 Let's start. I will start with just some and feel free to ask questions. As you know, we use these community calls, mainly to for three topics or to share with you. Recent developments, making you properly informed. My second objective is to receive your feedback, your comments, your requests, questions, whatever you want to share with us. And of course, as we are meeting every month, you can also take this opportunity to push if you have any an issue to be solved in our side, you can ask here. So no problem about that. And then we usually we try to have a main topic here for discussion. Last, last topic was about about the open orgs and we know that several of you several content provider managers, repositories, managers have provided us feedback about organizations and the curation of organizations in your country, which was really good. If you want to know more, as we know that we there are new people every call and please check the recordings in the presentation from the previous community call that we had in the first Wednesday of February, where we present to you a facility that we have that is the open orgs tool to create organizations entries in the in the open air research graph, which is something really important for us to merge organizations to select the proper name for the organizations because we receive organizations from different data sources we also IDs from the organizations and try to try to have a one single record for each organization for one specific universities that we receive different names from the same organization from the same university to try to merge them and to use this record to populate the graph with the proper way of representing that specific organization so be aware of that if you want to know more please check the recordings from the previous call and contact us via the help desk in order to to solve if you find any issue about the your organization exploring the information in in our discovery service explore.openair.eu So this call we will try to we will share with you. Something that we are working on to integrate the fair assessment that we first share with you as a better as a facility for you to use now we want to integrate in the validator. And colleague Leonides will detail this I will I will present him during this this call but about the recent developments what what we'd like to share with you. Here we did an index update last. February 99th of February so the content was updated on that date. For those that are also. Those that have subscribed for example notifications in the broker the for metadata enrichments they should also have received notifications around that those dates if if there is new information about the type of events that you have subscribed in the in the in the be aware of that. So, of course, be also aware that we have this this page. It's not completely visible but it's in the explore this open air dot to you aggregation in content provision workflows page where you can check for the last indexed date for if it was if we had the relevant updates so please check that which is something important. We also did some improvements in the help text on the on the dash in the dashboard. I will present it to you, because so we were aware that this was not completely clear for for the end users and we did some, some important updates so my colleague and work a bit about that we discuss it in our team. So we can improve it if you think that there are things that we should be improved but we, we did some improvements in that in that aggregation history page. We are finalizing an important work around the terms of use the terms of use. We didn't change the terms of use that the in the policies are the same. The acquisition policies are the same. But we want to make it more clear in terms of acceptance of this terms of use as we have the aggregation of the metadata and also the aggregation of the full text, just for combining the proposals not to expose that the full text the full text is always available via the original data source. We never point directly from open air to the PDFs. Okay, this is our policy and we will, and we have it but of course, to benefit from the rich graph that we have is important to have access also to full text from your, your content provider, your repository. Because then we can improve our test mining algorithms, the results of our test mining algorithms. The links between publications and projects publications and that the sets these kinds of things so are improved by the fact that we have more PDFs in our graph. And what we want is just to, when we update this and we want to do it in during during this month. So in the coming weeks, you will, when you access the provide dashboard you will open like you will see a pop up window, asking you to to to update your terms of use a simple simple way to to to update. Of course you can always do it in the update tab, but you can do it directly in this that pop up. Working I hope that we can finalize this soon. Also for the Chris registration. We are welcoming the more and more Chris systems in in our in our infrastructure, but we want to make it simple and to make this registration process directly in the, in the registration functionality in the dashboard so this will be also released soon. It's already being prepared long time I think all the workflows are established that it's a question of improve a bit. Some things in the user interface but we will have it soon. Just to detail what I have. I have presented. Let me check. Let me. Where do I have. Okay, just checking if I was sharing the screen. Okay, just for you to be aware that the, the, the states of the the signing. Okay, let me log in to proper demonstrate some of the recent and where you can find it. The. You can find two important things that we want to highlight you in the aggregation history tab. Okay. If you didn't. Two important things. That's important but it's important is this up text here because we have improved it we are aware that there are some doubts about some of the references we made here for the aggregation for the collection for the transformation so we have the aggregation history here we say when was the time that was transformed when the time it was collected and when is the when in fact is the last content made available in the in the in the in the in the in the in the in the published graph so visible in explore. And you can see here the example of data repository from University of Mino. So and this was here is better explained. And but an important thing is that we also as we received several questions