 CHAPTER VIII. Learn of non-resistance to evil by force must inevitably be accepted by men of the present day. Christianity is not a system of rules, but a new conception of life, and therefore it was not obligatory and was not accepted in its true significance by all, but only by a few. Christianity is, moreover, prophetic of the destruction of the pagan life, and therefore of necessity of the acceptance of the Christian doctrines. Non-resistance of evil by force is one aspect of the Christian doctrine which must inevitably, in our times, be accepted by men, two methods of deciding every quarrel. First method is to find a universal definition of evil which all must accept, and to resist this evil by force. First method is the Christian one of complete non-resistance by force. Though the failure of the first method was recognized since the early days of Christianity, it was still proposed, and only as mankind has progressed, it has become more and more evident that there cannot be any universal definition of evil. This is recognized by all at the present day, and if force is still used to resist evil, it is not because it is now regarded as right, but because people don't know how to avoid it. The difficulty of avoiding it is the result of the subtle and complex character of the government use of force. Force is used in four ways, intimidation, bribery, hypnotism, and coercion by force of arms. State violence can never be suppressed by the forcible overthrow of the government. Men are led by the sufferings of the pagan mode of life to the necessity of accepting Christ's teachings with its doctrine of non-resistance by force. The consciousness of its truth which is diffused throughout our society will also bring about its acceptance. This consciousness is in complete contradiction with our life. This is especially obvious in compulsory military service, but through habit and the application of the four methods of violence by the state, men do not see this in consistency of Christianity with life of a soldier. They do not even see it, though the authorities themselves show all the immorality of a soldier's duties with perfect clearness. The call to military service is the supreme test for every man, when the choice is offered him between adopting the Christian doctrine of non-resistance, or slavishly submitting to the existing state organization. Men usually renounce all they hold sacred and submit to the demands of government, seeming to see no other course open to them. For men of the pagan conception of life there is no other course open and never will be. In spite of the growing horrors of war, society made up of such men must perish and no social reorganization can save it. Christian life has reached its extreme limit and will annihilate itself. It is often said that if Christianity is a truth it ought to have been accepted by everyone directly it appeared, and ought to have transformed men's lives for the better. But this is like saying that if the seed were ripe it ought at once to bring forth stalls, flower, and fruit. The Christian religion is not a legal system which being imposed by violence may transform men's lives. Christianity is a new and higher conception of life. A new conception of life cannot be imposed on men, it can only be freely assimilated. And it can only be freely assimilated in two ways, one spiritual and internal, the other experimental and external. Some people, a minority, by a kind of prophetic instinct divine the truth of the doctrine, surrender themselves to it and adopt it. Others, the majority, only through a long course of mistakes, experiments, and suffering are brought to recognize the truth of the doctrine and the necessity of adopting it. And by this experimental external method the majority of Christian men have now been brought to this necessity of assimilating the doctrine. One sometimes wonders what necessitated the corruption of Christianity which is now the greatest obstacle to its acceptance in its true significance. If Christianity had been presented to men in its true uncorrupted form it would not have been accepted by the majority, who would have been as untouched by it as the nations of Asia are now. The peoples who accepted it in its corrupt form were subjugated to its slow but certain influence, and by a long course of errors and experiments and their resulting sufferings have now been brought to the necessity of assimilating it in its true significance. The corruption of Christianity and its acceptance in its corrupt form by the majority of men was as necessary as it is that the seed should remain hidden for a certain time in the earth in order to germinate. Christianity is at once a doctrine of truth and a prophecy. Eighteen centuries ago Christianity revealed to men the truth in which they ought to live, and at the same time foretold what human life would become if men would not live by it, but continued to live by their previous principles, and what it would become if they accepted the Christian doctrine and carried it out in their lives. Laying down in the Sermon on the Mount the principles by which to guide men's lives, Christ said, Whosoever hath these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man who built his house upon a rock, and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell not. For it was founded upon a rock, and everyone who hath these sayings, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man who built his house upon the sand, and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it. Matthew 7, verse 24 through 27. And now, after eighteen centuries, the prophecy has been fulfilled. Not having followed Christ's teachings generally, and its application to social life in non-resistance to evil, men have been brought, in spite of themselves, to the inevitable destruction foretold by Christ, for those who do not fulfill his teaching. People often think the question of non-resistance to evil by force is a theoretical one, which can be neglected. Yet this question is presented by life itself to all men, and calls for some answer from every thinking man, ever since Christianity has been outwardly professed. This question is for men in their social life, like the question which presents itself to a traveler when the road on which he has been journeying divides into two branches. He must go on, and he cannot say, I will not think about it, but will go on just as I did before. There was one road, now there are two, and he must make his choice. In the same way, since Christ's teaching has been known by men, they cannot say, I will live as before, and will not decide the question of resistance or non-resistance to evil by force. At every new struggle that arises, one must inevitably decide, am I or am I not, to resist by force what I regard as evil. The question of resistance or non-resistance to evil arose when the first conflict between men took place, since every conflict is nothing else than resistance by force to what each of the combatants regards as evil. But before Christ, men did not see that resistance by force to what each regards as evil, simply because one thinks evil, what the other thinks good, is only one of the methods of settling the dispute, and that there is another method, that of not resisting evil by force at all. Before Christ's teaching, it seemed to men that the only means of settling a dispute was by resistance to evil by force, and they acted accordingly, each of the combatants trying to convince himself and others that what each respectively regards as evil is actually absolutely evil. To do this from the earliest time, men have devised definitions of evil and tried to make them binding on everyone, and such definitions of evil sometimes took the form of laws, sometimes to have been received by supernatural means, sometimes of the commands of rulers or assemblies to whom infallibility was attributed. Men resorted to violence against others, and convinced themselves and others that they were directing their violence against evil recognized as such by all. This means was employed from the earliest times, especially by those who had gained possession of authority, and for a long while its irrationality was not detected. But the longer men lived in the world and the more complex their relations became, the more evident it was that to resist by force what each regarded as evil was irrational, that conflict was in no way lessened thereby, and that no human definitions can succeed in making what some regard as evil be accepted as such by others. Already at the time Christianity arose, it was evident to a great number of people in the Roman Empire where it arose, that what was regarded as evil by Nero and Caligula could not be regarded as evil by others. Even at that time men had begun to understand that human laws, though given out for divine laws, were compiled by men, and could not be infallible whatever the external majesty with which they are invested, and that erring men are not rendered infallible by assembling together and calling themselves a senate or any other name. Even at that time this was felt and understood by many, and it was then that Christ preached his doctrine which consisted not only of the prohibition of resistance to evil by force, but gave a new conception of life, and a means of putting an end to conflict between all men, not by making it the duty of one section only of mankind to submit without conflict to what is prescribed to them by certain authorities, but by making it the duty of all, and consequently of those in authority not to resort to force against anyone in any circumstances. This doctrine was accepted at the time by only a very small number of disciples. The majority of men, especially all who were in power, even after the nominal acceptance of Christianity, continued to maintain for themselves the principle of resistance by force to what they regarded as evil. So it was under the Roman and Byzantine emperors, and so it continued to be later. The insufficiency of the principle of the authoritative definition of evil and resistance to it by force, evident as it was in the early ages of Christianity, becomes still more obvious through the division of the Roman Empire into many states of equal authority, through their hostilities and the internal conflicts that broke out within them. But men were not ready to accept the solution given by Christ, and the old definitions of evil, which ought to be resisted, continued to be laid down by means of making laws binding on all and enforced by forcible means. The authority who decided what ought to be regarded as evil and resisted by force was at one time the Pope, at another an emperor or king, an elective assembly or a whole nation. Both within and without the state there were always men to be found who did not accept as binding on themselves the laws given out as the decrees of a God, or made by men invested with a sacred character, or the institution supposed to represent the wheel of a nation. And there were men who thought good what the existing authorities regarded as bad, and who struggled against the authorities with the same violence as was employed against them. The men invested with religious authority regarded as evil what the men and institutions invested with temporal authority regarded as good, and vice versa. And the struggle grew more and more intense, and the longer men used violence as the means of settling their disputes, the more obvious it became that it was an unsuitable means since there could be no external authority able to define evil recognized by all. Things went on like this for eighteen centuries, and, at last, reached the present position in which it is absolutely obvious that there is and can be no external definition of evil binding upon all. Men have come to the point of ceasing to believe in the possibility or even desirability of finding and establishing such a general definition. It has come to men in power ceasing to attempt to prove that what they regard as evil is evil, and simply declaring that they regard as evil what they don't like, while their subjects no longer obey them because they accept the definition of evil laid down by them, but simply obey because