 We're already a vulnerable population. Imposing this amount of pressure on a community is going to magnify those vulnerabilities. We live along the highway of tears. We're already concerned about our women. Research shows that when a mind or a big development comes in that it's usually women that are impacted. There is intergenerational trauma issues that are existing in the community. But having the mind there is really exacerbating all of these existing issues. And it's making a lot of challenges more difficult. But if women have given this leap to the public and we are facing the work outside of the house, the barons have not made the way reciprocal or the opposite. The women, besides being in these jobs, are still taking care of these vulnerable bodies that can't be stopped. The women are the nurturers of their resources as well as the family. So with lack of food and water supply, so that's an additional burden for the indigenous women, we have a way of helping one another which we cannot practice anymore because we don't have lands. 90% of the women that we talked to did say that the mind had clearly created problems in the community. It's contributing to a lot of family breakdown through both jealousy and uncomfortable spending long times apart. The scheduling also means that children are being unsupervised while their mother is at the mind. This is a community of over 3,000 people and they have one daycare that has about 25 spots. There are a lot of people who are still unemployed, but now the people who are employed are making a lot of money. So there's been a very dramatic increase in inequality. Also the higher incomes are enabling existing addictions, so alcohol use is on the rise, bootlegging is on the rise, especially with people bringing alcohol and drugs through the mind site. Work-first data shows that Inuit women are mostly in entry-level gender positions such as cooks, cleaners. The benefits have been very unequal in the community. Average income has increased greatly for men, increased by over 50%. But women haven't seen that increase. The unequal benefits is creating divisions in the community that weren't there before. In Canada, 3% of the mining workers are women. In Quebec, it's 1%. So what kind of jobs are you saying the women that you're bringing to their communities? How will they say yes to mining when they don't see the benefit? But they see the problems.