about when was the last time and this is not completely visible and some of you made that suggestion so this blue box here. And you can see that content updated on the portals in this specific date so you can, if you check here the aggregation history you will have the answer here and we point people to that page that I'm saying that it's not so visible in but now it's we make it visible in the dashboard where you can see when was the last update and if there are really relevant changes okay only the relevant changes in the in the graph. For example the last one new indicators available in open air monitor. Do I boast that we made visible also in Zenodo with dumps from crossref or kids Microsoft academic graph the last version of Microsoft academic graph as this is now it's not being updated anymore. So we took all the data from December so. Okay, now you, I think it's better so you can see it here in this box, you can have better knowledge about when was the last time that we have updated the graph and this is visible in in the different portals okay the information in provide in exploring monitor etc okay. Okay this was an important update that we made. The last and the other one clarification about this. This is not formally communicated by bias by open air but I want to share with you like the first, first people to be aware of this we had we had the long discussions internally in open air. The graph is is increasing as you know the numbers if you check I think now the numbers are more than 135 million records. And the data sources are increasing the complexity the diversity of the different the research products the type of links that we do. So it's making our life more difficult to ensure a proper update every month as we promised. And let's say that now it's not fair that we stay sharing with with our users and particularly with you that our our providers that we do this update every month, because it's making our life difficult so we are not ensuring what we can do now what we can say and we should make this clearly for the older the users is that open air will publish at least once every two months is an update okay. And this is what is possible now we are always trying to update it with more frequency but so the minimum that we can ensure is this every two months. Always trying to achieve. Our goal that is every one month but publicly we should say now every two months. Okay, if you have questions so stay. So if you have doubts or questions just put it in the chat or or just turn on your ideal audio and ask. Okay. So I think about about a date. This is what I want to share with you. This is the same slide that I shared last time was one month ago so just to ensure that we have. We are doing this work around the Chris system the guidelines and we are working also with the US research product catalog maybe in one of the coming calls, maybe in April or May we will talk about you. I will share with you about the research, the US research product catalog with you. Okay. Okay, in terms of recent updates is everything. As my colleague Andreas is here and we only have this like two slides here to share with you. We already highlighted this last time but be aware of this work. Kind of merging this versions of the guidelines so we want to, we are working on this draft of the guidelines for institutional and thematic repository managers. It's a kind of, it's an update of the last version that we have. We already received several contributions feel free to contribute in this Google in this in this web page. Andreas do you want to highlight something. This is just just really an alert for our, for our community that we are working on this. If they want to contribute. Thank you. Thank you very much for highlighted and highlighting this. Yes, and thank you for your contributions. On the one hand in the cheat that Peter mentioned and also as GitHub issues. There are some smaller changes in the guidelines in the last days, regarding the description or clarification of something of elements that we have in the guidelines. And I like invite you to take a look. And if you have any suggestions, or something is unclear for you. Please share with me or with us. And I would like to highlight this once for the actual is a minor update. It's, it's covering some fair principle elements. How is the guidelines guidelines are support you as fair assistance. Then are some improvements for aggregators. We have also implemented this is not mentioned here at the moment. Some relaxed handling of YPMH identifiers that we identify in this in the updating of the Chris guidelines. And this is will also be mentioned in the, what's new field or section in the guidelines. Take a look and feel free to contribute. Thank you very much. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you Andreas. I just want to highlight I now hearing them Andreas and the and and having this just want to highlight one thing that maybe we can make it more clear in the coming in the coming call and providing more more insights and more useful information is about the horizon Europe projects we are going also to put this in this version of the guidelines and in the previous some examples on the way to express the identifiers of horizon Europe projects. So, Paner is is receiving will receive soon horizon Europe projects list from from European Commission to populate our infrastructure. It's it's really in the pipeline we are just waiting for that. So, receiving this list of projects. We will of course then make it the available via our APIs and for and of course available in the different services that we have also in the node and the API is to be consumed by by the repository. We will put the examples in the in the in the guidelines also to express this. So let's let's let's talk about that in the coming call but be aware that we are working on that so we already received some questions from some content provider managers about this, I will, I will be the represented the information of horizon Europe project so we have already. We discussed that we are already instructions about that. So we cannot forget to mention that in the coming call. And we will make it also visible via a news item or something like that that we can disseminate it via our newsletter okay information about that so be aware of that because some some people already asked. So let me add a note here. The guidelines will also have an example for the horizon Europe. Yeah. Yeah. Yes, perfect, perfect. This is this will be important. Okay, let's see if we can have no I hope because we receive a promise that we will