 So, Mr Trump is on a tour of the Middle East. Poor man. He's got such a hard time in his own country, because what would one do in a similar situation? I know what I would do. I would go on a nice long holiday, which is perhaps what he's intending to do. And of course, what country would one go to to have a well-deserved rest from all the furory which is risen in the United States? Naturally, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This paradise of democracy, of human rights, of religious fervor and so on and so forth. Yes, what a pleasant change to step down the steps of the airplane together with his beautiful wife, and to be welcomed by these paragons of virtue, these holy men of the royal house of Saud. Wonderful. The embraces, the love, the adoration, the unity. What a change it makes. What a pleasant change from the kind of disagreeable public. That he's had to put up the poor man in the United States. Yes, isn't it noticeable how not just President Trump, but all the leaders of the Western world are very fond of this regime in Saudi Arabia? It really is a wonderful regime. A regime, of course, which has got not a single trace of democracy about it. A regime which specialises in trampling underfoot human rights, not just in Saudi Arabia, but also in Yemen, where they're engaged in a criminal war about which very little is said, by the way, in the Western media. They're conveniently hushed up. This criminal genocidal war in Yemen, I can't describe it any other way, where this wonderful Saudi regime is systematically murdering with the active support of American imperialism and British imperialism and French imperialism and all the rest. They're condemning millions of people to a terrible death. Men, women and children, oh yes, every day. Millions of people are facing a horrible, lingering, painful death through starvation. Well, this so-called coalition of the Saudis is systematically bombing what? Warehouses where grain is stored and ports, because Yemen has got to import all its food practically. Systematically bombing, they put it on the television. They systematically target the cranes which are used to unload ships. How can a crane unloading grain from ships be considered to be a terrorist target or a military target? But that's what's taking place. It's taking place with the active support of officers, of military specialists from America and from Britain. Wonderful democratic Britain. Theresa May, this wonderful woman, yes, strong and stable. Strong and stable support for the Saudi gangsters who are systematically murdering millions of people in Yemen with the active support of London, of the military, of course. There's a principle involved, isn't there? I forgot to mention cholerae, which the United Nations has just explained that there's another epidemic of cholerae taking place. A terrible, horrible death for men, women and children and so on. Well, these gangsters are systematically preventing, deliberately preventing the shipment of food and medicines to the Yemen. That's the kind of activities engaged by these wonderful holy men in Saudi Arabia. Oh, yes. Inside Saudi Arabia itself, they're engaged in charming activities like mass executions, floggings for minor trivial offences, cutting off of hands of thieves for stealing. This is the kind of regime. Crucifixion, yes, that's a charming device. The Romans used to do that a long time ago. The Saudis are doing it today. And of course, the agents in Syria, because they're behind the mad dogs, the jihadi monsters in Syria are doing the same things. Torturing, killing people, whipping people, raping young girls and so on and so forth. Crucifying all with the active support of these Wahabi gangsters exported, deliberately exported by Saudi Arabia. That's the kind of company which Donald Trump and Theresa May delight in keeping. Of course, there's a principle involved. Is there not? Of course, Trump announced this great principle. What's the great principle? Which attracts them to Saudi Arabia, to Riyadh, as flies are attracted by, I could say an unpleasant word, attracted by a honeypot, shall we say. Yes, a honeypot would be more appropriate. What's the principle? Well, Mr Trump said it. In front of all the television cameras, didn't he say it? What's the principle? Not democracy, not religion. Oh no, not peace, nothing like that. Nothing so mundane as that. It's money, my friends. Money, money, money, yes. A big contract. 