 The Modi government is working in the direction of bringing reforms in various labour laws with the objective of doing business in near future. What is your opinion on this? Every time the government says reform, it is not reform actually. It is taking away the existing rates in my view. Particularly the main target is unorganised sector. In Tamil Nadu, there are about 34 welfare boards for construction workers and every small trade, small work, there is a board in Tamil Nadu. I think nowhere in India there are such boards. They are giving so many benefits and those boards are now sought to be dissolved. And a single point, like in political arena or every sphere, they talk about only one culture, one language, something like that. Here also they say like GST, there are no separate boards. There will be one board and all PF, whatever is a tragedy and even the accident compensation. Everything will be clubbed into one authority is the policy of the government and how far they will implement it and what is the stage I have to verify and say. But they have introduced in this direction some legislative measures in parliament. Government is coming up with the new category of fixed term employment workmen for all sectors of employment. So this will definitely rule out the possibility of having a permanent employment nature. Working class in India all over India is the introduction of contract labour system on outsourced. That is a serious thing. For instance, even including in the core sector, even if it is a manufacturing, the entire manufacturing is now outsourced. Even in the central government also doing this. For instance, railway I used to quote often, one third workforce are outsourced now. Out of 21 lakhs, 7 lakhs are outsourced. They are not railway employees. They are paid a meager wages. They are second rate citizens, second rate railway. They have no right. They cannot have a pass, railway pass and nothing. Therefore, this is even in the service sector like banks that apart from the computer that automation has reduced employment. Now direct employment is reduced but outsourcing is taking place. Take for instance, madrasity. Whatever be the industry, either automobile or anywhere, the contract labour system is the big menace in my view. More than the fixed tenure employment. Because fixed tenure employment is a direct employment that may be misused by the employer. Even for the employment of permanent nature, he can use fixed tenure employment. But this more serious harm is caused by the outsourced contract labour that totally smashes the trade union movement. In my view, there was a lot of strikes, lot of actions, working class action in 70s and 80s. Thereafter, there is no such action. Why? In my view, it is due to this contract labour system. Take every industry, at least 50% of workforce are outsourced. Therefore, your bargaining strength is weakened. How can you, unless you are put together, that is the only strength you can use against the employer. That is not available now. Very attractive conditions of service is a pension. Now it is taken away from government employment. Whatever be the government employment, whether it is a direct employment under civil government or state government or railways or banks, the pension is taken away. Thereafter, why do you opt for a government employment? They want to take away from the mind. You cannot aspire. You will not aspire for government employment. Because it is no more an attractive thing. In my view, that is the best conditions of service for a workman. Even after his retirement, he is assured of some kind of support until his death. After his death, his wife, family pension. That concept is totally now taken away. That is why it is due to privatization. In fact, what we call it is LPG. Liberalization, privatization and globalization. Therefore, now it is all the fields including the labour. That is outsourcing also. There is one of the reasons. Therefore, everywhere outsourcing. That is the main reason for the weakening of the working class women that has been seen for so many years. It is done. It is also rated during the period of Modi. In my view, as far as these policies are concerned, both Rahul and Modi have the same policies. The only thing is, earlier for a long time, no civil government had an absolute majority. In my view, it is good for democracy if the civil government does not have adequate majority. If it is a minority government, then the democracy will flourish.