 530 I will call the public works committee to order do road call Holder person Decker here all the person's polio Yeah, all the person Phillips It's like Rose is not here and then all the person Sarnson is present. Maybe Rose will hop on a little late Okay, for those that are present at the meeting today, please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance Allegiance to the flag the United States of America Public for which it stands one nation Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. All right, let's get rockin and rollin right into our agenda here We'll approve the minutes from our June 9th meeting is there such motion to approve Second, there's been a motion by Marcus second by Dean any discussion on the minutes from our previous meeting Seeing none all those in favor, please state aye. Aye. I Anyone opposed chair votes either minutes are approved All right items for discussion impossible action 3.1 resolution number 3620-21 Document number 4.3 resolution authorizing appropriate city officials to sign amendment number two for the joint sewage treatment Agreement between the town of Sheboygan Sanitary district number two in the city of Sheboygan Do you make a motion to? Well, I was gonna say does Steve want to talk or David you want to yeah? Yeah, yeah, Steve Steve's on the line and so we're gonna let Steve Jaster from the wastewater Okay, thank you For their Charges which is kind of based on 1974 so they had Higher charges that our average customers do and we we've had some complaints on that So what we're doing now is we're going to charge them like a regular city resident Which means that they'll be charged a fixed charge like everybody is but then their water usage will determine their usage charge instead of just a fixed usage charge Like they will be Equally charged for their sewer usage There are three residents yet that will not get this that will still see a fixed charge One of the two of the services that is going to be listed as the name of safety And there's one other resident But the reason for that is they're on water through the town of Sheboygan and on the town sewer All the customers that are getting switched over are on city water our city of Sheboygan water So, uh, we'd like to make this change so that these customers are treated equitably, you know, like the city Cool. Thanks, Steve Any questions? Seeing none is there motion to approve motion to approve Second motion by dean second by marcus any other discussion Seeing none all those in favor, please stay die Aye Anyone opposed chair votes aye that is approved. Thank you 3.2 resolution number 37 dash 20 dash 21 document 4.4 resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to enter to agreement with the huckle pumping or plumbing and heating incorporated For the replacement of six heaters in the vehicle garage at shoreline metro Derek is this you Yes, sir. All right Thank you. This is a capital project to Further replace six heaters that are in our garage That need replacement. We did smaller quantity of heaters in the past But these are the last six units that need funding Or that need approval for replacement The amount is 19,320 dollars And the recommendation is to award to the lowest responsive bid, which was submitted by Excuse me if it's hockey plumbing and heating incorporated of Plymouth Any questions from committee members? Is there a motion to approve? Motion to approve. Do you move to approve? Is there a second second by marcus. Any further discussion? Seeing none all those in favor, please stay die. Aye Aye Anyone opposed chair votes. Aye. That is approved Okay, 3.3 resolution number 38 dash 20 dash 21 document 4.5 resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to enter into an agreement with cassock roofing incorporated for the complete replacement of the roof at the shoreline metro transportation facility, Derek Thank you again this project is To do a roof deck replacement on our main facility that houses our administrative offices and our vehicles We were awarded a grant through the federal transit administration that would pay for Just about 50 percent a little less than 50 percent of the total cost of this project Um, as you can see on the ioc form, uh, cassock roofing was the lowest bid and the recommendation then is to award this project to them We do have a budget of 750 000 dollars total on this with the city Funding 399 000 and the remaining roughly 350 000 coming through that federal grant There may be a balance uh allotted on this project and if so, uh, we may be able to take advantage of additional Repairs that our roof also requires but uh, the initial project is to Do the main large area of our roof? Of our facility with a new roof I have a question on this Marcus Thank you, mr. Chair I wanted to know if there were any plans to put solar panels on this roof. Was it considered? Was it? looked at as an option Marcus no, it was not. Uh, it was not factored into this project um, perhaps maybe just a 30 second overview, but our facility Is approaching 50 years of of life? And so the thought on this is that this roof will not last us The next five years And we do not see funding for our facility in the next five years. So we do need to move forward with Replacing the roof at this time However, the long-term approach of our building would be to Ultimately build a new facility that is more adequate with today's standards Both for energy and for maintenance purposes. So the longer to answer your question longer term approach would incorporate alternative I guess alternative