 It is time to finalize your bets list for Super Bowl 56 between the Los Angeles Rams and the Cincinnati Bengals because we are just a couple of days away now, which means we got to get you set for this big game on Sunday. Let's know our favorite bets for Sunday's game. Welcome on into the FanDuel Live Q&A. That's right here on the FanDuel YouTube, Twitch, Facebook, and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com. Joined here once again by Brandon Cadulla and Jessica Gridiron. Jessica is on Twitter at Gridiron and Wine. Jessica, welcome back once again. How are you doing on this glorious, glorious Super Bowl Eve Eve? Oh, I'm doing great. I'm glad to be here. And it's just that thrill of the game is almost here. So it's exciting. Sunday can't come soon enough. I know. I think two weeks is too much to diagnose an entire game. The good thing is I can dig in a lot, but there's only so far I can go. So I'm ready for this game to kick off on Sunday for sure. Brandon Cadulla is the managing editor of numberfire.com. You can find him on Twitter at Gadulla13. And Brandon, we talked about the DFS side of things. Yesterday we're breaking down the betting side here today. How are you doing today? Good. I'm glad that it's Friday. I've been looking forward to this game for two weeks. But like you said, I've been digging into stuff. So I've convinced myself of basically every possible outcome. I've looked at all these stats. And I'm like, well, this is the key to the game. And I forget about that because I find something else. And I'm like, that's the key to this game. So I'm ready just to kind of get some takes out here with all the research I've done. And then just from there, wait and see what happens on Sunday. The key to the game is like one of those custodial engineer key chains that has like a key to like every room in the entire building on at this point. So that's a rat in the analysis portion of all this. We are, of course, here alive on the Facebook and Twitter pages as we are pretty often. So make sure you are subscribed on your platform of choice. We do have NBA, DFS streams every Wednesday with Tom Vecchio. So a lot of good stuff still to come here, baseball, just around the corner, maybe some special streams in between as well. So hit subscribe wherever you prefer watching. Also, we're going to take some questions throughout the stream for today. So if you've got questions about some prompts you're looking at, maybe not so sure on, want to hear our thoughts on, put them in chat. Again, wherever you're watching, YouTube, Twitch, Facebook, Twitter does not matter. Put those questions in. We'll get to them on the air later on today. But let's start things off here on the broad level and talk about the game on the whole because the way we view the game will influence our props for today and for Sunday. So Jessica, I want to start with you because I've not heard your thoughts on this game yet. We have the Rams minus four, Bengals plus four with a total of 48 and a half. How do you see this game playing out? Any read on those more traditional markets for you? Yeah, I mean, originally this line is, I really don't really like that it's at minus four. And I guess even you mentioned you have it, we have this two weeks. So at first I was like, oh, Bengals and I usually love taking the dogs. But then as the time went on, you have more time to think, you have more time to analyze and you sit there and go, well, it's the Rams. They have the better, you know. The Bengals have been the dream team and believe me, I was kind of high on them seeing them in the Super Bowl, but now that they're actually here and they're going up against the Rams, it comes down to defense and the Rams, they have the better defense, especially in my opinion, of course, according to DVOA and EPA, all across the board. And then they have their offense too. They have a powerhouse offense and Matthew Stafford, when he doesn't throw an interception, he plays really well, you know? So in the end, I'm liking the Rams, I'm taking them at minus four. I'm gonna play that and I'm actually, if we're playing our little game today too, I'm gonna throw a unit on that. That's how confident I am. And as long as the Rams can continue to run the ball, they'll be able to win this game. If they can control the clock and, you know, keep the ball out of basically out of that dream team, like we've seen, I feel like they'll be able to, you know, win this game and they'll be able to cover. Okay, so we are gonna do the game we played in the previous week. So if you have not watched our previous streams, what we do here on the show, on the Friday show is we each have three units to