 All right, so as you know, I have been touting Barry Weiss' sub-stack for a while. I think some of you, because I have urged you, have become subscribers to Barry Weiss' sub-stack. Barry Weiss is a former journalist for the New York Times who was at last year kind of left the New York Times claiming that she founded a non-hospitable working environment. Her colleagues were basically harassing her for kind of the views she have. Now what views does Barry Weiss have? She is kind of a centrist. She's not particularly free market. She's not particularly right, but she's not far left either. She is generally a believer in free speech and open debate in exchange of ideas. She's also, which really hurt her in the New York Times with her colleagues. She's very pro-Israel, which I think was probably more hurt her more with her colleagues than the fact that she was pro-free speech. But anyway, she left the New York Times, which I thought was quite courageous. She resigned and set off by herself and started up a sub-stack, a sub-stack that I've recommended to you many times, a sub-stack that has dealt a lot with issues like critical race theory being taught at our high schools and professors being kicked out of universities or being sanctioned by universities for their views, for things they have said. So a sub-stack that is focused primarily, I think, on issues of speech, of critical race theory on culture and on really uncriticizing kind of the far left and the craziness of the far left. But Weiss has had a lot of other people writing for the sub-stack, and indeed the sub-stack is turning into not just Barry Weiss writing, but almost like a newsletter, almost like a place where people can, where she's creating her own alternative media source, including attracting recently a reporter for the New York Times, who's going to be doing news. So maybe what we're seeing is the beginning of some independent journalism, not just independent commentary, but independent journalism, actually news reporting, seeking out, going out and investigating the news, which will be very exciting if we can. The dispatcher already does that to some extent, if we can get multiple sources on sub-stack that are providing us not just with opinion, but with news, that is going to be super excited. Anyway, this morning in the Barry Weiss sub-stack, there was an article from Pano Kalenos, and I don't know if I'm pronouncing that name right, probably not. Pano Kalenos is the former president of St. John's College in Indianapolis, not Indianapolis, Annapolis in Maryland. St. John College is a great books program, an undergraduate, I think great books program, so one of the last great books programs in the United States. And Pano announced the launch of a project to establish a new university, the University of Austin. A new university, we'll talk about the principles and we'll talk about who the Board of Advisors is, but he wrote an essay for Barry Weiss on what's involved, so that's how I heard about it this morning. I actually knew about this, I've known about this since the summer, a good friend of mine was actually met with Pano in Austin, where the project was described to them and interest was assessed and so on. But I also know, have known for a few months, that Joe Lonsdale, Joe Lonsdale is an entrepreneur, you could say from the Peter Thiel circle of entrepreneurs, Peter Thiel was an investor in Joe Lonsdale's main investment. He's a serial entrepreneur, venture capitalist, but I'd say his main new company in the last few years was Planetier, which Peter Thiel invested in and that has gone public and has made Joe Lonsdale a very, very, very wealthy man. I met Joe years and years ago in Silicon Valley, he's a fan of Iron Rands, although more of a conservative, more of a Peter Thiel style conservative than he is a free market style objectivist, certainly not philosophically. Peter Thiel is religious and I think so is Joe Lonsdale, although I might be wrong. Anyway, Joe Lonsdale has moved to Austin. Joe, I've known, has been working on a secretive project to found a new private university in Austin. Well, it's no longer a secret. It was announced, I think, yesterday. I discovered it this morning from Barry Weiss, a sub-stack and today, they've been stories about it in the New York Times, Op-Ed in the Washington Post. It's been all over social media primarily as a source of ridicule by the left, but it has been this announcement of this new university has been treated as big news. And I think it's been treated as big news because of kind of the mission statement and it's been treated as big news because of the Board of Advisors, the people involved in the founding of the university, which is a super impressive list, will get to those people in a little while. But first, this is a university that is set up to counter this in terms of the existing status of universities, primarily to counter the anti-speech, the anti-free inquiry, the political correctness that used to be the old term, the wokeness that exists in the university campuses today. This university's mission is the pursuit of truth. The article that today was announced by Pano Canellos, and Pano Canellos is the new president of this university. So he left St. John's and he is now the university, the president of the University of Austin. He says, we can't wait for universities to fix themselves. So we're starting a new one. That's great. That's what markets are for. This is a beautiful development, a positive development. He