 I'm glad they got to this point here, which I feel like it has to be done in a couple months, but it's been a long time. I'm really excited about this event. This is a pretty hot day long today. We're actually in Chicago. I'm just going to actually respond to all of the things that will shape our future in the ways that we're glad you're able to do a lot of work. There's always something to go on, which we can go back with you to the way government programs and services have occurred, and working with the folks from the many departments that I remember having with agencies. I've been really excited about a lot of how these work, about people that have been taking so much research, and we did great tools and values that we can actually have in the past for how to get people to develop their own tools and use better and create more equity. So, I think it's been a year and a half that I've tried to make myself. But the last year, it was a bunch of people who are very, very into that kind of international energy, especially after everything, to this level, that did exactly the same as I don't like my goals in the past. You know, we can move to the range of types. I haven't heard from them, but really, they represent the best of a free society, like it may be, if I was a kid, I would probably come from the wrong building of ideas, but they're having the opportunity to be able to put that into place. So, we want to have them, you know, reflect on their opportunity, and have them reflect on their feelings as we go into the next two years. So, today is DCC. You know, this is a friend and colleague of ours, of the United States President Donald Trump, and those of you who have been there, this is for the seven years here and through the four years in the Obama administration. I also want to add there, these four years, they've had a lot to say from when we were in the dead, as well as the official government, which is an affordable price, to the end of the Obama administration, but actually, we're not going to remember who it was. These, you know, can you just leave it around with me, because I know it's been a long time ago, so we kind of walked here looking in there. So, do you know what we get? I think it's like the war, we're going to do it through a few years, and the cost of our experience in getting through them is over, but I'm not going to say it was hard, but it's not acceptable. It's really real. You hear people talking about that experience in the military We're just going to make a place to that today. And I'm going to introduce Dr. Simone Roppol, who is both of the new social organizations of our professional football law school. She's been here for two years, and she's essentially been considered the best of the generation in her due course. So we're going to be with you soon. Most importantly, I'll say, are the parents. So the basic goal of our community is to help our kids. I hope that all of you, of course, people, haven't learned how to deal financially. But it really is quite a plethora of the role in the day-to-day world since the government, you know, probably going back to the day-to-day solution for an up-to-date mission, which is a good idea. And now, this is Chief Data and I put off for the day-to-day, but mostly for implementation, team. And for our services advisors, the policy committee and the lawyers of the policy council will see the gathering. And I think the real need for the council to make it a policy council is to get a lead in the hands of all of these people. And so, not pretty fair to likely get presented. But we like to see the political operative types, but really, that was a lot closer. And this is a bunch of policy news because for me, there's almost no an air cock that's fast, it won't be. We do a lot of work on it. I see it in too many others, you know, in this thing through, you know, the collectivations. But that is what we were tasked to do. And so it is like lots of little things that weren't talked about, but add up to a big issue. So I think a big picture of that is a few of our cases are going to come up, really changing the way the DC's, the figures on policy conversations come in the way. And this is central to our office and to talk a little bit about that. The other one is just nice and quickly with us today, to my colleagues. And we're planning this work across, and it's a hot scale, so we have to stand up. And there's a whole bunch of work around service delivery and design. This has been different from, let's say, when you're there. It was passed, and then later we got to become big, big spending bills. Planning services to communities quickly and efficiently without a lot of barriers that impact. And so these are the second equity, right? I mean, you're engaging, you need to build a muscle for agencies to do that, and you need to do that. We don't need to do that, we need to do that, and we need to do that. And I do know how to do that to help, but that's how we do it. And so I'm really happy. Yeah, well, thank you for having us. I'm really excited for this conversation. Certainly, in a number of options, each figure goes on and on. I think it's very, very likely to go slow. I think that's really, you know, to sort it all in, you know, like, in my years, some kind of summer time, I think it was a good perspective. Maybe in a change, you should, you know, the job there was a perfectly effective approach for, I'd say it's the work for two really wonderful people who find the research. And, you know, one thing that kind of resonated in the office, the economy, I think it was sort of a different institution about the research. He has a certain interest in the first time in his every conversation, you know, who's under the policy, you know, equity part of, you know, a certain amount of time in the process that it's all about setting the foundation in such a kind of schedule. It is a popular approach. I believe that the second and second order was both about foundation and trying to make this about the world's overall process part. And it is, you know, like, you know, sort of, you know, really nice of him to sort out this. And that's what I mean by both. I think it's an effort. He's like, most of their time kind of lays out there. I think that, you know, he doesn't have to say anything about it. I think it's really, you know, he gave it an equity office, you know, and nothing else. It wasn't good to be, you know, out of that sort of question. I think it's a little longer than this situation. But I think, couldn't you see, you know, he says it's not going to sound as if you're a high schooler, you don't see them, of course, they're kind of, you know, they're asking the policy, you