 Good afternoon everybody. I hope you all hear me. Yes. Yes. My name is Gita Rosenberger. I am Chief Librarian at the Library of the University of Latvia and Manager of Open Air Advanced Project in Latvia. Today here will be held a webinar use of Creative Commons license for research and education. I am happy to say that in program will be two speakers from Czech Republic. Lucy Smolka is a lawyer in intellectual property and information and communication technology issues and representative of open content organization and Creative Commons Czech Republic. Lucy will give insight about creative comments in global context. Yuri Marek is Open Science Manager of Data Security and Management Department of Institute of Computer Science at Masaryk University as well as representative of Open Content Organization and he will tell about more practical questions related to Creative Commons licenses, our tool to open research, to open knowledge. Now please give your attention to some practical issues during the webinar. A webinar will be recorded for questions so will be given time at the end of webinar. If you have any questions please write them in the chat box or question and answer box. Video record and presentations will be accessible on the webpage of National Open Access Desk Latvia as well as the information will be sent to all participants by emails. Now I am happy to invite on the stage Lucy Smolka. You are welcome. Hello Gita, thank you very much. Can you hear me everyone? Is it okay? And the recording started of course. Okay so and you also can see my presentation right? Yes. Okay perfect so thank you very much. Thank you for having me and also having my Kori Kierka. We are really happy to be here at least through this online presence so my name is Lucy. I'm working as a lawyer in the area of intellectual property online and digital law areas and I'm also acting as a Creative Commons chapter lead in the Czech Republic and as a leader of Czech NGO Open Content where we are dealing with special areas of legal challenges and obstacles to sharing. So I would like to start my short presentations about our motivation and mission and current projects and then I will give the word to Kierka and he will talk more about the system or the use and about possible challenges when you are dealing with public licensing and especially with Creative Commons. So Creative Commons is the words leading non-profit organization which is trying to remove legal and technical obstacles to sharing knowledge and creativity and it's trying to help the society overcome the most pressing challenges from climate change to health emergencies and now for nearly two decades Creative Commons has been removing these obstacles to sharing to the set of open licenses and to public domain tools as well as to advocacy for cooperative form and open policies. So today we work not only on the licenses but on a variety of projects and activities. This whole Creative Commons network was originally focused on legal support and translations of Creative Commons licenses. Now the network connects over 85 Creative Commons affiliates or chapters around the world and this huge network creates global initiative with enormous impact. So it allows us to focus on other areas as well because in the beginning we started with building legal infrastructure for the open web to help millions of users and creators and enthusiasts and volunteers to provide free legal tools to be used in the context of special areas of work of these people and also in local languages so we also translated this set of licenses but over time the broader community grew and we expanded into new spaces including including free culture including open data cooperative form, open science, open education, open data and many more and seven years ago we transformed our set of licenses. We launched the 4.0 system, 4.0 version of the CC license suit which eliminated these local country versions in a favor of only one international license. So we transformed the system and we have only one set of licenses for the whole world which which is very special and which allows every state to work in the same way with the licenses. Specifically this year was very challenging and these challenges and crisis we have witnessed during this year, this special coronavirus time. It raised questions about a lot of areas about about power, about privilege, about who has access to knowledge in our society and we know that too often it's this access it's in the hands of the few not in the hands of many and with Creative Commons we try to change this. We have a role in this global movement to challenge power, to challenge privilege and we are trying to solve this situation and we are trying to open up access and share knowledge. Specifically during this coronavirus crisis there was some progress made. We saw some some paywalls came down and some institutions shared their research and this is what we are trying to do all the time. It's just a shame that it took a global pandemic to realize this and to implement these new ways of sharing. To be true for every step forward there is also a step backwards. So now we know that some countries, some nations have imposed restrictions on the right to information and not all of them have reinstated them and therefore too many knowledge remains out of reach. Newsrooms and libraries are shut in many countries and digital access is not available for so many. So breaking down these barriers and opening doors it's not easy but in Creative Commons we are trying to change this. A good example is National Emergency Library which was designed by maybe you know this initiative by Internet Archive to make over 1.3 million e-books available and it was all free of charge. So it's possible we can do this. It just needs some will and some tools. So earlier this year Creative Commons joined forces with some international groups researchers and academics and lawyers and we are trying to accelerate the development and opening up the knowledge and the research and to do this the new tool was created. It's called Open COVID Pledge. This project offers a very simple way for universities, for companies and for NGOs how to make their knowledge, their research, their patterns, their copyright available to the public and to be utilized for helping with the current crisis. If you know Creative Commons licenses it would be pretty easy for you because users who are using Creative Commons licenses regularly would be familiar with this because like Creative Commons licenses this Open COVID Pledge offers free public licenses that anyone can use to remove obstacles and to allow other people to disseminate the knowledge which is usually locked by copyright or patent rights. So already dozens of companies and institutions is using this Open COVID Pledge license to make their research available and they are trying to help with this tool to solve this global pandemic. The work of Creative Commons, what we are trying to do, helped help a lot during this crisis and it's been proved crucial during this pandemic because the obvious saying that sharing is caring is very true in this sense and this Open COVID Pledge made it easier for everyone who is holding some intellectual property to open it and to support development of of medicine, of vaccines, of test kits or to do some more necessary