 The resident Electoral Commissioner of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Ainek, who do UNICEF can now give evidence before the election tribunal. Council to Governor Amadou Umadou Finteri, Dumian Doudou, had argued that UNICEF was sneaked into the courtroom to give evidence contrary to the procedure. And this was corroborated by Mohamed Lawal-Garaba, a council to the first respondent, Ainek, who also objected to UNICEF, given oral evidence at the sitting on grounds that he was listed out of time. However, UNICEF, guarded by armed security operatives, left the courtroom without doing so. Petitioners try to call a witness. It's a witness that is well known, Marlamhuru Ari, former resident Electoral Commissioner of Guatemala State. But we took a technical objection for the past six hours. We have articulated arguments as to why he cannot be allowed to testify. And the other side have also made arguments as to why he should be heard. So tomorrow, by the grace of God, the court will give a decision as to whether he can testify or whether he cannot testify. I will continue from there. Yes. Not bringing that document again. Therefore, that witness cannot testify. That is just our, we don't have anything against the witness. But the only thing is that the law and procedure should be followed when a witness is to be called. So we are saying they did not follow the correct procedure. Therefore, that witness cannot testify because his statement, which is his evidence, was not put forward to the court as such when it was supposed to. Thank you. That's a simple answer. Today, we heard some arguments on whether our next witness could testify. That witness is the former state resident electoral commissioner who was to testify on what happened during that election. But of course, the respondents, we just met him in court and this fear came on them. And the thing they could do was to oppose his right to testify. So we now have to address the court on the right of every witness called by a party to the proceeding.