 It's me once again, and it's Kaku once again. So we had a very nice talk from Jakub concerning the horizontal pattern of the site, and now we're going to go some more deep to the vertical profiles, and I will compare the site to the other ones on the Danube-DISA interview. I will just shortly emphasize some points from the introduction, but not go into detail again because it's getting boring about Kaku. So we have the Vodja culture we already know, and we have the different types of settlements within the central area of the Carpathian basin during the Middle Bronze Age. And as we have mentioned previously, we have different types of settlements on the Western Bank and on the Eastern Bank of the Danube. The interesting thing is that on the Western Bank we have these hilltop settlements, mostly on the ridge of the lush territory of the Mezzelford, which are believed to be parts of the network and probably at least parts of these settlements were inhabited by the elites of these societies, and they are strikingly there. You can see them, they are very interesting, and a lot of archaeological and geological, many other research have been done in these areas, especially at Sassanbatta and in the Shorskut region, and recently some work in the Percata region as well. And on the other side, physically on the other side, on the Eastern Bank of the Danube, we have the Great Hungarian Plain, and we have sandy material, we have sand, fluvial and sand ridges there, and as you can see the sites are not as interesting, at least concerning the extraterrestrial features, but we have more things beyond our food. And a micro-regional study has been going on for a while, which is in this geographical region, and these are the sites that are, so to say, under the microscope. Some of them should lie about Tobasz Sölder, two from Kvakuć, very close to each other, and of course the already mentioned Kvakuć Turja, which is really in the focus of an international cooperation, and I'm also going to talk more about this one in this presentation. So before anything started out at Kvakuć, we had the opportunity to plan a coring series. We called it a mapping of the site. We had this very nice map of this geophysical perspective map, and then we designed a coring series focusing on the key points, the key parts of the settlement. First of all we wanted to have some sort of information about the rough stratigraphy, so not the micro-regional, just to have some information how it looks like beneath our feet, and therefore we designed two cross-section coring profiles, one from the north to south, the other one from east to west, and as you can see it is consciously expanding the ditches, the boundary of the site, which is believed to be the ditches, because we wanted to see what is the sedimentological, the geographical, and geomorphological environment of this site, which is embedded here in this area. And then we have the ditches, or the hydrological part of the site, which can be separated to inner and outer ditches, and there is one interesting cistern-like feature in the edge of the site, which is either a retention tank, or a cistern, or something like that, and we wanted to see can this be somehow supported by the geomorphological observations of the corings that were done here. Before we go into detail, it must be noted that all of these sites, if you look at this map, which shows the environmental conditions before the 19th century's river regulations, that all these territories really affected by water, and all of these sites are located next to water bodies, but probably on places, on higher elevation ridges, sand ridges, so that groundwater movements do not affect the life of the settlement, and this is a very important circumstance in terms of the hydrological arrangements and system of all of these sites, and it's probably linked to how the ditches were formed and planned and structured. So, first we are looking at the North Southern profile, which is next time we're crossing the entire site, and I would like to draw your attention to this main part of the area. You can see the red line is the chose where these profiles, and on the profile sections, you can see that there are these complex sediment layers with very high density of dowel and charcoal and other anthropogenic material content. As you can see, if we expand to the north and to the south of the site, it disappears. We only find an exit to anthropogenic accumulation of sediments in the very lower part of the sand ridge, which has probably moved with the erosion from both this ridge and that ridge into this valley, which is here. What we see here, or what is the conclusion based on this, or one of the conclusions, that we do not see any, at least in these profiles, we do not see any land use or territory use beyond the boundaries, beyond the boundaries of the ditches. And then to the ditches, the outer ditch was mapped with corings placed two meters from each other. It's kind of a dance, a high resolution coring technique to map the stratigraphy of this ridge section and if we somehow connect these very similar layers, we can find the bottom line here. We can find possibly the bottom line of the once-existent ditch, which gives a very nice U-shape. And then we have an in-field material full of anthropogenic particles, especially dowel and charcoal and all the other debris, which was, I removed, washed into this uranium supplement life, or after the habitat on the site. What is interesting is that we have a ceiling layer here, which is supposed to serve as the water retention layer. But if we have a look at the data, especially in terms of soil texture, we see that there is only loam and loamy clay texture, which is not the best for retaining water in this depths under this ditch. Therefore, I would say that probably this ditch was not always under water. It had a very strong periodical movement of the water table. It's also confusing that the in-field material shows a very low organic matter input. If you remember the phosphate concentration at Bolshow Divanka, then we have really nothing here, so compared to that, which is strange because we would expect to have higher organic material inputs in this in-field cultural layer. The inner ditch was also mapped in a similar way, so orings placed very close to each other. And we have a different situation here, because if we start to draw our lines, then we have the top of the cultural layer. We have here the possible bottom of the ditch, but we see that we don't find really, we cannot really throw or set out the in-field because of the soil, but K1 culture layer, which is present all over the site, it was shown on the first cross-section in the main nucleus of the site, is basically above these two possible answers or two possible theories rise here, either after the element of the ditch, the material, the debris material from this occupation area was washed into the ditch, or it's extreme, especially from the architectural point of view, the site gradually extended itself and moved towards the other compartments of the other sections and basically occupied the territory, the area of the ditch. Therefore, we find the occupation material on the top of the ditch itself. Again, we have a water ceiling, water retention layer here downstairs, below, sorry, below, where we have higher structured coefficient results, which is more or less explaining that the water could have been retained here easily. And then we have a more increasing amount of organic material appearing in the infill layer of this inner ditch, which seems to be in place, at least compared to the untouched or the natural soil profiles and the possible PPM measurements that we're conducting there. And then to the retention tank or the possible cistern of the site, which is more or less a mystery, but it could have served as some sort of junction of the ditches and could have served as a manager of the hydrology of the entire site. What you can see here is that we have almost a three and a half meter deep infill material, really like a well or something like that, which is only located in the small infall, in this very small area of this feature. Looking at, again, some of the data, oh, sorry, we see here that we are moving into the clay part, to the clay coefficient zone. So it's kind of an estimation, again, that water could really be retained there and it could be used for hydrological purposes. So we have Kakuč Turja Mögöt, which is really, really in the center of the research in the last couple of years. And then we have two other sites which look more or less similar in terms of this horizontal structure. At Dönbschut, we have, again, more ditches and more clusters, but we don't see the entire site because it's based on the start on the on the artificial channel at the moment. And then we have a very simple, only with one nucleus, the Dobosz Solokcalapusta site. This ongoing research is focusing now on if they are only simmering the horizontal way or also their vertical structure and the distribution of the different layers is also similar or not. We only have preliminary results at the moment because it's an ongoing work. We don't have these very nice drawings at present, but what we see is that, especially the allocation and the vertical distribution of the different types of soil and sediment layers, the modern soil, and beneath that, the culture layer sealed by the modern soil is present at Dönbschut Zanjivar. We have a very similar, very similar sedimentological circumstance in the ditches and similar depths also, which, again, links this to the Kakutsz site. And, of course, we have the same at Dobosz Solokcalapusta, which is a more simple and less complicated version maybe of Kakutsz Solokcalapusta. Thank you for your kind attention.