they cannot help themselves. It was not because it was a good thing, necessary and beneficial to men, and the contrary course would have been an evil, but simply because it was the will of those in power that Nice was incorporated into France and Lorraine into Germany, and Bohemia into Austria, and that Poland was divided, and Ireland and India ruled by the English government, and that the Chinese are attacked, and the Africans slaughtered, and the Chinese prevented from immigrating by the Americans and the Jews, persecuted by the Russians and the landowners' appropriated lands that they do not cultivate, and capitalists enjoy the fruits of the labor of others. It has come to the present state of things. One set of men committed acts of violence. No longer on the pretext of resistance to evil, but simply for their profit or their caprice, and another set submit to violence, not because they suppose, as was supposed in former times, that this violence was practiced upon them for the sake of securing them from evil, but simply because they cannot avoid it. If the Roman, or the man of medieval times, or the average Russian of fifty years ago, as I remember him, was convinced without a shade of doubt that the violence of authority was indispensable to preserve him from evil, that taxes, dues, suffrage, prisons, scourging, noughts, executions, and army and war were what ought to be. We know now that one can seldom find a man who believes that all these means of violence preserve anyone from any evil whatever, and indeed does not clearly perceive that most of these acts of violence to which he is exposed, and in which he has some share, are in themselves a great and useless evil. There is no one today who does not see the uselessness and injustice of collecting taxes from the toiling masses to enrich idle officials, or the senselessness of inflicting punishments on weak or depraved persons in the shape of transportation from one place to another, or of imprisonment in a fortress where, living in security and indolence, they only become weaker and more depraved, or the worse than uselessness and injustice, the positive insanity and barbarity of preparations for war and of wars causing devastation and ruin, and having no kind of justification. Yet these forms of violence continue and are supported by the very people who see their uselessness, injustice, and cruelty, and suffer from them. If fifty years ago the idle rich man and the illiterate laborer were both alike convinced that their state of everlasting holiday, for one an everlasting toil for the other, was ordained by God himself, we know very well that nowadays, thanks to the growth of population and the diffusion of books and education, it would be hard to find in Europe or even in Russia, either among rich or poor, a man to whom in one shape or another a doubt as to the injustice of this state of things had never presented itself. The rich know that they are guilty in the very fact of being rich and try to expiate their guilt by sacrifices to art and science, as of old they expiated their sins by sacrifices to the church. And even the larger half of the working people openly declare that the existing order is iniquitous and bound to be destroyed or reformed. One set of religious people of whom there are millions in Russia, the so-called sectaries, consider the existing social order as unjust and to be destroyed on the ground of the gospel teaching taken in its true sense. Religious regard it as unjust on the ground of the socialistic, communistic, or anachristic theories, which are springing up in the lower strata of the working people. Violence no longer rests on the belief in its utility, but only on the fact of its having existed so long, and being organized by the ruling classes who profit by it, so that those who are under their authority cannot extricate themselves from it. The governments of our day, all of them, the most despotic and the liberal alike, have become what Hertzin so well called Genghis Khan with the telegraph. That is to say, organizations of violence based on no principle but the grossest tyranny and at the same time taking advantage of all the means invented by science for the peaceful collective social activity of free and equal men used by them to enslave and oppress their fellows. Governments and the ruling classes no longer take their stand on right or even on the semblance of justice, but on a skillful organization carried to such a point of perfection by the aid of science that everyone is caught in the circle of violence and has no chance of escaping from it. This circle is made up now of four methods of working upon men joined together like the lines of a chainring. The first and oldest method is intimidation. This consists in representing the existing state organization, whatever it may be, free republic or the most savage despotism, as something sacred and immutable and therefore following any efforts to alter it with the cruelest punishments. This method is in use now, as it has been from olden times. Wherever there is a government, in Russia against the so-called Nillist, in America against the anarchists, in France against imperialist, legitimists, communards, and anarchists, railways, telegraphs, telephones, photographs, and the great perfection of the means of getting rid of men for years without killing them, by solitary confinement where, hidden from the world, they perish and are forgotten, and the many other modern inventions employed by government give such power that when once authority has come into certain hands, the police, open and secret, the administration and prosecutors, jailers and executioners of all kinds do their work so zealously that there is no chance of overturning the government, however cruel and senseless it may be. The second method is corruption. It consists in plundering the industrious working people of their wealth by means of taxes and distributing it in satisfying the greed of officials who are bound in return to support and keep up the oppression of the people. These bought officials from the highest ministers to the poorest copying clerks make up an unbroken network of men bound together by the same interest that of living at the expense of the people. They become the richer, the more submissive they carry out the will of the government, and at all times in places sticking at nothing in all departments support by word indeed the violence of government on which their own prosperity also rests. The third method is what I can only describe as hypnotizing the people. This consists in checking the moral development of men and by various suggestions keeping them back in the ideal of life outgrown by mankind at large on which the power of government rests. This hypnotizing process is organized at the present in the most complex manner and starting from the earliest childhood continues to act on men till the day of their death. It begins in their earliest years in the compulsory schools created for this purpose in which the children have instilled into them the ideas of life of their ancestors which are in direct antagonism with the conscience of the modern world. In countries where there is a state religion they teach the children the senseless blasphemies of the church catechisms together with the duty of obedience to their superiors. In republican states they teach them the savage superstitions of patriotism and the same pretended obedience to the governing authorities. The process is kept up during latter years by the encouragement of religious and patriotic superstitions. The religious superstition is encouraged by establishing with money taken from the people temples, processions, memorials and festivals which aided by painting, architecture, music and incense intoxicate the people and above all by the support of the clergy whose duty consists in brutalizing the people and keeping them in a permanent state of stupefaction by their teaching and solumenity of their services, their sermons and their interference in private life at births, deaths and marriages. The patriotic superstition is encouraged by the creation with money taken from the people of national fetes, spectacles, monuments and festivals to dispose men to attach importance to their own nation and to the aggrandizement of the state and its rulers and to fill antagonism and even hatred for other nations. With these objects under despotic governments there is direct prohibition against printing and disseminating books to enlighten the people and everyone who might rouse the people from their lethargy is exiled or imprisoned. Moreover under every government without exception everything is kept back that might emancipate and everything encouraged that tends to corrupt the people. Such as literary works tending to keep them in the barbarism of religious and patriotic superstition, all kinds of sensual amusements, spectacles, circuses, theaters and even the physical means of inducing stupefaction as tobacco and alcohol which form the principal source of revenue of states, even prostitution is encouraged and not only recognized but even organized by the government in the majority of states. So much for the third method. The fourth method consists in selecting from all men who have been stupefied and enslaved by the three former methods a certain number exposing them to special and intensified means of stupefaction and brutalization and so making them into a passive instrument for carrying out all the cruelties and brutalities needed by the government. This result is attained by taking them at the youthful age when men have not had time to form clear and definite principles of morals and removing them from all natural and human conditions of life, home, family and kindred and useful labor. They are shut up together in barracks dressed in special clothes and worked upon by cries, drums, music and shining objects to go through certain daily actions invented for this purpose and by this means are brought into an hypnotic condition in which they cease to be men and become mere senseless machines submissive to the hypnotizer. These physically vigorous young men in these days of universal conscription all young men hypnotized armed with murderous weapons always obedient to the governing authorities and ready for any act of violence at their command constitute the fourth and principal method of enslaving men. By this method the circle of violence is completed. Intimidation, corruption and hypnotizing bring people into a condition in which they are willing to be soldiers. The soldiers give the power of punishing and plundering them and purchasing officials with the spoils and hypnotizing them and converting them in time into these same soldiers again. The circle is complete and there is no chance of breaking through it by force. Some persons maintain that freedom from violence or at least a great diminution of it may be gained by the oppressed forcibly overturning the oppressive government and replacing it by a new one under which such violence and oppression will be unnecessary. But they deceive themselves and others and their efforts do not better the position of the oppressed but only make it worse. Their conduct only tends to increase the despotism of government. Their efforts only afford a plausible pretext for government to strengthen their power. Even if we admit that under a combination of circumstances specially unfavorable for the government as in France in 1870 any government might be forcibly overturned and the power transferred to other hands. The new authority would rarely be less oppressive than the old one. On the contrary always having to defend itself against its depossessed and exasperated enemies it would be more despotic and cruel as has always been the rule in all revolutions. While socialists and communists regard the individualistic, capitalistic organization of society as an evil and the anarchists regard as an evil all government whatever there are royalists, conservatives and capitalists who consider any socialistic or communistic organization or anarchy as an evil. And all these parties have no means other than violence to bring men to agreement. Whichever of these parties were