 So you are here in Agile India 2012, and you are back again in 2013. So what's been your reactions for the current conference, and how do you compare with the previous? Well, one thing that has maintained from last year to this year is I've been very impressed with the quality of the questions. People are really thinking deeply about the presentations, and I've received from very insightful questions on the presentations that I've given and also the ones that I've been in. So that's something that I was glad to see continued. It speaks a lot to the audience that is being drawn to this conference. And I have to hand it to Noresh and the rest of the program committee. This year's program is very, very strong. I've heard from multiple people. I don't know what I'm going to go to this time. There's just too many things that are in parallel. So this is a really strong program, and I hope that that's something that can get out into the community here in India that this is the quality of content that is being generated in the Agile community here in India and for India. And hopefully that will lead to even greater attendance next year. If you were to take one big highlight for you, being in this conference? One big highlight. I really enjoyed Neil's keynote this morning. And in particular, I've always been a big fan of Richard Feynman. And I never really expected to see the life of Richard Feynman, the scientists, weaving through a talk at Agile India. That was pretty awesome. Yes, so I'd say that's one highlight. But I think another highlight for me, going back to what I said before, the interaction, the level of conversations, not just the questions in the sessions, but the people I've had a chance to meet and talk to, this is a fantastic group of people, and I think it speaks quite highly of the way the Agile community is developing and has developed here in India. The other question is obviously you travel a lot, and you've been to a lot of conferences across the globe. So if you have to compare this, I know it may not be fair in comparison, but then where would you rate this? Well, I make a big deal about the questions and the conversations, and of course the kind of conversations varies from conference to conference. When you've got a very technical conference, you've got people seriously geeking out on what's the latest, jet optimization or something like that. And in a conference like this, which is as much process as technology and tools, you get different kinds of conversations. But the quality of the conversations here, the quality of the questions, I think rivals many of the conferences that I attend across the globe. So we made small changes in terms of last year we had seven parallel tracks running. So this time we consciously segregated between management and technical. So is that something to vibe with you? I think that that is going to increase the ability of certain kinds of practitioners and certain kinds of roles to attend the conference because it's a bit easier to make the case that this is a conference that's dedicated to what it is that I do, whether that be iteration management or scrum master versus a developer or a tester. I'm a little bit concerned about it though because one of the things that we try to do on an agile team is blur the boundaries between the roles. And so the segregation I think can have a bit of a detrimental effect on the way the various roles learn to understand each other's problems. One of the big issues I think is when you get conflicts between roles is that role number one doesn't really understand why role number two really cares about this. And so I think having a bit more interleaving is useful. But practically speaking there aren't too many developers who are going to show up to a session on agile project management if there's a technical session available to them. So I think I'm probably being a little bit too concerned but maybe if there's a way to have some kind of interaction maybe it be a closing keynote on the first night or something where you can perhaps get a little more mingling of the groups. Maybe an overlap. Yeah, that's what I thought because that blurring of the lines is critical in that sense. I find that when I deal with architects and developers when developers start to understand why it is architects care about things they start to be a little more comfortable and vice versa and I think we can get the same kind of us versus them when you start thinking the management of agile project versus the doing of agile projects when in fact on an agile project everybody is doing something. So one final question. So would you recommend people across the globe wherever you travel to attend agile India conference if you were to do next year? Yes, I would. Thank you very much. Thank you.