 Parsons image of the social order. Unlike the conceptions of Marx and Weber, Parsons has given a different image of social order. Because he has the perspective that the social system, social organizations and the ancillary organizations in the concept of social system has a prominent role. The image of Talcourt Parsons of the social order is that in every society, when there are various organizations, the outcome of those organizations is human contribution. When different organizations work on different levels, it means that representation will vary and the scope of the presentation will be larger. And the more the scope will be larger, the more contribution there will be and when there is more scope and margin in the society, the more contribution there will be. There people are satisfied with their society. Similarly, this basic philosophy of Parsons is that the basis of the social system is to evaluate any society. It can be seen there how the organizations are working and what is the mechanism of representation in the organizations. Because the social order of any society is another very important element and that is social stratification. Now if you want to understand social stratification, you will have to see that in the society, the difference or distribution or the name of the class system, what is the basis? What are the perspectives? What are the elements that cause the class system to exist in the people and how does the class system have the capacity or capability to disturb them? Because social stratification, when Karl Marx explained it, he did it on an economic basis. When Mix Weber highlighted social stratification, he thought that the individual role is based on that. When Talcourt Parsons highlighted the concept of social stratification or with specific context of social order, he thought that every society has a specific role according to their status assigned. There is some abstract model of their social stratification but what is very clear in that is that every society which is based on people, there are organizations in which people will have the capacity but what will be the capacity? People will have the capacity of their capabilities. And those capabilities will basically determine where the class system is rising and on which basis it is rising. Because if the society has the capacity to do so, it means that the society is not satisfied. But if people are linked according to their role with the class system, the role they will have means that there is some rationality behind it. There is some logic because if people are professional, educated or their source of income is more, then it means that their class is different from those people who are not educated, not skilled or their income is less. Now the question is that this is a fact that according to the class system who has the capacity to do so, but what mechanism does the class system make? What is the mechanism for social order maintenance in the class system? Who will be responsible? The mechanism for that is something abstract because they think that there are some goals of every person. To achieve those goals in every class system is a proper system. If someone disrupts that system, does not match that system, then social stratification cannot be overcome. Yes, if someone works in his own boundary to maintain that system, then the social order remains in the working position.