The Evolution of Irreducible Complexity

41.325 weergaven



Beoordelingen zijn beschikbaar wanneer de video is verhuurd.
Deze functie is momenteel niet beschikbaar. Probeer het later opnieuw.
Gepubliceerd op 17 mrt. 2007

If we are to have a proper debate we all need to use the same definition of Irreducible Complexity. Michael Behe defines it as:

"By irreducibly complex I mean a single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning"

The problem is ID / creationist supporters take this to mean that an IC system could not have evolved. Their mistake is that IC is a statement about a systems present state, not its past history.

Many systems are by definition IC. But for every IC system studied data exists supporting a biologically plausible scenario for their evolution.

So in short, are their IC systems. Yes. Does being IC mean it could not have evolved. NO.

To download this video go to:

If you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from:

Learn the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.

  • Categorie

  • Nummer

  • Artiest

    • Rage Against The Machine
  • Album

    • Rage Against The Machine - XX (20th Anniversary Edition)
  • Licentie aan YouTube verleend door

    • SME (namens Epic/Legacy); PEDL, Warner Chappell, UniĆ£o Brasileira de Compositores, Wixen Music Publishing, UMPI, SOLAR Music Rights Management en 21 organisaties voor muziekrechten


Wanneer autoplay is ingeschakeld, wordt een aanbevolen video automatisch als volgende afgespeeld.


om dit toe te voegen aan de afspeellijst 'Later bekijken'

Toevoegen aan

Afspeellijsten laden...