successful in bringing their schemes to pass must resort to support its authority to all the existing methods of violence and even invent new ones. The oppressed would be another set of people and coercion would take some new form but the violence and oppression would be unchanged or even more cruel since hatred would be intensified by the struggle and new forms of oppression would have been devised. So it has always been after all revolutions and all attempts at revolution all conspiracies and all violent changes of government. Every conflict only strengthens the means of oppression in the hands of those who happen at a given moment to be in power. The position of our Christian society and especially the ideals most current in it prove this in a strikingly convincing way. There remains now only one sphere of human life not encroached upon by government authority, that is the domestic economic sphere, the sphere of private life and labor. And even this is now thanks to the efforts of communists and socialists being gradually encroached upon by government so that labor and recreation, dwellings, dress, and food will gradually, if the hopes of the reformers are successful, be prescribed and regulated by government. The slow progress of 18 centuries has brought the Christian nations again to the necessity of deciding the question they have evaded, the question of the acceptance or non-acceptance of Christ's teaching, and the question following upon it in social life of resistance or non-resistance to evil by force. But there is this difference that whereas formerly men could accept or refuse to accept the solution given by Christ, now that solution cannot be avoided, since it alone can save men from the slavery in which they are caught like a net. But it is not only the misery of the position which makes this inevitable. While the pagan organization has been proved more and more false, the truth of the Christian religion has been growing more and more evident. Not in vain have the best men of Christian humanity who apprehended the truth by spiritual intuition for 18 centuries testified to it in spite of every menace, every privation, and every suffering. By their martyrdom they passed on the truth to the masses and impressed it on their hearts. Christianity has penetrated into the consciousness of humanity, not only negatively by its demonstration of the impossibility of continuing in the pagan life, but also through its simplification, its increased clearness and freedom from the superstitions intermingled with it, and its diffusion through all classes of the population. Eighteen centuries of Christianity have not passed without any effect even on those who accepted it only externally. These 18 centuries have brought men so far that even while they continue to live the pagan life which is no longer consistent with the development of humanity, they not only see clearly all the wretchedness of their position, but in the depths of their souls they believe, that the only salvation from this position is to be found in fulfilling the Christian doctrine in its true significance. As to the time and manner of salvation, opinions are divided according to the intellectual development and the prejudices of each society. But every man of the modern world recognizes that our salvation lies in fulfilling the law of Christ. Some believers in the supernatural character of Christianity hold that salvation will come when all men are brought to believe in Christ, whose second coming is at hand. Other believers in supernatural Christianity hold that salvation will come through the church, which will draw all men into its fold, train them in the Christian virtues, and transform their life. A third section, who do not admit the divinity of Christ, hold that the salvation of mankind will be brought about by slow and gradual progress, through which the pagan principles of our existence will be replaced by the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity, that is, by Christian principles. A fourth section, who believe in the social revolution, hold that salvation will come when, through a violent revolution, men are forced into community of property, abolition of government, and collective instead of individual industry, that is to say, the realization of one side of the Christian doctrine. In one way or another, all men of our day, in their inner consciousness, condemn the existing effort pagan order, and admit, often unconsciously, and while regarding themselves as hostile to Christianity, that our salvation is only to be found in the application of the Christian doctrine, or parts of it, in its true significance to our daily life. Christianity cannot, as its founder said, be realized by the majority of men all at once. It must grow like a huge tree from a tiny seed, and so it has grown, and now has reached its full development, not yet in actual life, but in the conscious of men of today. Now, not only the minority, who have always comprehended Christianity by spiritual intuition, but all the vast majority, who seem so far from it in their social existence, recognize its true significance. Look at individual men in their private life. Listen to their standards of conduct in their judgment of one another. Hear not only their public utterances, but the counsels given by parents and guardians to the young in their charge, and you will see that, far as their social life based on violence may be from realizing Christian truth, in their private life, what is considered good by all, without exception, is nothing but the Christian virtues. What is considered as bad is nothing but the anti-Christian vices. Those who consecrate their lives self-sacrificingly to the surface of humanity are regarded as the best men. The selfish, who make use of the misfortunes of others for their own advantage, are regarded as the worst of men. Though some non-Christian ideals, such as strength, courage, and wealth, are still worshiped by a few who have not been penetrated by the Christian spirit, these ideals are out of date and are abandoned, if not by all, at least by all those regarded as the best people. There are no ideals, other than the Christian ideals, which are accepted by all and regarded as binding by all. The position of our Christian humanity, if you look at it from the outside, with all its cruelty and degradation of men, is terrible indeed, but if one looks at it within, in its inner consciousness, the spectacle it presents is absolutely different. All the evil of our life seems to exist only because it has been so far, so long. Those who do the evil have not had time yet to learn how to act otherwise, though they do not want to act as they do. All the evil seems to exist through some cause independent of the conscious of men. Strange and contradictory as it seems, all men of the present day hate the very social order they are themselves supporting. I think it is Max Mueller who describes the amazement of an Indian convert to Christianity, who after absorbing the essence of the Christian doctrine came to Europe and saw the actual life of Christians. He could not recover from his astonishment at the complete contrast between the reality of what he had expected to find among Christian nations. If we feel no astonishment at the contrast between our convictions and our conduct, that is because the influences tending to obscure the contrast produce an effect upon us too. We need only look at our own life from the point of view of that Indian who understood Christianity in its true significance without any compromises or concessions. We need but look at the savage brutalities of which our life is full, to be appalled at the contradictions in the midst of which we live often without observing them. We need only recall the preparations for war, the Mitarusas, the Silver Guilt Bullets, the Torpedoes, and the Red Cross, the solitary prison cells, the experiments of execution by electricity, and the care of the hygienic welfare of prisoners, the philanthropy of the rich and their life which produces the poor they are benefitting. And these inconsistencies are not as it may seem because men pretend to be Christians while they are really pagans, but because of something lacking in men, or some kind of force hindering them from being what they already feel themselves to be in their consciousness, and what they genuinely wish to be. Men of the present day do not merely pretend to hate oppression, inequality, class distinction, and every kind of cruelty to animals as well as human beings. They genuinely detest all this, but they do not know how to put a stop to it, or perhaps cannot decide to give up what preserves it all and seems to them necessary. Indeed, ask every man separately whether he thinks it laudable and worthy of a man of this age to hold a position from which he receives a salary disproportionate to his work, to take from the people often in poverty, taxes to be spent on constructing cannon, torpedoes, and other instruments of butchery, so as to make war on people with whom we wish to be at peace, and who feel the same wish in regard to us, or to receive a salary for devoting one's whole life to constructing these instruments of butchery, or to preparing oneself and others for the work of murder, and ask him whether it is laudable and worthy of a man and suitable for a Christian to employ himself for a salary in seizing wretched misguided often illiterate and drunken creatures because they appropriate the property of others on a much smaller scale than we do, or because they kill men in a different fashion from that in which we undertake to do it, and shutting them in prison for it, ill-treating them and killing them, and whether it is laudable and worthy if a man and a Christian to preach for a salary to the people not Christianity but superstitions which one knows to be stupid and pernicious, and whether it is laudable and worthy of a man to rob his neighbor for his gratification of what he wants to satisfy his simplest needs, as the great landowners do, or to force him to exhausting labor beyond his strength to augment one's wealth, as do factory workers and manufacturers, or to profit by the poverty of men to increase one's gains as merchants do, and everyone taken separately, especially if one's remarks are directed at someone else, not himself, will answer, no, and yet the very man who sees all the baseness of these actions, of his own free will, uncohersed by anyone, often, even for no pecuniary profit, but only from childish vanity, for a china cross, a scrap of a ribbon, a bit of fringe he is allowed to wear, will enter military service, become a magistrate, or justice of the peace, a commissioner, archbishop, or beetle, though in fulfilling these offices he must commit acts, the baseness and shamefulness of which he cannot fail to recognize. I know that many of these men will confidently try to prove that they have reasons for regarding their position as legitimate and quite indispensable. They will say in their defense that authority is given by God, that the functions of the state are indispensable for the welfare of humanity, that property is not opposed to Christianity, that the rich young man was only commanded to sell all he had and give to the poor if he wished to be perfect, that the existing distribution of property and our commercial system must always remain as they are, and are to the advantage of all, and so on. But however much they try to deceive themselves and others, they all know that what they are doing is opposed to all the beliefs which they profess, and in the depths of their souls, when they are left alone with their conscious, they are ashamed and miserable at the recollection of it, especially if the baseness of their action has been pointed out to them. A man of the present day, whether he believes in the divinity of Christ or not, cannot fail to see that to assist in the capacity of czar, minister, governor, or commissioner in taking from a poor man its last cow for taxes to be spent on cannons or on the pay and pensions of idle officials, who live in luxury and are worse than useless, or in putting into prison some man we have ourselves corrupted and throwing his family on