says, I left my post as president of St. John's College in Annapolis to build a university in Austin dedicated and this is a beautiful mission statement. This is what a mission statement of university should be like, dedicated to the fearless pursuit of truth. That is amazing. That is great. Let's hope they stick to that. Let's hope they really are committed to the pursuit of truth and not just the pursuit of a truth that is consistent with their ideas, but the pursuit of truth, whether consistent with their ideas or not. So the idea of this university is not to be online. The attempt here is not to disrupt the educational system by a different means. The purpose here is to build a classical university, a campus. My assumption is there'll be dormitories, there'll be classrooms. The idea is a faculty and students interaction face to face. The plan is to keep expenses low by having very thin administration, not having any extracurricular things like fancy sports, fancy food. A lot of the Ivy League schools are not competing on the quality of the food. They expect tuition to be under $35,000 a year, so they expect to be somewhat reasonable in terms of tuition. This is interesting because there was some question about this. They are not going to try to be outside of the accredited system. They're not going to be a complete outsider to the system of universities. They are going to apply for accreditation. So even though they say they think their accreditation system needs to be reformed, they want to go through their accreditation system. They will have an undergraduate program that they will launch in 2024. They hope to launch, I think, in 2023 or 2022. Their first MA program, a master's program in entrepreneurship, and they plan to have both masters. Ultimately, they hope to have PhD granting and undergraduates, so a traditional full-scope university. It seems like it's clear they're going to have some kind of business school. It's also clear that they're going to have entrepreneurship. It's also clear that they want to have a law school at some point, although that's not high on the agenda, something early. In addition, they expect, but they expect all students, first two years, to be taking kind of classical, what is it, social sciences courses. So kind of a broad social science, liberal arts education, and then students will come and specialize in particular centers, very hands-on, very interactive. They claim innovative curriculum and so on. So exciting. More competition is always good, and it's exciting to see university focused on truth, the discovery of truth, the advocacy for truth, and also university dedicated to not being politically correct, not towing the line of political correctness, not being woke, not kicking people out because you disagree with them, not having diversity standards, supposedly, I assume, not having diversity standards, not being at the university, not being an advocate for social justice and so on. Some of you are asking, well, this person or that person would be a professor. I don't think it's clear. I think it's still very early on. I think there's probably announcement was announced because this was going to leak. There were probably some press stories and they started to rush it because there's a lot in the plan here that is still very early and still unknown. They have done Lex Friedman who is involved in this. You know Lex Friedman. He's interviewed me a couple of times. He's got this massive interview show on YouTube. Anyway, Lex Friedman is one of the board of advisors for this university. Lex also interviewed Nile Ferguson. Nile is also on the board of advisors. Those of you who don't know Nile Ferguson, he's an historian at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University and he is also well-known as the husband of Ayan Hirsi Ali or maybe she is known as the wife of Nile Ferguson. But anyway, both of them are like celebrity intellectuals. They are superstars in their own right. They are both on the board of advisors. Note that none of the people I mentioned are necessarily faculty. The only faculty with a question mark listed, it's not clear the faculty, but they're called Founding Faculty Fellows. Ayan Hirsi Ali, Peter Bogosian from Portland State University. I think he's a philosopher. Portland State University, if you remember he resigned. I talked about this. I think I reported on it on the Iran book show. He quit. The university left because of the extent to which he was harassed, extent that the university was tilting strongly towards, again, wokeness and political correctness and not accepting ideas that were outside of the mainstream. Ideas that deviated for kind of the far left. I don't know how good of a philosopher Peter Bogosian is, but he's definitely a critic of CRT. He's a critic of postmodernism. So he's definitely a critic of the right things, whether he is an advocate for the right things as a philosopher, hard to tell. Kathleen Stock, also a philosopher from the University of Sessex, not Essex, Sessex, I think Sessex. Also a resigned from the university because of wokeness and her position on gender. I think she has this crazy, radical, insane, completely unacceptable view that I don't know men, men generally have penises and women are women and generally don't have penises. I think that's her crazy position. And anyway, she created a bit of a fewer around transgender issues and around gender. But so she's on the founding faculty fellows. I hope the standard