have Dallas Goddard? That's kind of what I'd be thinking here. Yeah, I would be thinking that too. Your opponent doesn't have a tight end. That means that you have a tight end that's better than Goddard. But I would try to just have Goddard on my team. I mean, he's basically like averaging like a 28% target share per game without Zach Hertz there. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I would just try to get Goddard. Yes. And then you said you have Miami's defense. I mean, they're not like a horrific, horrific, I'd rather play the Bears than Miami this week for what it's worth. But yeah, I mean, I would probably still go with Goddard just because there's a lot more variants at defense. Unless you think someone else other than, you know, your opponent is going to pick up Goddard this week. Like if we're talking like Week 12 and you asked me, Jim, would you rather flex Hunter-Rentford or Dallas Goddard? I think that's a discussion I have. Yeah, I think you could flex Dallas Goddard in some leagues. So I'd just pick up Dallas Goddard there, honestly. Sock to Milo, which defense would you get out of these three and how do you rank them? So we got the Lions here versus Chicago with Eddie Dalton starting the Jags facing off with Atlanta and Houston against the Jets. All really bad defenses, but all facing not elite offenses, which is kind of the key thing for Week number 12. So any preferences here, JJ? I think I might go Jacksonville of these three. I can understand the Lions, I guess. Houston's, Houston, I get it's the Jets, but Flacco actually didn't look that bad this past week. I'm going with the Jags. The Jags are actually eighth in the NFL in pressure rate. And Atlanta's Atlanta's been the top defense, or sorry, top offense for defenses when looking at adjusted fantasy points allowed this season. Part of that is because of what happened last week against New England, but they were still top five even before that game. So I might go with Jacksonville here. And then I'd probably put the, maybe I'd put Houston. I think Jacksonville is the team though here. I think I'd go Jacksonville. Yeah, I think I don't have a preference. I'm going to go with JJ. We'll go with the Jags there as well. Let's talk to Joseph. Elijah Moore is obviously the top ad, but how big of a gap between him and Corey Davis is there when Zach Wilson comes back, which I would probably expect to be this week based on the way that Robert Sullivan was talking about it earlier on this week. I would, I bet Wilson plays because it kind of seems like they wanted to wait until they were facing, you know, not a blitz heavy team, not Buffalo for him to come back and other facing Houston. I bet it's this week. So if we assume that it's Zach Wilson, JJ, how are you viewing Elijah Moore and Corey Davis relative to each other? Yeah, I mean, I understand the tendencies in terms of, you know, what we saw earlier this season with Elijah Moore versus Corey Davis. The thing is Elijah Moore is also seeing better peripherals outside of just like Target share, you know, in the Jets office. He had his highest snap share this past week. He's running a lot more routes than he did at the beginning of the season. That's usually what we see from rookie wide receivers. I would still prefer Elijah Moore over Corey Davis rest of season because I want that upside. I want that potential. I'm an Elijah Moore truther. He was a 96 percentile wide receiver in my model. So I think he's very, very talented. I think he's very good. And the Jets actually have one of the best wide receiver schedules from here through the end of the season as well. So you do want to have pieces of this offense just in terms of just, you know, the wide receivers not the quarterback, obviously. I would prefer Elijah Moore still because I just think there's better upside than Corey Davis. I wouldn't worry too much about the splits with them earlier on this year because Elijah Moore was still running or learning to run outside, like not like physically run outside but like operate as a non-sprout. Were those friends outside? Yeah, just, you know, sprinting around the backyard, chasing his tail kind of weird. He was still learning how to play that position. And now he has learned it because they're playing in there and he's playing very well. So I wouldn't worry when Wilson comes back like Corey Davis is gonna get targets and he should cause he's good. But I wouldn't worry about Elijah Moore evaporating at that point. Dr. Joseph, if you're again, favorite waiver wire defense for next week between the Rams who are facing the Jaguars or the Cardinals who are facing the Bears don't know this as a Justin Fields for that game but based on right now, what would you prefer between those two? Definitely the Rams. Jackson Mills has been one of the easiest teams to stream against this year. The Rams just as good of a defense as Arizona if not better. So I'm gonna go with LA. So let's stick here with the Jags discussion and talk about a two quarterback league with Deesh. Would you drop Trevor Lawrence for Taylor Heineke, Taysom