 So myself, Sanjeev, know for me, the I start semester and I will be the moderator for today's debate competition. So I welcome each and every one of you to today's Indra Departmental Debate Competition. On the topic will be is artificial intelligence at threat to human civilization. So artificial intelligence refers to the stimulation of human intelligence in mission that are programmed to seem like humans and mimic their actions. The term may also be applied to animation that exhibits traits associated with a human mind such as learning and problem solving. Artificial intelligence has massive potential advantages but as every bright side has a darker version in it, artificial intelligence also has some disadvantages. So to debate on this topic, we have six participants, three participants from the motion and three against the motion. So let me introduce you to the participants. The participants for the motion are Miss Abhinyu from third semester, Miss Lika Ge Awami from first semester and Mr. Hitolol Loring Rengma from third semester. And the participants against the motion are Miss Sikrino from fifth semester, Miss Vimini Chishi from first semester and Leslie Mr. Harisabh from fifth semester. Now let me introduce you all to the judges for today's debate competition. First we have Dr. Deepa Pradha, Mr. Pradha, Department in Church and Assistant Professor, Department of Economics. Second we have Dr. Amirata Pappar. She did his PhD and MBA from Ignor University, LLB from GLBC Pune, LLM from University of Pune and he is currently serving as an Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, that's all in college. And he is also a former advocate from in the Bombay High Court, US or AS. And lastly we have with us Dr. Sabu Ali, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science. For today's the timekeeper will be Mr. Danger from fifth semester. So without moving on to the debate competition, let me briefly highlight the floor and the rules of the debate for all of us. So there will be two rounds and the debate will be opened with a team supporting the motion followed by a member of the opposing team. And the duration given to each speaker will be four minutes in the first round and two minutes in the second round. And a verbal reminder to complete will be given by the timekeeper. The other rules are negative points for violating the established norms of the debate. Debaters must not read your arguments existing that them will need in presenting will result in negative marketing. Them was that due to connectivity issue or network problems shall be subjected to prospective judge discretion. And also the debaters are encouraged not to use slides, instead be present on the screen in person virtually. And the debaters will be judged on the following criteria. One, organization and clarity of ideas. Two, use of arguments and relevance. Three, use of examples and facts for use of refusal in terms of defense. And lastly, presentation style and clarity of speech. So without further ado, let's move on to the first round. So for this, I call upon the first participant, Ms. Abinu from the team supporting the motion to kindly take your time followed by Ms. Sekrino from the opposing team, after which the other participants may also take your time accordingly. All the best to all the participants. Excuse me. Amountable. Ten. Yes, yes, you are eligible. All right, okay then. Okay, good afternoon everyone. On behalf of Team Motion, myself Abinu as a team leader along with Lika and Yutolo would be speaking on artificial intelligence as a threat against human civilization. So artificial intelligence, the word itself, as we all know, it was coined by John McCarty and then it's meaning is simply a smart machine that are designed in order to do simple tasks that we want. So it more or less like has its origin from the time of Aristotle. However, we can notice that it gained more spotlight during the industrial revolution period. That's just a brief introduction and going on to my point. The first point that I would like to say regarding its strategy, loss of tradition. You see, whenever something new is introduced whenever new inventions or new creations are introduced in the society, it is obvious that some old trends or some old practices that people do will be replaced. It will either be replaced, it will either be totally changed or it would just be altered a little. However, we know that the tradition touch itself would lose its originality. Hence, as a result, our next generations and so on, they wouldn't be aware of what we practice in order to keep our tradition alive. In terms of economic, I can give the example of firm industry. Let's say that an owner instead of employing people, he starts employing artificial intelligence. Like he starts applying those. So it's obvious that he will earn a lot. It's obvious that he will be able to, you know, like save more of his time. However, what do you think about those people who will be left behind or those people who will be unemployed? That term is usually what we know as technological unemployment. Second is personal motive. Even world-renowned people like Stephen Hawking, see himself said that the efforts to create like thinking machines itself can cause a threat to our own existence. So that really supports what I'm trying to say because if I take it in the politics term, say India as a democratic country, what if someday some leaders, they get to get a chance and they win the election and they start applying the methods which the public do not agree with. So that would obviously lead to a corrupted country, I guess. So in that