for being a founding faculty or faculty at University of Austin is not having had to resign from your previous position. But so it's not just the negative. I hate the far left. That shouldn't be the criteria. Hopefully these are also good academics. These are good teachers. These are people who have interesting ideas and are successful intellectuals. I hate to see it that it's all the negative. We're anti the left. That would be pretty boring, ineffectual universities. So the Board of Advisors is very impressive. Faculty is yet to be determined how good they are going to be. Obviously, Ayn Hirsi Ali as a founding faculty fellow is really good. Again, I have a lot of disagreements with Ayn Hirsi Ali, particularly about philosophy. But she's a hero and smart and interesting and unbelievably courageous. And for that, I would go take a class with Ayn Hirsi Ali any day of the week. So I think that's great news. The faculty advisors, this is a great list. So there are two people on the list. So this is the thing. How many people are there? Five, 10, 15, 20, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31. There's 31 people on the board of advisors of this institution. And you will be shocked to hear that of the 31 people on this Board of Advisors, I despise only two. Now that is a massive achievement for them, I think, to put together a list of 31 intellectuals. I don't know everybody. I might despise more of them when I get to know them. But I know almost everybody on this list. I think I know a lot about almost everybody on the list. There's a handful of people I don't know. And there's only two, the only two that I can tell right now, a few that I don't know, but only two that I actually despise. And then there's more than two that I actually like, right, that are actually good guys. So let's go over the list. You can tell me if you know who are the two I despise. And in panel, Canelo seems like a good guy. Don't know that much about him. Seems like a good guy. Now, Ferguson is very good. He's a conservative, more conservative than I'd like, but a conservative, one of the good guys, I think, super, super, let's see if I can speak. Stop for a second. Super smart. Super smart. A super interesting, good historian. Yeah, I read his books, good books, really good. Barry Weiss is on the Board of Advisors. Love Barry Weiss. Again, disagree with on a lot of things, but, you know, she's one of the good guys. Heather, hey, Heather is, is what's his name, Brett Weinstein's wife. Brett Weinstein's wife, not the other Weinstein. Yes, Brett Weinstein's wife. She's an evolutionary biologist. I mean, she's good. She's good. You know, Brett, I think, went a little crazy recently, but generally Heather and Brett are pretty good. And I'm a supporter of Heather. Joe Lonsdale. Joe Lonsdale is an entrepreneur incredibly successful. As I said, I've met Joe. He's a nice guy, a bit of an Iron Man fan, not too much, but a bit of an Iron Man fan. And obviously the financing, you know, the finances behind this, finances behind this. Actually, Legend 007, just do it. I hope I don't, you don't mind me, me, me, telling them who you are. But anyway, he says, now focus and had good things to say about Eilish Shrug. Yeah, I think both he and I, and he's really a positive about Eilish Shrug. They're not objective, they're not pro, but both really start. So Joe Lonsdale, okay, Arthur Brooks, you guys know my views on Arthur Brooks. I don't despise the guys too nice of a person. But Arthur is a real Catholic, a real altruist, a very, very, very weak and undermining defender capitalism. So I, you know, I'm mixed on Arthur as much as I like him. I mean, I think some of these other people are better than I in her CLA. I'm just reading up. Oh, Glenn Lowry. I love Glenn Lowry. Glenn Lowry is fantastic. He's an economist at Brown University. And, and he's, he's truly fabulous. So I'm a big fan of Glenn Lowry and really happy to see him involved in something like this. Stephen, thank you. Really, that's, that's very generous, really appreciated. Robert Zimmer, Robert Zimmer is the chancellor and former president of the University of Chicago. Don't know him personally, but he is one of the people responsible for the University of Chicago being one of the only universities, certainly among the top universities in the country, that has stood by the idea of free speech, the idea of faculty inquiry, the idea of, of faculty independence, the idea of not victimizing people over their political views over, over stuff. So generally, University of Chicago came out with a very good statement about free speech that was very positive. And I think Robert Zimmer was part of that. So I'm a, I'm a fan on that. And you'll see that most of the people here are very much on the side of free speech. Stephen Pinker, again, I think you know what I think of Stephen, lots of problems, obviously left of center on many issues, wrong on free will, wrong on some other things, but generally one of the good guys, I think in the culture in which we live and, and a good influence. Nadine Strossen, I don't know if you guys know who Nadine Strossen is, but she's a professor of law at the New York Law School. She's also the former president of ACLU, definitely leftist, but definitely pro-free speech. She's one of the strongest defendant of free speech. She was part of the ACLU and the ACLU actually went out there and defended free speech. So yeah, I mean, she's great and she's a, she's a fighter and to have her on the