Hill, Tyrod Taylor. He has Jalen Hertz, Danny Dimes and Trevor Lawrence. Danny Dimes, new offensive coordinator, Freddie Kitchens now, Cullen plays, so Jason Garrett being canned. I feel like it's not, is that really an upgrade to get to those guys over Lawrence? I don't know, what's your vibe on this one? Yeah, I mean, it's tough. Trevor Lawrence has been pretty horrific. He has three touchdown passes over his last seven games. So it's really hard to buy into T-Law right now. Obviously if Taysom is locked in as a starter, I think if you're looking for upside, Taysom's the play. I mean, Taysom, if he's starting, he's fringe QB one, if not a QB one, just because of his rushing ability. So if you have the ability to, or if you need to look for upside, I would probably go with Taysom Hill. If you're just looking for a body that you can maybe stream and utilize, then maybe I go with Trevor Lawrence but I mean, honestly, I might say that Taylor Heinecke is a better play than Trevor Lawrence from here on out. Though there are some rougher matchups for Washington there. But I think that it's fine if you wanna do that. If you need upside, I would go with Taysom Hill. And if I were a betting person and I could bet on said things, I would bet Taysom Hill starts after Thanksgiving because Trevor's struggled. Hill's been banged up but he'll have a full 10 days to rest up and I'd bet that he starts week 13. Yeah, can you also roster more than three quarterbacks? Cause I would try to do that too. Like I would really try to play matchup with those two being your QB two and three. I would be trying to play matchup with three quarterbacks as opposed to two. I think that makes a lot of sense. Let's talk to Wiley here. Is Quadrant Olson really worth a pickup in deep leagues? Appeared to me, he blew a bunch of pass pro assignments. Wiley is a big film grinder. I would think that leads to less snaps. I think that Cordero Patterson being healthy is more likely to lead to fewer snaps than pass pro. Would you add Quadrant Olson in a deeper league, JJ? Look, man, I'm a pit grad. I love pit, hailed a pit. I watched a lot of Quadrant Olson and I am shocked that he got run in the NFL. I don't think that he's worth a pickup. No, you know, Cordero Patterson will be healthy eventually. I don't know if he's going to play it this week or not. I don't know the status of him right now but regardless, Cordero Patterson is going to be back eventually. So think of it this way. If Patterson's back next week, let's say let's just say he doesn't play this week. Are you going to throw Olson in your lineup? Probably not. So what's the usability there? So no, I would not be adding. Agreed. DJ is asking JJ for survivor advice for good reason. DJ, you've learned your lesson. Does that mean I got it right? Does that mean I got it right last week, DJ? I mean, I don't... Well, it was Cleveland against Detroit, I think. A wins a win, man. Process, results for a process. Eagles facing the Giants. Tight spread, tight spread is what I would say. Are you okay with that one? Not, I mean, I haven't looked at the matchups and enough detail this. What's the spread in that game right now? It's like three and a half, I think. Yeah, three and a half. Is it in New York? There are no big spreads this week, though. There are no big spreads. Is it in New York, that game? Yeah. So a road game is like a bus trip, but you know. Yeah. Actually, there are no good survivor options this week. I'll just tell you that. So maybe it is actually Eagles. Yeah. I mean, the Giants looked horrible last week and Philly looked good last week but that's also seems like a recipe this year in the NFL for disaster that narrative's gonna flip. I don't know, I'd have to look at this slate a little bit more. I don't think it's like a horrific pick this late in the season, but. No. Yeah. The largest spreads are Dallas without their top receivers, Buffalo on the road and New England versus a somewhat feisty Tennessee team. So good luck, DJ. Godspeed. Yeah, that's rough. Joseph. You had Kyle Pitts as a buy this week. Joseph has got it and get sicky. Would you still try to upgrade if you got to, you know decent guys available already? I don't know if that's an upgrade, honestly. I don't know if Kyle Pitts is really a huge upgrade from like Dallas. I would probably prefer Goddard at this point over Pitts just given the work that he's seeing the offense is actually competent, all of that. The reason I had Pitts as a buy is because of touchdown regression. He only has one touchdown this year. That number based on a lot of formulas should be closer to four or five. So, you know, if there's someone in your league who is just low on Pitts and low on that offense which they should be, at least there's some regression that's gonna hit and that's why he was a buy. But I think that you're fine at tight end. I wouldn't be going after Kyle Pitts. I think it's more if you're starting like a lower and yeah, I was gonna say that exact name. It's very nice. Okay, Luke with Erts on a buy, options to pick up for tight end are Dan Arnold, Tyler