 Social Certification by Talcott-Parson. Social Certification occupies almost peripheral elements in Parson's scheme of social order. Because his understanding regarding the social stratification in modern societies has become as complex as it has lost its significance as a whole. In modern society, social stratification or class system is a challenge for all of us. Same is the case with Talcott-Parson. Because stratification or class system is based on the basis of income, prestige, status, or caste system, religion. Distribution of power. But we see that these things are mixed in a way to differentiate them. Because if someone has a lot of money, it is said that he will automatically get power. How will he get it? Because the rich can influence the decision-making process. The same situation is with Talcott-Parson. The philosophy of social stratification that you have contributed to your views, we feel that there are many challenges. Because he assumes that in modern societies, stratification is thought in terms of the symbolic media through which it works. Those of prestige and influence and of the function that it fulfills, that of integration. Talcott-Parson's philosophy is that those people who have their role are more prestigious and those who can influence the whole procedure or process, they may be considered most honored class. Now, if we look at all these debates, what is the source of communication? We usually get to know through the media which is more influential, which is more prestigious. So, if there is such a situation in the world, we will have to see how we will differentiate this situation that the prestigious people, in the real sense, who are more influential and why are they? Because it represents the ranking of individuals and families on a scale of prestige. Those who occupy roles of greater importance and also hold the higher ranks. Now, those who are more prestigious because their role is more, that's why they are prestigious, then their class will be separated in that society, and they will be considered important. Now, the prestigious, why they are considered prestigious? Did their responsibility make them prestigious? Did the privileges they have and the status they gave them gave them more important statuses? So, in today's world, there are so many questions that are in every society and many questions are unanswered because, moreover, social importance conveys two meanings, a sense that some individuals and groups occupy roles that are crucial to the survival of society and those other occupying groups are compatible with the general societal values. Now, these clear-cut two dimensions which were mainly discussed by Talcott-Parson, one dimension is that the people, those have the crucial roles, why they enjoy the crucial roles because the survival of the society is dependent on them and the other group is that the people, those are actually carrying the societal values. Now, the question is whether the values that they are carrying, they are transferring from one generation to other generation, will they be more important or their role is important for the survival of society? So, this is again a debate that we get in modern societies everywhere. So, the differential distribution of prestige and influence, though which it operates in a position of greatest social importance to mobilize the resources necessary to their operation and hence to the survival of society. Now, here we have to see whether the survival of the society is dependent on them, whether their resources are more, whether the resources of the society are important to the people who occupy the resources, this is why the survival of society is dependent on them or we have to see that the stratification is basically of integrative nature which tries to integrate the society by depending the inevitable discontent and by calling upon the commitments of individual society as a whole. On the other hand, we have to see that the concept of stratification which Parsons has given is that it is integrative nature because if there are different classes in the society and they will integrate back, then the society will grow ahead because no one can do everything. If some people have more resources, then the working class, they will work together with them, then it is beneficial for both of them. Similarly, if someone's role is more important, if someone's status is more important, then the combination of all these that the society has basically, this combination is important for the growth of the society. So, if the stratification is seen negatively, then it will become a hurdle, but if the stratification is seen from an integrative perspective, then it will work as an element for the improvement of the society, for the betterment of the society.