in April we will have all the data available. Let's see if we receive it during March or not from the European Commission. Okay. Any question about all these updates this changes this improvement so we are always available for suggestions for improvements but snow. So, let's hear about what we are doing with the fair assessment tool. Okay, that we have presented already. So last year, some people have already use it. Now we want to improve it into give another way to use it. My colleague Leonidas, it's it's a scholarly communication specialist that we have now working in the opener team will present you what are our plans and what we are doing. Leonidas, feel free to present yourself and to, and to, and to provide your presentation. So thank you. Thank you very much, Pedro for the introduction. Pedro have already told you, since January I have been working for open air as a scholarly communication technical expert. And specifically, one of my parts that I have been working is the development of the fair assessment tool. So I will we will give you an introduction presentation of what we have been doing so far and regarding the first vision that we will would like to that we will we are going to to present maybe in the next month in the open in the open and provide. Well, the first assessment tool will be integrated in the open air validator tool, as it is the better version integrated now. There will be no need to register the data sources or the repositories and point URLs to open air in order to run the tool. And the first version will focus on that objects or research data. Well, our development was based on the two models or metrics. The first model is the third data maturity model from RDA, which has specification and guidelines specifically 41 guidelines for each of the fair parts find a black sensible interoperable and usable. The model that we have been which we have implemented is the data object assessment metric model from Ferris fair, which is based on the RDA data maturity model, except from the fact that it contains 17 guidelines for that object that objects. 41. Let me briefly give a description of the these 17 guidelines regarding the fine double part. First of all, we are checking for a the existence of globally unique and persistent identifiers. The difference is that, for example, a URL that drives to the page is a globally unique identifier, but it is not a persistent identifier identifier like a DIY, which has a landing page regarding the metadata. We are checking if they include descriptive information about the specific data object. The core elements that we check are the creator title data identifier publication date. We also check if the metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes and if it is offered in such a way that it can be retrieved by machines. We check if the metadata contains access levels and actual conditions of the data. Also, if they if it remains available even the data is no longer available concerning the interoperable part. We will check if the metadata is represented using the formal knowledge representation language. If it uses semantic resources and if it includes links between the data and its related entities and for the reusable part. We check if the metadata specifies the content of the data. If it includes license information under which data can be reused. For example, for example, if it includes a creative commons license. If it includes provenance information, mostly about data creation or generation. And if it follows a standard, which has been recommended by the target research community of the data. And we also check if the data is available in the file format recommended by the target research community. Well, our goal is to provide the score for the fairness after the assessment, which will be presented in a proportion. We want to evaluate the score from the opener that object validator, we are evaluating the score from the opener that object validator, because when the metadata passes. The opener that object validator, it automatically fulfills. Some of the guidelines that was were mentioned before. I also want to mention that some of the guidelines are applicable depending on their content. For example, the guideline for the metadata that remains available even if the data is no longer available. It presents difficulties in the application. In the course we are in discussions on setting specific weights to its guidelines based on the eligibility and importance. Well, this was my short presentation for introduction presentation for the work that we have been doing for the last two months on the first version of the assessment tool. Feel free to ask any questions. There are many things I think it was a clear presentation. This is not so straightforward work it's not easy to to create assessment tools that clearly assess all the indicators all the metrics and indeed the community knows that. But I think it's a very good service that we can provide already integrating that in a more comprehensive way in our validator. Not sure if there is there are questions so Andrea is always trying to put here all the links the useful links so the assessment tool. It's it's visible in the. It's accessible in our in our provide okay so if you can you can see it. Sorry, you can see it in our. Here in the. You can see it here in the validator. Okay, fair assessment. You can already experiment the version that we have but so we do the what Leonidas present in terms of improvements in integration, really as a kind of valid validator tool. We will have it as soon as possible, but if you if you want already to play, you can you can do already if you were not aware. You can find it here but later you will improve it based on what Leonidas presented. So, not sure if there are any any other question comments. So you have also the contact from Leonidas if you want to contact them feel free so is working for open air is part of open air. Great team from open air that is always available to support you. So I'm sharing again the slides here as some people already joined so all the slides that I have presented and also these slides that Leonidas have presented they are here in this set of slides that they have shared now again in the in the section that you want to download. Please feel free to ask questions to provide feedback, not only about this presentation from Leonidas but about the other things that I have presented on Andreas, or any other issue that you have in in in provide or related with open air for free. So waiting for that for that question from you I just want to