 So tenure security is an important concept. Of course it is contested and there are different settings where tenure security can result in the outcomes we want and the other settings where it doesn't. But nonetheless, that does not mean that it's not an important concept. And just think about it critically. If you have access to a tree, right, or if you plant a tree, you want to be able to have access to the grown tree and the products from the grown tree. And we are looking specifically at reform implementation and looking at the impacts on local communities, tenure security. But at the same time, recognizing that implementation is an important process and it's done by multiple actors, especially government officials. And so we also wanted to open up that box or unpack the black box of implementation especially from the lens of government officials. It's not just access that they want, but there is a kind of confirmation that it is their region, their region of control. They also need a confirmation that when they can have access to the green area, the government can also have a confirmation that they actually have rights in the green area. There are a lot of schemes at the moment. The schemes offered by the government such as the green area of the community, the green area of the village, are something that is interesting by the village community. But they also hope that the traditional system that they have implemented will also be accommodated. The basic question for the local community is about information. So information, even for communication with the local government, it's like there is a distance. So about information, for example, about the rules that are developed. Well, for us, the local community, this is a bit slow. There is a specific issue here. There is a law, according to the long term, but when it comes to the social context, it requires the protection of the public in the form of a law when it is in the green area. Because when the MK35 is said to be in order to protect the public, there is a law. And that requires a team, a team that is formed and a team that sees whether there is a country, whether there is a community, whether there is a region, whether there is a community that is still alive in their culture or in their community. That is what is verified by the team that they hope that if it is indeed, it will remain. But according to the government that is here, that is the social community, we offer the green area first. Because the context is closer to their culture about the culture, about the culture. That is what we want. We offer it so that they can understand and choose the green area and the MK35. So actually the main challenge when we implement the tenorial reform in Maluku is indeed not separated from the characteristics of the social community itself. The main reason is that among them, there is no agreement in the state. The people in Maluku want the right to have full ownership. It means that it can be done through a legal scheme. But the main challenge is to be able to get full ownership through a legal scheme. This is one of the issues that is a loss for the local government. And this loss is not at the level of the Khabupaten. Dialogue needs to be built between the Khabupaten government with legal components and also with the help of the social community. For example, the security of the western part of the country. This can speed up the implementation of the law on the western part of the country. With the exception of the law, the law on the western part of the country in addition to providing the security of the social community can also help the government or the government to claim the social community with the help of the social community. With this, the social community can become the main actor in the development of the social community along with the natural resources that are available in the region. The benefits that will be provided by the law or by the local government will be very useful from the economic, social and commercial side.