board of advice is terrific. Again, credentials vis-a-vis free speech, very, very strong. Lex Friedman, I guess you all know Lex. I'm really happy to see him here, kind of taking a beyond, taking his act beyond the podcast and now kind of getting his ideas, you know, having a forum for his ideas as Lex. John Nunes, I don't know anything about John. He is a priest, a Catholic priest. He wears a collar, former president of Concordia College. I don't know how bad he is. He's a priest after all. Dorian Abbott is a geophysicist at the University of Chicago. He's the guy who, because he said some things about affirmative action and about this whole DIE, diversity, whatever, was refused or they disinvited him from giving a speech at MIT and he's become a big spokesman for this idea of, well, maybe affirmative action is not that great and over issues relating to diversity and so on. Okay, here's one of the bad guys. Okay, I said the two guys I despise on here, the two guys that I think are really bad, they shouldn't be here. If this is supposed to be a liberal institution, a push for, for, for liberality, liberal in the sense of freedom, liberal in the sense of free speech. If this is supposed to be anti the illiberalism of the left, what you don't want is people on here who are illiberals of the right. And so how, so Rob Amari is an illiberal of the right. And look, you don't have to believe me on this. He calls himself illiberal. He is a fighter against freedom, what he calls the libertarian streak of the right, free markets, individualism. He hates the idea of individual rights and individual liberty. So it's a little discouraging to see so about Amari here. It suggests that some of the funders, maybe even Joe Lonsdale himself, some of the funders have a conservative nationalist, nationalist conservative leanings. Hopefully he doesn't have a lot of influence. He's big. Saab Amari is very big. He is, he got into a big fight with David French about a year ago, two years ago. I did a whole show on the struggle, maybe it's more than two years ago, between Saab Amari and French. Saab Amari has become one of the leaders of the anti, what I'll call the anti-liberty part of the Republican Party. He is clearly a pro-statist, pro-statist right. And he is one of the leaders of that. Next person, Jonathan Haight. Again, good guy, left of center, very pro-free speech. Again, disagree with them on things like free speech and what the role of morality and what differentiates the left and right and all kinds of things, but basically a smart guy who's interested in ideas and is interested in open discussion and open debate. So most of these people are what I'll call liberal, liberal in the classical liberal sense, not free market, but in the liberal in terms of ideas and the pursuit of truth. Now, another one of the people I despise, this guy, I probably despise more than I despise Saab Amari. This is Leon Kass, who's the dean of faculty at Shalem College. Leon Kass is a bio, he sometimes is called a bioethicist. He is anti, longevity, extending human life. He was the head of George W. Bush's in the 2002 to 2005, I think, bioethics committee, and I've despised him since then. I mentioned him on one of my shows where I described what the bioethics committee came out against life extension technologies and all the problems against gene editing, against a lot of the gene technology and changing the human genome and playing God. He's very much against all of that. So I'm a big opponent of him. Anyway, as Stuart says that Jonathan Haid has written some bad stuff about Iron Man, yeah, I mean, that's not my criteria, right? A lot of these people oppose Iron Man. There's not an objectivist on here, not able to close the objectivist on here, and you wouldn't expect that. But a lot of the people here are anti-Iron Man, Arthur Brooks is, I mean, and, you know, and Stephen Pica is not a friend of Iron Man's. So, you know, you definitely have a mixture here. Leon Kass is a real Christian. I mean, religionist, I'm not sure he might be Jewish, but he's definitely a right-wing religionist. Larry Summers is, again, left-wing, a Keynesian economist, although better than Krugman, significantly better than Krugman, but Keynesian is economist, Neocainsian economist. He is the president, used to be former president of Harvard University. He was chief economic advisor to, was it Bill Clinton? Maybe Bill Clinton. He was kicked out of the University of Harvard because he said something about women not having a propensity for sciences or something that was deemed sexist, and he had to resign for the University of, from Harvard University again, somebody who's fought against the political correctness type of attitude. Vicky Sullivan, I don't know from Tufts University. Wolford McClay, a historian from Hillsdale, so if he's from Hillsdale, he probably leans conservative libertarian and religious, that's typically Hillsdale. Jonathan Rausch, a senior fellow Brookie Institute against, on the left, but pro-free speech, smart, leftist, bad on economics. E. Gordon Gee is president of West Virginia University, probably a pretty free market guy. West Virginia University has a number of pro-free market programs, so he's probably one of those. Kathleen Flanagan is a writer for the Atlantic. I probably read some of his stuff, but I didn't look her up, so I'm not sure. Andrew Sullivan, you all know Andrew Sullivan. I debated him. My debate with Andrew Sullivan from Clemson University is online. Andrew