Higby, Dawson Knox. He has Josh Allen as his quarterback. Those aren't bad options, honestly. Who would you pick between those three? It's probably between Higby and Knox for me. I might go with, I'm gonna go with Higby because the matchup is actually pretty decent on paper. The way that they've given up Target Share, adjusted Target Share to tight ends and points to tight ends. And Higby's seeing decent red zone work this year. He just really hasn't been able to convert. And then obviously, yeah, obviously, you know, no Robert Woods in that offense anymore. You know, we only have that one game sample of like OBGA and whatnot. I think Higby's actually a decent play from here on out. I think he's fine there. Yeah, I think both Knox and Higby are totally fine. I would have no objections to either guy there. Milo, I have, I feel he has value but is Galladay dropable? If he's my wide receiver six, 10 team PPR. I'm not sure when you'd have a lot of confidence in starting Kendi Galladay, which something that you would discuss earlier on is like having an equation in your head. It could change, but like Sterling Shepard, probably going to come back. Kaderi Estone is getting a lot of targets to like a 10 team league. Definitely he'd be on the fringe, right? Yeah, I think he's on the fringe. I mean, it just depends on who you'd be adding for him. But if like Elijah Moore is on the waiver wire in a 10 team league, I would rather have Elijah Moore than Kenny Galladay. If even like a Hunter Renfrow, I'd rather have than a Kenny Galladay. Cause I think Renfrow has just as much upside at this point as Kenny Galladay does. And that's what you're really looking for at a wide receiver six is who has a ton of upside. And while I think Kenny Galladay is a very good wide receiver, I just don't know if in this current environment, the upside is really there for him this year. Maybe next year, maybe it clicks and works out and they get things fixed, but this year, not so much. Or they get Russ. Joseph, what is your favorite defensive streamer for this week with the Bears being gone? So no Bears. We do the Eagles facing, you know, Danny Dimes. We've got Dallas facing off with the Raiders. We have the Dolphins facing Cam and the Browns facing likely Lamar. Who do you like most in that group? I would go with Philly of that group against the Giants. They just look completely inept last night. And the other thing too with the Eagles. So I talked about some of my 10 trend show that's dropping tomorrow as a spoiler alert, but Philadelphia has been very, very good against wide receivers this year. Like very good against, I mean, they get Darius Slay on the perimeter. I mean, they're going to be fairly good against position, but wide receivers have ranked 32nd in adjusted target share against Philadelphia this year. So they're the best team at preventing targets to the wider receiver position. They're one of the worst teams. They're third worst in preventing targets to the tight end position. And so basically you're looking at a scenario where the Giants might have to rely on Evan Ingram a lot and they have no idea how to utilize Evan Ingram in their tight end. So there could be some good defensive performance. There could be a good defensive performance for Philly this week. Yeah, the Eagles basically just like they try to do like that thing where like we're not going to get beat deep. Like the average depth of target against them is crazy, crazy outlier, actually low. Yeah. And like that's what Funnel's target tight ends. And that's also why one of the few wide receivers that have done something against them this year was Kenan Allen. Cause he's that, Tyreek Hill is another one who I think was Tyreek, didn't they play? Yeah. He had like 180, there's some of that yards. Yeah. He had, I think he had some big plays in that game, but like the three that have had top 20 performances against Philly this year are Antonio Brown, Kenan Allen and Tyreek Hill. And all of them are like shiftier. And that's why maybe Kaderious Tony has a decent game against them because of the way that they utilize him. So I like him in particular in this matchup, but at the same time, you know, do we trust them to be able to get Tony the ball in space because they clearly haven't been able to do that since that Dallas game. Please, let's get, just get Tony the ball. Let's do it here. Let's talk to Austin. Would you start Debo the rest of the year without you playing? Obviously this depends on its team. So general vibes check for you on Debo, Samuel kind of running back. Running back. Kind of wide receiver, kind of just playmaker. Where are we at on Debo right now? I mean, look, it's hard to like not be cool at Debo because he's amazing and he just can do anything apparently. Look, I think that what we're gonna see when Elijah Mitchell is healthier and when the 49ers don't have insanely positive game script, which this weekend, I don't think we're gonna see an insane positive game script against Minnesota. You know, cause even though Minnesota hasn't been good, they've been good. And