highlight that all the community calls until until the summer let's say already scheduled so you can see the dates of the upcoming coming calls visible for for March, April and May and June. Always the first Wednesday of the month. At the same time, and please be aware that we have this newsletter where we always send for five three news items every month. Just before the community call one or two days before also serving as a kind of reminder for our community calls feel free to subscribe and to receive this this news. So, any question, any comment. Feel free also to ask if you want to have discussions and clarifications about any other topic that you would like to to have. Okay. Even if you don't clarify it in this call we can use other calls. Thank you. Again very useful information and also I put some comments in the notes but I already respond. Yeah, it's okay. Now I would like to ask you another questions. Since we are in a project we need to collect our data from our repositories for some other purposes. That is this validator tool, not this new one about fairness but the old one is a some open source software or it belong to somebody. Yeah. So, it's belong to open air and the things that open air do they are open. They can be reused but the issue areas is that the issue that we have we don't, we don't have the validator clearly as an open source tool where you the code is available for you to download and install it in and reuse it in another machine something like that so. We are not prepared for that. Okay, we can, but we are not because the code is not proper documented and made available for that purpose. Okay, but do you plan to do it sometime? I'm not aware of any plan for that. Okay. And in the provide the management team plans, there are no plans for that. But, but, but maybe we can. So, Andreas, do you want to, as I said, something wrong. Do you want to correct me or to offer. May I just a question to you, Viljana, which type do you would like to validate. So, is this the, the literature or institution of thematic repositories or more data or more Chris systems. Okay. Yeah, it is an institutional repositories but all kind of software which means not only the D space but some of them also use e-prints and that kind of things so because this is some national project just started and we need to collect all this data, not on that kind of details. You use it for the opener, but just to validate let's say few things in that repositories. Yeah, to use the validator is always an important tool to assess the policies that you have for your service. I can say that so we have this for the open air infrastructure. Also, Bielefeld University of Bielefeld made available also a validator tool in the past I'm not sure I'm not following I'm not following that that that initiative if it is updated I can imagine yes. And then there are national national initiatives that have also validators. In Portugal we have also a validator tool that that you can serve as you as an example in order for repositories to participate in the in the national infrastructure they have also they need also to comply with minimum rules that also follow the open air guidelines. And we validate them so I think the approach that we have and then open air is something that can be reused at the national level I can imagine if the rules are close to yours. Let's let's let's present that I will present that in a coming call let's see what we can we can do because so we can set up rules specific rules within the validator tool. On my that on the knowledge that I have in the tool I can imagine that we can set up Serbia rules for your, your, your, your aggregator or national initiative and maybe the, the, the open air validator can serve as a facility for you but this needs to be discussed and then fee. So you are a member of open RM because so for sure. The facilities are available, but let's. I will I will include that in a in a call to discuss it. Please don't please don't. There are comments here also. Yeah. Yes, the awful the awful the the the initiative from from billy felt. Yeah, we also know. Find something from art Meyer but this is much more about Google scholar compatibility so. Investor something we already in for this purpose, yeah, but we are just in the position now to develop something for that purpose so I would like to address is highlighting something here. And about the also the linking the pointing to the validator of Greece, which is something that it was done. So, more recently and let's say that is proper documented is properly available in GitHub. This is what the other things should also be available but that's the question is important I think I'm also inputting putting some more information because I think it's also interesting for a for some other. Yeah, participants in this call because they they also are participating in national initiatives and this this validation is an issue in all, you know, national initiatives that are. We have policies we have guidelines and we need to assess those policies to assess the data sources against those policies and guidelines that we want to follow. Okay, thank you Brianna. The question. We have a new comment question in the Google Doc. It's being written by by this. I don't know if I just want to open the mic. A short, short question. The old mayor guidelines use different methods standards. Yes, of course. It depends on the evolution of the guidelines since 2010. The first literature guidelines use the info people vocabulary in semantics and the newer ones use core vocabulary, which of the vocabulary or guidelines version do you refer to. Is it version for is it version three or is it version two or. Maybe it's one of the last ones like this do you want to add something so. Do you do you want to, however, it's not fully clear how terms are implemented, but but but we can explain our terms are implemented Andreas. Yeah, so for it's also in part of the core vocabulary in version four of the institutional and thematic guidelines. There is also an update in the new guideline version that we have will be present in the next release candidate. In the core vocabularies. We use the version one one of the core vocabulary for resource types, and there are some new ones of the core vocabulary has updated in the last year, two times. One is version three in July last year, and there are some new terms are introduced by this vocabulary version, and others are removed. And in this case, it's best that we support both. So the remove vocabulary terms will be marked as deprecated. And the new ones will be, of