search. So what we are trying to do in the Czech Republic specifically is that we created, started for the purposes of sharing knowledge and for teaching about ways of sharing and for teaching the new ways, how to how to share knowledge and how to how to create new ways. We have started this NGO called Open Content and me and Tiarka and our other colleagues, we are helping other people, other NGOs and also local government and some government initiatives. We are helping with all the aspects of digitalization, we are trying and helping to solve legal challenges and we are creating new ways of sharing knowledge using modern methods and technologies. Right now we have this new project, the new project, it's called Reuse System Management and in this project we are analyzing and trying to find solutions on reuse of data of intellectual property and also reuse of project management with utilization of current resources and creating reusable initiatives and also reusable results. This project is trying to represent or trying to recreate a circular economy in the cyber world. So we are trying to reduce all the knowledge and all the IP we are already having and we are trying to use it elsewhere or we are trying to introduce it to someone else who is not using it but he still needs it or he's trying to reinvent it itself. So as a result we will create a methodological procedure for implementation of this reuse system and we are also creating some online tools which will help self-assessment and self-improvement of local governments and NGOs and also commercial subjects. So this is basically everything from me. This year is very challenging so we are trying to find ways and create means and tools to make both the digital and the physical world to be a little bit of a better place to live in and we are trying to do it in this challenging times as well and as it was before but if you can help us or anyone else it would be great. So thank you for having me and I will pass the word to my Kori Kierke. Thank you very much. Thank you Lucy. Please Kiri, that is yours. Can you see it please? Yes, yes. So thank you very much. Thank you very much for introduction. Thank you very much for the introduction presentation for Lucy. Actually as you can see she had the black label of the presentation you know and the networks you know so she is the CEO of our non-governmental organization so she has everything in the context you know and presenting in the global way and now you got the in Spanish it's called payaso you know it means clown you know the chief marketing officer that's me that is going to talk a little bit how you can use these creative commons licenses in your everyday practice as a legal tour for opening your science and education basically and as as Gita said it in the introduction sorry so I also work as open science manager of Masak University here in Bernal and we are both from Bernal with Lucy also so hopefully I will be able also to answer your questions in the discussion so I will not waste more time and let's go for it that we have more time for the discussion so basically our presentation we will we will have three parts you know both our creative commons license in a practical way how can you think about it how you can imagine it basically then it is strongly connected with copyright law content as Lucy mentioned in the previous presentation and then we will have space for discussion and you can try to ask me and I will try to I will try to give you an answer because I hope that I have already some experience in international law and also the in the international open science practice so hopefully I will be able to to respond to your question so let's go and start with the first thing what are creative commons license commons licenses so basically I just put here the key message you know this is what you should bring home from this presentation you know this two basically one one equation and one specification you know so if you have a copyrighted artwork that means for example your scientific article you know you add the licenses or licensing condition creative commons then you have open copyrighted artwork you know this is the basic equation and if you understand that that the copyright artwork is the mass you know what you have written you know your your work and you add these conditions namely creative commons kind conditions of these six or six times you know plus one that I will talk about it later so I will I will show you in more detail these conditions and differences and then you have these open copyright artwork so this is really important you know you have think you have the tool and you have the output and then what does it mean copyrighted artwork actually in the science or education it means scientific article scientific monographic creative research database etc of course I am from the Czech Republic and you are from Latvia so I don't have I don't have knowledge so deep knowledge about Latvia and copyright law but because there is no global copyright law but it's it would be probably I can say for 99% that scientific article and also scientific monography or creative research database will be copyrighted artwork also in your legal system then this is this is it you know and now I will talk a little more deeply in each of these concepts and then you can create that we can create together an image what how you can use this creative commons license so let's let's go further here as as was mentioned this is the definition basically of of artwork based on the Czech copyright law but it's following the international principle so again the the green thing you should you should remember that artwork is literary work or other work that means also scientific for example or art you and it is unique outcome of the creative activity so your basically creative ability and it's objectively uh objectively perceivable manner so this that means that your creativity inside your head that is not objectively perceivable because nobody can read your mind you know but written on the article you know in the on the paper you know that is objectively that you can you can show to your colleague for example that is basically the definition what artwork means in general you know there are very uh special uses etc but for this general knowledge this is important that you you have this clear so basically uh because we like a lot cats you know in our open content non-governmental organization and especially Lucy likes that so uh we we are trying we are going to using this presentation basically uh sometimes a cat you know so don't be afraid they are just nice nice creatures so what are licenses and what is public about them so basically creative commons licenses they are public license so-called public licenses so why they are public you know this this is the this is the question here so but firstly what's the license license is an institute by which the owner of the property for example you as a alter uh has rights to a work um property rights to a work allows other to work with work in a particular way so what does it mean so license means uh that it's a tool that gives uh an alter an option to let someone else to give to do something with his work you know this is the license and uh i will explain in the next slide why it is public so the author in the copyright law in the general