sense, we can just get a gisofate, the motive of the person who is taking control of it or say Silicon Valley, which we are very aware of, rather a hotspot, a technological hotspot. What if somebody, someday tries to take advantage of it and use it for his own benefit? The result would be something which we can't predict. And the other point is no room for errors. Why I mean no room for errors is because the designs that people make like the artificial intelligence, they are created in different forms. So they are created in a pattern with algorithms. And then it is built in such a way that inputs are converted into outputs. And the result are obviously predictable. However, as human beings, we have that human morality in us, that human being connection in us. So we tend to make mistakes and we tend to learn from our mistakes and we tend to grow, we tend to get better from that. So in one way or the other, mistake itself, it leads to unknown discoveries. Hence that supports my point. And last but not the least is dependency. Growing up in, you know, growing up in a surrounding with people, we ourselves can consider, we can consider ourselves as victims of our own cell phones of artificial robots like Google, Siri, or even mobile games. Time's up. Miss. Okay, then. Thank you so much. Good morning. Good afternoon. My name is Yekrin Yeo. I'm from fifth semester. I'm here to justify that artificial intelligence is not a true human civilization. Artificial intelligence is a branch of computer science that emphasizes the development of intelligence with machines to think and work like humans. The aim of AI is to make the functions of machines that can connect with the human mind, such as learning and problem solving like we do in Google, which provides us with functions to make our work easier. Like for example, speech recognition, learning, learning, et cetera. Let me emphasize further. Google is a search engine, which is also, which is an artificial intelligence. Help us in searching solutions to our problems within second date to book a flight or train. Google give us tons of thousands to select which suit our bed and book our tickets or to search ideas for our studies. It gives us tons of ideas within seconds. That AI has been serving as knowledge provider to many people and students. Another great feature of AI is language translation. This can also be accessed through search engines like Yahoo, Google, or Language Translation app, which is really helpful for a lot of people across the globe. It is also a great tool for tourists who like to travel. We can also learn different languages from around the world with the help of AI. If we want to learn, it will be convenient for us to go to work. We don't have the opportunity to learn such languages in universities. Like say, for example, Japanese, Korean, Russian, et cetera. Name any language. We can learn it with the help of AI. I myself have been learning Japanese language from the help of Google. Since I have a lot of interest in working in the Japanese culture a lot, well, I may not be able to speak fluently, but I have learned some basic words and sentences with the help of Google. Another point that I would like to emphasize on is banking. I would say AI is playing a very important role in banking because all our activities and transactions is being processed through AI in the form of computers and supercomputers used by the bank. It also provides security for our banking because AI stores the details of the users and helps it doesn't allow other people than the user to access a certain account with the advancement of AI. It has also made banking easier by providing online banking, so we don't have to go to bank and wait in long queue. But we can do our work from the comfort of our phones. This is largely benefiting us in the pandemic situation. First warning. AI is also helping the bank to extend their customer service further with the help of it. They can personally reach out to the customers and help them by providing customer service and loan offers and updating them about their current plan, et cetera. Thus, AI has met the hectic thinking which was a lot easier than it was. It helped us learn foreign languages from around the world and it has also met our life easier. Therefore, I strongly believe that AI is not a threat to human civilization, but these are only some few positive points. More will be explained by my fellow team. Am I debil? Yes, yes, you are. Okay, good afternoon, everyone. My name is Lika, representing the motion. And today as I take this debate, I take this as a privilege to enlighten my fellow opinion and to make myself once again clear that AI is indeed a threat to human team. I would like to draw on my very obvious point to justify my statement as to what I think AI is a threat to human team. Firstly, with full confidence, you might tell that AI is indeed a threat to human... Firstly, with full confidence, you might tell me that AI makes our work easier. For example, this is especially in the household of Western countries, we see that a person doing work with a voice command, which means they can simply do anything with a voice command, like open a door or window example, or anything it can be. They can... It makes our work easier, yes, but mind you, so we depend too much on AI that we forgot, we became lazy, and laziness makes our life spent. So let's also the researchers say that laziness can lead our life or make our life spent. So let's utilize our potential and keep ourselves busy because making busy help us live longer. Instead of depending too much on AI, we wish we'll eventually kill the whole