 So, again, thank you to the institute for that time. And thank you to Shane and Andrew for kind words about our work and our joint work together. I think it's just interesting that people like it. Because we don't know, I think the idea is we need to very carefully get to the extensive shops or stresses, as well as the important shops when we talk about analyzing risks. The other thing that's very interesting is diagram on the localized price market volatility in Malawi. We did a cash transfer to look at a season of hunger gap there in 2005-2006. And it was evaluated by Stephen Devereaux of the IDS. And it was seen as a really analytical response to the market. Because what we did was we looked at what food was available in local markets. And we balanced cash versus food. So we worked under nine local markets. It was quite interesting. Well, very quickly, Andrew, I have quite a few sites where I quickly run through them. And I think the main point here is I think there's a whole range of issues around resilience to food and nutrition security. But the whole global food systems, regional food systems, everything, I think it's if we have people like that and are not more experts on those, the concern focus really is within developing countries and particularly going off from the household community to the national level. I won't go to our definition because it was very similar to the one that Raju put up a while ago. And I think what I wanted to say is, I mean, I was at the EFRI in 2020, the Vision 2020 Conference in Addison in May. And it was a great conference. I think what was coming out about some of the big messages were that the concept of definition are large to you who need to know. And the bigger challenge is that you have the measurement and the operationalization of resilience, particularly to food crisis. I think there's a whole range of discussion around political economy analysis. Again, I think what you're saying are among the importance of that. The problem is, I suppose, that the cost of investments for long-term change don't see the value of the politicians making decisions to the shortage of electric cycles. So you have this problem about people investing in something that might not happen. And this is obviously a huge issue. Again, I think, you know, multi-sectoral collaborations, we all talked about it, multi-disciplinary, multi-sectoral approaches required to create resilience. But it's a crowded space. I mean, I think we need to be smart and build on the critical ones. I think Schengen focused on agricultural nutrition there. You know, there's only so many behaviors we as individuals can change. I think that's the same for governmental departments. I think that's something we need to be careful about. Again, just going back, it's very interesting that we're reading some of the psychology literature on resilience. What's this idea of the natural phenomenon of a stealing effect? That people who have faced adversity, something like 30% of them actually, generally, naturally, have positive adaptations. What's interesting is this idea about why they do it. We usually have one of the following. This idea of a perception of being effective or ability to use proxy efficacy or a belief in collective efficacy. So it's, again, helping individuals' community to acquire alternative methods of coping, helping them to feel and be effective in situations of adversity. And I think that, you know, I think it's very much a factor what Richard was talking about in terms of building on social capital and what's there already, as well as building capacities in the country. Okay, we won't go there. I suppose the intent behind it, I think you probably all have it already. Again, if we would be knowledgeable at this, because it was the basis of our part of the Global Hunger Weeks last year. We, in Kenya, we worked in my alley district at the very bottom there in Kenya for quite a number of years. We're still working there. And if you look at the difference between 2010, 2011, when the major hunger happened in East Africa, you can see the area where we were working. The global acute malnutrition, the sphere acute malnutrition rates didn't change very much. What they did was in a positive direction. In our area where we were working, we kept things well below the sphere standards. In the other areas, things were spiking massively. We said, how did we do it? We actually invested in long-term asset building and in, these are the lessons from it in some ways, is we invested in asset building. Looking at a multi-sectoral approach is getting people better water, better livelihoods, et cetera. So multi-sectoral interventions. We worked with existing institutions' coordination so that they own them. We addressed it to environmental drivers of risk, environmental degradation, for example. So you look at things like watershed management and all of that. Again, addressing gender issues, which was mentioned earlier, I'll come back to it. But this idea of making sure that you've got early warning systems and early action. So when you see that there is a food crisis about to happen, that you actually respond to it very quickly through social protection or good nutrition responses. So this idea of creating a contingency plan and responding quickly are very important. We did this program in Kenya. It was obviously very effective. The problem is we haven't invested in the evidence. So what we did with Tuxt University is we've now designed a program about two years ago in Eastern Chad, funded by R&D, and we call it Community Resilience through acute malnutrition. But we're investing in the evidence. So Tuxt University's done the, it's basically a randomized control trial. They've done the baseline. They're going to do the end line. We're just doing the midline at the moment, actually. And you can see on the left there, it's basically that package to build community resilience. So it's the building the assets of communities through these things. So improved agricultural production, so again, conservation agriculture, better livelihoods that Arnon was talking about, access to high quality health and nutrition services, access to WASH, and again, increased participation of women, sort of changing gender norms. And again, if you look at each of these dimensions, they're exactly aligned with the UNICEF conceptual framework for under nutrition. That's exactly the point. The point on their own is we've got to do that long-term work, so we have to build capitals and assets, but we also have to be able to respond to hunger prices as they happen. And we know now they're happy every two years, as opposed to every 10. Oops, sorry, let's go back. Just something to throw into the mix here. We're working in a very remote part of Eastern Chad. Now, you know, concern is a very grounded organization. We're really interested in what happens on the ground. Michael Woolcock from the World Bank and Harvard was speaking in Trinity