 good points. We're focused on innovation and integration at the same time. So we know we need to innovate in the storage space and we've been doing that for 60 some years. So depending on your point of view you could argue we created the storage industry back in the 1950s right? So we have a lot of experience here. So we need to leverage what we've done in the storage space over a long period of time. At the same time I don't think there's anyone in the industry that can integrate the capabilities the way our clients are asking us to to your point with servers, with software, with services components and IBM. So it's not either or one or the other. We need to be good at storage and innovating around storage but more and more of our clients are demanding this notion around integration and I think that's critically important to us going forward. We had Laura on earlier and we were talking about the whole the challenge and I'll ask you the question. So the the hard part of your your job is like you say you've got the integration and there's immediate ROI to doing integration on things that maybe others don't pay as much attention to. You know look what the integration you've done with Protect here in the main frame side. Look at the look at the average prices of those and the margins that you get for those and I know you can't comment specifically on that but it's that's good business that drives ROI and free cash flow and we made the comment that IBM outperformed Apple last year as a stock. A lot of people you know don't really pay attention to that. At the same time you know you've got a lot of pressure from clients to sort of chase a lot of what the startups are doing a lot of the new features. So how do you you know balance those. Can you do both. I think I think you can. I mean first of all a lot of the competitors in our space I think would like to look a lot like IBM. So our ability to integrate you know our broad software portfolio our broad services portfolio that is some unique value add we can bring to our clients and unique capability we can leverage for our business partners advantage as well. So I think we can be both we have to be able to do both and frankly our competitors aspire to be more like IBM. So one of my challenges to your point is a do what we need to do in storage but equally important leverage what's powerful and good about the rest of IBM because I think that's where the real value is delivered to our clients in the end.