 Good morning, everyone. My name is Aadha Shankar, third year Pure Outskirts resident, JJ Medical College. The title of my paper is Role of the Multiplanner Reconstruction, Imaging on the Three-Dimensional Computer Tomography, Imaging and Diagnosing Cranial and the Facial Factors. Name and the objective of this study, the verus injuries caused by the ferocity and the facial regions being the most commonly affected region in all of this region will leave to life-threatening situation, which includes the refuse blood loss of tissue swelling, glycerations, and the pain. Skull factor, also known as the canal factor, can occur in road traffic accident, as well as sports and any other injuries factor, so the skull can occur in any region on the skull. All brain injuries, including the traumatic brain injuries, subdural hematoma, epidural, dextraternal hematoma, or the traumatic, intercellular hematoma, or the conditions. The role of brain radiography in assessing the facial traumas has declined over the years in sexes as a sensitive to the canal wall factor, but are in such a to the skull-based factor as it does not provide sufficient information regarding the anatomic retails. The role of MRI in trauma is to assess the soft tissue injuries since it has good soft tissue contrast and also helps in eating, assessing the patients with the knowledge of their patients, but is not as useful as compared to the city in the evolution of the Bonnie pathologies. The role of multi-planar reconstruction of the 3D reconstruction of the multi-director computer tomography in the musculoskeletal system is of tremendous advantage in the traumatic injuries and the results of the brain data are filled to answer the doubts of the surgeons regarding the satisfactory alignment of the complex fracture. Small structures that are not well seen with the conventional CT imaging can be clearly depicted using the multi-planar reconstruction and the 3D overlapping reconstruction of the small intervals. Performed images can provide complementary information about the various conditions, including the congenital malformation, vascular damage, and the trauma involving the cranial and the facial bones. Coming to the materials and the method of the study, 100 patients with a clinical history and the examination findings of the cranial and the facial factors from the JJ Medical College were referred to the CT. The department of the radiology were included in the study. 100 patients fulfilling the criteria were included in the study. The average age taken was from 20 to 24 years. The patient was scanned within a GE CT machine with appropriate brain and facial protocols with the bone and sub-tissue reconstruction. During the study, proper instruction were given to the patients and protective measures, such as the late aprons were used to cover the patients but to minimize the radiation dose to the patient. Throughout the procedure vitals or monitor factors that were assessed include ear length, simple and displays communicated and the simple displays factor. The images obtained were subjected to the radiology analysis and the interpretation. The parameters for KVP were 100 to 120 and the MS was on 300 to 350 slice thickness was 5 mm and the field of vision was 18 to 22 and the scan length was 250 to 300 mm. Coming to the inclusion criteria, traumatic cranial and facial factors were included pregnant and lactatic women and non-traumatic patients were excluded for the study. Coming to the discussion, plane radiograph is the initial imaging modality in the trauma patients, one since it has cannot provide adequate information regarding the internal and the skull-based anatomy, its significance in assessing the cranial and the facial factor. Trauma has declined moreover in the patient with the multiple traumas, especially the involving the cranial and the facial factor. There may be life-threatening consequences while positioning the patient since its role is limited. This factor, not in the right paratal bone impinging on the underlying brain, parankema segmental factors noted in the ignitable of the right frontal bone or frontal sinus resulting in the large effect. The evaluation of the factors, multiply the reconstruction of the 3D sequences were widely used for the successful identification of the factors set. This is especially true for the factors of the cranial and the facial region. This is because the structures are located and then in the transverse plane, but trauma images can provide false-positive images since adjacent agents easily overlap. Hence, this produces a false image thereby making the diagnosis difficult. However, in a wider context, transverse imaging useful as a method of visualization of the anatomical element is perfectly equal to the examined brain. A good example would be the evaluation of the anterior and the lateral walls of the magnolias and the orbital bones. The high sensitivity in the agmas in the factors of the axilla frontal and the nasal bone was relieved with the multiply the reconstruction. It was noted that in the imaging of the thin and delicate bone structures, such as the crudiform plate of the etymid bone, orbital flow. And in some cases, also the anterior wall of the magnolias and the 3D reconstruction were less useful than the multiply the reconstruction. The use of 3D reconstruction in those areas often produces a false positive image as a suggestion of the inexistent source that are difficult or impossible to differentiate from the factors in 3D reconstruction cannot be used as the only imaging method in the visualization of the factor. When comparing the results of the imaging with the use of the direct acquisition of the raw data with the 3D reconstruction is also what noticing this is separated to artifact the disappearance of the false image. Elements that do not exist in real day may follow from the steady protocol. Only for example, if the thickness is 2-3 during the multiply the reconstruction, a stage to artifact appears. Off-run data conducted a study in which it was proved that the acquisition of the multi-detector computer tomography is like thickness of 2.5 mm and slice thickness less than 1.5 mm is enough to avoid the stage to artifact in the multiply the reconstruction. Furthermore, in the visualization of the 3D sluggered 5-size segment multiply the reconstruction turned out to be more successful in the assessment of the post-traumatic collisions involved in the orbit and the magnoliasis. 3D image reconstruction also turned out to be of the limited utility, not only in the abominable discursive group of symptoms but also in the imaging of the itmoid bones. However, it was successful in utilizing the free bone chips within the condyle process branches and the body of the mandible. And here all of these frontals and the zygomatic bones and the nasal bones also provided useful in the imaging of the cryophore fractures. The technique of the 3D reconstruction also turned out to be useful also in the evaluation of the fracture with the high number and the extent of the dislocation of the bone chips some of all the uplay techniques of the presentation and the reconstruction of the CT images of 3D. Option allows for a very precise reconstruction of the post-traumatic amortical deletion in contrast to the transverse and the multiplying of the imaging. This is a minimally displaced fracture in the right parietal and the temporal bones well-depleted in the coronal reformated CT image on the CT, such that a reformated CT image shows the fracture line. This is the axial CT image in the repressed fracture. This is the multiplier CT image is well demonstrating the repressed fracture in the right parietal and the temporal bones and flexion of the fracture. Coming to the results of the presentation, I believe that compared to the four types of fracture, simple and displaced was found to be the most frequently occurring one, where in the multiply and the reconstruction was found to be more deductive for the fracture compared to the multiply and the reconstruction of the 3D, multiply and the reconstruction axial and the 3D, multiply and reconstruction and axial. Statically, analysis was carried out using the formula and software detest. This is the above bar graph showing that in my study, simple and displaced fracture were the most common one sustained. This graph shows that in my study, multiply and reconstruction imaging was the most accurate means of detecting the canal and the facial factors compared to the other mode of study. Coming to the conclusion, this study has highlighted the usefulness of the multiply and reconstruction technique as imaging tool in the enabling the actual localization of the P for fragment and assessing the degree of the displacement and thus helping to reduce the recurrent exposures. These are my references. Thank you.