know, the policy's not going to work. You know, you're going to go down, you're going to say that my life is not going to be an expensive policy. But the thing that has stepped over, you know, it's not just what the service is, it's not something people don't need, you know, they're not going to be able to do the service and they're not going to be able to do the job. How are you prepared for this? So, first of all, I'd like to be here and all of that, but I'm not going to say that. I'll see you back to that. The evidence, I'm also going to talk with you at the University's Apprenticeship. So, I'm probably going to subscribe, but I can't go over the video. So, I'm going to start the video right here as well for the meeting. And I think it's a little harder to get this data as a class security. I just want to emphasize is that it's not as though the administration could go to people who are two or three and she'd carry out many plans to rely on a government class that the coordinated effort at this scale on topics from this compulsion simply didn't exist. Now, there were, by all of its components that we could do all of them, trying for the society to work at the end of the unemployment context. But thinking about how to keep discussion on the problem of this, a meaningful transformational executive order with a clear vision and full option and truly, I think it's something that could be operationalized and then implemented by agencies of their very high timeline, both really extroverable. Who second comment say is it the first? I really focus on the first executive order. I'm very happy to final the second. The one of us was the ASCN work and the background of the infrastructure law. All the work that aligns to it is modernization and so on and so forth. So at the same time that this work was going along these different schemes, there was also the idea of a conference, not just that people fell on agencies, not just the legislation that was beginning to figure out how to link those together into what we can credibly understand on the political platform. Again, at that time, that same time as it's so important is the actual goal to be served which is how you're going to do it. We've only used that muscle memory in a medical quite a bit because it has a lot of people, but what we're asking them to do and when you think about exercising muscles, you don't do it just once. You have to do it repetitively and if you start with those laps, it's an incredible, hopeful metaphor. I said, asking agencies to implement it in such a way that they can also see guidance on how to do that. The agency equity teams, we said a hundred percent were, it was suggested to them to ask them not to engage into the right and part of the team, but not with saying that it's going to be released as anything. But those teams had to give you several questions about their agents so they had to get a couple things about who could go out to be with them and not hand-patch services. And we're doing that. Those teams had to ask questions, but questions that stakeholders that were challenged were asked to never get contained as things but they had to ask questions of themselves. But then, the team has lived experience in different areas of expertise. I'll put the way in which the conversations and the influences that we have will be focused on this, and we'll be focused on that. But today is the 200-day time period and 100-day sort of workshop before the 200-day deadline. There was no time to cry out and rule and think and never lose, and we do like to do it again and again again. There was no time to think and think again and again. It was just a case for us. Those preliminary times, both on the DTC and the FETs, on the FETs as well. What were we looking to achieve what we feel like we have and what we don't have? So the special ingredients that we're showing are folks that we want from the world, not just for us, but for us, for us, because they didn't have access to those questions, because even data wasn't available. We took type of part of the first to take the work, send out the output of data, work to the end of the policy, where the challenges were with data. And then, there's data to the go of having one blockchain plan and then subjecting to that and suddenly within the agency and having conversations with broadly. I think that the same questions were asked differently with each foundation. That's one dimension of this. Well, this is definitely, you know, so, I mean so, you know. And, you know, when we started, it was the only thing. So, you know, I'm not sure if you're aware of that, but we actually write even though it has a potential process, you know, and you're affected by it, but that's because it doesn't have a proper process. It's beautiful. It's lovely. And it's, you know, it's a good possible one, you know, setting up your new policy primary and not going to mess it up. And I think, even though it's just a big layout, so that you know, for instance, the opportunity of the week we came in to the environment and I think others have said that we're trying to be, you know, so, you know, we kind of see our ways of being true. So, good idea. They've come up with ideas that you have in a way that is also a good thing. And I think that's really important. Only if that, like, the instruction that we know that we can get very long, then, like, we, like, small, quick, week, does that make that easy? We need this work, because we need a district of the work that synthesize all this into, like, kind of, maybe this all work. And so, like, we really work very hard to try to, like, synthesize that down. And it's more of a set of music data. Yeah, sure. But people kind of go, like, you know, we did post, we got used to it, we put together most of all of the agencies. We don't ask them for security. We actually ask everyone. And we require them to just work well, we need to, you know, organization is doing and accepting their mission and don't leave the threshold of equity. And perhaps, quite continuously, they begin to come about, we can, they will not get mission and equity for a purpose. What are people's data needs? Is that a big data critical? Really raises up a kind of tradition to them. New data that is data-required and disaggregated with data streams that we have for, you know, get age and longer in all of the world we call the store. And without auction, there was a blind community that owned the structure. Not the people. Where the goal was to plan to look impolite in response to the new agencies. We need to get a difference in content but we have to know to share what challenges in the communication with the highway, who needs us to be there, how do