100 billion was it? Yes, I think it was. 100 billion dollars worth of arms, an arms deal. Wonderful. So more bombs will rain down on the defenseless people of the Yemen. And of course, the money will be made by American arms manufacturers and British and French and German arms manufacturers. That's a wonderful symbiosis, which really sums up, completely sums up, accurately sums up the real nature of Western civilization, Western democracy, Western values, Western humanitarianism. There you have it in a nutshell. By the way, the same Trump that tried to exclude Muslims from America. Oh, not Saudis, however. Saudis were mysteriously excluded as if they weren't part of the Muslim world. They're not included in this. But he wanted to ban. He said that Islam hates us, he says. Now it's the same. Trump stands up in front of all these gangsters. Gangsters, reactionary gangsters, creatures from all over the Muslim world. Not just the Saudis, of course, the biggest monsters of all. And praises, oh, it's good, it's monster. Islam is OK. We're all friends. We're all against terrorism. Of course, your tax. Iran. As if Iran was responsible for these monsters, jihadi monsters running amok in Syria and Iraq, which Trump says, says anyway that he's going to fight against. I don't see much evidence of it. He's mainly interested in fighting Iran and bombing Iranian militia, which he did the other day in Syria. So the whole thing, frankly, is a repulsive spectacle which would fill any normal mortal with a sense of absolute disgust from start to finish. But of course, Mr Trump's holiday is not finished, is it? He's now taken to play the first time. Imagine it. Imagine. That's a real gesture of peace, isn't it? The first time that a direct fight was staged from Saudi Arabia to where? To Israel, of course. That other bastion of human rights and religious rectitude and so on and so forth. And there, of course, he had an even more enthusiastic welcome, if that were possible, from Netanyahu, BB, as he called him. BB and his wife and the other gang, all turned up with a gigantic red carpet. I don't know how many miles that carpet extended for. It seemed a pretty long one to me, with the military band, with the feasting, with the welcome that one would expect as a normal American tourist visiting a country in the Middle East. Oh, yes. And of course, in present, BB era, Netanyahu, I actually said, we love you. Of course, why shouldn't they love him? When he's leaning over backwards to support the monstrous actions of the Israeli gang in Palestine. Oh, he did happen to see Abbas also, this poor little midget Abbas, just to satisfy the Palestinians. But no, this is a monstrous charade. I was watching the other day Al Jazeera's coverage, the person responsible for the Palestinian coverage of Algeria. He's actually said to the cameras, he's, look, all this talk about peace. Oh, yes, he's going to solve the Arab Israeli conflict, the Palestinian conflict. He's going to solve all this, the Palestinian problem. How he's going to solve it, we don't really know. But he assures us anyway that he is going to solve it, without any bother whatsoever. Of course, exactly the same promises were made in the past by other American presence, by Bill Clinton, by Obama, by Reagan, but they all made the same, exactly the same speech. So what's changed? Well, nothing whatsoever. The spokesman for Al Jazeera, I thought, put it rather well. He said, this speech of Trump concerning solving the Palestinian problem is so empty of content that it does not really admit of any political analysis. It can't be analyzed because it's nothing to analyze. It is a PR stunt. Yes, and that's just what it is. That's typical of Trump, isn't it, you know? This TV celebrity, which has become now the president of the most powerful country on earth. Beware of TV celebrities, my friends. They're rather a treacherous and rather stupid breed. It's going to be said. Yes, PR, and that's all this is. All this is. This entire charade, this pantomine, this circus of Trump's visit to the Middle East, of course, it has no content whatsoever except one thing. And that is a desperate attempt to prop up Trump's position in America itself. In relation to that, by the way, I mean, I don't know. I don't know who's worse. Trump or the other gang, the Democrats, the so-called Democrats, the so-called liberals. I've grown to detest the liberals, the so-called liberals, more every day that I see them in action. You know, I ask myself very often, what would have happened, for instance, if Bernie Sanders could have won the election, if he'd have had the courage of his convictions, he could have won. If he hadn't been bumped by Hillary Clinton in the most monstrous fashion, by the way, they're on about wiki-wiki leaks and Russian interference in elections. It wasn't the Russians that determined the elections in the election. That's just utter nonsense. How anyone in the right mind, you've got to be feeble-minded to believe this stuff about the Russians, the Russians, the Russians. It seems now that if you've got bad weather, it's caused by the Russians. Or you've got a pimple on your ass, it's caused by the Russians. It's monstrous nonsense. Actually, it was on Russia today, the interview, actually, a former editor or a spokesman of the Spectator magazine, which is a right-wing conservative magazine, by the way, and he was questioning about this business of Russian interference in the American elections. He says, look, this is all nonsense. It's quite right. It is nonsense. And what it shows, the only thing it shows to me is this, the stupidity of the American Democrats who to this day have not understood why Trump won the election. That's a fact. The main reason he won the election is simple, that the American people in general are fed up of both the