terms has two set of rights personality rights and property rights personality rights at the first uh green a box it's right to authorize uh right to publish the work for example right to be to not uh diminish the value of the of the work you know that means for example if you have this cat you know and you share it openly so you can use it under these conditions but for example if you put it in the context with some racism or or war or some terror so this is diminishing the the the level uh or the the value of the artwork and uh uh alter even if he gave you the complete license you know to do anything so this is the right that he still conserves you know so he can sue you go with uh you to the to the court you know and to uh you can have problems also but this is this is one thing and then you have property rights that's uh about the right to reproduction dissemination communication to the public and that means these right the property rights are the ones that you are licensing you know the personality rights you can't try license basically in the in the european context of copyright law but the property rights uh you license yeah that's that's it so and what uh what are what's the public thing there you know so basically public license is non-exclusive free of charge provided through the period of protection of order time to identify indefinite sorry circle of people the licensing may further disseminate the work it can be obtained implicitly so what does it mean so the public license mean that is non-exclusive that doesn't mean that is not exclusive to one it's not to one person you know it's for everyone it's free of charge it's irrevocable that means that is if you license something under this license that means that for the eternity that is this artwork protected so you will waive this rights you know that you license and then to indefinite circle of people this is the public thing that it's public offering you know you don't know who will come you know because usually the contract uh license is actually special type of contract and contract is um i am person a for example me as usually will make a private contract with lucy you know and that's contract between two people but if you are working in the internet and you put uh you put um your artwork to use uh by anyone else you know so that means that you don't know who will use it you know so it's it's not practical and actually it's not possible to have bilateral contact contracts with each of these persons basically so you actually have a public offering with this public license that everyone and that's the last sentences you know that it can be obtained implicitly that means that if i'm um i'm um using the artwork according to the condition that are written in the license so i can use it you know and that's it you know that you make some action that means that right use of the artwork according to the license so this gives you the permission to use it you know this is the public license construct and there are no only creative comments but there are also genie google gpl mit best bsd mozilla public license these are for some public licenses that are more uh common in uh in software open source source uh error okay so how it all began this is the creative common sign probably you already seen it somewhere uh the person the important person is lauren slasik and this is professor from harvard actually from the itlo it has a similar background as we have flutsy and he he he was thinking you know that there is a commercial culture non-commercial culture and the protection of books for 70 years there's some sort of piracy there was also a special case al dread case and uh that's that's basically uh what what he can do that with that you know in the age of internet you know because as i mentioned in the start you know there is no global copyright law but and you in the you know in in physical board you are working with the administrative barriers you know you you go from one country to another and you have to pass the the you know country country barriers sorry i can't remember the word but uh in internet there are no barriers at all you know there are no borders there's border thing there are no borders you know so uh if someone wants to share the picture from united states he can actually and that's the question how he will do it if he has different copyright law than the check person you know and this is what creative commons basically are trying to trying to help to solve so it's a non-profit organization founded in usa in 2001 by this professor lorenz lasik it is set of public public licenses it's an it's an attempt to spread culture and creativity and there is a combination of licensing agreement so basically another key message of that so creative commons you have a on one side you have all rights reserved copyright you know on the other hand you have a no rights reserved with the usually 70 years after the death of the outro um formula that means that after that years the artwork is so-called free and you can uh you don't have to have license to to use this artwork but then between you have some rights reserved you know and this is the creative commons actually this is the double c so this is this is also a key message to take away so creative commons creative commons licenses just a moment i will put this yeah sorry yeah creative commons licenses elements there are six of them actually and there are there are elements that determining the scope of competencies and also there are elements that are defining the condition to be respected you know so the scope of competencies it's the right to share the work that it can be disseminated this is the right to share it's implicit to all six types of creative commons licenses and then you have right to edit the work that is that is possible to use in some of these uh these licenses then on the other hand the elements defining the condition to be respected you know so this is basically uh you can do something and you should oblige oblige something you know you should respect something so uh every license has the first one specific specified origin so-called attribution this basically citation you know uh but it's uh written in the in the license so it's not like the citation itself as you probably know it from your uh from your academic careers so that means that you should at least give the author his or her name or pseudonym if it disappears or that or the title of the work the link to the work and the references to the original creative commons license must be given must be given there is also a rule how to basically remember how to license well under creative commons or when you are using someone someone artwork so how how you how you attribute it right you know and the the rule it's called tassel that means title author source and license you know t asl you know and if you remember that so you should you should be able to license or actually make the attribution right with creative commons license then there is a there is a element keep your license it's called share alike or it's based on the copy left i would say yeah copy left agreement that is sometimes present in the open source licenses and that means that if you use someone else work and you modify it so your modification should be shared on with the same or compatible license you know with this you create