 Jack, the APIA investment in the new Brazil project has brought a lot of debate online at Investor Intel. What are your thoughts about this deal? I think it's a beautifully intelligent vertical integration by APIA. APIA is the most interesting project in Canadian wearers today because it may well be the premier deposit of neodymium-rich monazite in North America, and if that pans out, adding to it the heavy wearers that would be contained in the ionic clays in Brazil, it is just perfect. All right, so let's ask, let me ask you another question I saw online this week is, what are the benefits of being an ionic clay? The benefits of ionic clays are that they are very low in radiation, very little thorium, no uranium, and they tend to be enriched in the heavier atomic-numbered wearers like dysprosium and tervium, which are the key materials for magnets. We talk about neodymium all of the time, but in fact, without dysprosium and tervium, the only thing you can do with wearer-permanent magnets is put your shopping list on the refrigerator door or use it as a jewelry clasp. So additional commentary with regards to the APIA acquisition was that maybe they're trying to draw our attention away from Alice's lake. Is that true? No, no, no. The acquisition in Brazil is a natural addition to the Alice's lake discovery, which we're hoping is going to be approved in deposit very shortly, and that nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, they're synergistic. The one enhances the value of the other in both directions. So you're going to be the kickoff speaker. You're going to actually introduce Konstantin Karinopoulos from Neopreformance Materials at the Critical Minerals Institute Summit on June 14. Can you tell us, give us a little glimpse into what your number one issue is that you're going to be talking about? My number one issue is can North American industry become self-sufficient in critical minerals? This is yet to be determined, but it is the most important discussion in the critical mineral space, believe me. I'm going to give my opinion on that date, and we hope we're going to have other opinions and we're going to have a lively debate on whether or not North America can in fact become self-sufficient, not reliant on other countries who are the critical minerals for our manufacturing base. OK, so in addition, of course, to the shortage of critical minerals, that's why they're called critical minerals. Can you tell us whether or not you're going to get involved as well in another heated debate that I'm hearing a lot reoccurring themes about, which is the critical shortage of professional and qualified professionals? Actually, that is probably more of a problem for us in not only North America, but also in Europe, than even the supply of critical minerals. In fact, the most critical shortage in the Western world is experienced, competent mining engineers who are also chemical engineers, mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, but we produce hardly any mining engineers in the Western world while China is churning them out on an assembly line. And this is going to come back and bite us into, you know what, it may be it already has, but you've hit on a very key issue, Tracy. This is the problem of our time because you can't create new mining engineers just by snapping your fingers or allocating money. That doesn't work. It takes time and we better find the skills. We need the people to teach these people. We have them now, but they're getting older by the day, believe me. So on that note, the critical minerals Institute will be hosting a debate on that particular topic at the end of April. For more information, go to criticalmineralsinstitute.com. And Jack, as always, it's a pleasure. Thank you.