allocate however we want across this one game. And whoever has the most units at the end of the Super Bowl will win the contest. So Jessica's first bet is one unit on the Rams minus four at minus one, 12 over at Fandall Sports. But what about for you, Brandon? What are you seeing here in the traditional markets for Rams versus Bengals? Yeah, I'm gonna stay away from an actual recommendation in terms of the over under the spread and the money line. My numbers have this about 4.4 points in favor of the Rams. That's not enough for me to wanna get there. It's actually like four and a half on Fox bet. For example, it's been sitting at four on Fandall Sports book pretty much, you know, for two weeks now. So I don't think there's enough for me to wanna get on the spread. I think that the total is about right, which is never fun to say. Like, I think this is super efficient, but my numbers are about 0.8 points low on the over under. So I don't really wanna go that route either. I also would rather not root for an under in this game although a lot of the value in the props, I think, do come on unders based on the odds associated with them. My baseline assumption for this game is going to be that the Rams get out ahead early because of the early game tendencies for these two teams. And that's gonna drive things, but as far as the overall markets go, I'm not seeing a whole lot that I would put any units on for our game. Yeah, I have Rams minus 4.2 in my numbers as well. So it does lean towards Jessica's side of having the Rams being the better side here. Not enough for me to actually take it though. I think the total's pretty efficient as well. So stay away from me. And I think that like honestly, it's just kind of, it's there for a reason, is my read on this. So I think that it makes a lot of sense that these things are settled in where they are. Well, dig into some props here. In a second, but first let's go to the comments over on YouTube Grim fan asking about Super Bowl bingo. So you go to FanDuel and you click on the free to play tab. That's where you can enter in the bingo for Super Bowl 56. And the fun thing is if you've got like a Super Bowl party at your house and some people there maybe are not super into football, they can play along with Super Bowl bingo as a way to like kind of have some fun and some fun along there as well. So you got people who don't care as much about the game, totally fine. Having played some Super Bowl bingo and trying to get some free prizes there. Also $56,000 Super Showdown presented by Irish Spring. That is a single game contest over on FanDuel, the fantasy side of things. Brandon and I broke down the single game DFS slate yesterday on the heat check fantasy podcast. You can find that over on the FanDuel YouTube page, but also up on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed. Okay, born to laugh is wondering any offensive linemen to score receiving touchdown game prop, yay or nay? I'm gonna go nay here. Just, I can't see it happening. Jessica, can you talk me into an offensive linemen scoring receiving touchdown this game because I'm not going there. No, if the Chiefs were in the Super Bowl, that'd be another question, but a possible outcome for me, but I don't know, I don't really see it happening. I'd be a nay in this game. Andy Reid, Eric Biennemy might score two offensive linemen touchdowns because they love cooking up some weird stuff. Brandon, I'm gonna ask you about this one then. Born to Laugh wants to know total individual touchdown scores over four and a half. So looking at like the anytime touchdown markets and stuff like that, where do you fall on this? Okay, so my baseline assumption for this total is 27-20. I think we're gonna get some field goals based on how these coaches make decisions. So I think that I'm gonna stick with the under on four and a half total touchdown scores for this game. Okay, so let's go with Grimfan over here. First touchdown score a true. Any of Cooper Cup, Joe Mixon, T Higgins scored the first touchdown at two to one. Okay, so let's go to the first touchdown market over here. We've got Cooper Cup at five to one. We've got Joe Mixon at plus 750 and then T Higgins at 11 to one. I can't quite get there at two to one personally. I don't think that's quite long enough for me to buy in. I'm guessing that that's like enhanced odds from what you get here, but I don't think that the numbers for Link Haps lay things. So I'm okay staying away from that one person. I know it's boring to say no, but like also just no for me here. Okay, Grimfan total individual Cincinnati Bengals touchdown scores over two and a half plus 190. I think the issue here is, A, you have