the the community or group of creative commons license elements or artworks actually and the community is growing basically yeah then there is more there are two more so there is a restriction for using commercially or non commercially and this is classical thing and also you can make or not make derivatives that means that you are prohibited to modify the work or not so basically that means so right to share every type of six licenses of creative commons has this right then the specifically the origin it's at every of these licenses again and then right to edit the work keep your license do not use work commercially or do not modify do not make derivatives from the from the artwork this is special for several of them as you can see this is the the usual way how it is represented i will show better picture in coming coming slide this is only a summary you know these slides to have it for you on the all in one then what's also special about this license this is special because they were introduced in the era of internet basically there are three basic layers of these license machine readable one human readable and legal code you know and this is these two no two sorry three parts of interoperability as is called you know are crucial to make any open anything education data science work you know in the practical way because you need a machine that's usually for example for open science publication it's the repository or the publisher's website you know then you you need the you need something to be human readable you know because not everyone is lawyer you know and the internet so you you need a clear set of rules and then you have the legal code that basically it's the legal bind in your command that enables you this is the legal tool you know this is the part of legal tool that is really the legal one that that helps you to really make that contract and there is a common joke between the lawyers who are working within this license is that lawyers are not not people are not humans because they have their own layer you know so that's that that's it so basically just a moment i will drink a little so that means that you have six type of licenses plus one that's the public domain we can talk about it we can talk about it in the discussion but this is the six main creative commons licenses as you can see the attribution that's the that the guy you know in the circle that is everywhere then the sharing thing is implicit to the licenses so it's not represented by the by the pictogram and then you have the s a that means share a like that you should share your modified work also again with this license and say means non-commercial and end there means non-derivative so this is in total six six creative commons licenses lucy also spoke about a new version of 4.0 of creative commons licenses so there is four versions yet as she mentioned there is no porting that means that the licenses are not adapted to the national law but there is one international version that is translated to the Czech or Latvian or French etc and it works on the international standards you know of course where it is in conflict but it shouldn't be but it it can happen in i would say one or two five percent mostly you know i'll bet one person that if it is in contract with the national law you know so this means that it should be it should be governed by the law of the of the party that is not in advantage you know usually in the meaning if you are for example a company and you are selling to someone some some people you know that are buying your stuff only so usually they are in the minor position that you are because you are the big company you know they are just one person you know so the in this context there is an international law principles to tackle these issues you know but you don't have to worry about that because the really the percentage you can have a problem with that is so minor that basically don't worry about it yeah and then immediately if required that is new thing that in the version 4.0 you can also claim as an author that you don't want to use any name you know that means that if you have the rule tussle title outer source and license you will put out the a you will not use it you will just put for example the title of the artwork license and and source exclusion of support that is explicitly written that for example if i would say coca cola or apple or something is some of these big companies for example or government is sharing something under creative common license that doesn't mean that they are and you are using it you know so that doesn't mean that they are supporting you yeah this is explicitly written in the in the license and then there is a 30 days to remedy the violation and that means that before it was like that if you are not obeying these license condition anymore you lost the license of course you can start obeying them again so you get the license again but now it is more like that there is a this remedy close that if you if you make a remedy in 30 days so you don't you don't lost the first license basically but from the practical point of view for you it doesn't mean i would say it you will not use it you will not notice it you know in practical way so this is it so these are the for example check version of creative commons 4.0 probably i'm not sure sorry i haven't looked at it if you have in latvia the latvian version of that but it can be or someone from you can translate it from the international version so next is how many works are licensed with creative commons globally this is basically 1.2 billion it's the number from 2018 i think and it's growing rapidly in thousands in big or or even less so it will be soon much more so that's just to give you a perspective how widely it is used and if you have time so there is a link to state of creative commons or you can read more information about this license so now about copyright law context so before we start i would give the floor to one or two questions to have it more interactive so please don't hesitate to ask i will look in the in the chat i'm sorry yeah in the chat there is a one from Ilgonius Wilkes latvian law of altruite says nothing about cc licensing can we still use legally cc licensing in latvia oh yeah thank you for the question actually this is uh this is important that creative commons license it's not necessary that they are in the law you know that basically latvian law will be from copyright law will be probably based on the international international standards because you are part of european union so that means that you can use legally creative commons license of course i don't have a through i would say analysis of your copyright legal legal context but i would say for 98 or 99% that it's no problem to use creative commons license in latvia and if you want we can look at it with you for example we can talk with gita and alia after that and we we can try to if you are able to for example translate part of the latvian copyright law in the in english that we can understand it so we could look at it you know for example in coming weeks and we can tell you but i think that there will be no problem in that in using them so any other question because basically creative commons is it's constructing on the legal on copyright law legal system you know that means that you have these you have usually no