 I just want to say what somebody said about you is that you will follow you in taking Sonya and today. I'm going to get on here now. Where would you like me to go? Would you be able to tell me anything about that? Oh I did a great job on that. That doesn't ask the chart of what they've done with their money supply. In the last 12 weeks it has zoomed straight up and that's when the interest rates began to go up. I think they've got better tools than you think. The New York Times, they had a headline, Voker says federal patent money supply. The New York Times, they had a headline, Voker says federal lucent money supply. We've got our gambling leader, you have no sign of your right. If you see an error, that's the problem we have on our Facebook page. We have to find a way to get it out of here. We have to find a way to get it out of here. We have to find a way to get it out of here. I'm thinking about the law of law. That is also speaking to the world of tourism. We're wearing it somehow. That's going to be hard work. You know they love to do that. Thank you. This is the meeting of the Cabinet Council on Economics. We have three topics. We realize your constraint, which is we have to be out of here gentlemen. At noon we have three topics. The first is the employment training proposal. President, gentlemen, employment training proposal to replace CEDA. That's done away with last year. These are the training numbers. 8.1 in 80, 7.6 billion in 81, 3.2 billion in 82, and 2.4 for the 83 budget. The Reagan administration reduced CEDA funding by 5.2 billion or 70% between 80 and fiscal year eight and others. How did they try to implement it? By 480 local government units administrating CEDA's plus 55,000 subcontractors under those 480, it was literally an ordered nightmare for CEDA to maintain but is being cut back. Then it had contracts to special interest groups. The Secretary of Labor, $240 million worth of discretionary funds where he could fund any project, pilot project or otherwise. The types of operations that they have, the public service jobs, we talked about vocational. It meant something. It doesn't get any mileage. If I could use the South Floridian running target groups on the county commission of my day camp. I just want to thank both of you and the vice president from the bottom of our heart. I'll tell you that the people of South Florida are taking tremendous heart from the statement that you've issued and setting up the cabinet level test for a review of refugees in crime in South Florida headed by the vice president. Thanks for operating fully with us. We're still after two years of crying out that this is a federal responsibility to the statement and the establishment of this panel and the kind of response that we've been looking for. I'm very grateful to you for that. I'm sure it will be a statement. Thank you. President's asked me to go down there next week and get to a report. First report. I'll see if there's anything you say. Mr. President, are you willing to compromise with Congress on your new budget, sir? Well, I have sent a budget up that I believe in very much. On the other hand, there has been a suggestion now that even further cuts could be made and I feel the Congress should have the running room to be able to talk about those and see what they're talking about. In defense spending, sir? No, I feel very strongly about defense spending. Were you disturbed by the reports they brought you today about the reaction up on the Hill? No, because I know they're going home in a few days and when they get home they're going to find out how much the people want what we have proposed. How about changing the tax cuts, sir? How about eliminating part of the tax cut? No, I think that would be very counterproductive. Thank you, Mr. President. The tax cuts are actually essential to restoring the economy and putting our people back to work. The lights. I think the line is still drawn in the dirt. Sir, when Travis drew that line in the dirt in the Alamo, the Mexicans were coming across the wall. I didn't make that one. Well, let me, if I can, I know that you've been briefed early on the idea of the failures in the program, and I'm most grateful for your newspaper that came out with the recent headline and the story on it. Incidentally, I've just come back from speaking to the state legislatures in Indiana and Iowa. And I couldn't tell where the Democrats were or the Republicans were. They were all clapping very hard for the whole idea. And it was very gratifying to see how we've met in this room with governors, we've met with mayors, we've met with some of your own officials before and now they're pleased to be meeting with you. Because I'm sure, as you've been told, what we have offered is a conceptual framework that must be fleshed out. And we're counting on the help of all of you to do that fleshing out. Because we're determined there will be no winners and no losers, and we're determined that there will be a mandatory pass-through. And I think we're simply re-instituting the 10th Amendment to the Constitution and restoring authorities and autonomies to the states and local governments that were never intended to be passed on to the federal government. And the federal government has proven the wisdom of the Constitution by proving it can't work properly. And we think that all of you can. I know that you've been, as I say, briefed and you've heard all about this program, so maybe now we should start hearing from you. Mr. President, first, we want to thank you very much for the opportunity to meet with you today and discuss with you and your staff people. You're very eager staff people in my area. Some of our concerns about the need for federalism. We are strongly supportive of the concept and we have reiterated that time and time again on our national platform. And we'd like to say that we intend to be as helpful as we can in restoring the 10th Amendment to the Constitution as you could in making sure that federalism does work properly. One of the main concerns that we have about the program, Mr. President, is the...