to assume two things. You have to assume both that they score at least three touchdowns and that those touchdowns are different. When Joe Mixon scores every touchdown, you're gonna hit an under year. So I think that's my hang up here is I can't quite get there. The good thing is, you know, it is plus 190. So maybe Jessica, we can get there a plus 190. I need a little bit more than that personally. What about you on this one? Yeah, I feel like I would lean away from, I don't know, I don't know if I'd wanna throw anything on that. When it comes down to touchdowns though, I do have, there is one that I do like for any time touchdown. Okay, let's do it. Let's do it. I feel like as possible and I feel like any time touchdown with Cam Acres at minus 105 right now, I think that would be a good prop bet to take because, you know, the Rams they're gonna be able to get down, they're gonna wanna wanna control the ball, sorry, they're gonna wanna control the clock. Let's see if I can talk today. And they're gonna wanna get down to the end zone and then they just need to rely on Cam Acres to be able to punch it in. So I feel like that would be a good safe bet to make on any time touchdown. Okay, so Jessica is Cam Acres at plus 100. I previously had Joe Mixon, he was plus 115 last week and he was plus 110 earlier this week. He's now even money. I think that is short to the point where it's no longer a situation where I wanna dive in. I will say on this any time touchdown markets, Odell Beckham is plus 130 here, but there is an odds boost over on FanDuel to you can boost two to one. I would take that there if I can get a two to one, but a plus 130 not quite getting there with where the numbers currently stand. I think the interesting one to me is Sony Michelle at plus 290, not to, you know, going against the Cam Acres one. But I think that Michelle actually had a decent red zone role in that conference championship game. He was in for four out of six snaps when they were within 12 yards of the goal line and Acres in for two. Now, I think that part of the reason why you could buy into Acres is to say, hey, you got hurt in that game and like maybe that's why they were limiting him there. So like that's why you could still buy into Acres. And that's why I think that the one Jessica was talking about makes sense, but Michelle could be that guy there, could be the third down back. I think with where the odds currently stand right now, my favorite any time touchdown score would probably be Michelle at plus 290. It's either him or Tyler Boyd at plus 250. I think guys like Nixon are now efficient. I would not go there. What about you, Brandon? What's your read on the touchdown score market right now over at FanDuel? So I'm not a big touchdown prop guy just because it's a high variance outcome. Because you hate fun. You hate fun. Just saying. Well, that's the other part of it. I do hate fun. I know, I know. So my numbers have Joe Mix and about 54% likely to score. So there's a little bit of a value on him still at plus 100. So I'm all right with that. His red zone role has been awesome. 91% in the red zone in terms of their rushing share, 48% of their overall red zone plays have gone to Mixon. So I still think that I could get behind that. As for the Rams out like Van Jefferson, is he still plus 295? He's 320, he got boosted. Okay, so you got, okay. So I have about 24% likely to score. That makes him a value of plus 295. That would be even better at the new odds. And I just said I don't like touchdown props too much because it's high variance. That gets even more complicated whenever you say this guy's got to score first, but Van at plus 1800 when I last looked, I had to score first. I thought that was a fun way to maybe start off the game with a, you know, a small bet, get some action to Van. He scored as many times as Cooper Cup just to kick off the Rams games this entire season. So. And Van did get a full practicing on Thursday for the first time since before the divisional round. So that's a plus as well. Healthier than he was previously. Tyler Higby's banged up. Maybe enough to funnel some more work over Van Jefferson's way. Well, we're on the touchdown prop market. DJ's asking about Samajie Perine at seven to one. Now, Samajie Perine did score during the conference championship, but it was on a long kind of busted play. And like you said, Brandon, Joe Nixon has had a tremendous role in the red zone. If we look during the playoffs, a 48% red zone share. So a percentage of carries are targets inside the red zone for this team. I think seven to one would need to be a bit longer for me to get there. So no Samajie Perine for me personally in the