is a conservative, gay, conservative, anti-Trump, interesting guy, but also very bad on economics, very, very, very bad on economics. But no, I don't think there are too many leftists. These are the best of the leftists, and they're the kind of people who you would want to take a class from. I would want to take a class from Rausch, or Larry Summers, or Stephen Pinker, or all of these guys are super smart. They're super interesting. And no, I mean, I'm not as anti-left, anybody left of center that I, as much as some of you guys, I'm much more sympathetic to somebody like Stephen Pinker than I am to most people on the right, on the so-called right. Then of course there's Deirdre McCluskey. Deirdre, I think Deirdre is fantastic. She's a historian, economist, philosopher. Deirdre and I disagree on a number of things, but on the other hand, she's brilliant and she's very, she's the most free market person on this by far. So she's the one that on economic issues, on liberty issues, on role of government issues, I would agree with her more than anybody else, more than anybody else on this list. Tyler Cowan is another one, another free market guy, not as quite free market as Deirdre is or I am, but Tyler is quite free market. And a good guy, an interesting guy, clever guy, smart guy, interesting, right? I obviously disagree with him, but really interesting. Bob Henderson, I don't really know. He's a Cambridge scholar, Cambridge University. David Merme is one of the few conservative playwrights. So he's a playwright, famous playwright that used to be a leftist and turned conservative and is on here. Smart, clever. Some of the stuff I like, some of it I don't like. Jeffy Stone, a professor of law at the University of Chicago, don't know him. Stacey Hook, philanthropist and investor. I think I've met Stacey. I think I know Stacey. If I'm, if it's the right person, she lives in Austin, really nice woman and a big Iron Man fan. I think that's who I'm talking about. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's who I think it is. And then finally, Joshua Katz, a classicist from Princeton. I don't know Joshua. So don't know. All right. So there we go. It's a fascinating Board of Advisors. It's the Krem De La Krem. It's good, you know, generally good people. As I said, there were only two people I had really bad things to say about. And, you know, I love the fact that Glenn Lowey's there. And, you know, this is great news. This is good news. I think it's got a nice balance of having some people from the left. I think it would be terrible if this was not, if this didn't, wasn't balanced in that sense. That's the Board of Advisors. I don't have, then nobody else. So you can ask questions about other people, but if I didn't mention them, they're not on the Board of Advisors. It's very exciting. It's going to be very interesting to watch. It's going to be very interesting to see the bureaucratic groups they have to go through. They have to get accredited. They have to get land. They have to build a university. They have to get faculty. It's not necessarily going to be easy to get faculty. They're going to have to build out programs. Again, they're going to have to get accreditation for those programs. None of this is going to be easy. None of it's going to be simple. But, you know, if they go for STEM, if they go for science, I think they'll be able to bring in some good people. But, you know, we'll see the quality of the students. One of the things they don't want is to attract just rabid conservatives. What they want to attract is a wide spectrum of students who are coming to get a great education. They want to make sure that it's not assumed that the university is political. It should be non-partisan. It should not be political. If it turns into political, it'll be terrible. And it's a great effort. This is great news. They're already being ridiculed by a lot of the mainstream media. They're being ridiculed for being like Trump University, which is ridiculous. Trump University was basically a private university with, but not a substantive university. This is a substantive liberal arts university. It's been compared to Phoenix University. This is not Phoenix University. Phoenix University partially modeled the whole idea of online education, but also again, was large numbers. And you can't say that liberal arts education was a primary or primary focus. Here it clearly is, or at least that's the ambition. This is the ambition here is to create a world-class liberal arts university, more than liberal arts. I think they're going to have STEM as well. So a world-class university, capital U, with everything that they're going to entail. And competition is fantastic. They're already good universities. They are universities that break the mold of the traditional university. There is a Hillsdale University. There is this Northwood university that I spoke at last week. There is St. Johns, which does great books. The president of West Virginia University had to come out and say, I don't agree that the university system is broken because, hey, he's the president of a university. So I like this new university, but I don't agree with everything they say. So they're going to have some challenges. It's going to be interesting. They're in the process of raising $250 million, which I don't think they'll have a problem doing. They don't think they're going to have a problem doing. Some people are comparing that to Prager University, which again is a joke. And