 Good evening again. I will speak on behalf of part of the group of Casebastione working on the bioarchaeology. And basically, we are working together to get a bioenvironmental and paleognomic reconstruction of the site. Some of you were already here this morning. I will be quick on the site just to know that Casebastione is really in the middle of Sicily. I should say it's up the array mountains. And today the landscape is very different from what it was several thousand years ago. So we can see high level of repression of the area. And there is still probably a small part of a relitful vegetation. The open site is very close to another archaeological site. But what we see all around the site is basically all the land used for farming purposes. About this small part of modern meditation is still probably the natural one. We identified today, and also Professor Basta Lamentier identified after the, on the paper of 2013, the presence of Garig, Xerig, Rastland, and Primi. But for what you're concerned is species that usually we can detect on archaeological sites. We can find the bashing topwoods, evergreen Buddhist peaches, and rams, and riparian forests, also because there is still a big part of the river. And we are on the Mar del Valle, as Enrico taught this morning. And here, on the very close to the site, we used to have also the Lagostello. Lagostello is a lake that was dropped in the 30s. And its origin is probably the same as Lagoni-Bergusa, so we'll see later that we are trying also to see if there is still a sequence there. So basically, we're still having some comparison. As Professor Sanmercouli was saying, we always try to find comparisons, of course, with the natural sequences, for what to concern the archaeological sequences. And what we can use here is the sequence from Bergusa Lake that is not very far from the site. It's just about 20 kilometers. So basically, we can have a good idea of how the area was in terms of climate and vegetation. Unfortunately, the situation about the archaeological analysis for restore sites, I mean, from the Paleolithic until the Iron Age, we just have, in 2015, we had a posture about that, only 19 sites. The number today has not changed very, very much. And the problem is also that we do have some information from 19 sites, but it's not always well-published or fully-published, so sometimes we just have some short notice about what was recorded in the sites. So basically, this is really difficult for us then to find and to put also the site of Casio Passione in a system of, in the comprehension, especially of the Paleo-Gonomic data that we have. So, I think I already told this morning, Casio Passione is a site that covers about 500 years. So from the second part of the Second Millennium BC until the beginning of the Second Millennium BC, several field campaigns have been finished so far. One was one month ago when we finished our sampling also of the archaeological record. And thanks to the use of several C14 dates, we do have quite reliant comparison for what to concern the chronology. So we have this, this is quite important also for the sequence of the wooden charcoals. Archaeophilus remains have already been published for what to concern the first phase of the village, so the end of the Co-operate village. Archaeo-archaeologists found basically the most part of the remains belong to a viscabra, she could go to something like in Castelluccio, the percentage is among 55 and 66% also for the second phase, for the early Bronze Age phase. We do have a good amount of a source and according to their studies, it's not clear if it's so somaticus we saw for example for Castelluccio, but they recognize that it could be poor. And finally we have a good amount of deer and this is quite unusual for this phase, at least for what we know, the archaeological analysis of the other sites in Sicily that are mainly the coastal sites because usually wild animals starting from the end of the Co-operate and then Bronze Age are not as much as represented as here. So we have, the deer is almost double, the presence of deer is almost double as cattle and it is quite different from what we knew. We can say that percentage are not very different in the second phase, so during the Bronze Age, only the number of wild animals seems a bit lower. For what to concern the death age percentages, we do know that ovins were killed especially during one, two years and three, four years, so also here the consumption of meat and there's also signs of boiling of some bones from the analysis and sometimes they're also exposed to direct fire so it means that, of course, meat was consumed but of course they also had their practice as we saw also in Castelluccio, so here several sieves were also found and we got all this morning also some spoons, so many things and let's know that thing that the activities of the processing of milk was quite common in Castelluccio. And here on the right, upright, you can see also a deer's antler because deer were exploited not only for meat but for sure also for the use of an antler and there are several objects also and several signs of working of the antlers and according to the studies of the archeologists, the deer's were also just brought to the sites in pieces so basically they had some badgering activities before and then they moved it to the site. Archibodalegal analysis just started this year. I have to say that the archeology analysis were preceded by them working on the dog and then we moved also to charcoals and seeds. So basically we made samples on all the archeological soils, wooden poles of course, pits and hearts and now we're starting like one month ago also then to sample the pollen from the archeological section so we are going to have always the, we will try to have the two different proxies even if we have to say that Castelluccio and soils are quite difficult for that because they are extremely dry, they look like rock so we'll see if something happens. And this is also, I want to thank all the people that are working for this, not only archeologists of course, but the French National Community Max about biodiversity that is set by the Department of Salento and we said the historian, the historian, the local historian with the Nathalie Combray-Nabou she is the paleontologist. So what we can say so far is that there are several phrases of burning on the wood charcoals and this is of course