fueling such as solar for the building and then as well as cng and Alternative fuels such as electricity for the buses themselves Thank you very much. Is there a motion to approve? Motion to approve Dean moves to approve Marcus seconds. Any further discussion on this item? Seeing none all those in favor, please stay die. Hi Hi Hi, anyone opposed chair vote side that item is approved. Thanks, Derek All right, move it along 4.1 general ordinance number 5-20 21 um document number 6.1 ordinance repealing and recreating section 26-907 in article 8 division 4 of chapter 26 of the municipal code Entitled sewer and water services director Bevel Yeah, I believe Joe Trueblood is participating Virtually and he will lead this discussion. Thank you. Joe. How's it going? Yes, good alderman sirenson Thank you the requested change um follows approval by the Wisconsin public service commission last week of the water utilities led service line replacement financial program So this program now It's authorized by the state will allow us to spend water revenues to replace led Laterals that are not owned by the utility. So this is a big change a big step forward um One of the things the state wanted us to do was to switch from using municipal assessments Which we had done in the past for water lateral replacements And instead they want the water utility to operate a loan program and this would be for led service line replacements and customers would qualify for a grant of up to 50 percent of the cost um not to exceed $2,500 And then the remainder of the cost would be funded by a no interest six-year loan to the property owner So instead of using the municipal assessments as has been done. We would now simply be issuing loans directly by the water utility from the water utility And then those customers would be paying those back over six years um Those are the primary elements of the change to that otherwise pretty lengthy ordinance um It does also discuss The number of qualifying entities You know, we're not aware of any daycares or schools that still have led laterals But if one of those were to be discovered they would immediately qualify and there are other Property owners listed as well that would qualify So I'd be happy to field any any questions on the changes or the program from the committee. Okay Are there any questions for drill? I do have a question shoot So coming from the real estate background with these six-year loans Are those going to be filling up on the current properties? Like a letter when they ask for are there any outstanding charges and such for when property transfers before the six years is up? Yes Assistant city attorney Cameron and Chuck Adams had worked with us on the process and and we settled on a notice of lien process Which would be filed and then would become Callable upon property transfer Perfect. Thank you any other Questions and sorenson. Yes, thomas So there was one tweak that was necessary as a result of the psc approval last week. Okay The the original version of the ordinance that was sent in Was based on the guidance we'd gotten at that point. They did ask for Joe is it two or three minor changes? um to relating to Some clarifications to remove words saying whose determination is final and the word priority So there's a couple of minor tweaks that we would recommend to ensure that we're in compliance with the With the psc approval. Okay. So are you requesting just us making these amendments right now then? That would be the the preference and then that can be incorporated into the version that goes to council In a few weeks for approval. Okay. Um, so Do you want us to make the the amendments or should we just make the motion to approve with the staff recommendations? And then send us the amended document. How would you rather do that thomas? I think to actually make the The changes and I can I can read those out and someone can say so moved at the end if that would be helpful Okay, so this is what we'll do so we'll make a motion to approve it first and then we'll make a motion to amend it And then we'll vote through the amendment. So we'll we'll follow the good old All right, there's been a motion to approve. Is there a second? All right, marcus has motioned to approve dina seconded it now thomas would um, you had some recommended amendments that needs to be made on this document So the the recommended motion to approve would be to amend the general ordinance So as to remove the word whose determination is final from section section 26 dash 106 subsection k And the word priority from subsection from section 26 dash 1006 slow down Both of which are changes to section six of the general ordinance Is there a such motion to amend? Motion to amend All right, there's been a second. So moved amendment in a second Any discussion on the amendment? All right, seeing none on the amendment all those in favor of approving the amendment, please state. Aye. Aye Aye Anyone opposed chair votes aye that amendment is approved So now we're back on the main motion that's been amended Are there any discussion on the amended main motion? Seeing none all those in favor of approving the motion as amended, please state. Aye. Aye Aye Anyone opposed chair votes aye that is approved All right, thank you All right next meeting july 14th Seeing that we've exhausted the agenda. Is there such motion to adjourn? Motion to adjourn Motion by dean second by marcus all those in favor of adjourning, please state. Aye Aye Aye Anyone opposed chair votes aye. We are adjourned at 546. Thank you everybody. Have a great night