 Ensuring inclusive education, it is also part of SDG4 and we see that significant progress has been made through different programs just like education for all as well as the millennium development goals. This may probably progress through here, but that's not enough. It is not sufficient, lot more to be done. We still see there are lots of inequalities among countries. We see that national averages in many countries, let's say, hide the striking inequalities within countries in levels of attainment and outcome of basic education. Children with disabilities are mostly very often overlooked. A very important factor is gender inequality. We are trying to move towards gender equality. We see that the majority of out-of-school children are girls while two-thirds of the youth and adults with low levels of literacy in the world are also women. If we want to help empowerment of the women, men as well as the boys must also be engaged in the fight against gender inequality. It is not simply the job of the women to fight for equality and empowerment. It is actually the men as well as the young population, the boys who should come forward for this mission. Traditional factors of marginalization in education such as gender, urban or rural residents continue to combine with income, language, minority status and disability to create mutually reinforcing disadvantages, particularly in low income or conflict affected countries. There is not a single factor when these factors are combined. We see a cumulative interaction as well as a cumulative effect. When we think that education has the potential to equalize, we also see that it produces inequalities. But certainly we are focusing on education as a means to equality. So, inclusive education processes are essential for equitable development and this appears to be true for various levels of educational provision. If we talk about different stages of education, early childhood education is important. Researches tell us that early interventions for young children are essential not only for their own well-being but they also have sustainable, long-term effects on the development of human capital, social cohesion and economic success. The foundation for this is that it becomes very important for sustainability of the development. So, especially for disadvantaged children, early childhood education has a lot of impact on them. But despite this, we see that this program is not so effective. So, intervening earlier requires fewer resources and less effort. At the same time, it is more effective. After this, if we take secondary education, the expansion of access to basic schooling worldwide has increased demand for secondary and tertiary education and concern for vocational skills development. Because at the lower level, primary school level or basic education level is being emphasized all over the world in all the countries which a lot of progress has been made. When progress is seen here, we expect that there will be demand for secondary education as well. Because they become aware of the importance of education, then they have higher aspirations and then they go for secondary education. So, the expansion of basic educational opportunities combined with pro-poor public policies have been shown to reduce inequality. So, people move forward in that. Investment in education, labour market institutions and regulations can change patterns of inequality. So, for that, we also believe that there has to be increase in public expenditure on education. So, this is connected to that. Talking about higher education, we see that access to higher education has shown a particular expansion over the past 15 years. Global enrollment in tertiary education has doubled since 2000 with today some 200 million students worldwide, half of whom are women. So, there has been a lot of expansion in this. Basic education has also been done, but it has also been done in the future. However, we see that there are lots of disparities. These disparities are based on income and other things like ethnicity and discrimination. So, we also see that there is a lot of social marginalization and that continues to persist. So, we see that learners from higher income groups have retained their relative advantage in access to tertiary education all over the world. The people who can afford to pay the fees because this is not something which is compulsory, which is not necessary, that may be considered as a luxury. So, therefore, those who can afford, they might go over there. So, we see that even in countries with high enrollment rates, the participation of minorities continue to lag behind the national average in these, let's say, tertiary education, which may have university level education. So, most of the growth in higher education has been and continues to be in the private sector. And when we talk about the private sector, they do not give education particularly at this level. Many a times, this private sector might be taking this, let's say, mission, not mission, but as a business. So, in that, they have to make the money, make the profit. And if this is the approach, then they will come who could pay for this education. And this trend of privatization of, let's say, tertiary education increases in inequality. This is the other implication side. So, therefore, we see that public sector may have to come forward for giving access to, let's say, everybody as well as looking after the equity of the people.