 Today we are going to talk about the third principle of ethical theories that is right ethics. This is very interesting debate on right ethics that is based on ethical theories. In different societies different types of rights are accepted. And some specific types of human rights are available to some countries in the world. If we talk about feminist rights then we can see different principles and applications in different countries. Likewise the animal rights. In many countries you can easily travel with animals and in some countries you cannot travel. So when there is a very basic difference in application of kind of the rights to different countries across the world then when we talk about ethics then the first question is that we need to see the rights of society. In ethical theories based on right the rights established by the society are protected. So the most important thing is that what are the rights of that individual's society that we should talk about. It may be that in Pakistan in an Islamic society you are not given rights on some particular things. But those rights are available to a US citizen in their country, in the US United States. So while making our decision we need to look at the cultural context of that country and the right and wrong values of that society. In recent modern times we see that there are many debates on these things on social media. So there should be some basic ethical principles which should be followed while we look on all those social experiments which is going on in social media. Secondly when we look that the ethical principles are those which are being endorsed by a large society population. So there is an interesting debate into it. So our society has been distributed in many segments and we see that some people are raising the norms of that society in some other way. In such a situation it is more crucial for a researcher to see that what code of ethics should be followed in designing any kind of particularly social experiment. Because its acceptance may be of some community and not of some community. So the right of the society should be studied in detail before making the foundation of any particular research. Individual may also bestow rights upon others if they have the ability and resources to do. So the right of the society should be followed by the right of the society. For example a person may say that her friend may borrow her laptop for one evening. Now ethically speaking if you have said that my friend can borrow my laptop tonight. So after evening the right of the laptop is reserved to the friend. But on the other hand if an important official task is read to you and you have to use that laptop then what to do in that particular situation. If we only look at the ethical principles of the right then it says that if you are committed to give it to someone it means that you are committed to give it to someone. And after that you cannot claim for that particular duration. So you know it is important to see that what our society outweighs the rights of the society. Or what angle it looks at its ownership. So these foundations are very important to understand. So looking at the limitations. First major complication of this theory on a larger scale is that we understand the rights of society along with the understanding of research. Secondly society has to determine what right is want to give it to the citizen. And which right it does not want to give to its citizens. And what are the overall practices of the society and its goals and its ethical priorities. Briefly talking about some of the rights as we see that our animal rights are not so much. Whereas in western countries animal rights are sometimes more than humans. And in sense our street dogs all those states say that they do not want to do crooling. But they are killed by gun shoot firing. And these practices are very common. And along with that we keep voicing that we should not do such steps for animal rights. But in west if we think we cannot even think of doing this heinous crime. Because there is no concept of how we can harm animals. So by saying that it is obvious that society's thinking matters a lot in determining that what is right and what is wrong. Third it is very hard to identify who should determine the rules and principles of moral behavior. Either it is the elite class. Either it is the general masses. Either it is some vulnerable groups. Either it is the females. Either it is the male. This is a general community. This will be a religious perspective. So it is very important to see that in what kind of connotation are the rules made by the society. Therefore in order to see the right theory to be useful. This must be used in conjunction with another ethical theory that will consistently explain the goals of society. Till then we should not determine that how many goals of a society are positive. May be the proper use of ethics rights is not possible. For example in America people have the right to choose their religion. Because this right is upheld in constitution. American president put this in his constitution that everyone has the right to choose religion. And if you do not want to keep any religion then it is your choice. You want to go to Christianity. You want to go to Buddhism. You want to go to Islam. It is up to you. But we do not see the goals of society. In society may be we are not showing equal acceptance for all religions. Or we are showing it. So it depends on the society that either the right ethics theory as principle would be applicable in that situation. Or it may not be appropriately applicable in the whole situation.