touchdown markets. Let's go now to the passing props and talk about these quarterbacks. We got Matthew Stafford versus Joe Burrow. These markets have held pretty steady throughout the week. So let's talk to you, Jessica. We got Joe Burrow, two 78 and a half, Matthew Stafford, two 83 and a half, and also some passing attempt numbers, et cetera, et cetera. When you look at the quarterback props, anything standing out for you? Yeah, actually I like Joe Burrow with most pass attempts at minus 110. I just feel like they're gonna be trailing a lot and they're gonna have to rely on Burrow to be able to throw the ball. And they're gonna have to abandon the run game because they're gonna have to try and keep up and put points up on the board to try and stay with the Rams. Another one I also really like too is over one and a half total interceptions, minus 110. I just feel like both of them are known to throw interceptions. They've actually have done it 11 times in the 20 games this season. And I just feel like again, if something big happens and either team is gonna have to try and get back in this game, what are they gonna do? They're gonna rely on the quarterback to be able to throw the ball. They're gonna probably make for some plays that maybe are not the best decision. And in return, some interceptions will happen. Yeah, I think that I can get behind that one as well. I actually hope that your Burrow to lead in pass attempts one is correct because one of my bets for our game is that Joe Burrow will go over 36 and a half attempts. That is minus 106 over at Fanjul Sports. We're on the same page here. It's in part because I do agree where again, if my numbers had the runs by four that implies they could trail. But also I think the Bengals will be more aggressive than maybe the sport than Fanjul is saying they will be here given the fact that given the fact that they have been a bit more pass heavy at times during the playoffs, they're early down first half pass rate over the past five games with Burrow is 66%. Their full season mark was 59%. So they've been more pass heavy. And I think that that could lead to getting Burrow over 36 and a half. He's gone over that in four of the past five games. So personally, I think that's a good bet. And I will make that one of my unit bets for our game Burrow over 36 and a half. So Jessica and I both riding Joe Burrow overs from riding with Joe Burrow to drop back quite a bit here, Brandon. What about you? What are you seeing in the passing markets? I got a Joe Burrow under. I can tell by their laughing. They're snickering. Yeah, you have that like Brandon look on your face like about to bust out the contrarian boy here. But it's on the completions. So then I chose completion specifically under 24 and a half at minus 122 because I don't want to bet against Burrow's volume or yardage because he's got the high leverage receivers he can throw to and get a lot of yards after catch. But in terms of completions, Burrow is having an outlier season in completion rate over expectation based on both NFL's next gen stats model, NFL Fasters model. He is like top 20 since 1999 and completion rate over expected. So you throw that in against this Rams defense which is top five and completion rate over expected allowed. I think that, yes, I'm playing this angle that the Bengals will have to throw. I do think that the Rams will be able, as Jessica mentioned, to establish that run a bit which I don't normally advocate for but it seems like something that they would like to do. Keep the Bengals off the field. So I think that Burrow could still have a high yardage output, throw it a lot but he might not have the completion rate that we're looking for just based on this matchup and some regression. But for a unit for this game, I'm gonna stick with the passing prop here and go with the under on Matthew Stafford's attempts, 36 and a half minus 114. Both of these teams have actually been slower than the NFL average in the playoffs if you adjust for game context. It's about two seconds slower than the NFL average per play. That stuff adds up. And if we have the Rams playing from ahead, I think that they don't necessarily need to get Stafford 37 pass attempts to win this game. And they've been a little bit more run heavy in the red zone as well in the playoffs. It's kind of strange for them because they were so pass heavy in the regular season. And with all three running backs now in the mix, kind of just playing the angle that the Rams do play from ahead and that they don't have to rely on Stafford. Yeah, I think Stafford's gonna be efficient but I think that the volume might not be there for him to get 37 attempts. Plus if