the streets, or in plundering and butchering in war, or in inculculating savage and idolatrous superstitions in the place of the law of Christ, or in impounding the cow found on one's land, though it belongs to a man who has no land, or to cheat the workmen in a factory by imposing fines for accidentally spoiled articles, or making a poor man pay double the value for anything simply because he is in the direst poverty. Not a man of the present day can fail to know that all these actions are base and disgraceful, and that they need not do them. They all know it. They know that what they are doing is wrong, and would not do it for anything in the world if they had the power of resisting the forces which shut their eyes to the criminality of their actions and impale them to commit them. In nothing is the pitch of inconsistency modern life has attained to so evident as in universal conscription, which is the last resource and the final expression of violence. Indeed, it is only because this state of universal armament has been brought about gradually and imperceptibly, and because governments have exerted in maintaining it every resource of intimidation, corruption, brutalization, and violence, that we do not see its flagrant inconsistency with the Christian ideas and sentiments by which the modern world is permeated. We are so accustomed to the inconsistency that we do not see all the hideous folly and immorality of men voluntarily choosing the profession of butchery as though it were an honorable career, of poor wretches submitting to conscription, or in countries where compulsory service has not been introduced, of people voluntarily abandoning a wife of industry to recruit soldiers and train them as murderers. We know that all of these men are either Christians, or profess humane and liberal principles, and they know that they thus become partly responsible, through universal conscription, personally responsible for the most insane, aimless, and brutal murders, and yet they all do it. More than that, in Germany where compulsory service first originated, Caprivi has given expression to what had been hitherto so assiduously concealed, that is, that the men that the soldiers will have to kill are not foreigners alone, but their own countrymen, the very working people from whom they themselves are taken, and this admission has not opened people's eyes, has not horrified them. They still go like sheep to the slaughter, and submit to everything required of them. And that is not all. The emperor of Germany has lately shown still more clearly the duties of the army by thanking and rewarding a soldier for killing a defenseless citizen who made his approach incautiously. By rewarding an action always regarded as base and cowardly, even by men on the lowest level of morality, William has shown that a soldier's chief duty, the one most appreciated by the authorities, is that of executioner, and not a professional executioner who kills only condemned criminals, but one ready to butcher an innocent man at the word of command. And even that is not all. In 1892 the same William, the infant terrible of state authority, who says plainly what other people only think, in addressing some soldiers, gave public utterance to the following speech, which was reported next day in thousands of newspapers. Conscripts, he said, you have sworn fidelity to me before the altar and the minister of God. You are still too young to understand all the importance of what has been said here. Let your care before all things be to obey the orders and instructions given to you. You have sworn fidelity to me, lads of my guard, that means that you are now my soldiers, that you have given yourselves to me, body, and soul. For you there is now but one enemy, my enemy. In these days of socialistic sedition it may come to pass that I command you to fire on your own kindred, your brothers, even your own fathers, and mothers, which God forbid. Even then you are bound to obey my orders without hesitation. This man expresses what all sensible rulers think, but studiously conceal. He says openly that the soldiers are in his service at his disposal, and must be ready for his advantage to murder even their brothers and fathers. In the most brutal words he frankly exposes all the horrors and criminality for which men prepare themselves in entering the army and the depths of ignominity to which they fail in promising obedience. Like a bold hypnotizer he tests the degree of insensibility of the hypnotized subject. He touches his skin with a red hot iron, the skin smokes and scorches, but the sleeper does not awake. This miserable man, imbecile and drunk with power, outrages in this utterance everything that can be sacred for a man of the modern world. And yet all the Christians, liberals and cultivated people, far from resenting this outrage, did not even observe it. The last and most extreme test is put before men in its coarsest form, and they do not seem even to notice that it is a test, that there is any choice about it. They seem to think there is no course open, but slavish submission. One would have thought these insane words which outrage everything a man of the present day holds sacred, must rouse indignation, but there has been nothing of the kind. All the young men, through the whole of Europe, are exposed year after year to this test, and with very few exceptions they renounce all that a man can hold sacred, all express their readiness to kill their brothers, even their fathers, at the bidding of the first crazy creature dressed up in a livery with red and gold trimming, and only wait to be told where and when they are to kill, and they actually are ready. Every savage has something he holds sacred, something for which he is ready to suffer, something he will not consent to do, but what is it that is sacred to the civilized man today? They say to him, you must become a slave, and this slavery may force you to kill even your own father, and he, often very well educated, trained in all the sciences at the university, quietly puts his head under the yoke. They dress him up in a clown's costume, and order him to cut capers, turn and twist, and bow and kill. He does it all submissively. And when they let him go, he seems to shake himself and go back to his former life, and he continues to discourse upon the dignity of man, liberty, equality, and fraternity as before. Yes, but what is one to do? People often ask in genuine complexity. If everyone would stand out, it would be something. But, by myself, I shall only suffer without doing any good to anyone. And that is true. A man with a social conception of life cannot resist. The aim of his life is his personal welfare. It is better for his personal welfare for him to submit if he submits. Whatever they do to him, however they torture or humiliate him, he will submit, for alone he can do nothing. He has no principle for the sake of which he could resist violence alone. And those who control them never allow them to unite together. It is often said that the invention of terrible weapons of destruction will put an end to war. That is an error. As the means of extermination are improved, the means of reducing men who hold the state conception of life to submission can be improved to correspond. They may slaughter them by thousands, by millions, they may tear them to pieces. Still, they will march to war like senseless cattle. Some will want beating to make them move. Others will be proud to go if they are allowed to wear a scrap of ribbon or gold lace. And of this mass of men so brutalized as to be ready to promise to kill their own parents, the social reformers, conservatives, liberals, socialists and anarchists, proposed to form a rational and moral society. What sort of moral and rational society can be formed out of such elements? With wrapped and rotten planks you cannot build a house, however you put them together. And to form a rational society of such men is just as impossible a task. They can be formed into nothing but a herd of cattle, driven by the shouts and whips of the herdsmen, as indeed they are. So then we have on one side men calling themselves Christians and professing the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity. And along with that ready in the name of liberty to submit to the most slavish degradation, in the name of equality to accept the crudest, most senseless division of men by externals merely into higher and lower classes, allies and enemies, and in the name of fraternity ready to murder their brothers. The fact that among certain nations, as the English and the American, military service is not compulsory, though already one hears there are some who advocate that it should be made so, does not affect the servility of the citizens to the government in principle. Here we have each to go and kill or to be killed. There they have each to give the fruit of their toil to pay for the recruiting and training of soldiers. In footnote. The contradiction between life and conscience, and the misery resulting from it, have reached the extreme limit and can go no further. The state organization of life based on violence, the aim of which was the security of personal, family and social welfare, has come to the point of renouncing the very objects for which it was founded. It has reduced men to absolute renunciation and loss of the welfare it was to secure. The first half of the prophecy has been fulfilled in the generation of men who have not accepted Christ's teaching. Their descendants have been brought now to the absolute necessity of patting the truth of the second half to the test of experience. End of Section 8. Chapter 9. The Acceptance of the Christian Conception of Life will emancipate men from the misery of our pagan life. The external life of Christian peoples remains pagan, though they are penetrated by Christian consciousness. The way out of this contradiction is by the acceptance of the Christian theory of life. Only through Christianity is every man free and emancipated of all human authority. This emancipation can be affected by no change in external conditions of life, but only by a change in the conception of life. The Christian ideal of life requires renunciation of all violence, and in emancipating the man who accepts it emancipates the whole world from all external authorities. The way out of the present apparently hopeless position is for every man who is capable of assimilating the Christian conception of life to accept it and live in accordance with it. But men consider this way too slow and look for deliverance through changes in material conditions of life aided by government. That will lead to no improvement as it is simply increasing the evil under which men are suffering. A striking instance of this is the submission to compulsory military service which it would be more advantageous for every man to refuse than to submit to. The emancipation of men can only be brought about by each individual emancipating himself, and the examples of this self-emancipation, which are already appearing, threaten the destruction of governmental authority. Refusal to comply with the un-Christian demands of government undermines the authority of the state and emancipates men, and therefore cases of such non-compliance are regarded with more dread by state authorities than any conspiracies or acts of violence. Examples of non-compliance in Russia in regard to Otha Valegin's payment of taxes, passports, police duties, and military service. Examples of such non-compliance in other states. Governments do not know how to treat men who refuse to comply with their demands on Christian grounds. Such people, without striking a blow, undermine the very basis of government from within. To punish them is equivalent to openly renouncing Christianity and assisting in defusing the very principle by which these men justify their non-compliance. So governments are in a helpless position. Men who maintain the uselessness of personal independence only retard the dissolution of the present state organization based on force. The position of the Christian peoples in our days has remained just as cruel as it was in the times of paganism. In many respects, especially in