 Good morning ladies and gentlemen. First of all, thank you for the invitation to this session. And we are going to complete a different environment comparing Netherlands. And I would like to go through the chick case. At first, those who know me, I'm always complaining about the chip legislation, so I start again with this topic. So the research priorities, I know that the chip legislation mentions maybe in a few sentences. The old State Landmark Conservation Act was created in the late 80s and still it's working or not working well. And there were about nine, at this moment nine attempts to change it to bring to introduce some other law. So still, the most of the very rich care is organized by all communities law in a market economy more than nearly 30 years in the market economy environment. So it looks quite strange. The second law I want to mention is right now on the special plan in the building regulation where the most important part of the Valetok provisions are incorporated. Especially for the special planning, there is a written that there must be some, that all the projects, all the special plans must avoid over the destruction of archaeological monuments, archaeological heritage. But in reality, it's a kind of a mantra in each project. This project won't violate any way archaeological remains, even the highway or the road goes across protected parts. So it's not used appropriately. So in reality, no national research framework exists now. So, and I could finish my presentation at this moment. Or the other option is to show you how the chief coaches are dealing with this situation. Not only a requirement to have a research designs for scientific excavation. So it's about 20 excavations a year. On the other hand, there is about this moment about 15,000 of monetary construction or about 1,000 of the real excavation in the country. So it's just a piece of sand on the desert. What is protected in the Czech Republic? I start at the lowest point of the pyramid. The Czech law talks about this. There is the act on heritage protection. Talks about the era with the potential of archaeological finds. It's one of good points in this law. And it's nearly the whole Czech Republic, excluding the large coal mines already excavated in the US and so on. So nearly everyone is obligated in kind of construction to send that announcement to the Institute of Archaeology and we'll receive in the institute about 50,000 of this announcement a year now. So it's very good net that's covering about 17% of all construction in the country. That's the positive moment. But this era with potential archaeological finds and also the archaeological sites doesn't have any other special protection. So that means that in case of any development or research, the only question is how long, how much? How long does it take the research and how much the developer will pay? Only a special group of the cultural monuments. We can, I can say that we have three levels, the UNESCO sites, national cultural monuments and the cultural monuments. But this structure is also, it was built in the 60s and the 70s of the last century, most of them. And you can see that it's very unbalanced, distributed these cultural monuments. I can't say that it's part of the Czech Republic, the region called Moravia or Silesia is without archaeological finds. But the more active colonies were in Bohemia. So that's why we have, we have 12, 1200 protected sites. At this moment, it's very complicated to add any site to the list and usually it's about two, three sites a year. So to improve the situation, it would take a very long time. Who is responsible? Who's responsible in the decision making? At the top is of course the minister of culture and the decisions concerning the protected places are made by the regional administration. Yes, you've been talking about Spanish case or German case, where it's for each part, different legislation. We have one legislation for the whole country, but in 14 regions, we have 14 different practices. Maybe you know it from other countries as well. National Heritage Institute, it's an organization founded by the minister of culture, takes care only of the protected monuments. So they gave advice, it's working like an advisory board for the decision of the regional administration. But the decision making is on the regional level and you can appeal to the minister of culture when someone does not agree. The Institute of Archaeology and the Academy of Sciences has a really different position. It should control the quality, the scientific quality of the research. And so we are also a place where all the excavation reports are carved. Actually, the control of scientific quality we can do from the excavation report. So it's very hard to control what's happening during the excavations. So we see how it went in the terrain three years after the end of the excavation. So it's a little bit of a problem for the conductor to say that the person dies after the funeral. And who has the biggest responsibility and also the power? Our licensed organizations because the most, because the licensed organizations has to have ability to agreement with the developer. And what will happen in the terrain is based on this voluntary agreement. So the use of the methods, so the applied methods for the research, the costs, the time, it's not a matter of the state decision. That's a little bit strange. And it comes from the community's plot. It looks very liberal way. And it's necessary to say the licensed organization has to employ at least one person with MA degree and practice experience in acrology at least two years. So that's the qualification of these organizations. They get the license for one moment and then some of them they have to renew in two or three, five years. Some of them they have no limits of their license. That's also very different. And we have 110 these organizations. These organizations are mostly organized by the regional government. It's about 60, 70%. There are some state organizations, the universities, institutes of the academic sciences. And we have also about 15% private organizations that they do it for profiles. What means this situation? The state doesn't require any research frameworks, any system of decision making, but also for the acotica community is a very complicated to live in this system. So many tools were developed by the community and they are accepted by, it's not obligatory to accept these requirements. So in the 2010, I thought this was in the presentation, the rules of acotica excavation was produced by the acotica institute and other organization. It's something like the ethical, it's no more ethical dex. What to do, not to leave half of the skeletons in the trench and things like this. So it's very simple, the human having about 12 pages. So it's very short. And sometimes the developers requires to keep this rules of acotica research and it's part of the agreement, the birth agreement that happens. Also the developers wants to find any organization, any system in rescue excavation. And in regional practice, there's example of crack, then I have some general example of the whole country. The national, sorry, the make up, the national heritage institute produced a map of important acotica programs in crack preservation. They produce a map and in the map they mark places where acotica currents are still not damaged and they have very high potential. But they are belonging, if you remember the pyramid, the lowest level. It's only place with acotica fans, nothing else. But this is accessible for the developers and it says if you want to build in this place on the crack garage, that could be a problem. It will cost a lot of money. You will need some, it will be very complicated in time. So that's the only way or only one way how to inform the developers and so to say that try to find any other plot. One minute, okay, sorry. Another one is the central acotica map of the Czech Republic. It's a central evidence of acotica excavations and also it's used only on voluntary base. And I would like to show just two examples. One example is a highway. To the most densely-settled region in Czech Republic, one of the largest excavations. But at the beginning there were no plans, no decisions what, which way the highway should go. The company, the state company came to the acotica at the moment when they wanted to make it tender. So also the analysis of the potential was prepared for the protocols and the geophysics was done just one month before the start of the excavation. Just to know where to move the top stop soil. Other example was a decision of the developer Jewish Cemetery and was discovered on an unexpected place and the developer decided to preserve the cemetery in very strange way. It's a box inside of Antitron garage in the second floor. So it's big box of a concrete. But this decision was made only because of pressure of the Jewish community of course, pressure of the National Heritage Institute and so the developer now asked the state for recompensation. So the process is started three years ago, it's not finished yet. To the conclusions, I think these conclusions are nothing, I think positive to learn but I just mentioned because the start is short, just one. The different preface in regions actually abuse undermines reputation of archaeology in public that I wanted to mention. What does it mean when the framework or the rules are nearly unknown and always I created ad hoc for the special particle project, particle construction. So this is in my opinion a very important point that has to be included in the discussion. Thank you.