 Sorry, everyone, for the schedule, I'm just going to have seven minutes left. Okay, I'm going to present about the case about vandalism on community project policy and bring to you some cases from disunainist Indonesian Wikipedia. So this is supposed to be a little bit introductory for myself. You can check it in the slides later. Of course, I'm going to talk about vandalism and also this is supposed to be a video, but I don't think that we can play it right now. This is the existing cross project and local policies on vandalism. The most recent terms of use has the vandalism word in it, but when I asked, I want to ask what is defined as vandalism as written in section 4 and accent consistently written to harm the project. Is that your definition or definition mentioned somewhere in terms of use? Vandalism is defined as triumphalously in the term of use. Okay, this is someone from the foundation answering directly. Content vandalism may not be used in universal of code of conduct. We have the definition of deliberately introducing bias false, inaccurate, and inappropriate content, or hindering, impeding, or otherwise hampering the creation of content. Okay, this is the current policy in the English Wikipedia. Vandalism deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project purpose, but we can see in the project purpose Wikipedia has no formulas. So, does it mean when we create rules, it means vandalism? I don't know. It's one of the English Wikipadians to solve themselves. And also there is a little rule about ignore our rules. This is rather different than the Indonesian Wikipedia and the dumpster writing one. So, we have a similar form of ignore our rules. But in Indonesian, we translate it into don't feel to be too burdened by the rules. So, not ignore. So, there's also a praise of use your brain, don't make something up, or don't mess up. So, this is a policy in the Indonesian Wikipedia. So, this is the criteria on vandalism, content as vandalism in Indonesian Wikipedia. And also, not vandals, these are the criteria. And vandalism may lead to block with all of these other reasons. And I want to emphasize on the examples, of course, whether you consider is this vandalism or not. So, this is an article about the balance beam. Balance beam in gymnastics, balance beam event in gymnastics. Any of you in the room currently consider this as vandalism or not? No. Yeah, I'm just going to let you know. This is an incorrect translation. The supposed correct and more older term and still use term in Indonesian supposed to be balok ke seimbangan. It is already very common. But the person I censored their name here, of course, who created this article took it on himself and use papan instead, which mean board, not beam, which mean board. Do you guys consider it as vandalism or not? Okay. No, right. What about two articles with similar these problems? This is just one article, but two articles like this. Three articles by the same person. Four articles, a thousand articles. Okay. This is a different kind of audience I see from the wiki data section I attended this morning. So, what about this one? This one is from the Sundanese Wikipedia. Is this vandalism? Why is it not? I'm currently a CSOP in Indonesian and Sundanese Wikipedia. And this is very difficult, particularly for small wikis because we don't necessarily have a content policy like vandalism or something that may lead to block and so on. I don't think this is a correct Sundanese term. I'm not so sure whether we use angkatan sagara because we use allowed also in Sundanese. It means Navy, U.S. Navy. And you can see there's no references in here. And this info box just supposed to be go on until down there so long. And it was created by, I don't know who it is. They are not an active member, user of the Sundanese Wikipedia. I suppose maybe not even Indonesian. Not really, there's something about that. And also, how about this, is this vandalism? I'm going to point it out directly. You can see the references. It's not supposed to be like this only. And you can see this is a really similar, a very similar transition from the Indonesian article. And it's also the same because it's the same as before as this article. It wasn't created by routine members of the Wikipedia. So I really want to know whether what is this vandalism that we are talking about? I hope if anyone is joining me in online, I'm really glad to connect. My username supposed to be on pre-box and even yay. And if you are attending here, I really would be glad if we can define it ourselves. Okay, thank you. Terima kasih.