course, integrated. I don't know if it fits the question really so please feel free. Could I just add how what is the policy how you implement the lower level terms, so to speak, so we have like image moving image and then we do so. So you use just the lowest level of s level. And when you include any term into the metadata. So from the core vocabulary, we support both. So we support also the different levels, different levels and there are some some terms in the core vocabulary that are removed between version two and version three, but this is not supported. I think the question specifically here is when we because we have the level one of the term the level, the sub level of the term. So if text, then we have report text articles or this kind of so we support we support we support all the levels of the term. This is the answer no Andreas. Yes. Correct. So if I just to be more clear, whatever you expose that follow any specific level of the resource type vocabularies from color, we consume that information. Of course it's better to make it more clear to make it more granular. Okay, so this is what we want to achieve to make it clear that we are not talking about test wall. Yes, but we want the article or we want to know so that level. Okay. And currently which which version is used for resource type. The one dot one for for the vocabulary one dot one. This is what we want to improve in the second in this new version that we want to release we will integrate version two of the cover vocabularies but so I didn't discuss it with Andreas but this is but this was already defined, I was not involved but but it's not but which is which is make more which is which make a lot of sense is that we will include the two versions in the in the infrastructure so we suggest in guidelines for that so that the improvements that we are doing resource type. Our resource type version two, but we will accept both versions. Because there are, there are repositories that have already that are exposing already types by Zedon version one dot one that now are not visible in version two. If they fix it, they change it. It's everything is okay but we need to accept both. And there are new terms which we something that is really important that there are new terms in version two, which are interesting and important improvements. For example, I remember that the management plans. So I fully agree. Peter also, we will support and the aggregation system will support but also the guidelines prefer the version three of the core vocabulary. So we are the, if we release the new guidelines that are clearly that we are. It's good to have the vocabulary version three of the core vocabulary resource types. But if you are follow the version one one. That's also possible. So for integration. I like also to share with you here, the link to the vocal core vocabulary. Yes. And this is the last one that will be supported. So there's some more terms regarding data sets, some more terms regarding patents. Yes, and this will support it on versions. Okay. So, thank you. We can we can maybe Andrea Andreas maybe we can provide the short answer in the in the document to virus to make it more clear you or me so in the in the Google in the Google document okay. Yes. Okay perfect many things, many things. So, thank you very much for your presence is there are no any other question. Thank you for your questions comments. So, this is an open, open community call for those that are part of open air contributing with content managing repositories that repositories archives, journals, etc. So be aware that we we are always available to collect your feedback to receive your suggestions. We hope to discuss in the coming calls some we have in the pipeline at least the three topics so this update to the guidelines to make it more more clear when it comes to. So when this will be finalized and present and we can present it to you. The other is about the research product catalog in the Oscar and the way that you are part of that catalog. And we want to also to do a discussion so if you can think about that so in April or in May about how you can also benefit from Argos from the data management tool that we have and the links between Argos and the dashboard and provide because our idea is that if a researcher prepared a data management plan in Argos saying that I want to deposit the data in a specific repository. This information will be visible in the dashboard so we would like to discuss a bit what are our plans into receive some also some input from you. Okay. Okay, let me check the shot. I was just asking about the fair that the maturity model so. So, the, the open air guidelines. We will have it soon. So, in this first semester. Okay, the open air guidelines, the fair that the maturity model specification is something from research that alliance is not from open air. We are just using the, the indicators from the fair that the maturity model to implemented in our validator. Okay. And this is something from, from research that alliance. It's in the research that alliance plans. So, I'm not aware of any update from the fair that the maturity model specifications and I was a was part of the initial group. So, I'm not following now that that specific group I'm not sure if there will be any update to see it, but please, and what I advise you is to check the research that alliance website into see if there are any information about the fair that the maturity model specification. And what we are doing is that we are implementing in our validator and so the validator. The fair assessment tool is already available. You can check it so it's available for all the users of provide dashboard it's an open thing even if you don't have a data source you can check it. And the, and the integration in the validator. And Leonidas we can also promise that for the first semester if we say first semester for sure we will, we will have it. We will say, April I'm not sure but I agree. Yes, okay. The first semester we will have it also. Okay. Thank you very much. Oh, thank you for your comments questions recordings, as you know, will be made available in the community call website website page in the in the open air website, and also the presentation. Bye bye all see you in one of the upcoming meetings webinar from open air or in one month. Our meeting, our next community call will be on this 6th of April, first Wednesday of the month. Bye bye. Have a nice day. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Andreas. Thank you, Andreas and Leonidas. Bye bye. Thank you very much. My colleague, Andre. Bye bye.