you're efficient, you don't throw as much. So like that could actually lead to an under here as well and you look at the Bengals against the Chiefs, they were dropping into coverage. Could see the same thing here because you don't really want to blitz Stafford with how good he is against the Blitz. And that could lead to more rush attempts. So I could see this one going under as well for Matthew Stafford. We got a breaking news coming here from Grimm Fan. We'll call him Grimm Schefter now on or call them Grimm Schefter. Tyler Higby ruled out for Sunday. So the Van Jefferson numbers more enticing. I'm curious that that will move with Higby being ruled out. I just want to check on Jefferson. He's still 33 and a half from a yardage perspective. So maybe we'll check back on that later. But Tyler Higby ruled out that's good for Van props I think. Kendall Blanton I'm less into. He had four targets across two games when Higby was out in weeks 14 and 15. Did have five last week but I'm not sure if that was with Bryson Hopkins and active and I'd expect him to be active for this time. So I would be a little bit wary of that one. Jacob is also talking about some Joe Burrow props like the total under 48 and a half in Burrow over 10 and a half rushing yards. We had someone I don't recall actually who was someone on Thursday was talking about I think it might have been Ryan Williams talking about Burrow's rushing yardage over. So he is on board with you there as well. Larry or Jacob let's move over to the receiving yardage props and maybe talk about some Van Jefferson a bit more starting off with you Brandon anything you're seeing in the receiving yardage numbers that you like right now. Yeah, actually two overs. So I'll buck the trend here for me. But Van over 33 and a half. So if you can still get that while it is where it is I have it 72% likely that he goes over that based on my baseline projections. I know it doesn't take a whole lot though and Van is also a high ADOT receiver. So he could probably get there in one catch. And last game Van actually had more air yards than Cooper cup on five targets compared to cups 14 which it just sort of goes to show that his role is still really good. There's some volatility with Van but I like his over and for another unit for our game I'm gonna go with an over on Tyler Boyd 42 and a half for minus 110 odds. So according to pro football focus Jaylen Ramsey has played the most coverage snaps from the slot among all Rams defenders. He's allowed 0.84 yards per coverage snap. All other Rams have allowed 1.11. The NFL average is a 1.19. So it's basically a league average matchup. Ramsey is gonna bump out of the slot to focus on Jamar Chase and T Higgins. CG Usama is not gonna be a hundred percent even if he says he's gonna play but can't imagine that he's a hundred percent and Tyler Boyd has run around on 83% of the drop backs for the Bengals in the playoffs. So I think there's gonna be a lot of work for Tyler Boyd over the middle in this game. Yeah and Ramsey's played in the slot I think less than 10% of the snaps during the playoffs. So I think that that is probably the right way to view things where it will not be Ramsey out there going with Chase and Higgins on the outside. So I think that would work well as well. So Brandon is on Van Jefferson and Tyler Boyd overs. What about you Jessica? What are you seeing if any value in the receiving yardage markets? I stayed away from the receiving yards for this game but I do have some rushing yards. So I'll let you, once we get to the rushing I'll be able to chime in here. But when it came to receiving there's nothing that really stuck out to me. I gotta echo you there. There's nothing in the receiving yardage market that actually stands out to me. So we're actually on the same page there with it. Up being the best market. So let's slide over to the rushing yardage market. We're actually have two bets that I like for our game. I had the burrow pass attempt one and I like both of these numbers the rushing plus receiving yardage numbers. I like the Nixon over at 88 and a half and I like the Acres under at 83 and a half. Nixon, he actually was up at like 95 last week. And this came down to 90 earlier on this week and it went down to 87 and a half on Wednesday. Back up 88 and a half now. I do still think there is value on that number with where it currently stands. So I think that the Nixon over is the way to go with this market. As far as Acres go again, it's a worry about Michelle working in the third downs. It's a worry about Darryl Henderson being back. I think there are a couple of things that factor in here that lead me towards an under for Cam Acres. So I got