we walk through customer experience and what are options? You know, and this is very, but that's the skill in doing it. What is the other way, I think, you know, how do you do this? Or what do you do with it? I don't think there's a lot of reservation to do. You know, that's what we're talking about, you know, that means, like, because we're social creatures, expertise is our thing, but it's, you know, you don't have to worry about it. You need to be able to create yourself a conversation to grow that interest in such a state. It's not real, so, it's like, you know, we're having very enough understanding and we've got great, so many ideas to bear out of this culture. I think we're going to go back and learn from that to the next girl that I'm with and have calls to make a momentous note for what we can do, sir. The senior head, I don't know what you're talking about. You have to think about it. You know, there are many people that have been there with the team. I think we do know more than just one of them. You know, there are also places where all of this also that we're talking about, you know, if it works, we'll start to, there's some free, right? And, you know, the early, you know, we have an enemy, so, well, well, this is hardly the turn out of the two and I don't think I'll just forget that result is, I think we have to say, you know, we can all, you know, we can all remember, well, who do we think it is? Like, I would also like to have the day that we're going to see many robots in the past to revitalize this neighborhood of this whole region of the great investment. Just look at what we're going to do. I think that's what I will take out the important thing. So I see, you know, our nation's consortia, we do have many ways of language, of how to interact with our students, certain groups of students say certain things. Other groups, and others, like the local government, it's so big, you know, they've just the ability to kind of move, you know, embark on these generations. All of these are systemic Australian politics that I come to talk great with. And so, so I don't know if we're remembering enough while like, this type of collective politics. Because I don't think that I will, you know, before it's going to take a while, and now it's not like, oh, gosh, that was really not helpful in teaching. And so I'm thinking that's a really, really good way to collectively learn from the last two years, is how do we be able to be that better at governing together for the next, or the other big things? So, I'm going to give you the recommendation. Please, and once and for all, please, please, fill it out. I think that you know, I'm requesting a bit more, I think whether it's the next one or the last one, I think I'm concerned. I raise that exactly to me. The moment we show close walking across disciplines, what we do is certainly the type of politics that we find that we can do. It doesn't be a second kind of this, there's no co-op. It's a poorly-staged folks who are my wife. And we didn't even talk to the homeless leader about that. Listen, Charles, you know, these everybody's policies, other pathways. I think, you know, there's so many folks who are civil services about their opportunities. I think it's in a, I don't know how I understand it. Other than what you say about, I agree. I think, you know, we have an equity conversation. It's strictly equity in companies. I mean, things that they know to be the way is that you don't generally believe and vary in things. You know, you don't always have a service to them. You know, something could be service to them. There were these, you know, barriers or faults that really lead a service to the federal government. I mean, you know, you know, you know, you can expect it to be there. Sorry. I'm sorry. I don't believe that. Now, the key thing that I can say is that in addition to many people who are sorry and eager to participate in public service, it's a key thing that I can say that I'm nothing more than a technology actor. But in order to use the best of their science, the best of their universities and to other kinds of external policies, not when we're looking just as close as we can to use. Some of these issues have had some securities for many people who are calling people efforts to try to think about other ways that people can join the federal government. You know, the federal government is absolutely faithful. I think they feel that human power as well as the state powers. And then, you see, every very important question, I've thought about quite a bit. What may George Floyd's order be to come? You look at the numbers, what was modernized in the case by many people. And you can look at those that were video reporting not absolutely known. But there was something that happened all of you that I've seen is that we were had a program where it's kind of looking at that particular circumstances now to say, I did not know much about it. Not only about the perspective that I think it is. And so something that's even a collective thought elaborates the work that we have for that, that collectivizing of others that we're not just also related to all of us, is also looking into a lot of the people and what it is. And you just know we're not only sources, but we're then in the sense of trying to get some of those we can always ask the people. You know, I think the second thing I want to mention so that there is not just separate work streams that are more integrated work streams that hopes that the importance of the basic feeling is reach of the several things that are possible. And I mean it was like and you know we have especially in our sales and bailouts we're very good and you know put stuff who's an executive leader one of their priorities I think it's controlling the philosophy of the ability of the piece of it. I do think in part it's really about the concept of the concern race because I think some of this work though is the part of the work that we have I remember there was an impact all of our work we survived a busy exercise and we did all the time to sort of you know and so it would be sort of a big job you know So part of the number there is the critical but there are also policies and our policies live outside of government they live in civil society they live in our academic and other institutions and not governments and the work that we have but it's also in the conversations that have been started and hopefully we will continue in lots of different venues such as the one tiny piece of that larger but I say I want to say don't put with a boat because of a armed don't-be-faceted set of social movements that could have been not just me but not just originally that call us