 This is what we essentially recommended the council adopt. I think if they're not in the packet, but Michelle's been trying to get them in as CRC knows these in various forms have been reviewed by the town attorney. The latest clean version is currently technically under review, I believe, in the emails I've seen for to formally get. I think it's Joel Bard that's been doing it at KP law to get him to write the email that says clear consistent and actionable. I'm not sure we've received that email yet Michelle would know better but she's not here, but I sent him when he asked what that meant. I basically sent him the GL guidance on what a clear consistent and actionable review is, and that basically what GL seeks from KP law review is that it's not in conflict with any state law that that's that's what we kind of want KP law to say and if it is in conflict to tell us what the risks are and things like that, given that KP law has reviewed this on multiple occasions, I, I cannot imagine them coming back saying now it's in conflict, you know, and in that sense, but we always like to have that email for the council. But yeah, I mean, you guys mostly have all seen it. So it's eight pages long. Okay, so just if I have a question. So we can still go ahead and vote on this. And if there's anything else that comes back from KP law, what would happen would it come back again to do well. Okay, so what I would recommend is that we vote on this and that's that's as chair of CRC. I'm, I'm looking at a couple of things. And the zoning bylaw needs acted on by the council by June 13. I would like to order for the council not to have to hold another public hearing. Based on when meetings are although I guess if there is a meeting on June 27, we could vote at that meeting but when I made that timeline that June 27 meeting was unknown whether it would happen and I still don't know whether it will truly happen. This is sort of the last formally scheduled meeting right now before the 90 day deadline. And as we all know, when we were declaring the rescission actionable at GOL. This is the second part to that. If we were send a zoning, we kind of want the general in place at the same time. And so the easiest way to do that is to vote on both at the same meeting. The motions are a lot clearer they become then effective the same days. Because they were voted on at the same meetings. So, in order to do that we would need that declaration done today. Because the bylaw needs to be posted on the bulletin board 14 days before a vote and since the vote would be tentatively scheduled for June 13 14 days is the 30th, which is a holiday so that moves it to the 27th, in a sense, in terms of Athena posting without having to work on a the charter 14 days is still technically Memorial Day, the holiday but no one works on the holiday and so we want Athena to be able to post it before the weekend. And so, you know, that would mean we declare it today it can be posted and it can be acted then if for some reason, KP law and the first reading would be June 6 if for some reason KP law comes back and says, you know, what can happen is the June 8 meeting GL could look at those changes and just make a recommendation to go to the June 13 meeting for voting and so that's been done multiple times on multiple agents for bylaws for policies for things where after the first reading things come up and a committee we looks at it and says hey, let's let's make this recommendation for the final vote. And so, you know, if that happens with paper law, I think, given that KP laws already seen this multiple times, we just don't have the formal email, I think it's, it's fine for us to go forward as GL to make that declaration today. And then if something surprising comes through and we can deal with it on the eighth after the first reading would be my would be as a CRC chair who really doesn't who wants easy motions and doesn't want to hold another public hearing that's my goal. I have an alternative reason for this. Thank you. And thank all of you for your work on this where they're Pat and Jennifer did you have anything else to add. No. Okay. All right, could we have a motion to declare the preservation of historically significant buildings clear consistent and actionable. So moved. Second. All right. Mandy. Hi. Jennifer. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Okay. Okay. All right, so we decided that we will wait for the equity lens review process for Michelle to be able to join us so. With that, I do not believe that we have anyone in the audience for public comment today. Okay. And we don't. All right, we're there. And oh, okay, so has everyone had a chance to look at the minutes from May 11. I wasn't at that meeting, but you know, they look fine to me. Look like quite a meeting. All right. Yeah. Okay. So we have an interview dates for finance. I know you were talking, Annika, about that. Can you explain what you've run into with the potential for the 22nd? Absolutely. So we have one of the applicants is not available. At any point during the 22nd. And, you know, had questioned if there was another way to participate. I would imagine just by answering the questions and submitting them. So I explained that they had to be live and together. So we're going to see I'm going to send another message now to see if this applicant is available the morning of June 8. And I will do that right after we end this meeting and report back ASP. So I guess my question is if that applicant is not available June 8 should we have some other, and you obviously have to check with both applicants. So should we as a committee discuss whether I don't know whether the one applicant that's not available just has a conflict on Wednesdays in general. It sounded as if it was just that one morning and very, you know, project willing to be flexible. It was just seems like it was just that morning that there's a fixed schedule. So I was wondering should we as a committee discuss some potential alternate dates that aren't either of our scheduled GL meetings just in case. Either of them are not available on the eighth to move forward. And I say that because with the eighth just just so the committee knows what's going on if we set the interviews for the eighth, the statements of interest need posted by next Wednesday one week from today if we're still so so they haven't been told when they have to submit their statements of interest yet. And so the longer it takes for a Nica to figure out that both applicants are available on the eighth, the less time they will have I will finalize these documents that we just voted today and get them to a Nica for distribution to the applicants today. It might be wise Nica to when you email both applicants today at least tell them to get their statements of interest in by this coming Monday it's a holiday weekend this is my concern though with a June 8 interview date is if they need posted on Wednesday June 1 before 9am. Nica in organizing them basically has to have them on Memorial Day or the 31st at 9am in order to give Athena time to post. Given that that's six days away. That's not a lot of time. But you know if maybe when you email them today you give them all of the information regarding statements of interest and how long they can be in all. They might be able to be working on them and get them in in time anyway, for that to happen, as we still set an interview date but it might be good for us to know whether we could pop to the 15th of June. Or some other date so that you have some backup dates and Nica. Okay. So, so the request would be for the eighth. And so eighth or 15th preferably the eighth for the interview. Or is everyone available on the 15th in the morning it's it's a Wednesday it's just not a scheduled meeting day. Right now I am. I'm muted I am. Okay. So the event Michelle was not available, would we all have to be present or would we be able to proceed. So the goal is always that everyone be present because it's always helpful to have all committee members weigh in CRC has done it before with four or five members. It's just not liked, if that makes sense. Alright so I'll contact Michelle as well everyone at the same time. Thanks for that I will Nica right after this meeting send you the adopted questions the adopted selection guidance and all and then a draft email just showing you how I send the email out regarding the statements of interest. Okay, thank you so much. Thank you to help you for that. Appreciate it. Thank you. Okay, so with that, we do we have a motion to adopt the minutes for me 11th. I think that was a move in a second. It gets to pick who did one. Okay, Jennifer. I. Pat. I, Nandi. I, I mean I again unanimous. Moving right along. Or there any announcements. I just want to say thanks for running the meeting and Nica. Yeah, she missed a short meeting. Try and tune in and we'll be off. It's great. Thank you all for supporting me and so tight ship. I think with that are our next agenda preview. I, I think that we're okay there were there any questions, suggestions around that. I think it's just what interviews and then equity lens at this point right now. Yes, oh wait and the deceptive advertising potential right. That will be on. Okay. All right, everyone. Okay, thank you. And enjoy the rest of your day. You too. Bye bye. Bye.