 Governments at the federal and state levels have been charged with the need to urgently provide an effective mentorship platform and a creative redesign curriculum that would blend into the new areas of development for the youth and the less privileged in the country. Some leaders of a non-political, social, cultural group in learning-like minds gave the charge in learning the choir of state capital during an event where they noted that doing so with a view to channeling the energy and strength of the youth in the right direction will not only bring out the best in them but lead to positive impact on their communities. I think we have problems with mentorship, naturally, and we have problems with our parents overseeing and superintendent over the activities of some of the youth. We should try as much as possible to find out what exactly we want as youth. Then when we determine what they want and those things are not in consonance with what we think they should want, can we then input curriculum that will also blend with the new ideas for progress? The thing is people like me, like you, others here, let's go to the level we can go. Even if it's 10, 20, 30 people who can care for in that area, this will go a long way. The little we are doing, when the government sees, if they can help, we take. The group also maintains that the place of entrepreneurship through joint efforts cannot be over-emphasized in fighting poverty amongst the youths. All over the world, particularly among the Asian Tigers, they have taken entrepreneurship as one of the ways to reduce poverty and I think we are also trying to see what we can do at our micro level to help our people. The only way we can go, government cannot do it alone. In fact, government cannot do anything else as at this time. The economy, the system is battered, seriously, that waiting for government is waiting at