 So we're working on the Yutthafro Dilemma. The Yutthafro Dilemma was posed by Socrates to another person in the dialogue named Yutthafro. Now you know where they came up with the name of the dialogue and he is posing, he's trying to answer a particular question with the Yutthafro Dilemma. So what question is Socrates trying to answer? Now just, you know, kind of keep in mind here, he's doing something really different from any of the philosophers that we looked at so far this semester. Remember the previous philosophers, we had Hume and Sumner trying to answer the question, how are more beliefs justified? We have Glaucon and Hobbes trying to answer the question, whose interests are most important? We have Aristotle and Epicurus trying to answer the question, what has moral worth? Now the first reading of Aristotle, the second reading of Aristotle is trying to answer the question, how does one acquire what has moral worth? And then we have Locke trying to answer the question, well, what are your rights? And after that we had Mill, who actually took on two questions, what has more worth, how does one acquire it? And then the last one we just covered was Kahn trying to answer the question, what is your duty? Now each of these philosophers were offering a moral theory there, trying to answer the question, how should you live your life by answering the second question, any of these directly informed the moral theory. Now Socrates is doing something different, he's not necessarily trying to answer, you know, he's not necessarily trying to answer the question, how should you live your life? At least not directly with this question, and even indirectly still becomes a little bit muddled. So what's he trying to do? Well, with this youthful dilemma, he's trying to answer the question, what is the relationship between religion and morality? He's trying to figure out, you know, he's just not going to deny that there are religions, right, obviously there are religions, of course there are religions. But the question is, well, okay, supposing that there is, is there any, or Socrates case was the Greek gods, suppose there are the Greek gods. Supposedly the religions are there, and they're, you know, it's just perfectly fine, right? There's nothing wrong with thinking that there's Apollo and and oh, just blanking the names. There's Apollo and Zeus and Hera and Ares. There's just no problem saying that there are these gods. Okay. If there are these gods, then, what's the relationship between religion and morality? Now Socrates answer is, there isn't one.