rights reserved or all rights reserved and copyright law is giving this some rights reserved but it's building on the copyright law it's not like contra or something else you know it's based on copyright law that you already have okay is there any other question i see oh yeah oh great thank you lucy so there is latvian version so you can use it that's 100% you know okay so i will go with the next part of the presentation so sorry sorry sorry no i don't want that so copyright law context because it's based on copyright basically and so for the reason you have to have a basic idea how copyright works you know and this i'm going to explain in this section so basically you have two two main roles you know a licensor and licensee you know licensee is outer for example who gives the license and licensee is the one who is receiving the license so the the construct in general so what does creative commons allow to the licensor so for if you are a author for example scientist that that is working on some publication so you can with creative commons share a work on terms that uh you are uh you designate you know and at the same time stand on the basis of copyright you know as as we talked in the before then it's a superstructure of copyright it's called summarize reserved as i mentioned before and share the work under the terms of the author so there is a so-called chooser on creativecommons.org in english and you can look at it and pick what you want to do with the artwork and it will generate you the legal power legal layer human readable and machine machine readable player yeah as we were we were doing here sorry here so if you use this chooser so you will get these three layers and you can copy paste it to your web to your digital publication or you can even use it with non-digital objects of course there's a little bit it's unpractical but it can be used then how do i use creative common licences so there is a set of question that you have keep in mind first one is the material you want to license subject to copyright that's important you know licenses creative commons licenses works on copyright artwork so if you don't have copyright artwork that i for example mentioned in the start that's only your fault usually in the international context there is for example for example in the check law there is a paragraph two and two slash six of copyright check law and there is written that for example data by by themselves they are not they are not copyrighted artwork you know so what does it mean for example you have a bedroom forecast you know and there is tomorrow will be 24 degrees celsia you know so the number 24 degrees celsia itself it's not for example copyrighted work you know so that means that you can use it freely you don't have to have license for for the you then the second thing you have to think about if you own the material you want to license you know basically so if you have all the and this is connected to the third one are you entitled to license it actually so do you have all the rights you know for example if you are working for a university so you probably the the the person that is entitled to license this work is probably your maybe manager of the re or the rector you know the the one who gives you the work you know because you are in the work contract you know so this is important to keep in mind that not outer is not always the one who has all the rights to do this to this sharing you know for example at check there was also one question about how it works in the Czech Republic for example at our university is that we have in the work contracts we have a clause clause that everything that i produce in my work is it belongs that these licenses for for dissemination etc it belongs to the university but on the other hand we have internal directive that says in the type of scientific article and scientific scientific lecture on the conference the right to to make a contract basically to give a license is given to the outer back i would say yeah that that's the that's in short you know it it has some special meanings but in short it means this then are you aware the fourth point that cc licenses are irrevocable that means that if you do that once you know that you can't bring it back so that means that you should think twice before you license is basically that means that if you put some article on the web you put the creative comments license and then you said oh but i will not i don't want to share it anymore so you can put it out of the internet you know and if nobody downloaded before you it it can be used of course from the practical reason but the license is still active but in the in the situation that someone already downloaded it and he has this he was acting in i would say good faith you know that that he was obliging the license and he really gets the license by this condition so he has you you have no right to stop him that's important to know then the fifth one you can and not influence the copy on the internet yeah that what i mentioned sorry and are you represented by a collective management organization this is not on scientific issues this is more in the musician so i will i will skip this and by granting the license to extend possibly you may you wave the royalty rights for the license is excess exercise of rights so this is basically the the answer to the question connected to them mostly to the music etc so then and we can talk about it more in the in the discussion you have some special type of work you know you have employee work and school work employee work is the one as i mentioned with the university that the university is exercise has the copyright the the property rights of copyright are exercised by the employer unless otherwise agreed it is how it works in the Czech Republic so this is this the collaboration between the employer and employee is set in the employment relationship and in internal directives for example on of university on the other hand school work is the is the thing of the student you know you can use it as you want but you have some special condition that you have to follow for example you can use your work that was created in school for in connection again with racism or terrorism etc because because you are putting bad light on that university for example you know this is one of the one of the reasons also so basically the difference between employee and school work is that employee work if it is not stipulated differently so the employer has the rights to exercise these property rights of of copyright on the other hand the school work is you as an author as a student are able to do whatever you want but you have some condition that you have to follow and if the university wants actually to if the university wants to for example if you are doing research in chemistry i'm a chemist actually so so if you are doing research in chemistry so you probably use some electron microscopy that cost a lot you know and you can have a patent you know after that that you will sell for millions you know so university can say hey we have some uh some uh we we had to spend some money you know for your school work so give us i don't know 100 000 you know for example check rounds so this is how the school work works differently from the employer work and then uh you should know how do i express that the work is available under creative