so, yeah. So I think that in this scenario, I don't think we're gonna see Debo be used as a running back as much, especially when they don't have those positive game scripts. And that's gonna then in turn hurt IUK a little bit. I mean, I'm still putting Debo as the better wide receiver than Brandon IUK if that helps. I mean, I know that IUK has been really great and that's great to see. But with those three weapons and the lack of passing volume in that offense, you're not gonna see the three of them go off each and every week. It's gonna be one or two tops that are gonna be able to actually produce and give you a reliable fantasy performance. And I would much rather bet on George Kittle and Debo Samuel than Brandon IUK. And the thing with Debo is he's gonna get points one way or another because if Eli Mitchell is out and he's in the backfield, he's gonna get points via rushing. If Eli Mitchell is back and he can be a receiver, he's just the preferred target. We've seen that all year. Even when IUK's had full snap rates, it's still been Debo over him. So he's gonna get your points. I don't really think you care how you get him. So I think that's a good thing for Debo going forward. Like downgraded from where he was when Kittle was out, yes, but still a very good fantasy asset. Joseph wants to know Matthew Stafford or Justin Herbert the rest of the way, both are good. Who do you prefer? I'd go Herbert. I mean, I know that the main reason I say that, I know that he's had some down weeks, but his spiked weeks are just amazing. And he's just, I mean, he unleashed his rushing ability a little bit this past week. I mean, I just think there's more upside with Herbert without Robert Woods in that Rams offense right now. And Stafford can have down weeks too, as we've seen plenty of times this year. Grim fan, do you think the Giants offense can be better now with no Jason Garrett, Freddie Kitchens, the interim play caller for the Giants? I don't know, man. What you got here? I mean, I don't think it can get that much worse than like how they were performing. I mean, there was a, speaking of Dan Orlowski, there was a tweet that he had sent earlier today where it was a play breakdown where they had three wide receivers. Maybe it was even sake one on the backfield, but they all converged in the middle of the field and literally all three of them were like bumping into one another. In the middle of this, there was a three man rush from Tampa Bay. Danny Dimes is getting, getting pressured from three, from a three man rush. And then all the while, the three of them out going, running, running, there's no one doubt underneath for Danny Dimes to throw to, and the three of them were literally colliding with one another. Like it was just like the perfect example of what this Jason Garrett offense has been for the Giants. Mike Clay sent a tweet out earlier today that since the start of 2020, the Giants had the fewest offensive touchdowns in the entire NFL. I mean, it can't be much worse than what we've seen. So yes, I think they're gonna be better now because it can't get them much worse. Are they gonna be good now? Probably not. Yeah. I think that's probably a fair way to view it. So we'll see, but it can't get worse. That's positive. Let's talk to Rocky here. He's got the 49ers defense. I could pick up the Bears defense against the Lions. Do you view that as an upgrade? Probably. Yeah, yeah. Kurt Cousins or Jared Goff? Yeah, I'd rather face Jared Goff. Yeah, I don't wanna really play defenses against Justin Jefferson and Adam Thielen very much. No, thanks. JJ, you had Elijah Mitchell as a sell and then a hold and now he's injured as you're opinion about him the same the rest of the way, great schedule. So he's gotten hurt. I think the positive honestly for Eli Mitchell, JJ, is that like, Jeff Wilson was just okay. Yeah, he's not good at this. Jimmy missed him in the end zone, but like he didn't do a whole lot to earn extra playing time. I talked about this on my podcast. Like the Jeff Wilson stuff when the fantasy world has been so strange to me. Like everyone complicates the San Francisco 49ers backfield way more than it needs. I mean, literally ever since the start of the season, the only reason why we're complicating is because everyone thought it was gonna be Trey Sermon, right? But since the start of the season, everything that they've done has been predictable and it's shown us that they like Elijah Mitchell, that they think Elijah Mitchell is their early down bell cow. And then they would throw Jim Michael Hasty in there as a pass catching back and maybe they throw Jeff Wilson in there a little bit more, but like Elijah Mitchell is still probably going to see 75-ish percent, 70 to 80% of the team's running back rushes from here on out. The real question mark with Eli Mitchell the entire season has been what kind of receiving role is he gonna have, right? He finally had that one game right before he got hurt, where he was running routes, where he had a decent target share and we're sitting there and we're like, oh, maybe now he's gonna be our