 Okay, and let's go ahead and bring in David Cantor, a criminal defense expert as well, who's helped us put things in perspective here, David. The jury was able to ask, as we've laid out for folks who are just joining us, hundreds of questions of those witnesses who came to testify. We had dueling psychologists going back and forth on what they thought, PTSD, borderline personality disorder, by letting the jury ask questions directly before those witnesses were dismissed. Did that really cut the length of deliberations when they finally sat down to determine her fate? Yes, absolutely. I think by allowing the jurors to ask questions, they're cutting to the chase of what they're really looking for. So I believe the jury questions tell you exactly where they're leaning whenever it comes in. David, let me ask you. Some people were very surprised that the jury in this case was not sequestered, especially with the length of the trial and the intense media coverage. It would be almost impossible to believe that the jury members didn't accidentally, at some point, see some media coverage of this trial. How do you think that may have impacted not only how they tried to stay away from that type of material, but then also knowing how big of a circus it is outside the courthouse, how that may have impacted them as well? Well, I think absolutely the jury should do their duty and not watch the media, but it is almost impossible if you're clicking through the channel. And I do think it does have an effect. And if I were to judge, I would ask the question to the jury, especially once national media gets phoned. Okay. And I want to get back to what you said just a moment ago about those questions that the members of the jury asked of the witnesses being kind of a tell-tale sign of which way they might be leaning. How did you read their questions as a prediction of today's verdict? Well, the questions were definitely favorable to the prosecution. I don't believe they're favorable to the defense. And a sheer number of questions that were pro-prosecution, in my mind, indicates that they're probably leaning towards the first-degree verdict. If I had to guess, I also thought if they would have drifted in the next week, it would have been more likely that a second-degree verdict was coming. But this is incredibly fast for a 16-week jury trial. And the rule of thumb is the quicker the jury verdict, the more likely it is going to be guilty. Now, there's exceptions with O.J. and K.C. Anthony. And it was another one, yeah. So I think I would not be shocked if they came back with first-degree and then it goes to the penalty stage repair. Juan Martinez, the prosecutor in this case, had a very different style than the defense attorney. It was very aggressive, especially early on in the trial. Sometimes the questioning was even somewhat bizarre as we got into snow-white questions with the domestic violence expert. But how do you think that his style and his aggressive style played not only to everyone who's watching this case at home, but to the jurors specifically? Well, I think his aggressive style plays well to the people watching at home because that's the Nancy Gray style of questioning where he's just attacked. The reality is when you're on a sequestered jury and you're there for hours on end, he can backfire on you if you go too far, because then they think you're just piling on and bullying and he can backfire on you. Now, in this particular case, he was provided with a treasure trove of cross-examination because she had lied on videotape and she had given interviews where she challenged any jury to find her guilty. So in this case, she was probably OK about 95% of the time. I don't think it backfired because I think you'll get the first he was looking for. However, in other cases, when I was a prosecutor, you got to learn to back it off a little bit and you got to learn to let the question just hang in the air and not necessarily do every question as a nail that needs to be hammered. All right. Well, David, thank you so much for joining us. In fact, I'm sure we'll be tamping your knowledge a little bit later.