let's again hope that they're not just, you know, narrowly focused on Prager University kind of stuff that they really are. And that's why I'm glad to see a Jonathan Haidt and Roush and Steven Pinko on there that is going to give it a much bigger scope and a much wider scope and a much greater variety of courses of areas of expertise and of political emphasis and political ideology. I think that's a good thing, a good thing. So yeah, now Foguson has written on this. You can find it in Bloomberg. Again, you can find a Barry Weisestack, Substack, which you should subscribe to. You can find the original statement. I mean, part of the thing is to create an environment in which professors are not afraid to be sacked, not afraid to be marginalized because of their opinions. And you know, I mean, it would be nice if communists were marginalized and real fascists were marginalized. The problem is that today anybody right of the far left is in a position to be marginalized. All right, so that's University of Austin. Great news. Hopefully you're excited. Hopefully this is good news. We don't always get good news, so this is great. And it really is good to have Lex Friedman on there and to have some other people that I know. I know Iron Hosea Lee and I've met Iron Hosea Lee a couple of times and I know some of the other people involved and this is great. Let me also add this. I'm not going to say too much about this partially because there isn't a lot to say about it but partially because a lot of it is kind of still being worked on. But, you know, attempts are being made to have some objectivist influence here. Again, I know there are people within the objectivist world who know Jolons there quite well. There are people within the objectivist world who know many of the people involved here quite well, whether it's Lex Friedman or some of the others. There are objectivist donors who are donors to this university and I think there will be even more. Some big donors who are contributing to this. There are some objectivist in the education field who are, you know, who are, have a lot of, done a lot of thinking about education more broadly and in ways in which to revolutionize education. They are having discussions with this university. They're having discussions with people at the university. They are objectivist academics who have been, have had some discussion with this university, names not to be mentioned and then of course there's a massive, massive objectivist presence in Austin, Texas. We have a philosopher in Austin, Texas. Two philosophers in Austin, Texas. We have Greg Selmierius at the University of Texas in Austin. It's going to be now confusing. University of Austin in Texas versus the University of Texas in Austin. But who's there, who is, you know, right there and we know that Greg's, the center that Greg is part of has some overlap with some of the people who are involved in this new university. There are no objectivist on the board of advisors. They're not going to be. But again, there are some points of influence. There are points of interaction. Again, look, the reason to be excited about this is not because this is going to be an objectivist university. It will not. The reason to be excited about this is that we want alternative to the existing universities. The existing universities are the problem in our culture and we want alternatives. We want competition. We want engagement. So again, and there are a lot of objectivists with ideas, with money, with or with money, or with ideas, or with knowledge, or with access who are going to have an opportunity at least to engage with the people at this university and to try to have some influence. I will be at the University of Texas in Austin for my debate with Yoram Chazzoni on December 8th. My guess is Yoram Chazzoni is probably, you know, knows all the people involved in this. And again, you know, again, his is a version of conservatism. I hope doesn't land up dominating this university, although it could. But again, there's a lot of intersections and there's a lot of reason to be hopeful about the potential for maybe some objectivist to, you know, that the philosophy in Texas has been there who works for the Ironman Institute. A number of staff members of the Ironman Institute work in Austin, Texas. So I'm excited. Not because I think this is an objectivist university, not because I think the soul is a problem of the world, but because I'm a believer in competition. I like, you know, I like to see this. Somebody asked Matt, Matt Bateman is not in Austin, although he spends quite a bit of time in Austin. But the school, higher ground education, is I think now based in Austin, the headquarters are based in Austin. Thank you for listening or watching the Iran Brook show. If you'd like to support the show, we make it as easy as possible for you to trade with me. You get value from listening, you get value from watching, show your appreciation. You can do that by going to IranBookshow.com slash support, by going to Patreon, subscribe star locals, and just making a appropriate contribution on any one of those, any one of those channels. Also, if you'd like to see the Iran book show grow, please consider sharing our content. And of course, subscribe, press that little bell button right down there on YouTube, so that you get an announcement when we go live. And for those of you who are already subscribers and those of you who are already supporters of the show, thank you. I very much appreciate it.