commands how do i represent the work under these licenses so this is basically uh how it can be represented this is a photo from lucy and it says this work entitled fluff on on the rocks this one by lucy stragg uh is available uh under creative commands by for international the license terms are available at blah blah blah blah blah blah you know so this until here you know until the legal code dot and this means this is the very nice representation how you should um basically what kind of information you should put together with your artwork that you are trying to license under creative command so uh and the rest of the slide says while persevering these terms and condition and above all indicated the origin of the book you are entitled to distribute even commercially so if you want to give even more hints you know to the out to the next user of your artwork in the digital world so you can put also this but it's not necessary this is the maximum way how to do it then as you can see uh you have another one another representation you know and now it's kind of complicated right you have six type of one and plus five but uh good message is that all variants are possible so it depends only on the bill of the provider about information he wants to mention in the board you know and then uh you should uh you should uh the reasonable bill of the provider actually you know so if he said hey i won't dare everything you know written my biography etc so this is not a reasonable bill and this is written also in the legal code so if you are interested in your uh you can look in the uh in your translation of latin creative command so okay now the another part licensee so someone who is uh receiving the license so uh another cat so if you work with outer box uh is it always the use in the sense of the copyright act that means like um yeah that's it so basically uh if you are licensing something under public licenses you are working within the copyright law then but you have some some special um i would say uh it's uh legal licenses it's called in in check and uh or law licenses and this is typical quotation you know so uh here in the check quotation paragraph that means that you can use for a small uh some small parts of the artwork or you can use a small artwork excel or uh you can use um yeah extract or that for for example teaching or illustrative processes so it's um it's the way when you are present preparing the presentation for your teaching lesson and you use for example a picture from i would say google or you would say from flicker for example so or another colleagues part of the book etc but what's important is that if the work it's not anonymous so you should always put the name of the person under whose name the work is made public the name of the work and the source must always be mentioned you know so that means that even in the quotation and did this kind of uh bad practice for example in the chicare republic but it's slow not slowly but kind of rapidly changing that even in this presentation for students you know for your class you should use uh proper attribution and proper list of sources you know that you use uh another uh artworks during your lecture then you have another i think um there is a usually uh it's called uh reproduction for personal use uh that's the happy cat you know so if you are usually using it from uh from um personal use that you can use already published work for non-commercial purposes it doesn't apply to usually to computer programs no nodes are architectural works electronic databases etc but usually no it's important it's to remember that it doesn't apply to computer program this one but you can use it for for personal use yeah that's it we can talk about it in discussion what does it mean uh then how to correctly indicate the origin of work that's the thing that i already mentioned this is the title author source and license of tussle so then you can read it um basically during your uh when you have the presentation uh after this lecture and how to correctly state the origin of the work so you can do it again broadly or you can use it uh very very shortly and as i mentioned before watch out for the offline art uh you can of course use these creative commons licenses uh and creative commons license artworks but you have to be careful because it's more uh it's not so practical and you can the problem is that you can't use hyperlinks so uh what to watch out for uh this is just uh last a few slides uh as i mentioned before license is sponsors support or is anyway connected with you in any other way that means that these coca-cola or apple if you are using their images under this creative commons license that doesn't mean that they are supporting you and then uh the last thing is if you use the work only for your personal purposes and you are no longer making it available to anyone you do not to provide it with the origin information so that means that if you download a picture and you just look at it basically and i don't know sometimes you open it because you like it and or there isn't some quotation you know for albert anstein for example and you use it only for you you don't have to put in your computer or when you print it for example you don't have to put a quotation basically the origin but uh when you are publicly you are publicly uh making it available to anyone else so you should put that there so um when no last thing where to search for creative commons works uh there are there is a search dot creative commons dot org when you can look at different type of artwork material that is licensed in creative commons licenses as you can see uh there is a cc search open knowledge repository internet archive open educational resources common and basically in the cc research there is a flicker also connected there is a google you can see if you are sometimes looking for something with google then you should use also the tools for the for the search and in the tools there is a right to use and if you basically click on it there will be six type of rights there and this is connected with the with the creative commons licenses you know basically these six six areas so this is how a creative commons is spread across the board so and now also one of the question was what about data at all if i quote it well just give me a minute what should be considered when you're using and combining data sets you know because and how to use creative commons to research data and how to add attribution of license practically you know so basically uh it's harder not harder but it's more complex you know because in uh with research data you don't have only uh copyrighted work you have also uh database law you have personal data and then you have some for example know how etc so it's much more complex think of considering then making open your publication basically there are approximate there should be 64 cases probable cases that you can say for example the artwork is copyrighted it has database rights but it doesn't have any personal data etc you know so this this combination if you put together you know you have 64 you have 64 possible cases for this thing there are approximately five of them they are the most common one and what we are doing going to do at Masak University during the this this winter basically we are building a new new web called openscience.moone.cz