of humanity. Secondly, weapons automation. These weapons could enable assassination or alternatively they could become weapons of... Weapons of deprivation, allowing dictator and rulers to subdue their people. For example, guns, which can fire human, or many more missiles, defense systems, such as iron drone, has an autonomous targeting capability. This consists of robotic weapons, also killer robots and slaughter robots. Thirdly, in this 21st century where machines are doing everything, we cannot deny the fact that machines are replacing human beings. In Japan, the robots are even teaching English to students and without the rate of unemployment is increasing. At the very fast pace, according to the Yale news published on May 23, 2002, it says that raising unemployment causes higher debt rate, which caused to prove the fact that AI are not only replacing humans, but it's also responsible for the high rate of mortality. Machines perform much more efficiency as compared to human beings. It is said that a machine will displace between 400 to 800 million jobs by 2030 as a result in this fewer human intervention, which make us immense disorder in the employment scenario. Task AI is indeed without a doubt, without not doubt a treat to humanity, having said that I would like to say my case. Thank you. I'm Maudible. Okay, good evening everyone, respected judges, teachers and student presenters. I'm Vinivika Hsieh and I'm from Belfast Semester. I'll be speaking against the motion. So I strongly say no, artificial intelligence is not a threat to human civilization. Okay, first let me tell you what is artificial intelligence actually. Artificial intelligence is a simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think like humans and mimic their actions. It can also be applied to any machine that exhibits the trait associated with human minds such as learning and problem solving. Okay, first example, well. Well was among the first invention to condemn the human labor and it was invented by ancient Greek. Since then, human curiosity and meticulous effort helped them for new invention and discovered in every field and discovered in everything. In modern age of technology, the innovation of AI has been involved almost each day to make our life more easier and simpler. The introduction of artificial intelligence, say like robotic, which perform every functions starting hanging from best toleration to entertainment and can also assist to home, door, automobiles and other tasks. And also now social medias. For example, say like letter, which usually takes week or even a month to reach a particular person. But now with the help of modern gizmo, say like television, automobiles, smartphone, in a form of software like WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, which are usually using. Just take even a fraction of minutes or seconds to reach a particular person. Artificial intelligence is also getting better at dream text translation to voice translation as well as voice translation to text translation. It helps people with disability, especially in numerous way. Examples like disability, handicapped, deaf, etc. Artificial intelligence is also playing an important role in education today. A good example is online classes, which are going through. As we all know, our school and colleges are closed, but we can still continue our classes or studies with the help of artificial intelligence. Not only classes, but referring to this debate and all, we can still have that with the help of artificial intelligence, which is only for our benefit. Thus, artificial intelligence can dramatically improve the efficiency of workplaces and can also augment the work we human can do. I know and I guarantee that nobody else wants to go back to the days of Stone Age where there were machines and certainly no automobiles, no smartphones. Some advantages of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence drives the time taking to perform attacks with also increased efficiency. Artificial intelligence enables the education of complex tasks without significance cause outlays. So, we can't or I can't blindly say that artificial intelligence is a threat to human civilization. Indeed, it plays an important role in our life. Thank you. Since Mr. Hidler-Loreen could not join, we will move on to the next participant. That is Mr. Harissa from the opposing team. Can we take your time? Hello, good afternoon to your respected judges. Moderator, my dear opponents, fellow and my fellow friends present here this afternoon. My name is Harissa from Fifth Semester and I'm here to speak against the motion on the topic is artificial intelligence a threat to human civilization? I say no, artificial intelligence is not a threat to human civilization. Let me point out some points why I believe so. Now, let's start from our home, smart home devices. Once I was watching YouTube and I saw this advertisement about an AC where the user was using voice recognition to open the AC and set the temperature that you wanted to set it in. Now, this has made his life very easy and it can make our lives very easier. And then with the advancement of AI, I believe that even without using voice recognition, just by turning on the AC, the AC will be able to analyze the environment and then give the suitable temperature that will help us be comfortable in our life, in our homes. The next is while researching for this debate, I came across this fridge, which could suggest the products, suggest vegetables that needs to be kept in the fridge and then suggest also warn the user about the things that are getting over that needs to be