Republicans and the Democrats. And Trump apparently suggested, represented something new. That's all. Which he doesn't, of course. He doesn't, as they will soon find out. But nevertheless, Bernie Sanders also got considerable support and could have won, except that he was deliberately removed and excluded by undemocratic means, by dirty means, by Hillary Clinton and the gang that is in charge of the Democrat Party. And this was revealed in WikiLeaks. Now, what astonishes me is this. All this fuss about the Russians were responsible for the leaks. Well, I don't know if they were or they weren't. But one thing is clear. Nobody now is talking about the content of these emails, the content of the stuff that was, and that's the purpose of it. These emails are a damning proof of the criminality and the dirty politics of the Democrats. That's a fact. And of Hillary Clinton. That's a simple fact. Nobody talks about that anymore. Oh, it's the Russians, the Russians, you know. There was a spokesman from WikiLeaks who now is in hiding in Brazil, because if he was here, he'd be arrested. In Democratic Britain, he'd be arrested. And in jail. Look at the vindictive treatment of Assange, who, although he was, the Swedes have dropped this nonsense about rape case, he's still locked up in the Ecuadorian Embassy. That shows the vindictiveness and the cruelty of the Western so-called democracies. America and Britain, if it comes to that. Yes, this spokesman, speaking from Brazil, he said the following in relation to this business of the Russians. He said, now look, if emails or whatever information is put on my desk, I don't ask where it comes from. What I ask is two questions. A, is it true? And B, is it in the public interest to publish? And if the answer is affirmative on both those questions, then of course I will publish. And they did publish. So did the Washington Post, another thing. Publish this stuff in relation to Hillary Clinton. Now it's all been forgotten. Never mind about the content. It's the Russians, the Russians. By the way, there isn't a shred of evidence. Not a shred of evidence that the Russians were behind this. But even if they were, what difference does it make, it's the actual content of the thing that one has to look at. No, no, they've ganged up on, the whole of the establishment has ganged up on Trump because he's a maverick, because he can't be trusted to do as he's told, as Hillary Clinton undoubtedly. She's an agent. She's a direct puppet of Wall Street. She can be relied upon. Trump cannot. That's where they ganged up on him in the way that they have, including all of the intelligence services and the FBI and so on. So what position should we take in relation to this conflict? Well, it's an interesting conflict. It's an unprecedented conflict. I can't think of anything like this in history. Where an elected president is in conflict with all of the intelligence services and with the FBI and so on, and all of the media who've ganged up on him in quite a monstrous way as a matter of fact, irrespective of what you think of Trump. The way they've conducted themselves is completely monstrous. There is not a shred of evidence for this, but they've built a massive case in order to discredit him and, if possible, get rid of him. I don't know that they can get rid of him very easily because it's not simple. In order to impeach him, are they shouting and bawling about an impeachment? That's nonsense. They can't impeach him. Without the votes of Congress, the Republicans have got a majority, except for a handful of idiots like McCain and so on and so forth. They've got a majority. They can't impeach him. But they're doing their damnedest to do so. There's a lesson here, you see. There's an importance. First of all, what side do we take? It's snakes against crocodiles, isn't it? Poisonous snakes against crocodiles. We don't take any side of this. We watch with some degree of pleasure. I must confess with some degree of amusement. We watch this open public conflict, an open split in the ruling class of the United States of America. That itself, by the way, is a forerunner and a warning of a profound social and political crisis in America, which is preparing the way for revolutionary developments in the future. You better not doubt this because it's a fact. No, we can't support either side, obviously, in this, but we should use this to explain to American workers and to explain to the young people in America in particular the rottenness of so-called, the falsity of so-called democracy in the United States, which is just run by a gang, run by Wall Street, by bankers and by capitalists. That's the point. The reason they want to get rid of it, they don't like Trump. It's purely because he's a maverick and they can't control him. They like to control people. And therefore the whole thing is a charade, is a circus, which shows the complete hollowness of so-called democracy, which they always talk about, democracy this, democracy that. Well, the rotten nature of so-called bourgeois democracy is there for all to see now. So please take note and please draw all the necessary conclusions.