 First, acknowledgment on the historical problem, especially deforestation and forestry division, including forest fire in some countries. And highlight on progress of chief in the Ranger in resolving the problem, the challenges faced and commitment to transform to a long-term low-carbon and climate resilience development path. With environment and economic growth and ensuring the benefits for communities. A second is the commitment to work together between government with civil society, research organization and private sector to strengthen collaboration across the region to share lessons and build on successful approaches that achieve economic development in the context of sustainable development. The third is the importance of education, awareness, raising capacity, building demonstration activities and collaboration with the private sector in generating good outcomes. In short, integrating climate and development agenda. The fourth is expectation and commitment for continuing collaboration through a stronger relationship and exploring opportunities for greater connectivity between parties. All the members of the Asia Pacific Rainforest Partnership to share experience using online platforms. The next is specific messages from high-level panel on forest in NDC and high-level panel on operationalizing red plus in the Asia Pacific region. There's more specific about the importance of forest. In a broader context, it's land sector. In achieving NDC, in terms of mitigation, the unique role of forest is because forest can be a source of mission, but can also be seen. So forest can create problems, but forest can also solve the problem. This is the uniqueness of forest and then red plus. Red plus by concept is mitigation in forestry. And then in terms of adaptation, it's related to a role of forest in food security, people livelihood and climate resilience. And we heard yesterday the progress in red plus, in red plus countries, we have two cases, Indonesia and PNG, and also the challenges we are facing. So, thinking from the two high-level panels yesterday, the key issues and all challenges. The first is about the cost-effectiveness of forest activities. And then the issue of revenue mechanism both for short and long-term to value forest in NDC. Issue on land tenure, especially land conflict and for some countries, including Indonesia, is about fire incidents and also climate finances and other issues. In terms of climate finance itself, it was identified that there is a need for scheme for today, tomorrow and in the future. And then the need for collaboration between government and stakeholders, also private sector, considering the rapid development of climate finance. There are many different schemes of climate finance. And it should be supported by strong accounting, baseline and inventory. And now we could take up the lesson learned from red plus. The third is about access, still finance, but this is about access. Access to finance and attract investment. Access, we have a case yesterday, access to GCF and then also bilateral. And how we could attract a private investment. The challenges are there because we know the nature of private investment, a requirement for host country and for forest. But this is another challenge, the shift of focus of finance from forest to agriculture. Approach, a landscape. For technical people, for forestry like us, like many of us, the landscape is a landscape, this approach is very logical. But this is not always the case when we talk about political side and also the implication of the implementation of the approach. And then also the shift of the fund to focus on action that address supply change. The last is about the MRV. It was mentioned both in NDC, also in red plus. This includes institutional arrangement and regulation, human resource capacity and methodology, especially for addressing uncertainty. A colleague, ladies and gentlemen, it was the report from yesterday, all the PIC and their team have a complete note for our complete report from this summit. The day two, as we have a sub-team from Pitland, production for us, finance, investment and trade, ecuterism and biodiversity conservation and community for us. Our recommendation is that each sub-team should take up issues addressed in day one sessions. As yesterday, we didn't have sufficient time to address those issues. And the second day session has sufficient time. Each session is allocated for three hours. From day one, we have summary from all sessions. Also, we have co-chair summary from the ministerial round table. We will just check when it's ready to be released sometime today. For the day two session, we recommend all PIC and team to deliver the key messages from their session. This is from moderator who will take up as part of the summary for all sessions from day one. The whole event, the whole summit agenda in the closing session. And then for all PIC and team, should also later on prepare full report that will be coordinated by DGCC and FUERDIA. The recent gentleman, that's all the rep up and also the arrangement for day two. And with you very productive discussion today and with expectation, we could ensure all issues to be addressed and achieve what we would like to achieve from this summit as reflected in the team protecting for present people supporting economic growth. With that, we close the first session in plenary. And I think the organizing committee will have announcement. Thank you very much. Good morning. Wassalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.