restocked and also suggest the user what he needs to eat to lead a healthy life. Now, these are only possible only because of AI and it is making our lives easier and better. Now, my next point is digital assistance. We all have heard about Google Assistant's Siri M. So what these are making is not making our lives worse or is not stopping us from having interaction with other humans, but this is helping us use our smartphones and big smartphone iPhones and be convenient with what we are using now because let me remind you that smartphone itself is an artificial intelligence and this artificial intelligence, because of this advancement, this artificial intelligence, we are using a feature of artificial intelligence to use another feature of artificial intelligence, which is amazing if you ask me. And then it is making our lives easier. And then my next point is GPS. We all know what GPS is. It gives us direction of the places that we want to go to. Now, if you are visiting a new place that you have never been able to, you might get lost, but if you have GPS, then you will be able to roam each and every corner of that place like it was your own, like you were roaming in your own colony backyard. So that is what it helps us with. And then in my next point, I would like to emphasize on AI as an alternative for humans in dangerous places and during emergencies. Now, according to the data from Labor and Employment Ministry, 1,562 workers died in factory accidents in India between 2014 and 2016. And more than 51,000 were injured, which means that an average of three person died each day. And for this person, you are injured every day. And 377 deaths in the mining industry were reported in 2015 to 2017. Now, we could avoid these deaths. We could avoid these deaths if we were using AI in the industry. Now, I'm not saying that we are going to completely overturn AI and throw away all the human workers, but what I'm saying is in the dangerous places that is hazardous for us, like for humans like in gas industries, chemical industries, mining industries, these places are hazardous for human beings, even without the accident. So using AI in these places will really help us and will really save lives. And another is in the medical field. Like doctors sometimes make mistakes during emergencies, being pressurized by emergency situation. Like they make mistakes giving wrong diagnosis of the patient's diseases and sicknesses. So, but AI will not make such mistakes. And then even during emergencies, it will be able to give accurate results and will be able to save the patient's life. So I'm not handling our lives, but we can see that from the above points, even if making our lives easier, and also we can save life with the help of AI. Thank you so much. This Mr. Hidulon is not here still, we will be skipping him. So that wraps up the first round. So now we will be moving on to the second round. And so for the first, for the second round, I request a participant from the team supporting the motion to take your time or followed by the opposing team. Opposing team, please take your time. Whoever is going first. Okay, the opposing team against the motion. Okay, and I'll be going first. I would like to first of all point out this thing about the first speaker that said for the motion. She said about thinking machines, building thinking machines. So like, I would not add anything new, but I would like to oppose you with your own words. Like you said something about making thinking machines and then in the later part of your speech, you said about something about giving input that something input gives output. So machines are not something that can think, but it's just that like using, using your own words that is just that something is put inside and then only gives an output. Unlike humans who we think, we think, and then we, like we, how do we say we process the information and we think like our human sense works in a different way other than the machines that works. So that is thinking human thinking, but machines does not think, but it just gives the output that has been given in the, they just give the output of what has been given as input as a result. And then talking about, and then for the second speaker, I would like to oppose you like for weapons. Like I agree that of course, I has really, I has really advanced and like even machines can know, even weapons can know have targets and then like they can just go and hit the place. But I want to ask you like who is the person? Who is the user? Who is the one giving the comments? Who is the one making the order to launch those rockets? It is, I believe that it is not the AI, but the user on the other end of the AI, that is human beings that is. So it is not the AI that is a threat to human civilization, but it is rather the human humans that are, that is a threat to us, for ourselves. We are a threat to ourselves, like the negative thinking of the humans is what is a threat to human civilization. Thank you. Thanks, Jin. That is for the motion. Please take your time. Okay. I would like to answer our brother here who has talked about my point. So see about conversion of input to its output, that is simply what a human has prepared. We are aware of it that AI, they are building softwares that are performed to do tasks. So as a result, that is something which humans have done. However, with regard to thinking machines, which I added Stephen Hawkins as an example, like myself as well, if I can give you some examples, even in our current generations, we aren't aware of it, but there are people building robots to have debate among each other, like we are