Nixon over 88 and a half, Acres under but Jessica what are you seeing here on the rushing side of things? Yeah, so when it comes to rushing my favorite play is taking Joe Nixon under 16 and a half rushing yards at minus 115. Again, going back to, I feel like they're gonna be trailing most of this game and they're gonna have to abandon that run game. And then like I mentioned earlier, they're gonna have to rely on Joe Burrow and his arm and be able to keep up with this defense because like I said, they're gonna be struggling all game and if they wanna continue to be in it, this is like, they're gonna have to rely on Joe, being able to throw those balls, throw a couple of interceptions so I can hit my other prop and I'm not saying they're gonna get destroyed by any means but I feel like they are just gonna have to rely more on the pass than the run and with that, Joe Nixon's not gonna be able to hit that 16 and a half. Well, I like that your props mesh really well together because you have the Burrow attempt number, you have a lot of pass attempts for him, you have the interception number which is correlated to pass attempts and you have Nixon under rushing yards. So your props play well together, they're getting along on the playground and stuff like that. I think that that's a positive for sure because you're giving yourself upside. If you're right in your assumption that the Bengals trail, that's gonna lead to this cascading effect where it increases the odds that your props, it was kind of that kind of thought process that played in for you trying to essentially tie them together. So if you're right on one thing, you can brand on all things at the same time. Yeah, and I actually, with that being said, I kind of have a four, I have a four leg Parley that I liked that I went along with it basically. So with the four leg, I have Joe Mixon under 16 and a half rushing yards. I have the Anytime Touchdown cam makers. I have Anytime Touchdown Jamar Chase because it's Jamar Chase and we know that well, him and Burrow have been all season in their chemistry and it's a Super Bowl and magical things. I feel like, well, something will happen and you're gonna see this amazing catch. Let's hope it's, you know, which from Jamar Chase and that happens in a minute. It would be shocking to see that, right? Jamar Chase doing something cool. I know, yeah, exactly. And then Rams minus two and a half. So with, like I mentioned earlier, that four is a little high, but a field goal to me could easily cover in this game and it's at plus 968. And I feel like if you want to, you know, throw some money on a fun Parley, I feel like that would be a good one to take. Man, we're getting creative. I love it. But also like it's not anything outlandish. Like you're not going with anything that doesn't mesh well together. Cause again, if the Bengals fall behind, that leads to more pass attempts, which leads to more touchdown chances for Jamar Chase. Leads to fewer rush attempts for Joe Mixon. If the Rams are ahead, that's more for Cam Acres. Acres meshes well with the Rams minus two and a half. So again, thinking about the way your props intertwine, I think is a summary to play things here. So I think that that's pretty interesting as well. Let's go to Brandon here. Brandon rushing yardage numbers or rushing props in general, anything of value to you there? So the Cam Acres rushing attempts market, it's 16 and a half. The odds on the under minus 144, but even if you account for that, I still see some value there with what my model is showing just because we're looking at a, what is supposed to be the hot hand approach? And based on what we saw from, now, based on what we saw last game, I think that Sony Michelle should have the first chance to show that he's got the hot hand. He's got some playoff experience. Cam Acres is really underperformed from an efficiency standpoint. I could see him being a factor. I don't really see him getting 17 carries. So I think that's a pretty safe one, but because not a lot of mine are very fun, I have one that's fun, but I think also makes sense. And it's over five and a half rushing yards for Matthew Stafford at minus 110. Stafford's run for 22, six and eight yards on four, six and five attempts in the playoffs. The Bengals are 27th in rushing success rate, a lot of quarterbacks this season, according to number of fires metrics. Ryan Tano had 12 against them. Derek Carr had 20 on one play. Holmes had 19. I think that if it comes down to Matthew Stafford picking up a first down, he's capable of doing that. He just doesn't do it very often. We also see him, he's got three goal line carries in the playoffs. So I think that they're