 Mae'r unig iawn i gael y gweithio, mae'r unig iawn i gael y gweithio, a mae'n ffwrdd yn gwneud yn fawr ar draws sy'n gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio. A dyna, rhai wnaethwn i'r gweithio'r uchwyniad americol yn gyfnodol yn eich ystafell ar y cynnig sy'n cymdeithasio i ddefnyddio'r gweithio. Rwy'n meddwl, mae'n meddwl amser, mae'n meddwl amser o'r gweithio'r ddafnod, Diolch i'n gwneud am hwnnw'n dweud â'r srannig hwnnw. O'r ddarllenfod hwnnw yw'r sناidgoedd yn ymdanyl iawn, penfery'r holl hwnnw i'w ff Daytiw Datysydd, ond mae'r ddweud yn ymdain yw ymddefnyddio cyfrydol. Felly mae'n dweud atidrhyw i dda chi'n gweld o'r bod ni'n ddweud. Mae hi'n gweithio'r cyfrydol hwnnw'n gweithredu, mwyaf 12 oed. Roedd y gallwn ni yn iddyn nhw ddweud o ddaeth y person? Caell o'n cael gwelio chi'n dweud y tu wedi yr adrod yw'r plant? Ac rwy'n meddwl y gall fan hynny yma. Rwy'n meddwl ni'n meddwl ar y parwanydd o'r blaid. Mae hi nesaf, sydd wedi defnyddio'r bach a'r ysgolion, mae rydw i'n clywed o'r brifau gyntaf, yng Nghyrch yn gweithgiadau i ni wedi eu pob llwyr mewn gweld o dd Overfn. Felly, mae'n fновod i'r ddaeth, bod hynny'n rhoi gweld chi'n gweld ond y cymdeithaseth y cymdeithaseth ac ydy'r ddaeth efallai mae'r ddweud o'r peirio'r ddelweddau. Felly, hanfyd,'r CEO ydy'r company ddates ydw'r Bellig? Roedd yna fyddo 12,000 euro o'r ddataeth. Roedd fyddo i'r cyffredinol, yn gweithio'r ddefnydd. Mae'n dŵr 5, wedi'i gofo hyn cyflwyfyrdiadau, a ddo i'r ddaeth), i ddefnyddio cael eich cyfnod siwr o 5 cyfnodau. Gweithio ddau'r ystyried ac'r bysd sy'n gweithfyrdd mfrindigol mewn casod. Felly mae'r prifu'r cyfrifiadau yn gwahanol. O'r cyfrifiadau ei ddechrau, bythdyn ni hi capabilitye o'r llwyffyr, yr hyffordd yr hyffordd hyffordd clywedyn ymgyrch chi weithio gweithio. Mae'n diwylliant yn meddwl sy'n cyrraedd y fennor i ni, the state separate from the managers and the owners. When you do that there is not just the social compact. It also kills innovation. ond amser o bobl o'r oedon ni wedi eu wirio gwneudio yn ei wneud o'r gymunedau. A dyli'n gân y gallwn i roedd y Cyfgredig Eilistrci Criticynol i'r Cyfredig Eilistrci Criticynol ar gyfer oedd yn dweud yn duno'r cwestiynau. A byddwn i'r cyfodol i siarad gyda'r Cyfredig Eilistrci Criticynol. Fen i i ddаю'r cyfredig eich cyfredig eich cyfredig eich cyfredig. Byddwch yn ddiwylo'r cyfloreson i newid eich byddwch ar ames y gweithredu but actually frankly, we better off not trying. We better off just actually going off and solving some problems. So there are good people in the commission, there are good people in the parliament. I have a huge amount of time with belly cr blankets and her cabinet, but I think fundamentally what government needs to do, what governmental organizations like them like the commission Ac y twyd yn ystod y tuwch yn ystod yw'r blynedd i'r ffordd i'r ffordd. A'r ffordd i'r ffordd i'r ffordd i'r ffordd i'r ffordd. Yn cael ei wneud, y hyn sy'n gwybod, mae'n acell iawn. fel y gallwch gael ar amser o hyd yn ei hunain. Yn ychydig, mae'r cyfnodol wedi bod yn ffodol yma o'i wneud yma yma o gael y cyfnodol, yn ymgyrch yn ymwysig, o bwysig o'r popeth, o bwysig o'r popeth yn ymwysig, o bwysig o'r popeth yn ymwysig, o bwysig o'ch cyflwyno'r cyflwyno, felly'r cyflwyno'r cyflwyno yn ymwyllgor, the less the space for commons to happen, at all levels is shrinking, that's amazing, everybody speaks and even the unusual suspects say that opening is great but if you look at what happens in legislation initiatives, everything you say, you see the opposite setting and you see waves and waves of things that seems and impossible task to tạiwll A byddai'r ddwyledd a'r unrhyw o'r defnyddio, a'r ddwyledd yn cael ei bwysig i'r rhai. Mae'r ddwyledd yn cael ei ddwyledd a'r ddwyledd wedi ddwyledd, ac mae'r ddwyledd yn cael ei ddwyledd. Rydyn ni'n meddwl y ddwyledd. Yn gyfarcheis ar hyn, ond rydyn ni wedi'n cyrrafodd. Mae'r unig iawn yn enwedig iawn. Mae'n meddwl yn gynllunio'r ffordd. Mae'r ffordd yn ymddangos fel yn yw'r nobl. Ond yn y ddau, mae'n gwneud yn meddwl'i c兴 y lleol. A'n gwneud, Simon yn yn amlwg. Bydd yn ystafellr hyn arall. Ond yma ydy'r ffordd cyhoeddfa ychydig yma, sy'n cyd-deithasio'r cyd-deithasio'r cyd-deithasio'r cyd-deithasio, yn cyd-deithasio'r cyd-deithasio'r cyd-deithasio. ond, ond y mae'r amlwg cyllid yn ei dddefnyddio'r cyfnod ddegwyd yn ei gynhyrchu yn iawn. Mae'r llyfr wedi gweld â'r maesafol iawn. Dydyn ni'n cael ei ddegwyd â'r llyfr cyllid yn ddegwyd. Mae'n cael ei ddegwyd, fod yn ei ddegwyd, fod yn cael ei ddegwyd. Mae'r gweld ein amser yn oed tai oedd hynny'r pr�awwyd, oed digwydd, oeddiwch, oeddiwch, oeddiwchродd, oeddiwch yw'r rei iawn i'r lle defnyddio cytt Count, mae'r lleifredig yn ei lleidio at y gwledwch yn Europa ac mae'r lleifredig yn rhaid i'r lleidio'r lleidio ar hyn a'r lleifredig yn rhaid i'r lleifredig ar hyn. Felly, ychydig oes y unedol gennymau dydeu chi'r argynod, oeddiwch yn rhaid i'r lleidio ar hyn i'r lleidio er mwyn i'r lleidio ar hyn. Why don't we have one single system for having a patent? I don't mean the EPO which is a distributed system more or less. But I'm not sure that the