true bell cow. Like instead of just like this early down guy, he's gonna be a real bell cow in this offense. And that's why I went from him being a sell because people were saying, oh, he's an RB one without this receiving work to then a hold because he started seeing that receiving work. So I think he's probably still more of a hold because of this injury and because they did litter Jeff Wilson in there a little bit more the last time we saw both of them healthy, but let's not overcomplicate this stuff. Like guys, Jeff Wilson is not as good as Elijah Mitchell. Elijah Mitchell is a very good running back. And we also don't know when that finger injury occurred in that game. And it's possible Wilson played more in that game because Mitchell's finger was banged up. So I think that's worth keeping in mind too because I was concerned too seeing Wilson play in that game, but then the injury comes on. I was like, okay, that makes more sense now. It's kitty time. Possible Mitchell replacement this week. Is that David or D. Ernest Johnson? I never know which one this is. I mean, regardless. Boston Scott, Tevin Coleman, Don Trell Hilliard. Jeremy McNichols could play this week. I know they signed Don Trell Hilliard to the act of roster, but I think McNichols, I would keep in mind that that is a possible situation there. Michael Carter out, which could influence Tevin Coleman here at Boston Scott with no Jordan Howard, but with Miles Sanders, a lot of moving pieces here, what you got. I think that of these players as a player, I like Boston Scott the most, like as just a player who can generate fantasy points in this situation is probably the best of anyone here. I think that if we're projecting volume, I probably feel best about Tevin Coleman this week, just from like a volume standpoint. So if you need more of a floor, I'd say Coleman's your guy. I think Scott though provides a little bit more of a ceiling because his environment within his team, I mean, they're just running the ball so much and they're able to, I mean, the running backs are seeing just absurd. I mean, like, Miles Sanders did not have a good running back rush hour this past week. He still saw like 16 rush attempts. If it's between the two of them, Boston Scott should still see a lot of volume this week. You can run on the Giants too. So I think that's going to be leading to effective rushing as well for them. Okay, Grimfan wants to know where we're at on AJ Dillon after last week. Obviously a down game, but like, I feel like you can't really say no, right? Yeah, I mean, like AJ Dillon obviously didn't have a great outing and in terms of fantasy points scored, but his running back rush hour and his target share combination had not been hit by any Green Bay running back all season long. So his peripherals were still fine. It's just that he didn't produce. Yeah, six targets is pretty sick from a guy like that. Also Grimfan, pick up Darnell Mooney or Elijah Moore to start this week. I'd like both personally. It's just for this week. Darnell Mooney against the Lions, Elijah Moore against the Texans. Preference? Pardon me, I kind of want to say Mooney, but I think that I would just pick up Elijah Moore because I would want him on my team for the rest of the season. I like it. You can take the slight, you know, decrease this week, maybe the longer season long stuff. And it's like a 55 to 45 type that, you know, this isn't like a obvious Darnell Mooney. I'm just sitting there. I'm like, Darnell Mooney sell for almost 49% of the team's targets last week. Like if it's anything close to that this week and a good matchup, like, you know, he's going to have a good game. So I think he's a little bit safer of an option, but Elijah Moore can go off and he's been awesome. So I would rather have Elijah more rest of season than Darnell Mooney. So let's use that as a tiebreaker. It was a 49% target share when they actually threw like 30 times. He had 16 targets. Yeah, it was absurd. It wasn't a 20 target game, but just awesome. Pickle Rick is asking permission to drop Jared Cook. That's my takeaway from this question because it's Jared Cook versus Jerry Judy, Marvin Jones, Kaderis, Tony, Darnell Mooney. It's cooked by a mile here, right? Yeah, I mean, I guess you can make a case for Marvin Jones, but the other three, I definitely wouldn't be dropping. But yeah, Jared Cook would be the one to drop. Sean is speaking my language. Do we like an Emmanuel Sanders revenge game this week against the New Orleans Saints? Give me all the revenge games, baby. That isn't every game for Emmanuel Sanders or revenge game at this point. He's played what, for four or five teams at this point? Hitzburg, San Francisco, Denver, New Orleans, Buffalo. Yeah, a hot sack. They traded like a second round pick for him. Yeah, I forgot about that. Yeah, he went to the Super Bowl. So Emmanuel Sanders, I don't mind him because it's, like to me, Emmanuel Sanders feels like he's a season-long playshores, like a wide receiver three. But I think he's like a good leverage play, too, from a DFS standpoint. I mean, it's a smaller