so we will put the practical example and description of these open these five common examples how to reuse data and data sets in in context of Czech Republic but it will work basically also for you and we will make it also in English you know so if you are interested and I can I can send it later to Gita and Alja and they can they can send it to you also so where we are going to have it so there is no problem you can use this but this will be for another one and a half hour to explain you maybe how to work with data but you can have specific question in the discussion and I will try to respond so basically now we have a discussion I just want to mention several last two things thank you of course there is a information about how the creative commons work in the Czech Republic what was the history of it there is a helpful links and resources it's most in Czech but maybe you can find some the creative commons CZ will be in English in coming in coming here next year so this is also possible then there are attribution as we used it in the in the presentation and so now it's the time for the question as I can see there are two of them in the two new questions and answers so I will try to answer these first and then if anyone else wants to ask for example directly or by chat you can so how should I mention the changes which I make in cc documents for example I use the cc teaching materials which I modify for my students and it is hard to mention all the places with I have adjusted okay so if it is presentation so you can for example mark somehow the the slide or there usually you have these slide numbers you know and then in the end you will just put it there you know and how you should mention the changes you should mention the changes you know in as was written here as was written here just a moment reasonable will of the provider you know so be reasonable yeah that that's important miss miss ills beer's I'm sorry for putting your name maybe wrong so I hope that I answered this question then uh ill gony's bilks uh you in 2009 19 has adopted use of creative commons international and cc zero what about illy cc license version of course now if we have four point zero use four point zero you know and you have this translation as lucy sent it in the chat uh in in latvia so use that and of course the rest of them works also but they can have smile so some small special differences but usually uh it should be uh it should be uh it should be okay in general you know but the the more higher you go so there is more compatible with the current version that that's the clue okay so now I will look in the chat just a moment chat yes uh yeah lucy mentioned c19 and new challenges we are about to work at university strategy for 2025 a slot to work and quality indicators are related to citation publication etc do you see that number of publication will decrease what are the steps you are doing to predict forecast the movement uh how it will affect the universities all communities so I'm not sure if lucy is still here with us lucy are you here okay if not so I will answer that because I have also practiced practical experience with that basically uh there's strong intention in the communities to not make as many publication as possible because it is contra the scientific quality you know basically so this the forecast it's probably that there will be for example maybe in the future we were talking with our advisory board on open science at the university that there may be there will be only one publication pair for example phd you know but there will be a lot of data connected to the publication you know and for example now we are working in the Czech Republic and also our organization is working on on change of the evaluation of science in the context also that the research data are eligible and secondly that more in the context less is more you know as there is there was a famous architect Ludwig Misfan de Rohe he created the villa to Bernhardt that's our UNESCO monument here in Bernhardt and he was the functionalist architect actually and he he had a quote less is more you know so probably this is the forecast for for a number of publication in coming years it maybe it will just stabilize to 2025 but till 2030 probably will decrease because there is a huge initiative called european open science cloud that is coming and it will be fully operational by 2022 25 sorry so this will impact you know the side definitely it's one it's more more than 1 billion euros initiative for europe so everything is clear thank you for that so now any questions you can also ask directly you know you don't have to write only in chat if you have the possibility to ask and maybe i pass the board to Gita if she wants to moderate the discussion for example maybe you could give more information about what have to do journal creators and publishers yes okay yeah this is good question thank you i have here also several questions so i will answer them step by step so you know journal and outro this is a contract you know there has to be some sort of contract you know and what what's important there is also for you and it works like that in check republic it works like that with european funding so probably it will work as the same in latin funding you have also contract as a scientist for example you have the contract with the funding agency and funding agency said your research output should be open access you know so for that reason that is the basic condition that you should follow to have this money basically and if you make a contract with the publisher that doesn't allow the open access regime of publication you are basically breaching the contract with the with the funder so this is not good to practice so what you should do so you should and it's quite i would say quite simple you should be all the time aware about the condition of your contract with the funder if there is a problem for example what happened in check republic happened that sometimes the outro wants to publish in some journal sorry he wants to publish in some journal that is not allowing open access you know so in that reason you should before that you sign up your article to the publisher you know you should probably ask to your grant funding agency if it is okay or not you know if they say that it's okay so you can publish no problem at all and you get your points you get your article etc and you are happy if they say no you have to apply with the with the principles so then you have to think to talk with the publisher you know and there are two things you know the publisher usually has general conditions where it's written what you can do with the article itself and there is 82% of all publishers enable so-called green open access you know there is a difference between gold open access that usually it's the pavement and green open access and there is very good chance that also the the funding agency allows you to fulfill this condition by green open access so you should look for the first for the first point on this option if it is not possible so you have to look on creative commons gold open access open access if this if you have no money for example for them so then the last option if you really want to publish in that article is that you are you are you write to the publisher and you try to make a reason with him you know and we have