 What the data shows is that 93% of the cases are being resolved the same way today as they were before Booker. So we're talking about 7% of the cases around the country. What happens in those 7% of the cases? Men and women who work very hard on the federal bench to reach fair decisions in these cases have found some unusual factor that is not accounted for in the guidelines or the departure provisions that they believe require some modest adjustment in the sentence. Can I say modest? Again, let's talk statistics. The average adjustment is 12 months in prison, an adjustment down to reflect the circumstances. In the case, and I should mention that there are some federal judges that have gone up a little bit more because they've found cases that are more aggravated. I would suggest that what that is causing is not unwarranted disparity, but it's eliminating unwarranted uniformity. Under the old rules, we had situations where two cases, even though they were dramatically different, sometimes had to be sentenced in the same way, and the new more discretionary system has given judges the opportunity to be judges and to render justice in those cases.