 Hi everyone, I'm a Nikki Pfeiffer with the Center for Open Science. I'm a lead product manager there where our mission is to increase openness, reproducibility, and transparency of scientific research. One of the things that my slides are hopefully going to relate to everyone is sort of where we fit into that research lifecycle and obviously our roadmap. This has a lot of information, but what I wanted to relay here is just where we see ourselves fitting into that ecosystem. And I think everybody has their own version of what these little pieces are along that workflow. And where we are focused is around our core platform, the OSF, the Open Science framework where researchers can come and manage their projects, discover other public contents, develop their ideas, and start their studies. And part of that is with our pre-registration workflow where they can start their design, they can pre-register that, they can acquire their materials and begin their data collection back on their OSF project. And we integrate with lots of different storage add-ons that help store data, even analyze the data and interpret the findings, and find a way back around to the top of the workflow where they can write and publish, and that would be with our pre-providers. So, here's another, sorry, it's not the best, depiction of all of the different tools that we integrate with so that you can see how we're trying to fill that collaborative workflow. And as you can't see so clearly at the top, but some of the key ones that have been recently mentioned, their cross-graph and data site, where we're using them for DOIs on our public content, and one of the newer things that we'll be integrating with on our pre-print servers is an integration with Kronos so that pre-prints can be directly transmitted over to publishers through the pre-print workflow. So here's a quick slide about some of our roadmap items. So specifically on project management, some of the key areas that we're focused on through the latter part of this year and early next year is about UIUX. We've heard lots of our users complain about how some parts of our user experience need improvement, and so that is a focus that we're going to be taking on over the next six months. And I'm excited about it. It's been a really fun project to take a lot of the challenges that our users are telling us about and not just try to shove a new fix on the same current page, but really think holistically about what are they trying to accomplish and how can we help them do that. So the other remaining items are more specific feature sets. So storage internationalization, we have researchers that need to store their data in a specific geographic location. We want to allow them to decide that when they create their project so that it's an easy workflow for them to meet their requirements in the EU or Canada. Custom citation, this is another thing where we are generated, they want to be quotation, we want to give them the opportunity to cite as. So it's clear to anyone landing on their public content what the citation needs to be. Also file metadata, this is something I think we're all interested in is metadata and we are too. So trying to think of ways that we can start to support the fair principles and one of them is to take the files that our researchers are uploading and give them an opportunity to use a defined schema. The community has defined the data site schema and put that against their files so that when you actually go to that file you can export the file along with the metadata along with it and eventually version that. And data site is just the first schema we've chosen to work with but the vision would be that multiple schemas could be available for a specific ontology depending on the discipline or the community needs. And lastly groups, this is one of the things that also our users have brought up just having the ability to manage collaboration more effectively in a group management workflow. For pre prints, we, this is sort of a long term roadmap. But some of the areas we're working on as a clear withdrawal for our pre print services and integration with hypothesis that was recently done a couple months ago where pre print providers can turn on the embedded hypothesis for annotation and have sort of that open review. Submission to journal, like I mentioned, we're building some some easy impacts for viewing and downloads of the pre prints. And then eventually we'd like to put the opportunity for some peer review working with the cocoa foundation on some of their recent development to put that as a module on our pre print. The other sort of large area that we're in is registration. And so some of the big things that we're working on currently are redesigning that interface and giving a very easy to follow submission workflow we've we've heard that researchers don't always clearly know what is a pre registration of their research and how do they create one. It's not just about the, the form that you complete that the questions that you answer. But it's also about the files that you upload in that time stamps immutable version and adding moderation branding for similar to our pre print servers where registries can be built based on communities or specific forms. And then lastly, one of the areas that we're currently sort of an early development on is creating a way for aggregation. So we have lots of projects public projects on the LSF. And sometimes there are key stakeholder groups that want to aggregate that content under one common sort of community or stakeholder. So one of the one of the things that we're working on this is working with those groups and deciding how we can help collect the metadata and surface that aggregation so that's all I have on our roadmap I'm excited to be here and to talk with each of you about ways we could more formally collaborate.