doing right now. And then if I can give you another example, there is a technology built by Japan, it's called GEDBOX, and there are people actually talk with a live robot, more or less like that, Miku Hatsune, I don't know if everyone is aware of it or not, but that is a vocal lead where a human being, she talks on behalf of it. However, the fact is that regardless of the gate box being controlled by a person, it responds upon the human who is questioning to him. She can respond to him in any form of sentences. So it's like they are being designed in such a way that they can counter back any kind of questions that the person asks. As a result, I'm really sorry, I really can't come up with the points. Yes, that would be all I would like to conclude with these points. Some of my opinions say about unemployment. Yeah, unemployment, artificial intelligence affects unemployment, but not exactly. It does not impact all the jobs. Yeah, it may affect some jobs like human resources, cell managers, marketing, etc, etc, but it does not affect all the jobs. Instead, it gives a positive, which takes our repetitive, repetitive or dangerous tasks. It frees up the human's workforce. Artificial intelligence, it could increase happiness and job satisfaction, actually. Let me say something about robotic hair. In 2017, there are 3,412 robots in the world. And robots can influence us too. They have the emotion of their own when they become very smart. So in this modern age of technology, we robot are playing important roles and even started making us satisfaction. Okay, let me end that here. Okay, as my friends say, unemployment. How you can solve employment? Robot transformation, the intention of creating a robot was to protect and watch over humankind, but later the robot started killing the humans. Yeah, one example, a Japanese factory worker, Kinju Ureda, was killed by a robot on December 8, 1981. The robot beat him against adjacent and had a knowledge. Well, artificial intelligence is programmed to do something beneficial or good, but it can be dangerous to take the lives of humans. Also about the online classes. Yes, online classes, it takes one person to isolation. Also, we like communication skills. And yeah, during the online classes, it is many, you know what? We can't be taking classes like person to person, and we don't know what all are doing there. It's all presenting in the class. And especially exams, we can't fully say that online exams or online are helpful because we don't know where the sources are coming from. Especially goes to students like... What's up? AI, it will kill the whole of humanity. Yes, machines are bringing everything. Okay, thank you. I want to ask these questions to Ms. Lika. You said that AI makes our life or health bad and we should live longer, not depending on that. I just want to say that AI is creating for well-being of everyone. It just depends on the user. How are you supposed to spend your life in this generation without the help of AI? Everything is done with AI now. It's because of AI that we were able to give our day and we were able to finish it up, our syllabus and all. So it just depends on the user and the link that which provides us the most good participants to take their time for the conclusion we must. Okay, on behalf of Team Motion, I'll be concluding with our points. So AI, it can be understood as a short-term motive for the moment, but in the long run we never know what one's invention will take at all on its own master. It should therefore be applied, used only when needed. No matter how much time is put into pre-deployment designs, a system specification often result in unintended behavior the first time it encounters a new scenario. For example, Microsoft stay-behaved inoffensively during pre-deployment testing, but was too easily baited into offensive behavior when interacting with real users. With behaviors like this, it is likely that they will become a threat to humans. AI could replace humans if we get in its way during the long run considering the advancement and need for supercomputers we are relying on. Humans would one day sooner or later fall in the hands of its own creation and might be someday a subject to enslavement if not put into one's thought. With this, I would like to conclude our point. Thank you. Okay, let's try and look at this, a diary AI discussion from a different angle. Say consider our life as a process and consider everyday as a process that is divided into single steps and then consider AI as an autonomous process automation that provides us with more convenience and thus makes our life easier. So AI is just a side part that is helping us go through our daily life process and our life in this process of life. But I believe that what we should be discussing is not really AI as a threat to human civilization but the biggest threat to humanity is humans itself, like I said earlier. Like the insatiable hunger of humans is what's really threatening us. And then in the process AI is being used by humans as a tool to fulfill our insatiable hunger, like the hunger maybe of different types of political power, money or just personal grudges, like these things are more of a threat to human civilization than AI because these feelings and these insatiable hunger is what is making the human use this AI as a tool to disrupt the peace that is in the society. So in the end the tool that is made is not the threat but the maker and the user is the real threat to our human civilization. I'd like to conclude. That would be it for a debate competition. But before declaring the result, I'd like to give time to our respective panel