the oppression of the masses, it has become even more cruel than it was in the days of paganism. But between the condition of men in ancient times and their condition in our days, there is just the difference that we see in the world of vegetation between the last days of autumn and the first days of spring. In the autumn, the external lifelessness in nature corresponds with its inward condition of death, while in the spring the external lifelessness is in sharp contrast with the internal state of reviving and passing into new forms of life. In the same way, the similarity between the ancient heathen life and the life of today is merely external. The inward condition of men in the times of heathenism was absolutely different from their inward condition at the present time. Then the outward condition of cruelty and of slavery was in complete harmony with the inner conscience of men, and every step in advance intensified this harmony. Now the outward condition of cruelty and of slavery is completely contradictory to the Christian consciousness of men, and every step in advance only intensifies this contradiction. Everything is passing through seemingly unnecessary, fruitless agonies. It is passing through something like the throes of birth. Everything is ready for the new life, but still the new life does not come. There seems no way out of the position, and there would be none except that a man and thereby all men is gifted with the power of forming a different, higher theory of life, which at once frees him from all the bonds by which he seems indissolubly fettered. And such a theory is the Christian view of life made known to mankind eighteen hundred years ago. A man need only make this theory of life his own, for the fetters which seemed so indissolubly forged upon him to drop off of themselves, and for him to feel himself absolutely free, just as a bird would feel itself free in a fenced in place directly at tools to its wings. People talk of the liberty of the Christian church about giving or not giving freedom to Christians. Underlying all these ideas and expressions there is some strange misconception. Freedom cannot be bestowed on or taken from a Christian or Christians. Freedom is an inalienable possession of the Christian. If we talk of bestowing freedom on Christians or withholding it from them, we are obviously talking not of real Christians, but of people who only call themselves Christians. A Christian cannot fail to be free because the attainment of the aim he sets before himself cannot be prevented or even hindered by anyone or anything. Let a man only understand his life as Christianity teaches him to understand it. Let him understand that is, that his life belongs not to him, not to his own individuality, nor to his family, nor to the state, but to him who has sent him into the world. And let him once understand that he must therefore fulfill not the law of his own individuality, nor his family, nor of the state, but the infinite law of him from whom he has come. And he will not only feel himself absolutely free from every human power, but will even cease to regard such power as at all able to hamper anyone. Let a man but realize that the aim of his life is the fulfillment of God's law, and that law will replace all other laws for him, and he will give it his sole allegiance, so that by that very allegiance every human law will lose all binding and controlling power in his eyes. The Christian is independent of every human authority by the fact that he regards the divine law of love implanted in the soul of every man and brought before his consciousness by Christ as the sole guide of his life and other men's also. The Christian may be subjected to external violence, he may be deprived of bodily freedom, he may be in bondage to his passions, he who commits sin as a slave of sin, but he cannot be in bondage in the sense of being forced by any danger or by any threat of external harm to perform an act which is against his conscience. He cannot be compelled to do this because the deprivations and sufferings which form such a powerful weapon against men of the state conception of life have not the least power to compel him. Deprivation and sufferings take from them the happiness for which they live, but far from disturbing the happiness of the Christian which consists in the consciousness of fulfilling the will of God, they may even intensify it when they are inflicted on him for fulfilling his will. And therefore the Christian who is subject only to the inner divine law not only cannot carry out the enactments of the external law when they are not in agreement with the divine law of love which he acknowledges as is usually the case with state obligations, he cannot even recognize the duty of obedience to anyone or anything whatever, he cannot recognize the duty of what is called allegiance. For a Christian, the oath of allegiance to any government whatever, the very act which is regarded as the foundation of the existence of a state, is a direct renunciation of Christianity. For the man who promises unconditional obedience in the future till laws made or to be made by that very promise is in the most positive manner renouncing Christianity, which means obeying in every circumstance of life only the divine law of love he recognizes within him. Under the pagan conception of life it was possible to carry out the will of the temporal authorities without infringing the law of God expressed in circumcision, Sabbaths, fixed times of prayer, abstention from certain kinds of food and so on. The one law was not opposed to the other, but that is just the distinction between the Christian religion and heathen religion. Christianity does not require of a man certain definite negative acts, but puts him in a new different relation to men from which may result the most diverse acts which cannot be defined beforehand. And therefore the Christian not only cannot promise to obey the will of any other man without knowing what will be required by that will, he not only cannot obey the changing laws of them, but he cannot even promise to do anything definite at a certain time or to abstain from doing anything for a certain time. For he cannot know what at any time will be required of him by that Christian law of love, obedience to which constitutes the meaning of life for him. The Christian in promising unconditional fulfillment of the laws of men in the future would show plainly by that promise that the inner law of God does not constitute for him the sole law of his life. For a Christian to promise obedience to men or the laws of men is just as though a workman bound to one employer should also promise to carry out every order that might be given him by outsiders. One cannot serve two masters. The Christian is independent of human authority because he acknowledges God's authority alone. His law revealed by Christ he recognizes in himself and voluntarily obeys it. And this independence is gained not by means of strife, not by the destruction of existing forms of life, but only by a change in the interpretation of life. This independence results first from the Christian recognizing the law of love revealed to him by his teacher as perfectly sufficient for all human relations, and therefore he regards every use of force as unnecessary and unlawful. And secondly, from the fact that those deprivations and sufferings were threats of deprivations and sufferings which reduce the man of the social conception of life to the necessity of obeying to the Christian from his different conception of life present themselves merely as the inevitable conditions of existence. And these conditions, without striving against them by force, he patiently endures, like sickness, hunger, and every other hardship, but they cannot serve him as a guide for his actions. The only guide for the Christian's actions is to be found in the divine principle living within him which cannot be checked or governed by anything. The Christian acts according to the words of the prophecy applied to his teacher. He shall not strive nor cry, neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets. A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench till he send forth judgment unto victory. Matthew 12, 19 and 20. The Christian will not dispute with anyone, nor attack anyone, nor use violence against anyone. On the contrary, he will bear violence without opposing it, but by this very attitude to violence he will not only himself be free, but will free the whole world from all external power. He shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. If there were any doubt of Christianity being the truth, the perfect liberty that nothing can curtail which a man experiences directly he makes the Christian theory of life his own would be an unmistakable proof of its truth. Men in their present condition are like a swarm of bees hanging in a cluster to a branch. The position of the bees on the branch is temporary and must inevitably be changed. They must start off and find themselves a habitation. Each of the bees knows this and desires to change her own in the other's position, but no one of them can do it till the rest of them do it. They cannot all start off at once because one hangs on to another and hinders her from separating from the swarm, and therefore they all continue to hang there. It would seem that the bees could never escape from their position, just as it seems that worldly men caught in the toils of the state conception of life can never escape. And there would be no escape for the bees if each of them were not a living separate creature endowed with wings of its own. Similarly, there would be no escape for men if each were not a living being endowed with the faculty of entering into the Christian conception of life. If every bee who could fly did not try to fly, the others too would never be stirred, and the swarm would never change its position. And if the man who has mastered the Christian conception of life would not, without waiting for other people, begin to live in accordance with this conception, mankind would never change its position. But only let one bee spread her wings, start off and fly away, and after her another and another, and the clinging inert cluster would become a freely flying swarm of bees. Just in the same way, only let one man look at life as Christianity teaches him to look at it, and after him let another and another do the same, and the enchanted circle of existence in the state conception of life, from which there seemed no escape, will be broken through. But men think that to set all men free by this means is too slow a process, that they must find some other means by which they could set all men free at once. It is just as though the bees who want to start and fly away should consider it too long a process to wait for all the swarm to start one by one, and should think they ought to find some means by which it would not be necessary for every separate bee to spread her wings and fly off, but by which the whole swarm could fly at once where it wanted to. But that is not possible till a first, a second, a third, a hundredth bee spreads her wings and flies off of her own accord. The swarm will not fly off and will not begin its new life, till every individual man makes the Christian conception of life his own and begins to live in accord with it, there can be no solution of the problem of human life and no establishment of a new form of life. One of the most striking phenomena of our times is precisely this advocacy of slavery, which is promulgated among the masses, not by governments, in whom it is inevitable, but by men who, in advocating socialistic theories, regard themselves as the champions of freedom. These people advance the opinion that the amelioration of life, the bringing of the facts of life into harmony with the conscience, will come not as the result of the personal efforts of individual men, but of itself as the result of a certain possible reconstruction of society effected in some way or other. The idea is promulgated that men ought not to walk upon their own legs where they want an ought to go, but that a kind of floor under their feet will be moved somehow, so