fine, getting a little bit more, getting a little more carefree with what Matthew Stafford is doing. So I think Stafford over five and a half is kind of fun. And it also makes sense to me with one scramble to pick up a first down. I feel like you're just like a secret like Stafford rushing truth here. Like you just like hang out like deep in like a basement, like watching Matthew Stafford like rush attempts tape. I think that that's like, in my head cannon, that's what happened. Look, I love Matthew Stafford. So, and I think this one makes sense though. Okay, so let's open up the vault here and talk about some fun props because DJ has one that I refused to bet. So I'm not going to have any thoughts on this. I have thoughts. I'm just not going to bet it. Okay, DJ wants to know the color of the Gatorade at the end. And the correct answer, DJ is not listed. The correct answer is lime. It will be lime guaranteed. Don't bet that based on our recommendation. I'm just saying it's, this is a hot take. I want to be clear. This is not betting recommendation. Like I need a disclaimer on the bottom cal that says this is not a betting recommendation. Don't actually do that. But lime green is the actual color of the Gatorade guaranteed. Jessica, hot takes about Gatorade, go. Purple, even though it's only like purple, I think like 28% of the time or something like, I don't know, something crazy like that. It's, that's just my favorite color. So when it comes to that, I'm choosing my favorite color. Got purple, two purple pens, a purple mug, go cats. I'm on board with that as well, Brandon. Gatorade color takes, go. Give DJ what he wants. Never fade tails on the coin toss and never fade lemon lime Gatorade. So it's minus one of four on the coin toss. I'm assuming that you would actually do like an alternate market, you know, like if you could hypothetically just like, lay you drop 120 on tails if you had to, right? I mean, it's always a lock, right? Yeah, obviously, tails never fails. Grim fan is also asking about a yardage prop, seven, 60 and a half. I have not personally delved into this market. I'm guessing neither of you have either. If you have, you couldn't shout out, but I have no real read on this one personally. Yeah, I have not. I have not. No. Sorry, Grim fan. Sorry to let you down. We can't quite get there on our sides. We got a pick here from five, two, eight, O'Hazy. Cincinnati gonna beat the, or beating the Chiefs in my Super Bowl. Sad Broncos fans. So you got the Chiefs out of the Super Bowl. Congratulations to you, five, two, eight, O'Hazy, which means you can sit back and enjoy on Sunday as the game unfolds. That is all that we have here for today on our final live stream of the 2022 or 2021, I guess, NFL season. I just got used to saying 2022 and now I'm mixing myself up. Anyway, Super Bowl 56 coming up on Sunday. Jessica, any final thoughts for you before close-up shot for today? Yeah, one cool little fun, interesting thing I found out was White Jersey teams are 34 and 20 all time straight up, which is 63%. The Rams are wearing white. So they're 14 and three straight up in the last 17 Super Bowls. So something to keep in mind. I know it's one of those trends, but hey, that's another reason why I was like, I'll take the Rams. Do you want to know the most important part of that though? Is that they're not wearing those stupid bone jerseys, the like bone colored jerseys. Like it's like an off white, it looks terrible. So like the most important thing is they are wearing white and not bone. So I agree that that actually does matter. If they were in bone, bangles all the way. But if it's white, we're fine. I'm okay with that. That's Jessica Gridiron. You can find her on Twitter at gridiron and wine, Brandon Gadoula is at Gadoula 13. Brandon, any final thoughts for you for bangles versus Rams? My last unit is Rams are score first minus 126. Bangles are not very good to start games. The Rams are significantly better. So that's the route I'm going. Just hating on Joe Burrow. That's all I hear here. I wore the orange. It's not Burrow. It's not Burrow so much. Hey, Zach Taylor. Okay, I get it. Actually, I wore the orange for Joe Mixon. He will be the MVP for your FanDuel single game contest. Highest score in the game. You heard it here first. That is all that we have here for today. I'm on Twitter at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to Calvin Theobald, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Cal, as always. Thank you all for tuning in, not just today, but for the entire post season. Enjoy Super Bowl 56. Have fun, go win some bets. We'll talk to you all once again soon. This has been the FanDuel Live Q&A.