 is some solution that we have developed for a very busy, in the archaeological site of La Roca's coast. Just to give you some particularities that La Roca's coast is in the prime business of the region of La Rida. It is problematic because we are in an amazing landscape, but it is isolated. So we don't have people there. The archaeological site is like 5,000 years old, and the understars were living there. There's probably a big site. We can see it's important, it's important. And people who want to visit this site and want to know what the underfalls have done here. Through our experience, we have noticed in our records a lack of public that has some type of disability. This situation shows us that we are exploring a high percentage of the population. Probably they are not interested in this kind of site, but we don't believe that. We think that we are exploring people. So this year we have started working with people with mental disorder. Working together, we have found inclusive strategies that facilitate the attendance of the indigenous group of the site. And we don't want to do a different kind of visit for this kind of public. What we want to do is to normalize the presence of this kind of public in our visits with the general public. So also, of course, we have had the help of users and workers of a personal center named Le Valarie di Lerida. This is a place where only people with mental disorder work and participate in many different activities. Some of them, of course, are cultural activities. All the users are adults, between the 10 and 65 years old. And finally, this is important. The project that we are presenting here today is an unfinished project by some factors that we will see later on. Our goals are to give a scientific and faithful and impressive view of our history. We don't want to miss the scientific information that we are getting from the research process. Also, to cable the presence of indigenous groups and to avoid the creation of specific products and receive to people with disabilities. Of course, it's very important to create a museum in the streets and to create support materials. Also, to test them and improve the results. Of course, it is a work in progress that we have to develop the Le Valarie di Lerida. La Roca de Spous has many problems. Of course, the paleolithic sites are in the most isolated places in the first places. And this is the perfect example. You have to walk out in like 330 meters. Also, we have some sections with stairs. As you can see here, the stairs are difficult also for the general public. This step is more than 25 centimeters. It is difficult for us as well. At the site, you will be able to find important parts of the archaeological record and some records, which show you the importance of these sites. Sometimes the archaeological records are difficult to visualize. Therefore, we use a projection that emphasizes the most important items and helps to complete the tour. Visitors can also use the iPads. Because these kinds of devices offer a great interpretation of the landscape. Then the antithas and the whole site. Later on, we will see that this kind of visit have been canceled for a new way of sightseeing. Here you can see a previous analysis that we did. For example, we cannot allow some audiences because of the location of the site. And now, we are developing the second one, with people with cognitive disabilities. Here in yellow or orange, you can see the things that we can improve in a short term. In red, we need a long term to solve it. Unfortunately, it is like that. And of course, people with cognitive disabilities have many characteristics. Probably, most of you can recognize them. You have one of them. Sure, for sure. People with mental disabilities have a very intelligent look. For example, some have one characteristic. They have difficulty in analyzing the situation and ability to decide. Difficulty in communication and personal relationship. Concentration within the duration. Difficulty in memorizing the capacity of abstraction. Difficulty or lack of access to writing. And difficulty of situation and directing. And our intention of temporary space, as well as the half-moderable problems. What we have done is try to change a little bit our model of vision. Our focus was on three important aspects in the framework of the cognitive disorder. Participation, temporal comprehension, and oral comprehension in order to improve our methodology. We have had to change our protocols for vision, as well as we have had to learn the techniques recommended by the workers from the state of Israel. They are psychologists, educators. So it is an interdisciplinary project. We want to seek information on how to use the techniques to be applied on the site. The workers from the state of Levaladier have gone to the site three times. One to test it. The second one, they came again with five users. And the last time, it came the whole group. First of all, we had to rethink the model of the vision. We visited with the access, as they are difficult for people with motor and mental disability. On the other hand, we realized that the presence of archaeological objects is a very positive option as people can understand better the site and the activities that we in the past developed in the past. The use of high pass, the use of high pass, wasn't well-valued by the professional of Levaladier. And also, people with mental disorder would not regular users of this kind of devices. For them, the use of high pass can be really complex. Furthermore, high pass don't help within the long term memory. There is arcy, videos, and images, are not static, but precise. Therefore, further to this experience with tablets or high pass, with a new audience, we decided not to use them. We did a content revision, which consists of a basic reading comprehension, the infographics, and the insertion of permanent elements. Here, you can see some parts of the user reading contents. Our goal is for everybody to be able to understand the site's contents. The user reading comprehension is a popular method that consists on a strategy to make information accessible, bringing back barriers to their comprehension, learning, and participation. In our contents, we have located some words that can be difficult to understand for many users, nomad or the briefing, and that on fire, stratigraphy, flint, endogami, baking, for example. Now, in the visit that we do, we don't avoid these words. We just explain them in a simple manner. And with short sentences, we're not losing any scientific explanation. We believe in our visitors' capabilities. Infographics, we use the use of infographics has been really positive. There are some aspects about the Leanderthals that we have saw in this method. For example, we have used these prints to show how the unseen past of the site looked like, between 38,000 years and 52,000. These prints ask the user how many grandmothers have passed since the humans last saw the Leanderthals. The result is a very long document that showed more than 1,600 grandmothers. So if they don't have a real idea of the antiquity of our story, observing that large number of grandmothers will make them have an idea of the time distance. Last of them, we put materials in fixed planes because we think that everything that we show to the visitors are exposed in fixed places. They must not be removed once the explanation is over. It is allowed to visit us to disconnect from the explanation, given and resume them quickly by means of the Victorian visual licenses. For this reason, it is required to have permanent visual references with minutes out of the site. Here you can see, for example, the prints that we use to show them how many grandmothers they had and they need all of them, all of them, all of them. This is a grand model, so what do you think? Also, if you like now all these prints, they have an idea of the distance that they had. OK. No, hey, no. I come back, sorry. The valuation is very important. That's from the first time that the workers came. For example, we have used, at the beginning, we used pictograms of neanderthals that reflected some emotions, happiness, solidarity. But we cannot use these pictograms for the general public because now you are using some importance. They are using the scientific regular, they say. So we have arranged them. And also, the idea of the materials and kitchen places is their idea, because we had all the papers and people, they look at one side, the other side, they follow everything. They must have a reference in the whole time, in order to resist. Here I have some reflection that I would like to discuss. Sorry, because I'm a very nervous person, as you can see. And just to say that inclusive work is a slow but progressive. Also, the importance to create protocols about inclusion and getting on with it, and getting help, and getting publics. Sometimes we're used to improvise the visits when people come here. So if we have good protocols, we can know better how to act with these people. Finally, inclusion can be the key to attract non-disabled customers. If you remember some of the necessities of people with cognitive disabilities, I have more than one of that. So probably, if we try to look for strategies, we can make them also come here, and that's it. This is just made to disabled publics. This is just made to disabled publics, can destigmatize, assess it before. We want to integrate them in our visits. We don't have to make experiences with them. For us, it has a sense if we do a different activities for them, they happen. They are people, and they must be with the disabled public. They are the disabled public. Finally, we cannot reach the universal inclusion. Unfortunately, I wish. And inclusion is about our gaps in their way to understand and show the cultural heritage, not about the capabilities of the audience. We must learn and try to find a dialogue with people to discuss about the quality of heritage and try to find whom likes to present it and to improve values in society. And that's it. Thank you so much. Thank you. APPLAUSE