that on it they can reach where they ought to go without moving their own legs, and therefore all their efforts ought to be directed not to going so far as their strength allows in the direction they ought to go, but to standing still in constructing such a floor. In the sphere of political economy, a theory is propounded which amounts to saying that the worse things are, the better they are, but the greater the accumulation of capital, and therefore the oppression of the workmen, the nearer the day of emancipation, and therefore every personal effort on the part of man to free himself from the oppression of capital is useless. In the sphere of government, it is maintained that the greater the power of the government, which according to this theory ought to intervene in every department of private life in which it has not yet intervened, the better it will be, and that therefore we ought to invoke the interference of government in private life. In politics and international questions, it is maintained that the improvement of the means of destruction, the multiplication of armaments, will lead to the necessity of making war by means of Congresses, arbitration, and so on, and, marvelous to say, so great is the dullness of men that they believe in these theories, in spite of the fact that the whole course of life, every step they take, shows how unworthy they are of belief. The people are suffering from oppression, and to deliver them from this oppression, they are advised to frame general measures for the improvement of their position, which measures are to be entrusted to the authorities and themselves to continue to yield obedience to the authorities. And obviously, all that results from this is only greater power in the hands of the authorities and greater oppression resulting from it. Not one of the errors of men carries them so far away from the aim toward which they are struggling as this very one. They do all kinds of different things for the attainment of their aim, but not the one simple obvious thing which is within reach of every one. They devise the subtlest means for changing the position which is irksome to them, but not that simplest means that everyone should refrain from doing what leads to that position. I have been told a story of a gallant police officer who came to a village where the peasants were in insurrection and the military had been called out, and he undertook to pacify the insurrection in the spirit of Nicholas I by his personal influence alone. He ordered some loads of rods to be brought, and collecting all the peasants together into a barn, he went in with them, locking the door after him. To begin with, he so terrified the peasants by his loud threats that, reduced to submission by him, they set to work to flog one another at his command, and so they flogged one another until a simpleton was found who would not allow himself to be flogged, and shouted to his companions not to flog one another. Only then the flogging ceased, and the police officer made his escape. Well, this simpleton's advice would never be followed by men of the state conception of life, who continue to flog one another and teach people that this very act of self-castigation is the last word of human wisdom. Indeed, can one imagine a more striking instance of men flogging themselves than the submissiveness with which men of our times will perform the very duties required of them to keep them in slavery, especially the duty of military service? We see people enslaving themselves, suffering from this slavery, and believing that it must be so, that it does not matter, and will not hinder the emancipation of men, which is being prepared somewhere somehow in spite of the ever increasing growth of slavery. In fact, take any man of the present time whatever. I don't mean the true Christian, but an average man of the present day, educated or uneducated, believing or unbelieving, rich or poor, married or unmarried. Such a man lives working at his work, or enjoying his amusements, spending the fruits of his labors on himself or on those near to him, and, like everyone, hating every kind of restriction and deprivation, dissension and suffering. Such a man is going his way peaceably, when suddenly people come and say to him, first promise and swear to us, that you will slavishly obey us in everything we dictate to you, and will consider absolutely good and authoritative everything we plan, decide, and call law. Secondly, hand over a part of the fruits of your labors for us to dispose of. We will use the money to keep you in slavery, and to hinder you from forcibly opposing our orders. Thirdly, elect others, or be yourself elected, to take a pretended share in the government, knowing all the while that the government will proceed quite well without regard to the foolish speeches you and those like you may utter, and knowing that its proceedings will be according to our will, the will of those who have the army in their hands. Fourthly, come at a certain time to the law courts, and take your share in those senseless cruelties which we perpetrate on sinners, and those whom we have corrupted in the shape of penal servitude, exile, solitary confinement, and death. And fifthly and lastly, more than all this, in spite of the fact that you may be on the friendliest terms with people of other nations, be ready, directly we order you to do so, to regard those whom we indicate to you as your enemies, and be ready to assist either in person or by proxy in devastation, plunder, and murder of their men, women, children, and age it alike, possibly your own kinsmen or relations, if that is necessary to us. One would expect that every man of the present day who has a grain of sense left might reply to such requirements, but why should I do all this? One would think every right-minded man must say in amazement, why should I promise to yield obedience to everything that has been decreed first by Salisbury, then by Gladstone, one day by Boolinger, and another by Parliament, one day by Peter the Third, the next by Catherine, and the day after by Pugachev, one day by a mad king of Bavaria, another by William. Why should I promise to obey them, knowing them to be wicked or foolish people, or else not knowing them at all? Why am I to hand over the fruits of my labors to them in the shape of taxes, knowing that the money will be spent on the support of officials, prisons, churches, armies, and things that are harmful and on my own enslavement? Why should I punish myself? Why should I go wasting my time in hoodwinking myself, giving to miscreant evildoers, assemblances of legality, by taking part in elections, and pretending that I am taking part in the government, when I know very well that the real control of the government is in the hands of those who have got hold of the army? Why should I go to the law courts to take part in the trial and punishment of men, because they have sinned, knowing if I am a Christian, that the law of vengeance is replaced by the law of love? And if I am an educated man, that punishments do not reform, but only deprave those on whom they are inflicted? And why, most of all, am I to consider as enemies the people of a neighboring nation, with whom I have hitherto lived, and with whom I wish to live in love and harmony, and to kill and rob them, or to bring them to misery, simply in order that the keys of the temple at Jerusalem may be in the hands of one archbishop and not another, that one German and not another may be the Prince of Bulgaria, or that the English, rather than the American merchants, may capture seals? And why, most of all, should I take part in person, or hire others, to murder my own brothers and kinsmen? Why should I flog myself? It is altogether unnecessary for me, it is hurtful to me, and from every point of view it is immoral, face, and vile. So why should I do this? If you tell me that if I do it not, I shall receive some injury from someone, then in the first place I cannot anticipate from anyone an injury so great as the injury you bring on me if I obey you. And secondly, it is perfectly clear to me that if we our own selves do not flog ourselves, no one will flog us. As for the government, that means the czars, ministers, and officials with pens in their hands who cannot force us into doing anything as that officer of police compelled the peasants. The men who drag us to the law court, to prison, and to execution are not czars or officials with pens in their hands, but the very people who are in the same position as we are. And it is just as unprofitable and harmful and unpleasant to them to be flogged as to me, and therefore there is every likelihood that if I open their eyes they not only would not treat me with violence, but would do just as I am doing. Thirdly, even if it should come to pass that I had to suffer for it, even then it should be better for me to be exiled or sent to prison for standing up for common sense and right, which if not today, at least within a very short time, must be triumphant, than to suffer for folly and wrong which must come to an end directly. And therefore, even in that case, it is better to run the risk of their banishing me, shutting me up in prison, or executing me, than of my living all my life in bondage through my own fault to wicked men. Better is this than the possibility of being destroyed by victorious enemies and being stupidly tortured and killed by them in fighting for a cannon or a piece of land of no use to anyone or for a senseless rag called a banner. I don't want to flog myself and I won't do it. I have no reason to do it. Do it yourselves if you want it done, but I won't do it. One would have thought that not religious or moral feeling alone, but the simplest common sense and foresight should impel every man of the present day to answer and to act in that way. But not so. Men of the state conception of life are of the opinion that to act in that way is not necessary and is even prejudicial to the attainment of their object, the emancipation of men from slavery. They hold that we must continue, like the police officer's peasants, to flog one another, consoling ourselves with the reflection that we are talking away in the assemblies and meetings, founding trade unions, marching through the streets on the 1st of May, getting up conspiracies, and stealthily teasing the government that is flogging us and that through all this it will be brought to pass that by enslaving ourselves in closer and closer bondage, we shall very soon be free. Nothing hinders the emancipation of men from slavery so much as this amazing error, instead of every man directing his energies to freeing himself to transforming his conception of life, people seek for an external, united method of gaining freedom and continue to rivet their chains faster and faster. It is much as if men were to maintain that to make up a fire there was no need to kindle any of the coals, but that all that was necessary was to arrange the coals in a certain order. Yet the fact that the freedom of all men will be brought about only through the freedom of individual persons becomes more and more clear as time goes on. The freedom of individual men, in the name of the Christian conception of life, from state domination, which was formerly an exceptional and unnoticed phenomenon, has of late acquired threatening significance for state authorities. If in a former age, in the Roman times, it happened that a Christian confessed his religion and refused to take part in sacrifices and to worship the emperors or the gods, or in the middle ages a Christian refused to worship images or to acknowledge the authority of the pope, these cases were in the first place a matter of chance. A man might be placed under the necessity of confessing his faith, or he might live all his life without being placed under this necessity. But now all men without exception are subjected to this trial of their faith. Every man of the present day is under the necessity of taking part in the cruelties of pagan life, or of refusing all participation in them. And secondly, in those days cases of refusal to worship the gods or the images or the pope were not incidents that had any material bearing on the