about two weeks ago, I don't know if you've heard about, the lack of government implementation capacity in many countries. And it's quite interesting. He's identified two things that he feels are really problematic with government implementation capacity. One is this idea that, you know, the government can have, they have the function of the forms and structures, but they actually don't have the functions. They're actually not functional in very remote parts of these countries. So you've got a health service that's not functioning. You've got various ministries that really have very little functional in the implementation capacity. And this idea of premature load bearing. So unrealistic expectations can happen from those. Feelings that they're undermining indigenous learning. And again, this idea of local political economy. So, I mean, for us as an organization, I think it's that classic tension between global better practice. So we know the systemic reviews based on randomized control trials and big impact evaluations. We know that you always have to contextualize those and it causes a problem. There's a classic dilemma for NGOs, I think, in finding mechanisms to scale up pilots. And, you know, and I think this is the shengen referred to the if-pre-rain program. Again, I've always said that my job and concern for the last 15 years has been to try to get concern out of the middle of programs and put us on the edges to try and get governments or local actors as the ones driving it. But we find ourselves in these more remote areas having to start something off and then try to hand them over as much as we can to local institutions. So again, I think it links very well with I think something that came out of division 2020 about needing to get people access to success stories and be able to scale them up. That's what we're actually doing at the Rain Program in Zambia. We're trying to show something worked and shengen referred to it, how it's being scaled up. In fact, the Zambian government is now applying this district nutrition coordination committee in 15 other districts. And that was the whole purpose of it that it would get scaled up like that. Just to give you an idea, this is a delivery ward at the Cowra Health Centre where we're working in Eastern Chad. That's it, that's the delivery ward. And there's nothing in that cow. So it gives you a sense of what the health services we're talking about. One of the things the concern is trying to do with the month, this is a very crowded site, but the sense of it is this, that we identify thresholds where the local health services are completely overburdened. And then what we need to do is provide support depending on how high that case load is. This can be applied to cases of severe acute malnutrition. It can be applied to diarrhea. It can be applied to cholera or whatever. And it's very similar to what we're trying to do with the border now, where the local health systems have been overburdened. But how do we give them surge capacity when they need it, especially on a seasonal basis, and then it becomes scaled back. Just the last couple of things, just I said the two biggest challenges are measurement and operationalization. There's obviously an international group focusing on measurement issue at the moment. There's a technical working group and you know, Mark Clanstas, John Hudnett from MIFRE is involved in that. Dan Maxwell from Rachel Scott from OECD. There's a whole range of very clever people involved in that. We're not gonna work at that level. What we're doing though is we're developing this community with its indexing system. And our DRR advisor is actually working on that at the moment. Ironically, Goal, one of our colleagues here in Ireland have developed their own, just similarly, just funded by ECHO. And actually the Goal one is both based on the Hiogo framework for action. ours is focused very much on the sustainable livelihood approach. But very similar, both probably a little bit overly DRR focused. I think in one of the things we've done with our PRAM program is we have a very simple proxy of success. And it's basically about the hunger period and making sure that people are not severely acute managed for a short period of time. I think it's actually a very good proxy. We realize that the clever intellectuals will have to do a huge amount of work on resilience at the moment we're trying to be very practical about it. Don Hunt, our DRR advisor, has just come back from Chad, actually, and he's been doing some risk planning funded by OFTA on this one. So what's interesting is, basically, there are no DRR structures below district level. So he's been working at community level. He's got this comité local de action. And he's been doing risk plan with them, but he's getting them then to self-assessed what are their capacities like for resilience based on the sustainable livelihoods framework. And it's a really interesting tool. You can see even that before they had their community, see the community resilience index score at the bottom. After they did their risk plan, they scored themselves higher. Not surprising, but what's good about it is that it's about building capacity. Just to say on that is, we're having a bit of an argument internally about whether this is actually a really good capacity self-assessment tool for communities or whether actually it contributes to global knowledge about the measurement of resilience. And Chris Bainin, for example, for IDS, has suggested to us how we might be able to use it as a contributor to this wider measure, but I think it's going to be probably too complex and probably only for funding forward. The last thing just to say, and it's just a kind of a pointer, we do focus very much on the UNICEF conceptual framework. We talk about the key issues around food nutrition security. Concern now is working in extremely insecure departments. We're talking about the Chad's, the Niger's, Sudan's. We're talking about DRC. And I think one of the things, if we really want to be experts in community resilience building in these kinds of contexts, we're going to have to build expertise, I think both in governance, but also in what I would call conflict risk production, because conflict, there's a relationship between conflict also and food and nutrition security. And it's very interesting. We had a really interesting presentation from CLEAN or RALLY from the University of Sussex, who used to be in Trinity here last year, on this armed conflict location and event data. And it's a phenomenal data set. But what's interesting about it is now she's beginning to do a lot of analysis, linking things like rainfall and seasonal rainfall with incidents of conflict. And again, we're interested in looking at that. How do people, how are people resilient to conflict because it's something that we're always dealing with? I think that's pretty much it. So I don't think I have a conclusion. Thank you very much. Thank you.