 I mentioned that feminism is not just a hate movement against men. That's specifically what I'm getting at when I say that at the beginning of this talk. It's also a form of supremacism, specifically for women. And this has been, I believe, since day one of modern feminism, since the first wave, about a hundred years it's been around. It's never been about equality, which is what they'll tell you. Actually, when I first put out the ideas of this talk to a new friend of mine, I met about a year ago, someone who is young, highly intelligent, I go out with him all the time, maybe a woman, and he's someone who's highly familiar with the men's sphere, but particularly the POA community, Shrop Young Guy. He had an immediate, knee-jerk reaction that influences this talk when I discussed criticizing feminism and what we'll get into more throughout this talk. His initial reaction was rapid, too, and articulate. So you're opposed to women's rights and you want to destroy them. And that is not what I was talking about in the slightest. But the minute I criticize feminism, boom, immediately. And this is Shrop Young Guy. That is a good thinker. He thinks outside the box, does not believe everything he's told, and is willing to go against the grain in a lot of areas of his life. So it was interesting that immediately when I criticized feminism, he jumped to women's rights, which I think has never been the case. If it was about equal rights, why would they call it feminism? They would have called it equalism or something along those lines that made more sense. I don't believe it's ever been about that. And in particular today, if you ask a feminist in the West, in the United States, in Canada, and so on, what rights do I have as a man that you don't as a woman? They just flip their shit. They get, depending on the woman, but they'll get angry because you're pointing out the hypocrisy of this. They've had equal rights for a long time, in the United States and elsewhere in the West. So if it's not about why is this young man in America today in Florida talking about women's rights with feminism, if they've had equal rights for a long, long time, I don't believe it's ever been about that. What they do over time is goalpost shift, which is a logical fallacy and informal one, I believe. So each wave that goes by, they move the goalpost. They move the markers of what's going on. And yet they still claim it's about equal rights. But what rights? And that's a smoke screen in my judgment. The waves, in particular, I believe, have been a march of supremacism over time. Beginning with the first wave, it was better concealed then and less explicit. But as time has gone on, it's now spiraled out of control into third and fourth wave feminism, which is so toxic that the Overton window, the window of discourse, is actually moving in our favor, surprisingly. Hillary Clinton was the first major party, quote, unquote, female candidate in the U.S. history for president. And she nearly became president in the United States. Just earlier this year, I believe, she went on camera for some sort of production studio and proudly declared the future is female. And then women, other feminists joined in. The future is still female. This is a person who nearly became president of the United States, 365, 70 million people, half woman, half male. Where did men fit into this? Where's the equality in the future is female? There is none. What is the future is female? What does that have to do with equal rights? None. There's nothing to do with it. It's strictly about women and supremacism.