state. Whether men worshipped or did not worship the gods or the images or the pope, the state remained just as powerful. But now cases of refusing to comply with the un-Christian demands of the government are striking at the very root of state authority, because the whole authority of the state is based on the compliance with these un-Christian demands. The sovereign powers of the world have in the course of time been brought into a position in which, for their own preservation, they must require from all men actions which cannot be performed by men who profess true Christianity. And therefore in our days every profession of true Christianity, by any individual man, strikes at the most essential power of the state, and inevitably leads the way for the emancipation of all. What importance, one might think, can one attach to such an incident as some dozens of crazy fellows, as people will call them, refusing to take the oath of allegiance to the government, refusing to pay taxes, to take part in law proceedings, or in military service. These people are punished and exiled to a distance, and life goes on in its old way. One might think there was no importance in such incidents, but yet it is just those incidents more than anything else that will undermine the power of the state and prepare the way for the freedom of men. These are the individual bees who are beginning to separate from the swarm and are flying near it, waiting till the whole swarm can no longer be prevented from starting off after them. And the governments know this and fear such incidents more than all the socialists, communists, and anarchists, and their plots and dynamite bombs. A new reign is beginning. According to the universal rule and established order, it is required that all the subjects should take the oath of allegiance to the new government. There is a general decree to that effect, and all are summoned to the council houses to take the oath. All at once one man in perm, another in tula, a third in Moscow, and a fourth in Kaluga declare that they will not take the oath. And though there is no communication between them, they all explain their refusal on the same grounds, namely that swearing is forbidden by the law of Christ, and that even if swearing had not been forbidden, they could not, in the spirit of the law of Christ, promise to perform the evil actions required of them in the oath, such as informing against all such as may act against the interest of the government, or defending their government with firearms or attacking its enemies. They are brought before rural police officers, district police captains, priests, and governors. They are admonished, questioned, threatened, and punished. But they adhere to their resolution and do not take the oath. And among the millions of those who did take the oath, those dozens go on living who did not take the oath, and they are questioned. What, didn't you take the oath? No, I didn't take the oath. And what happened, nothing? Nothing. The subjects of a state are all bound to pay taxes, and everyone pays taxes till suddenly one man in Karakoff, another in Tiver, and a third in Samara refuse to pay taxes, all as though in collusion saying the same thing. One says he will only pay when they tell him what object the money taken from him will be spent on. If it is for good deeds, he says, he will give it of his own accord, and more even than is required of him. If for evil deeds, then he will give nothing voluntarily, because by the law of Christ, whose follower he is, he cannot take part in evil deeds. The others, too, say the same in other words, and will not voluntarily pay the taxes. Those who have anything to be taken have their property taken from them by force, as for those who have nothing, they are left alone. What, didn't you pay the tax? No, I didn't pay it. And what happened, nothing? Nothing. There is the institution of passports. Everyone moving from his place of residence is bound to carry one and to pay a duty on it. Suddenly people are to be found in various places, declaring that to carry a passport is not necessary, that one not ought to recognize one's dependence on a state which exists by means of force, and these people do not carry passports or pay the duty on them, and again it's impossible to force those people by any means to do what is required. They send them to jail and let them out again, and these people live without passports. All peasants are bound to fill certain police offices, that of village constable and of watchmen, and so on. Suddenly in Karkov a peasant refuses to perform this duty, justifying his refusal on the ground that by the law of Christ, of which he is a follower, he cannot put any man in fetters, lock him up, or drag him from place to place. The same declaration is made by a peasant in Tiver, another in Tambov. These peasants are abused, beaten, shut up in prison, but they stick to their resolution and don't fill these offices against their convictions, and at last they cease to appoint them as constables, and again nothing happens. All citizens are obliged to take a share in law proceedings in the character of jury men. Suddenly the most different people, mechanics, professors, tradesmen, peasants, servants, as though by agreement, refuse to fill this office, and not on the grounds allowed as sufficient by law, but because any process at law is, according to their views, un-Christian. They find these people, trying not to let them have an opportunity of explaining their motives in public, and replace them by others, and again nothing can be done. All young men of twenty-one years of age are obliged to draw lots for service in the army. While at once one young man in Moscow, another in Tiver, a third in Kharkov, and a fourth in Kiev, present themselves before the authorities, and, as though by previous agreement, declare that they will not take the oath, they will not serve because they are Christians. I will give the details of one of the first cases, since they have become more frequent, which I happen to know about. Footnote. All the details of this case, as well as those preceding it, are authentic, and footnote. The same treatment has been repeated in every other case. A young man of fair education refuses in the Moscow town Hall to take the oath. No attention is paid to what he says, and it is requested that he should pronounce the words of the oath like the rest. He declines, quoting a particular passage of the Gospel in which swearing is forbidden. No attention is paid to his arguments, and he is again requested to comply with the order, but he does not comply with it. Then it is supposed that he is a secretary, and therefore does not understand Christianity in the right sense, that is to say, not in the sense in which the priests in the pay of the government understand it. And the young man is conducted under escort to the priests, that they may bring him to reason. The priests begin to reason with him, but their efforts in Christ's name to persuade him to renounce Christ obviously have no influence on him. He is pronounced incorrigible and sent back again to the army. He persists in not taking the oath and openly refuses to perform any military duties. It is a case that has not been provided for by the laws. To overlook such a refusal to comply with the demands of the authorities is out of the question, but to put such a case on a par with simple breach of discipline is also out of the question. After deliberation among themselves, the military authorities decide to get rid of the troublesome young man to consider him as a revolutionist, and they dispatch him under escort to the committee of the secret police. The police authorities and gendarmes cross-question him, but nothing that he says can be brought under the head of any of the misdemeanors which come under their jurisdiction, and there is no possibility of accusing him either of revolutionary acts or revolutionary plotting, since he declares that he does not wish to attack anything, but on the contrary, is opposed to any use of force, and far from plotting in secret, he seeks every opportunity of saying and doing all that he says and does in the most open manner. And the gendarms, though they are bound by no hard and fast rules, still find no ground for a criminal charge in the young man, and like the clergy, they send him back to the army. Again the authorities deliberate together and decide to accept him, though he has not taken the oath, and to enroll him among the soldiers. They put him into the uniform, enroll him, and send him under guard to the place where the army is quartered. There the chief officer of the division which he enters again expects the young man to perform his military duties, and again he refuses to obey, and in the presence of other soldiers explains the reason of his refusal, saying that he as a Christian cannot voluntarily prepare himself to commit murder, which is forbidden by the law of Moses. This incident occurs in a provincial town. The case awakens the interest and even the sympathy not only of outsiders, but even of the officers, and the chief officers consequently do not decide to punish this refusal of obedience with disciplinary measures. To save appearances, though, they shut the young man up in prison and write to the highest military authorities to inquire what they are to do. To refuse to serve in the army in which the Tsar himself serves, in which enjoys the blessing of the church, seems insanity from the official point of view. Consequently they write from Petersburg that, since the young man must be out of his mind, they must not use any severe treatment with him, but must send him to a lunatic asylum that his mental condition may be inquired into and be scientifically treated. They send him to the asylum in the hope that he will remain there like another young man who refused 10 years ago at Tiver to serve in the army and who was tortured in the asylum till he submitted. But even this step does not rid the military authorities of the inconvenient man. The doctors examine him, interest themselves warmly in his case, and naturally finding in him no symptoms of mental disease, send him back to the army. There they receive him and making belief to have forgotten his refusal and his motives for it, they again request him to go to drill, and again in the presence of the other soldiers, he refuses and explains the reason of his refusal. The affair continues to attract more and more attention, both among the soldiers and the inhabitants of the town. Again they write to Petersburg and thence comes the decree to transfer the young man to some division of the army stationed on the frontier, in some place where the army is under martial law, where he can be shot for refusing to obey and where the matter can proceed without attracting observation, seeing that there are few Russians and Christians in such a distant part, but the majority are foreigners and Mohammedans. This is accordingly done. They transfer him to a division stationed on the Zikaspian border and in company with convicts, send him to a chief officer who is notorious for his harshness and severity. All this time, through all these changes from place to place, the young man is roughly treated, kept in cold, hunger and filth, and life is made burdensome to him generally. But all these sufferings do not compel him to change his resolution. On the Zikaspian border, where he is again requested to go on guard fully armed, he again declines to obey. He does not refuse to go and stand near the haystacks where they place him, but refuses to take his arms, declaring that he will not use violence in any case against anyone. All this takes place in the presence of the other soldiers. To let such a refusal pass unpunished is impossible and the young man is put on his trial for breach of discipline. The trial takes place and he is sentenced to confinement in the military prison for two years. He is again transferred in company with convicts by Ettape to Caucasus and there he is shut up in prison and falls under the irresponsible power of the jailer. There he is persecuted for a year and a half but he does not for all that he can alter his decision not to bear