of judges if you have anything to say. Okay, if I am permitted to share my views, I would really love to share what I have experienced, what I feel actually about the debate and how I actually perceive the debate competition. Thank you so much for, first of all, for inviting me as one of the judges. Debate has been very close to my heart because whenever I judge a debate competition or whenever I organize debate competition, my mind always goes back to the time when I used to be a contestant. Throughout my journey as a student, maybe undergrad student as well as a post grad student, and then later on a law student, I have personally participated in a number of debate competitions. So thank you so much for taking me back in my days. Nostalgia is always beautiful, not necessary to spend. So dear friends, for me debate is an attempt to cling to the illusion of control provided by a point of view, designed to keep the ego in place. Dialogue is an attempt to dance with the unknown at the risk of losing what we think we know. This is my view. And also I believe a debate has one purpose and one purpose only and that is to facilitate the exchange of ideas directly between candidates, participants, and that's it. So one good thing that I've observed is you all have observed the decorum, the rules of the event, that is point number one. Second important thing is I also like the way all of you have used the language. There was no anger, there was no unnecessary aggression, there was no unparliamentary language. So I'm really happy to observe this. And also I'm very happy to know the topic as well about artificial intelligence. So from city to self-driving cars, artificial intelligence is progressing rapidly very well, especially those who are using those smartphones and laptops and computers and so on and so forth. Our entire life is influenced by artificial intelligence either directly or indirectly. While science fiction often portrays artificial intelligence as robots with human-like characteristics, artificial intelligence can encompass anything from Google's search algorithms to IBM's vaccine to autonomous weapons system. You just name it guys. Artificial intelligence today is properly known as narrow artificial intelligence or weak artificial intelligence. And that it is designed to perform narrow task, that is facial recognition or internet searches or driving a car. However, what I perceive and what I visualize is that the long term goal of many researchers in the field of artificial intelligence is to create general artificial intelligence, AGI or you may call it a strong artificial intelligence. And narrow artificial intelligence may outperform humans at whatever its specific task is, like playing chess or solving equations. Artificial, general artificial intelligence would outperform humans at nearly every cognitive task. In this larger context and in a very complicated as well as complex platform, I believe this debate has a valid reason to be organized. And on the other hand, if you take the legal framework that governs the overall artificial intelligence, you'll be surprised to know that there is no legal framework as such. Okay, so it is not just the, the space law, which is still in its infant age, but also laws related to artificial intelligence are also at a very infant stage. So whether artificial intelligence is going to be beneficial for us or will it impose threat to us. That will not be decided by the artificial intelligence that would not be decided by the machine, but ultimately that will be decided by the supreme human intelligence. And in this context, on the basis of this complex platform, I have judged this debate. I will take one or two minutes to, you know, jot down the scores since I'm sharing my thoughts with you. But I really want all of you to understand that it is not just the present, but also the future would belong to a proper, a cordial cohabitation of man and the machine. Stephen Hawking once warns us that there is a possibility that one day the machine intelligence will outperform the human intelligence. I don't want to comment on that because many people have already commented on it, many debates have been going on, but I still believe and I still want to believe in the supremacy of human intelligence. We are the seeds and we are the one who are capable to grow the trees out of the seed. So with these words, I congratulate to each one of you. And most importantly, I congratulate the Department of Economics, its head, Dr. Devrata and his faculty members. Because choosing this topic is never an easy job, but he made it and most importantly, the participants have given justice to it. Thank you so much for giving me an opportunity to share my views. Give me one or two minutes. I will jot down the score and share with head of the department so that, you know, the final score will be communicated to you. Thank you so much. All the best. Keep debating. Keep learning. Thank you. Dr. Saboor, please give us your valuable feedback. First of all, I want to do my thanks to the Department of Economics and our beloved Devrata. It was a very wonderful presentation. According to my understanding, the second round was that much effective. The students didn't prepare well in the second round. This is my understanding. I am coming to that point. However, I want to say something about the artificial intelligence. The field is now seriously emerging every look and corner. If it enters in the military business, everywhere now it will enter. Here, the artificial intelligence, first of all, we have to give some preference to the big corner of the artificial intelligence