a good experience at Masach University that four from five publishers said oh this is okay for this article if you have such condition because we like it for example yeah so hopefully I answer this question Gita I was thinking more what have to do the publisher publisher I think that the university publishers for example the publisher have to organize the his work so the authors could use these cc licenses and so on the yeah yeah okay okay it is not quality it's not called to work if they not using some licenses or agreements with authors every time the license actually the agreement can be usually it is written but it hasn't to you know it can be also like oral agreement you know but then you don't have the legal we call it legal certainly you know yeah that the publisher will not or the author will not change the mind next day you know and you don't have evidence about it so basically every time from the legal perspective from the conceptual point of view every time if you are signing or giving someone a the artwork the article to for example to be licensed to be published sorry so you are you have to do it by some some concept of copyright law basically and you do it by the contract you know and the contract has not to be written it can be oral but that that that doesn't make sense you know this is not a good practice you know but so so basic line is every time when you pass your article to the publisher there is some sort of contract you know that that's the baseline you know the second thing is that if you have this gold open access for example if you pay for making this open accessible in nature for example so usually it's like that that you you give exclusive license so all rights you give of this property rights you give to the publisher and publisher said yeah you pay me three thousand euros so i will put this article under license is creative comments by for example the less restrictive one and then you as outer you are not using it on based on your your original license or your your original yeah license not license but rights for the article that is yours but you are using it on the basis of these creative comments licenses basically you are he basically sold you the license that's one thing you know another thing what's happening with the open access publishers for example in diamond diamond gold open access that are not taking money for for publishing is that they said hey there is a process you you you make an agreement with us for example that during the process of revision blah blah blah something you know the conditions of the of the process and then in the end that means that you are obliged yourself to publish it under creative comments licenses so basically after the work is actually you put the creative comments licenses yourself on that on the work and based on this license the publisher is later using it in their system it is this one what you wanted yes yes okay we have more five minutes only oh okay for example you ask about the scopus here and basically how it's working with the evaluation of science evaluation science in Czech Republic is slowly changing we had a very old before in 2015-16 there was still an old system of evaluating science that this was about impact factor you know that it was called like the machine for making coffee you know because as many you made you get the points you know and this was well criticized so now we have a methodology 2007 plus and it's in progress methodology 2021 plus and these methodologies should also evaluate the science and institution also in another context that only in the as many articles as possible there's a our community basically of open access managers also our open content organization others are pushing quite a lot now to to make open research data or research data in general these datasets you know as an eligible output also and to be evaluated and we are doing the same at the university we are trying to think about the mechanism they are not implemented yet but about the mechanism that would benefit also someone who is doing for example a really great dataset that others are working on that you know but he is not publishing you know for that he is creating the dataset the general data that the others are using for the publications you know so we are trying to think about it at the university somehow then yeah that that's it and yeah that's basically I hope that I answer think you mentioned also scopus here yeah what you know basically scopus it's part of if I'm sorry I can't remember that it is correct but it's part of there's science direct you have scopus you know you have web of science and all these you know so these these are sorry yes citation dataset something similar verbal science yes are you using that yeah we are of course using it in the Czech Republic and there is also what we have kind of special and I'm not sure if it is in Latvia we have a national information system of research projects research publication and we will put in the system also info about where to find datasets you know in the future so this is the national database of research basically you know of people doing research people the project publicly funded project and outputs of that that doesn't mean that they are all open this is only metadata catalog that we know that they exist you know and based on that so the metadata it's key principle in this that all these databases should implement some sort of filter how you can you can sort the open articles and non-open articles I would say with that so of course scopus web of science etc they are working with that but these are not publishers actually you know the publisher is Elsevier springer nature vile etc yes yes yes do you allocate yes we have a possibility to have do why and we are now working in the mechanism how to make it practical for our authors at university if I talking from the mosaic point of view mosaic university point of view yes this is important aspect that researchers wants and for now because we don't have it fully operational so we have we give zeno though if you apply to zeno though the international you know the database or repository that is governed by cern so they will give you do i for free for your data set that's one thing and now we are working with an application called that as the watch wizard for the data management and these data management plans are machine actionable and there is a thing that part of this development of this application is also based in Czech Republic it's a combination with Netherlands and Czech Republic and for life sciences researchers maybe you know elixir so this is part of elixir and we are trying to apply it also in humanities so if you are interested in that we can also provide you in contact to the person that is developing them and this will work of course with the y and identifiers etc and we are now thinking about national org id consortia with the national technical library any more questions i can't see here no okay so thank you lucy and thank you easy if there will be some more questions i will send you by email yes okay no problem send we are able to respond till i will say one or two weeks you know with that but uh but no problem no worries thank you thank you so thank you for webinar and have a good evening today and thank you for inviting us it was a real pleasure bye bye till i see you