arms and he explains why he will not do this to everyone with whom he is brought in contact. At the end of the second year they set him free before the end of his term of imprisonment reckoning it contrary to law to keep him in prison after his time of military service was over and only too glad to get rid of him as soon as possible. Other men in various parts of Russia behave as though by agreement precisely in the same way as this young man and in all these cases the government has adopted the same timorous undecided and secretive course of action. Some of these men are sent to the lunatic asylum some are enrolled as clerks and transferred to Siberia some are sent to work in the forests some are sent to prison some are fined and at this very time some men of this kind are in prison and not charged with their real offense that is denying the lawfulness of the action of the government but for non-fulfillment of special obligations imposed by government. Thus an officer of reserve who did not report his change of residence and justified this on the ground that he would not serve in the army any longer was fined 30 rubles for non-compliance with the orders of the superior authority. This fine he also declined voluntarily to pay in the same way some peasants and soldiers who have refused to be drilled and to bear arms have been placed under arrest on a charge of breach of discipline and insolence. And cases of refusing to comply with the demands of government when they are opposed to Christianity and especially cases of refusing to serve in the army are occurring of late not in Russia only but everywhere. Thus I happen to know that in Serbia men of the so-called sect of Nazarenes steadily refused to serve in the army and the Austrian government has been carrying on a fruitless contest with them for years punishing them with imprisonment. In the year 1885 there were 130 such cases. I know that in Switzerland in the year 1890 there were men in prison in the castle of Chilin for declining to serve in the army whose resolution was not shaken by their punishment. There have been such cases in Sweden and the men who refused obedience were sent to prison in exactly the same way and the government studiously concealed these cases from the people. There have been similar cases also in Prussia. I know of the case of a sub-lieutenant of the guards who in 1891 declared to the authorities in Berlin that he would not as a Christian continue to serve and in spite of all admonitions, threats and punishments he stuck to his resolution. In the south of France a society has arisen of late bearing the name of the Hinchists. These facts are taken from the peace herald, July 1891, the members of which refused to enter military service on the grounds of their Christian principles. At first they were enrolled in the ambulance corps but now as their numbers increase they are subjected to punishment for non-compliance but they still refuse to bear arms just the same. The socialists, the communists, the anarchists with their bombs and riots and revolutions are not nearly so much dreaded by governments as these disconnected individuals coming from different parts and all justifying their non-compliance on the grounds of the same religion which is known to all the world. Every government knows by what means and in what manner to defend itself from revolutionists and has resources for doing so and therefore does not dread these external foes. But what are governments to do against men who show the uselessness, superfluousness and perniciousness of all governments and who do not contend against them but simply do not need them and do without them and therefore are unwilling to take any part in them? The revolutionists say the form of government is bad in this respect and that respect. We must overturn it and substitute this or that form of government. The Christian says, I know nothing about the form of government. I don't know whether it is good or bad and I don't want to overturn it precisely because I don't know whether it is good or bad but for the very same reason I don't want to support it either and I not only don't want to but I can't because what it demands of me is against my conscience. All state obligations are against the conscience of a Christian, the oath of allegiance, taxes, law proceedings and military service and the whole power of the government rests on these very obligations. Revolutionary enemies attack the government from without. Christianity does not attack it at all but from within it destroys all the foundations on which government rests. Among the Russian people especially since the age of Peter the first the protest of Christianity against the government has never ceased and the social organization has been such that men emigrate in communes to Turkey, to China and to uninhabited lands and not only feel no need of state aid but always regard the state as a useless burden only to be endured as a misfortune whether it happens to be Turkish, Russian or Chinese and so too among the Russian people more and more frequent examples have of late appeared of conscious Christian freedom from subjection to the state and these examples are all the more alarming for the government from the fact that these non-compliant persons often belong not to the so-called lower uneducated classes but are men of fair or good education and also from the fact that they do not in these days justify their position by any mystic and exceptional views as in former times do not associate themselves with any superstitious or fanatic rights like the sex who practice self-immolation by fire or the wandering pilgrims but put their refusal on the very simplest and clearest grounds comprehensible to all and recognized as true by all thus they refuse the voluntary payment of taxes because taxes are spent on deeds of violence on the pay of men of violence soldiers on the construction of prisons, fortresses and cannons they as Christians regarded as sinful and immoral to have any hand in such deeds those who refuse to take the oath of allegiance refuse because to promise obedience to authorities that is to men who are given to deeds of violence is contrary to the sense of Christ's teaching they refuse to take the oath in the law courts because oaths are directly forbidden by the gospel they refuse to perform police duties because in the performance of these duties they must use force against their brothers and ill treat them and a Christian cannot do that they refuse to take part in trials at law because they consider every appeal to law is fulfilling the law of vengeance which is inconsistent with the Christian law of forgiveness and love they refuse to take any part in military preparations and in the army because they cannot be executioners and they are unwilling to prepare themselves to be so the motives in all these cases are so excellent that however despotic governments may be they could hardly punish them openly to punish men for refusing to act against their conscience the government must renounce all claim to good sense and benevolence and they assure people that they only rule in the name of good sense and benevolence what are the governments to do against such people? governments can of course slog to death or execute or keep in perpetual imprisonment all enemies who want to overturn them by violence they can lavish gold on that section of the people who are ready to destroy their enemies but what can they do against men who without wishing to overturn or destroy anything desire simply for their part to do nothing against the law of Christ and who therefore refuse to perform the communist state requirements which are therefore the most indispensable to the maintenance of the state if they had been revolutionists advocating and practicing violence and murder their suppression would have been an easy matter some of them could have been brought over some of them could have been duped some could have been over-odd and those who could not be brought over duped or over-odd would have been treated as criminals enemies of society would have been executed or imprisoned and the crowd would have approved of the action of the government if they had been fanatics professing some peculiar belief it might have been possible in disproving the superstitious errors mixed in with their religion to attack also the truth they advocate but what is to be done with men who profess no revolutionary ideas nor any peculiar religious dogmas but merely because they are unwilling to do evil to any man refuse to take the oath or pay taxes or take part in law proceedings to serve in the army to fulfill in fact any of the obligations upon which the whole fabric of a state rests what is to be done with such people to buy them over with bribes is impossible the very risks to which they voluntarily expose themselves show that they are incorruptible to dupe them into believing that this is their duty to God is also impossible since their refusal is based on the clear unmistakable law of God recognized even by those who are trying to compel men to act against it to terrify them by threats is still less possible because the deprivations and sufferings to which they are subjected only strengthen their desire to follow the faith by which they are commanded to obey God rather than men and not to fear those that can destroy the body but to fear him who can destroy body and soul to kill them or keep them in perpetual imprisonment is also impossible these men have friends and a past their way of thinking and acting is well known they are known by everyone for good, gentle, peaceable people and they cannot be regarded as criminals who must be removed for the safety of society and to put men to death who are regarded as good men is to provoke others to champion them and justify their refusal and it is only necessary to explain their reasons of their refusal to make clear to everyone that these reasons have the same force for all other men and that they all ought to have done the same long ago these cases put the ruling powers into a desperate position they see that the prophecy of Christianity is coming to pass that it is loosening the fetters of those in chains and setting free them that are in bondage and that this must inevitably be the end of all oppressors the ruling authority see this they know that their hours are numbered and they can do nothing all that they can do to save themselves is only deferring the hour of their downfall and this they do but their position is none the less desperate it is like the position of a conqueror who is trying to save a town which has been set on fire by its own inhabitants directly he puts out the conflagration in one place it is a light in two other places directly he gives into the fire and cuts off what is on fire from a large building the building itself is a light at both ends these separate fires may be few but they are burning with a flame which however small a spark it starts from never ceases till it has set the whole ablaze thus it is that the ruling authorities are in such a defenseless position before men who advocate Christianity that but little is necessary to overthrow this sovereign power which seems so powerful and has held such an exalted position for so many centuries and yet social reformers are busy promulgating the idea that it is not necessary and is even pernicious and immoral for every man separately to work out his own freedom as though while one set of men have been at work a long time turning a river into a new channel and had dug out a complete water course and had only to open the floodgates for the water to rush in and do the rest another set of men should come along and begin to advise them that it would be much better instead of letting the water out to construct a machine which would ladle the water up from one side and pour it over the other side but the thing has gone too far already ruling governments feel their weak and defenseless position and men of Christian principles are awakening from their apathy and already begin to feel their power I am come to send a fire on the earth said Christ and what will I if it be already kindled and this fire is beginning to burn End of chapter 9