 intellectual criticism. In this session we are going to highlight some intellectual criticism on Hobbes philosophy that what type of views Hobbes has shared regarding society, regarding human life, regarding state and what type of the criticism the other philosophers they try to have on the philosophies of Hobbes because Hobbes faced intellectual criticism from various school of thoughts like feminist school of thought and other liberal school of thoughts because they criticize the Hobbes model of human nature. What do they think? The various schools of thoughts, they say that Hobbes has explained the human nature that human nature is very selfish and its basic desire is to give control to its own characteristics. So, if human nature is selfish, then there should be a positive sense of acceptability for others. This perspective is part of the intellectual debate, especially the feminist and liberal school of thoughts. They express these thoughts regarding Hobbes and where it is compared, the debate on the human nature of Hobbes, the debate on the state of nature of Hobbes has to face this criticism because Hobbes gives too much powers to the government to make laws under the guise of protecting the public. Another main criticism about this is that Hobbes thinks that if the government has too much powers and they make laws where people can be controlled, then the feminist school of thought, liberal perspective, they think that if the government has too much power, if the government has the power to make laws, then people will have limited options, there will be fewer opportunities for people to work, and when any government passes any kind of law, it can disturb people's lives. Specifically, according to Hobbes, the government may use the clock of the social contract to invoke the fear of a state of nature to warrant laws that are instruosive. Now, Hobbes thinks that since people have to make a social contract with the state and through that contract, the state will regulate people's lives. Now, when the state has the power to regulate people's lives, then the human freedom comes up with the question of how the freedom of expression, freedom of life, and the freedom of the people's freedom will go away and how the human liberties will exist. So, we can say that from the time that we are born, we do not knowingly agree to a contract and, therefore, do not consent to the contract. Now, the criticism is that when a person is born, he does not know what kind of life he has to live with. So, why does Hobbes bind people to a contract through his own liberties, his own desires, and the power to limit his own freedom of expression to assign to the state? So, this is such a criticism that in many circles, there is a debate, especially on the concept of Hobbes which is brought under the debate of sovereignty, and how the freedom of the land is related to his desires. This is all the perspective on which, time by time, the parallel philosophies brought by him, such as the law, such as the rules, they have also suggested that Hobbes, the human contribution in society, in state, should be based on the top priority of the state, because Hobbes thinks that a person is naturally selfish. So, it is not possible for a person to be selfish because when a person lives together, he can decide his own limits, not to assign his own power to the state authority.