because most of the samples that we analyzed so far belong to the wooden poles and to the apartment layers that were exposed to fire so sometimes the presentation is not very good and identification is quite difficult. Most of the wood charcoals that we recovered are of less than half centimeter but we have the chance also to find some almost entire poles of several centimeters. And this is on the right, the diagram is on the numbers, it is about the layers, the number of the layers, not the numbers of the single specimens because it was not considered reliable, the absolute number as we have different sampling methods so we just consider the different layers and we found mostly the presence of oaks also here, probably the sheath oaks or rubber site but we also found a low percentage of other species like cappinus, ulmus, populous, rhannus. Oaks are the most represented species especially for the ancient phase. I have to say that the identification of quercus of oaks is quite difficult sometimes so we can say that probably most of them are by indigenous oaks but some of them could also be by evergreen oaks but what we can say is anyway that all the hot poles as we saw probably for Castellus but also for the site of Morventina even if it's like Bronze Age, we only find oaks so this is quite interesting because it's always the same species. For the early Bronze Age phase, we have more different species and the only hot pole that we analyze so far is not from oaks but it's probably cappinus, betelus, orbeam so it means that probably it is one of the hot poles so the second phase is not made by oaks. But the seeds, they are not very reward just in some context. For example, for the early Bronze Age phase we have the presence of a bit where we found most of the triticum and alginum rest. We identified the triticum digocum, which is underwit and it is very interesting, especially from the second phase, the presence of several palses but it is big sized palses who are still trying to define latheospecial but it's quite interesting because there are some sites of brugosulphium that for the priestry so far it has not ever been identified and it's a specific bean, betel that is present and only in so far, just in this case. The other study, I will be quick because for those who are more curious we'll give a paper tomorrow morning in the Athena Structures session. We are working together with the biologists of Marseille trying to identify what kind of reeds are used in the art and the structures because we are used to say just reeds but of course reeds is a big world with several species. One of those is Alumdodonax that is one of the most common today also because it's very strong and it's very useful in general for its features for the buildings. So we hypothesized that there was Alumdodonax already at the end of the Copper Age in Sicily and this is, I mean, quite important for us because biologists are unanimous in saying that Alumdodonax is not an active species for me, there are another that it arrived from Asia but they don't know exactly when so we're trying to give some answers maybe from the archeological side to say maybe in Sicily we already had it in the third millennium in Sicily and of course maybe even before. And just, yes, a quick spot but we'll see Leif probably on the top and this is interesting for us also because I said before about the difficult, it's a very difficult time to find the yolks, what kind of yolks, so maybe having also other kind of information is useful. So finally the last part is about Palinology. I thought that we just made the samples on the archeological soil. We are still waiting for the results from the Lagostello. I hope that the sequence is, as I said before, the same as Pergusa Lake and I think this would be really of great interest in comparing the national sequence with the archeological sequence. The last thing that we're doing about Palin is a monitoring system, a modern monitoring system that's not that it's heading, it's a research that she's been carrying out in the Mediterranean for some years. Basically she's monitoring the quantified membrane in different sites. In Sicily we have, we're also in Patellaria, we are all around the Mediterranean and it evaluates the blood pollination over several years. So basically we collect all and every month and every year from each site. And this is to evaluate the biodiversity change in the Mediterranean from the pollin data. So this will give us some answers for the answer from the reaction of the vegetation to the possible change today. And we hope to compare that with the past. So basically we can see through a modern model if we can find some comparison with something that happened in the past. This is to sum up what we found so far. So I think that we have also many not identified species for the woods and we still have a lot to process in terms of our population research. So probably some other species, thank you. Some other species, we will find some other species and we for sure have to go farther with the identification of pulses. And so basically this is the first conclusions that we can have about that. So as already the archeological data were saying, we can imagine a site that was in a dense soil woods and we know for sure there were several water sources. I didn't say that we found in the archeological some rebarian species. As I told you before, the use of vegetation in our resources is quite different from the coastal sites that we know for the same phases. The only site that we can compare with for the seeds is in the groove aside but where only some small samples were taken. So we're not sure that we can really have, I would compare some through our site. And the diet was made, of course, by pulses and cereals as we would imagine, but we still have to analyze better the system of conservation and process of the pits. And we still don't have any data from the pits that Professor Mercury was asking this morning, the pits to know. So once we have some answers from there, we see that there is probably a different use of plant resources and finally we are waiting to have the first results from the pollen and from the prehistoric sites that are really. So I think it would be the first time to have these two different kind of proxies. So close to the prehistoric site, the archeological data and the laparstrina pollen samples. So we'll see. Thank you.