slate, so it's not gonna be as much leverage. But his peripherals have been fine. It's just that they're not targeting him at as high of a rate. But over the last three weeks where he hasn't really performed, maybe the last four weeks, he's run more routes than Stefan Diggs. I mean, he's run the most routes on the team. So he's getting a lot of cardio. They're just not targeting him. And like with March on Laddermore being there, you don't worry about Diggs because Diggs would be fine, but it may shuffle a couple targets elsewhere on that team, that could be good for Manny. As you said, Revenge Game, that's the biggest factor here is Revenge Game, but just other stuff does help him as well. How is asking, is it worth it to roll at Logan Thomas on Monday against Seattle or go with Cole Comet on Thursday versus Detroit? So basically, do you take the guy you know will play on Thursday or risk it and go with Thomas on Monday? I don't think I like Comet enough. I don't like the scoring environment for them. I mean, it's not like I love it for Washington either, but Logan Thomas is a better, like he has, you know, if he were healthy, it's a higher projected target share. I might risk it, but then if we learn more, just get a random dude off the waiver wire who realistically can score just as many points as Cole Comet, anyway. Yeah, I think that that's probably what I would be doing with that one as well. Okay, just making sure I didn't gloss over anyone's here. Okay, a big trade from LeBron's brain. What to do with, or a trade here with Christian McCaffrey, CD Land, TG Hawkinson, for Najee Harris and Devonte Adams, they have Kelsey. So it looks like they have Kelsey are thinking about trading away Hawkinson here. Big trade, a lot of names here, what do you think? This is absurd, this is insane. I probably would lean the CMC side just because he is the best asset in fantasy football. So that's the main reason, is it a fair trade? It's not terrible by any means. I would, instead of doing this like massive trade, and if you have TG Hawkinson with Travis Kelsey, like try to get rid of Hawkinson sure, but just do something a little smaller, like package, you can package CD Land and Hawkinson, see if they would do that for Adams, or package CD Land and Hawkinson for like a, I don't know, I mean, Land's like a top five wide receiver anyway. But, you know, like a Justin Jefferson or something maybe. I don't know, would you like, I'd probably prefer Jefferson over Lamb the rest of season. So that's sort of the way that I would think of it. Yeah, I just want McAfrey, like get CMC out of this trade. They're trying to con you, man, push back. Okay, one final one here from how, preference on Odell after the buy, we'll just make this more broad, to make it more applicable here. Are you willing, what's like the cutoff for you to start Odell Beckham this week? Cause TG Hawkinson is not a real player based on the production on the targets he's gotten, like, sure, he's getting targets, but is he real? So weird. Where is the cutoff for you for starting Odell, giving the unknowns around his situation right now? I think he's like a wide receiver three. You know, I don't know if I would put him in wide receiver two conversation, but T Higgins is sort of in that too. I think Higgins is safer just because we've seen a pretty consistent target share from him. And like we know sort of what to expect at this point and touchdowns really haven't come. But, you know, I would probably still go with Higgins, but OBJ I think is sort of like in that wide receiver three discussion, which is where you might find T Higgins as well. I would treat Odell the same way you've treated like Van Jefferson basically. Like, would you start Van Jefferson over them? Because like there's the integration process, but they're not going to play Ben Scurronic over Odell out of the buy. Like Odell's going to be out there. So I would just say, would you start Van Jefferson here and use that as being the test for Odell? That's the way I would play things at least on my end. That is all that we have here for today on the waiver wire Q and A. As always, we are here each and every Tuesday taking your questions on the Fandall YouTube, Twitch, usually on Twitch, Facebook and Twitter pages. So make sure you hit subscribe and make sure you swing back here every weekday four PM for all of our live streams. Check out JJ's podcast, the late round podcast wherever you get your podcasts. I find JJ on Twitter at late round QB and check out the 15 transactions call and written form over on numberfire.com. JJ, happy Thanksgiving and I'll talk to you again next week. Thanks Jim, happy Thanksgiving to you too. I'm on Twitter at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to Calvin Theobald, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Cal as always. And thank you to everyone for tuning in. Happy Thanksgiving to all of you as well. Good luck on the Thanksgiving games. Good luck on Sunday. Good luck with your waivers. We'll talk to you once again next week. This has been the waiver wire Q and A.