system. The market world is only introducing artificial intelligence and the market world is going to control the entire population of the world. So what I am trying to say here, the artificial intelligence is going to give such a direction to the human society. In which direction they have to think. So here we have to come over from the artificial intelligence for that we have to think beyond the boundaries. So for example, if you search in the Facebook something about the shoe or laptop. So around your social media, always this kind of advertisements comes. So here what they are trying to say, they are limiting our thinking pattern. So in one or another time, it will lead to the suppression. In this perspective, we have to think beyond the boundaries. So based on this, we have to address the artificial intelligence. And however, we cannot stop the artificial intelligence. Aniruddha, Dr. Aniruddha mentions that there is no law for the artificial intelligence. I hope the law somewhat can help to the human society to handle the artificial intelligence. Yeah, it was nice. We have given our remarks. Head of the department will announce it. Once again, thanks for this opportunity. Once again. Thank you, Dr. Sabar, Dr. Aniruddha, for your valuable feedback. Both of you highlighted the importance as well as the drawbacks of artificial intelligence. I am also of the opinion that for the development of the society, the role of science is crucial. And we are using technology because of the development of science and technology. So here, regarding the threat to human civilization, AI, I feel that it's dependent on the human being, with the people, how we use this technology. This can be bound as well as being. But as Dr. Aniruddha rightly pointed out that, still we don't have any law. So I think in the near future, when there will be a threat of technology or threat of AI, I'm sure there will be new laws to new laws. And that's it. And lastly, I would like to appreciate all the participants for volunteering themselves. And speaking on this crucial topic, this is a content of contemporary topic. And its importance with regard to the decent purchasing and threat will be realized in the near future. I would like to thank Ms. Lillie, Sanchoomlo, Tenza, for being active, for taking the active role while conducting this program. I would also like to thank Assistant Dean Mr. Anjan Dehra and our respected Vice Principal Ma'am for joining us. Thank you. Within a minute, I think we will have our score ready. So just have patience and wait for two minutes. Thank you. Thank you so much, Dr. Aniruddha, Dr. Sapuralli, and Dr. Gubabrata for giving your views and feedback. It was indeed very knowledgeable. While waiting for the results, we can have a few minutes. I mean, we can have a question and our session now. You can switch on your microphone or use the chat box. Well, may I ask one question? Sure, sure, please. What motivated Department of Economics to take up such a wonderful topic? I'm really curious, you know, how did you guys come up with this? Anybody would like to answer to the question? Yes, yes, anyone can answer. I'm really curious, seriously. Okay, so if lecturers have come up with the topic, then at least you must be having some idea that why this topic came up. Because I'll tell you why I'm so curious to know about it. Because this artificial intelligence is a talk of a modern day. Okay, see, have you heard about data science? Data science is a new career avenue, which is just coming up, right? So basically, on one hand, new job opportunities are coming up. On the other hand, you know, artificial intelligence and theories around it also coming up. So therefore, you know, I think it is really important for me to understand why this topic came up. Because I have a proposal and I'm sharing with you all of you that coming future, maybe in few months, okay, if you guys are comfortable from the Department of Economics, okay, we together can organize some small seminar kind of thing, okay, on this artificial intelligence. So that is why I wanted to know. Dr. Devrata, if you want to share something. Definitely, we would love to cooperate with you. This is a, as I said, this is a contemporary topic and I think it has immense scope in the future. So definitely why not? Okay, I think the final scores are ready. And I feel that, yeah, as we have seen that there was steep competition. Yes, I will start with the third position and this third position is secured by, I am finding it difficult to know the name. and your score was 42. Winnipeg your score was 40. And third position, say Trinio, your score was 37. And then the fourth spot, it was a fourth spot. We have a Pinio as well as Lica. So once again, I would like to congratulate Harusset and I also want to congratulate and also appreciate, especially Winnipeg and Lica for participating and your being the first semester student you have done a good job. So with this, I would like to conclude over to you, Sanjeev. Thank you so much Dr. Debra Bada for announcing the result. I would also like to congratulate the winners as well as all the participants for actively taking birth. Even if you may not win this time, don't feel low because for good ideas and true innovation, we all need human interaction so well done all of you. So we did say we have come to the end. So finally I would like to thank Mr. Anjan Berra, assistant dean and our vice principal and Mrs. Miwa Solorin for joining with us and also not forgetting to all the audience for joining with us it would not have been possible. Without each and every one of your presence. Thank you everyone.