present system of patenting is a good thing per se, but I'm sure that in certain areas patent should not be allowed. And frankly, one of the most interesting voices that this, from which this has come, is one very free market Chicago school judge, Judge Posner in the States. But why unitary patents are relevant for software patents? Because of several details. And one is the taking away the control over the granting of patent, or the highest level from the European Court of Justice, which last year has been one of the voices that brought comfort to us because they have issued one very important decision, the SAS, against versus war programming language, which has redefined an area of commons for once in a while, you cannot copyright interfaces and languages and file formats, which is important. This is what I understood the law of being, but again IP maximalist went for the whole thing and said also API needs to be patented. Perhaps I could ask Keith to comment particularly on this area of the unitary patents. What impact do you think that might have on Linux specifically, and what are your thoughts about patents generally? I think we've seen some positives, but also some negatives that represent a perversion of the patent system and the adjudication process in the United States. Particularly as it pertains to a famous case that was handed down, the verdict was handed down not too long ago, which will undoubtedly be appealed, which is the Samsung suit, the Apple Samsung suit. And I think at multiple levels that's endemic of some of the problems in the US star driven culture that pervades all aspects of life, even the jury deliberation room. The precedent set by a case like that is very dangerous and damaging, not just for open source, but across the board. I was just at Land Rover's facility last week at an open source event there in central England. And I was reminded when I looked at the evoke that now based on this case, the fact that one year after the evokes introduction, the Ford has produced a car which looks remarkably similar. Inside and out, that maybe they'll be now a suit brought by Land Rover against Ford for look and feel. We've even endeavored into the arena of the absurd, attempting that the runway shows are all happening over the last five weeks, New York, Milan, Tokyo, London, Paris. Everyone knows that in that business the half life of a couture dress is about 15 minutes before it's coming off of a production line somewhere around the world for a lot less money with a lot different brand name associated with it. We live in a world of emulation. We've replicated things on a regular basis and we look to essentially in an awkward way create something different, better or price performance on a price performance better, more appealing. So we have that case as kind of the low point and I think we'll see where trade dress and the restriction of relevant prior art that was excluded and juries that are support hometown justice and don't necessarily can't escape from the cult of the black mock turtle neck that Steve Jobs has left us with. We've created mythology around people which is completely irrelevant and in this case false because as we all should understand that the place where smartphones come from is from a one woman and her name is Donna Dubinsky. She's never mentioned anywhere but without her smartphones wouldn't exist because when Steve Jobs was kicked out of out of out of Apple in in 86 they bet the farm on the Newton which was essentially the version of the equivalent of the Lisa. It's the elegant failure that that Apple is so so wonderful at producing that gave rise to a whole generation of transitional devices that Donna Dubinsky championed at palm at US robotics and then at handspring before we ultimately made the phase shift to a commercially viable product because of networks and content being accessible. So we've got this myth that we live with around who created what and our memories tend to be very short in the United States because we're constantly looking for to be influenced by the next star that we want to make that we want to build and then destroy. And so that that is the setting for the backdrop of the patent wars. We've had all kinds of perversions where now as I said earlier we're having people who have legitimately developed true innovations in radio frequency technology over the last 35 years and spent tens of billions of dollars developing it whether it be Alcatel or Ericsson or Motorola or Samsung or Nokia. These are the companies who built the mobile industry now they're being deprived of the ability to use these patents in the counterclaims not even as as basic litigation offensive litigation but as counterclaims to be able to defend and protect the industries that they've created by companies that have additive technology but nothing that that is as central and fundamental and in the backdrop of this we've got some good news stories we've got ITC reform which is coming down the pike. One of the real challenges we've had in the U.S. is that creativity is never in short supply we've seen it in the financial services industry.